Balsa deck core
If I were going to take this on, I'd turn the boat upside down and use a
vacuum bag. I say "if" because I know how much work you have in front of you, and I know what you might pay for a far better replacement. It would cost you less, and be far less work, to buy a better boat. Michiel wrote: Hello, I'm looking for a little bit of advise. This is more boat repair then boat building, but I'm figuring you guys here would have the right kind of knowledge. At the beginning of the summer I bought a trailerable fiberglass minicruiser (a 1983 Gloucester 20). When it rained in the fall I found there were some leaks into the interior and I found out that the central part of the deck (not all of it) is balsa cored and one side of this is saturated with water. All of it has some delamination. I drilled some holes from the inside and found that the port side is wet and some of the balsa is dark and the starboard side is mostly dry. The water may have come in at holes for deck hardware and some cracks in the gelcoat, one of them spiderweb shaped. As an extra piece of information, the mast rests on a higher area of the deck which seems to have a thicker core (probably not balsa) which is dry. I want to stop the water from getting in and I'm also concerned that the delamination will cause the gelcoat to flex more and thus crack more. It's been on my mind and I've thought of the following options: 1 - leave it be. put deck hardware back on sealing carefully with polysulfide or 3M 4200. Perhaps drill a large number of holes in the inner skin so the balsa can dry out. 2 - cut out inner skin, scrape out old balsa core and glue down new balsa or plastic core and then cover this with polyester and fiberglass. 3 - cut out inner skin, scape out old core and add multiple layers of fiberglass and polyester, building up until the deck is nice and stiff. I'm strongly leaning toward option 3, but also considering 1. Let me know what you think, please! Thank you, Michiel van Wessem |
Balsa deck core
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:56:47 -0500, Michiel
wrote: On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 16:28:09 GMT, Jim wrote: (...) It would cost you less, and be far less work, to buy a better boat. Do you really think so? Do you have rough estimates or "guesstimates" and a suggestion for a different boat? It seems that fixing it wouldn't be so expensive and not even that much work, just messy and nasty. I've done this in a small area (port side genoa track, so about two metres by 15 cm.) and there's no denying it's a messy job. The expense is in the time to you, because between shuttling back and forth for supplies, and the raw labour, and the further labour to correct your mistakes, could eat up the better part of your season. On the other hand, you will have a stronger, more secure deck. I suspect the reaction here is to the fact that it's a 20 foot boat and thus very cheap on the open market, where everyone seems to want over 35 feet. You can pick up a bulletproof Shark (24 feet) for $5,000, throw in a sleeping bag, a sandwich and a six pack and go sailing. It's a good time to buy a well-found smaller boat, but repairing boats is as expensive, or more so in the cost of core materials, epoxy and so on, as ever. So it comes down to how much you like this particular boat. Fix it because you have to in order to restore the structural integrite of the deck. One solution I haven't heard is to consider taking off the entire deck and inverting that. In the long run, that might be easier, but as I'm unfamiliar with your boat, I can't say. Another option is to cut in from above, removing panels of gelcoat, dig out the core, replace the core, bond the deck panels back in and fill the cuts with thickened epoxy. Fair well, and cover the entire deck with two-part paint to hide the "scars". Or, frankly, just gelcoat it for protection. If you DO sell it, it's perversely nice to show the next buyer that you've done the horrible necessary job already and have the deck scars to prove it...G A good core is marine grade plywood encapsulated with epoxy for places where deck hardware is through bolted. On larger, empty stretches, I'd use synthetic cores for strength and lightness. A sandwich of inner skin, core and outer skin--when bonded in an epoxy matrix--is stronger than solid fibreglass itself. Get some of Don Casey's deck and hull repair books to see if you want to tackle this. They are simple, full of diagrams and illustrations, and have the standard techniques for majour renovations like this. |
Balsa deck core
Not knowing what your requirements are, it's hard to recommend anything.
If you hang around any marina with a pocket full of cash and are patient, you can do pretty well. I'd suggest you watch a surveyor or two and learn what to look out for. Michiel wrote: On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 16:28:09 GMT, Jim wrote: (...) It would cost you less, and be far less work, to buy a better boat. Do you really think so? Do you have rough estimates or "guesstimates" and a suggestion for a different boat? It seems that fixing it wouldn't be so expensive and not even that much work, just messy and nasty. Michiel |
Balsa deck core
Michiel wrote:
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 16:28:09 GMT, Jim wrote: (...) It would cost you less, and be far less work, to buy a better boat. Do you really think so? Do you have rough estimates or "guesstimates" and a suggestion for a different boat? It seems that fixing it wouldn't be so expensive and not even that much work, just messy and nasty. Michiel ....and tiring! I spent 2nd last summer with a dremel, cutting off antiskid and deck in sections, replacing the basla porrige with plywood, reassembling and then sculpturing the anti skid back to reasonable. Next year, starboard side deck? ugh! Leaks are gone, but the difference in price between a soggy deck boat and the same solid deck boat is still suspect. Still, now I am an expert, no;-? Oh, and I did a lot of messing about on the boat, even if it was only yard sailing:) Terry K |
Balsa deck core
Somebody wrote: It would cost you less, and be far less work, to buy a better boat. Michiel wrote: Do you really think so? Do you have rough estimates or "guesstimates" and a suggestion for a different boat? I'll try to put this into perspective for you. I buy materials at prices you would dream about getting. That is because I buy large quantities of epoxy, deck foam, knitted glass and fairing compound. My guess is that it will cost me at least $2,000 for materials and at least a year's time. You will pay more. Add in money for tools and supplies. I'd budget at least $200 for just abrasives and another $200 for sanding equipment, if you don't already have them. You'll spend another $500 for misc tools and supplies. DAMHIKT Does this give you enough incentive to recognize that attempting to rehab a 20 ft, 20+ year old fiberglass boat is economically an unsound path. Lew |
Balsa deck core
Lew Hodgett wrote:
My guess is that it will cost me at least $2,000 for materials and at least a year's time. My guess is that either you work very inefficiently, or else you're sniffing too much resin. For $2K and a couple months labor, one could completely remove the deck, use it as tooling, mold a complete new one, and install it. You got this right: sanding materials & tools will both cost a lot. DSK |
Balsa deck core
DSK wrote:
My guess is that either you work very inefficiently, or else you're sniffing too much resin. You haven't priced materials lately, have you? Think OIL. Lew |
Balsa deck core
Lew Hodgett wrote:
You haven't priced materials lately, have you? Think OIL. Actually, I have- am buying materials for a carbon fiber rowing dinghy. But I think you grossly (very grossly) overestimated the cost & amount of materials needed for replacing core on a 20' deck. It's not going to be free, that's not what I'm saying. DSK |
Balsa deck core
I figure it'd be somewhat over $10/ft^2.
Core-cell $4- maybe 4 laminations of: 12 oz. knitted Glass $10/yd = $.80/ft^2/ply epoxy $70/gal = $.60/ft^2/ply paint $1/ft^2 plus abrasives, peel ply, fillers, vacuum bag consumables "DSK" wrote in message .. . Lew Hodgett wrote: You haven't priced materials lately, have you? Think OIL. Actually, I have- am buying materials for a carbon fiber rowing dinghy. But I think you grossly (very grossly) overestimated the cost & amount of materials needed for replacing core on a 20' deck. It's not going to be free, that's not what I'm saying. DSK |
Balsa deck core
Just wondering do you guys that use epoxy for everything also use titanium
for auto body repairs after all it's better than steel. It seems rather silly to repair a polyester and glass boat which is old with epoxy and the latest high tech fabrics. Why not try resin infusion too John "Jim Conlin" wrote in message ... I figure it'd be somewhat over $10/ft^2. Core-cell $4- maybe 4 laminations of: 12 oz. knitted Glass $10/yd = $.80/ft^2/ply epoxy $70/gal = $.60/ft^2/ply paint $1/ft^2 plus abrasives, peel ply, fillers, vacuum bag consumables "DSK" wrote in message .. . Lew Hodgett wrote: You haven't priced materials lately, have you? Think OIL. Actually, I have- am buying materials for a carbon fiber rowing dinghy. But I think you grossly (very grossly) overestimated the cost & amount of materials needed for replacing core on a 20' deck. It's not going to be free, that's not what I'm saying. DSK |
Balsa deck core
"Jim Conlin" wrote ...
I figure it'd be somewhat over $10/ft^2. Core-cell $4- maybe 4 laminations of: 12 oz. knitted Glass $10/yd = $.80/ft^2/ply epoxy $70/gal = $.60/ft^2/ply paint $1/ft^2 plus abrasives, peel ply, fillers, vacuum bag consumables Vacuum bagging it would be the way to go for bond strength, but knitted glass? I didn't think that was all that cost effective? One thing I would like to mention is that hardware store F'glass cloth is NOT worth it. It's actually a bit more expensive than most mail order, plus it's crappy quality. John M wrote: Just wondering do you guys that use epoxy for everything also use titanium for auto body repairs after all it's better than steel. It seems rather silly to repair a polyester and glass boat which is old with epoxy and the latest high tech fabrics. Why not try resin infusion too Actually, it's not silly at all. Secondary bonding with polyester is rather iffy... nowhere near as strong and what's more important, less reliable (more prone to voids, imperfectly mixed resin, more temp sensitive, etc etc) so it's less likely to achieve it's best strength. Epoxy is not that much more expensive (considering the expense entailed by owning the rest of the boat too) and that little extra is very well worth it IMHO. The last boat I did extensive rebuild work on was an old Lightning... considering that I bought new trailer tires & bearings (or would you advocate buying cheaper used ones?), new running rigging, new sails, and fairly nice paint (now this could have been economised on, but would it have looked as good), the 2 gallons of epoxy that I used to do structural work was trivial... and I sailed that boat in 20+ knot winds many times, never broke anything that I'd worked on with epoxy. The first few times I was nervous, but after that became very confident in the strength of my work. BTW this included relamating some patches of deck as well as installing a new mainsheet bridle & traveller, which comes under quite heavy strain. OTOH I have seen other boats suffer structural failure in strong winds... it doesn't look like much fun, but perhaps the skippers are telling themselves they're glad they didn't spend the money as they take the pieces home. DSK |
Balsa deck core
I presume you are saying that all my secondary bonds like bulkheads, liners,
water and fuel tank supports are about to let go. Epoxy has it's place, ultrlight racing boats where the same strength can be had at much lower weight and as a glue resorcinol is a pain. I live e in what used to be the hub of boatbuilding in Canada and have seen many boats new and old repaired with the same material they were built in that is polyester none that I know of have yet disintegrated. John "DSK" wrote in message .. . "Jim Conlin" wrote ... I figure it'd be somewhat over $10/ft^2. Core-cell $4- maybe 4 laminations of: 12 oz. knitted Glass $10/yd = $.80/ft^2/ply epoxy $70/gal = $.60/ft^2/ply paint $1/ft^2 plus abrasives, peel ply, fillers, vacuum bag consumables Vacuum bagging it would be the way to go for bond strength, but knitted glass? I didn't think that was all that cost effective? One thing I would like to mention is that hardware store F'glass cloth is NOT worth it. It's actually a bit more expensive than most mail order, plus it's crappy quality. John M wrote: Just wondering do you guys that use epoxy for everything also use titanium for auto body repairs after all it's better than steel. It seems rather silly to repair a polyester and glass boat which is old with epoxy and the latest high tech fabrics. Why not try resin infusion too Actually, it's not silly at all. Secondary bonding with polyester is rather iffy... nowhere near as strong and what's more important, less reliable (more prone to voids, imperfectly mixed resin, more temp sensitive, etc etc) so it's less likely to achieve it's best strength. Epoxy is not that much more expensive (considering the expense entailed by owning the rest of the boat too) and that little extra is very well worth it IMHO. The last boat I did extensive rebuild work on was an old Lightning... considering that I bought new trailer tires & bearings (or would you advocate buying cheaper used ones?), new running rigging, new sails, and fairly nice paint (now this could have been economised on, but would it have looked as good), the 2 gallons of epoxy that I used to do structural work was trivial... and I sailed that boat in 20+ knot winds many times, never broke anything that I'd worked on with epoxy. The first few times I was nervous, but after that became very confident in the strength of my work. BTW this included relamating some patches of deck as well as installing a new mainsheet bridle & traveller, which comes under quite heavy strain. OTOH I have seen other boats suffer structural failure in strong winds... it doesn't look like much fun, but perhaps the skippers are telling themselves they're glad they didn't spend the money as they take the pieces home. DSK |
Balsa deck core
John M wrote:
I presume you are saying that all my secondary bonds like bulkheads, liners, water and fuel tank supports are about to let go. Umm, no ... Epoxy has it's place, ultrlight racing boats where the same strength can be had at much lower weight and as a glue resorcinol is a pain. I live e in what used to be the hub of boatbuilding in Canada and have seen many boats new and old repaired with the same material they were built in that is polyester none that I know of have yet disintegrated. If you're talking about the structural 2ndary bonds as put in by the builder, consider this: 1- they are made under ideal conditions by workmen who presumably are expert with the materials 2- they still break often enough that it's not uncommon at all to see grid work, bulkhead tabbing, etc etc, pop loose from inside the hull. I was talking about repairs/upgrades done in a garage by the home handy-man (who in some cases is more expert & produces higher standard of craftsmanship than the "pro" in the boatbuilding shop), of which I have also seen many break loose. If you hang around boats & sailors that push their boats in hard conditions for a few years, you'll see it too... and probably hear more. In some cases, a single such bond failure provides years worth of amusing stories. Regards- Doug King |
Balsa deck core
Lew Hodgett wrote:
Somebody wrote: It would cost you less, and be far less work, to buy a better boat. Michiel wrote: Do you really think so? Do you have rough estimates or "guesstimates" and a suggestion for a different boat? I'll try to put this into perspective for you. I buy materials at prices you would dream about getting. That is because I buy large quantities of epoxy, deck foam, knitted glass and fairing compound. My guess is that it will cost me at least $2,000 for materials and at least a year's time. You will pay more. Add in money for tools and supplies. I'd budget at least $200 for just abrasives and another $200 for sanding equipment, if you don't already have them. You'll spend another $500 for misc tools and supplies. DAMHIKT Does this give you enough incentive to recognize that attempting to rehab a 20 ft, 20+ year old fiberglass boat is economically an unsound path. Lew It depends entirely on how you value the labour required. My labour is free for me, but for this job, I wouldn't work for less than 15 bucks / hour. I would pay 10 bucks an hour to mess about on a boat, if it was mine and the value of the labour remains in the boat. The rest is arithmatic. Terry K |
Balsa deck core
John,
Do you do body repairs with window screen and plastic filler? You can make it look just as good as steel? If you would go to sea in a boat patched with polyester, be my guest. One of the famous ones in the book is "Tomahawk". She sank during a Bayview Mackinac in the mid 80's. That was a polyester patch job. A clients mast came down when it buckled at the spreaders because the tabbing for the anchor for the lower came away from the hull side. I helped recover a sloop that lost its steering because one of the turning blocks came adrift. Those last two were both bond failures of parts installed at teh builders yard. We are set up for resin infusion in several versions (skrimp, spike and texp2) but none are well suited to most non-molded assemblies (that most repairs). Epoxy is used in repairs for two reasons, it has cohesive and adhesive bond properties that far exceed that of poly or vinylesters. We specialize in fixing things - once. Our clients only talk to us if they want a first class job. We clould save the client 1or 200$ on a 5k$ job by using cheap materials. We use only epoxy. You can do what you want, but some of are not interested in doing it ont he cheap - cheap is the price of low value. Matt Colie John M wrote: Just wondering do you guys that use epoxy for everything also use titanium for auto body repairs after all it's better than steel. It seems rather silly to repair a polyester and glass boat which is old with epoxy and the latest high tech fabrics. Why not try resin infusion too John "Jim Conlin" wrote in message ... I figure it'd be somewhat over $10/ft^2. Core-cell $4- maybe 4 laminations of: 12 oz. knitted Glass $10/yd = $.80/ft^2/ply epoxy $70/gal = $.60/ft^2/ply paint $1/ft^2 plus abrasives, peel ply, fillers, vacuum bag consumables "DSK" wrote in message ... Lew Hodgett wrote: You haven't priced materials lately, have you? Think OIL. Actually, I have- am buying materials for a carbon fiber rowing dinghy. But I think you grossly (very grossly) overestimated the cost & amount of materials needed for replacing core on a 20' deck. It's not going to be free, that's not what I'm saying. DSK |
Balsa deck core
Matt:
Actually I don't do repairs on cars. You mention Tomahawk and her "polyester patch job" how about the other five boats that lost their masts or the eight that were damaged or for that matter the 96 that dropped out. All polyester patches? There are many boats built down to a price that will have parts falling off. But think off all the plain old polyester and glass boats that have been around the world with little or no problems. Which brings to mind a British catamaran whose name escapes me at present, that was built for a round the world record attempt in 1999 or 2000. Built of prepreg epoxy, carbon fiber all the latest high tech. On its first test run in weather that wasn't to bad its bows fell off. I won't blame the epoxy or carbon fiber. My point is epoxy and polyester have their place but nothing replaces proper building practices. With prices of epoxy at $74 a gallon and polyester at $105 for 5 gallons it's hard to believe there is only a $200 difference in a $5000 job. John "Matt Colie" wrote in message ... John, Do you do body repairs with window screen and plastic filler? You can make it look just as good as steel? If you would go to sea in a boat patched with polyester, be my guest. One of the famous ones in the book is "Tomahawk". She sank during a Bayview Mackinac in the mid 80's. That was a polyester patch job. A clients mast came down when it buckled at the spreaders because the tabbing for the anchor for the lower came away from the hull side. I helped recover a sloop that lost its steering because one of the turning blocks came adrift. Those last two were both bond failures of parts installed at teh builders yard. We are set up for resin infusion in several versions (skrimp, spike and texp2) but none are well suited to most non-molded assemblies (that most repairs). Epoxy is used in repairs for two reasons, it has cohesive and adhesive bond properties that far exceed that of poly or vinylesters. We specialize in fixing things - once. Our clients only talk to us if they want a first class job. We clould save the client 1or 200$ on a 5k$ job by using cheap materials. We use only epoxy. You can do what you want, but some of are not interested in doing it ont he cheap - cheap is the price of low value. Matt Colie John M wrote: Just wondering do you guys that use epoxy for everything also use titanium for auto body repairs after all it's better than steel. It seems rather silly to repair a polyester and glass boat which is old with epoxy and the latest high tech fabrics. Why not try resin infusion too John "Jim Conlin" wrote in message ... I figure it'd be somewhat over $10/ft^2. Core-cell $4- maybe 4 laminations of: 12 oz. knitted Glass $10/yd = $.80/ft^2/ply epoxy $70/gal = $.60/ft^2/ply paint $1/ft^2 plus abrasives, peel ply, fillers, vacuum bag consumables "DSK" wrote in message t... Lew Hodgett wrote: You haven't priced materials lately, have you? Think OIL. Actually, I have- am buying materials for a carbon fiber rowing dinghy. But I think you grossly (very grossly) overestimated the cost & amount of materials needed for replacing core on a 20' deck. It's not going to be free, that's not what I'm saying. DSK |
Balsa deck core
John M wrote:
I presume you are saying that all my secondary bonds like bulkheads, liners, water and fuel tank supports are about to let go. Epoxy has it's place, ultrlight racing boats where the same strength can be had at much lower weight and as a glue resorcinol is a pain. I live e in what used to be the hub of boatbuilding in Canada and have seen many boats new and old repaired with the same material they were built in that is polyester none that I know of have yet disintegrated. John Hey, I've seen many boats built with polyester that had the tabbing pull free from plywood bulkheads. You can use polyester if you like, but given the amount of epoxy you're talking about for a 20' deck repair, the cost difference is trivial. And I think 2 x 12 oz biaxial would be ample :) for an inside skin, given typical spans you'd find on this size of boat and a core thickness of = 1/2". Evan Gatehouse |
Balsa deck core
Subject
Epoxy is an adhesive, polyester is not. Next. Lew |
Balsa deck core
John,
Any part, piece -whatever of any racing yacht can fail at any time, I mentioned "Tomahawk" because I knew some of the cast involved and it was a polyester bond that failed in this case and caused the loss of the vessel. I agree that there is no substitute for proper practice. My problem with polyester is simple, the bond strength is poor. If you can do it all as a wet assembly, that is fine, but if you need to put pieces together - polyester can be problems. I have done whole boats with poly and vinylester (which is another animal). I completely agree that it has its place. Most of them are in a mold. If a guy is going to work under less than ideal conditions and do small patches (less than a mold section), I always that they look at the additional cost of epoxy. If you could get p or vest resin that had nice little measuring pumps and was as well behaved, I still would be hard pressed to advise it for repairs. At the prices I pay 5 gallons (the smallest we buy) of poly is about 85$us, vinyl is about 140$us and 250$us for gallon mix - includes harder of epoxy. The way any job works, labor is the big cost and the labor to use gallons of resin is a big number. The only problem with epoxy for repairs that require cosmetic surfacing is taht you have to do a intermediate coat of vinyl to bond the polyester gelcoat to the epoxy. Gelcoat will just fall right out of an epoxy patch - given half a chance - it will has been know to do the same to a poly repair but vinylester is good enough to bond the two. And - when it come to the failures of super-lights - I don't even count them as real. Like the ICAA boat that folded and sank off San Diego. There is a reason why the shipwrights that I knew as a child worked the way that they did. I have come to understand that all the wouldful new analysis stuff like FEA, CFD and such are nice, but the people that have been out there better not use it to determine what the sea can do. Matt Colie John M wrote: Matt: Actually I don't do repairs on cars. You mention Tomahawk and her "polyester patch job" how about the other five boats that lost their masts or the eight that were damaged or for that matter the 96 that dropped out. All polyester patches? There are many boats built down to a price that will have parts falling off. But think off all the plain old polyester and glass boats that have been around the world with little or no problems. Which brings to mind a British catamaran whose name escapes me at present, that was built for a round the world record attempt in 1999 or 2000. Built of prepreg epoxy, carbon fiber all the latest high tech. On its first test run in weather that wasn't to bad its bows fell off. I won't blame the epoxy or carbon fiber. My point is epoxy and polyester have their place but nothing replaces proper building practices. With prices of epoxy at $74 a gallon and polyester at $105 for 5 gallons it's hard to believe there is only a $200 difference in a $5000 job. John "Matt Colie" wrote in message ... John, Do you do body repairs with window screen and plastic filler? You can make it look just as good as steel? If you would go to sea in a boat patched with polyester, be my guest. One of the famous ones in the book is "Tomahawk". She sank during a Bayview Mackinac in the mid 80's. That was a polyester patch job. A clients mast came down when it buckled at the spreaders because the tabbing for the anchor for the lower came away from the hull side. I helped recover a sloop that lost its steering because one of the turning blocks came adrift. Those last two were both bond failures of parts installed at teh builders yard. We are set up for resin infusion in several versions (skrimp, spike and texp2) but none are well suited to most non-molded assemblies (that most repairs). Epoxy is used in repairs for two reasons, it has cohesive and adhesive bond properties that far exceed that of poly or vinylesters. We specialize in fixing things - once. Our clients only talk to us if they want a first class job. We clould save the client 1or 200$ on a 5k$ job by using cheap materials. We use only epoxy. You can do what you want, but some of are not interested in doing it ont he cheap - cheap is the price of low value. Matt Colie John M wrote: Just wondering do you guys that use epoxy for everything also use titanium for auto body repairs after all it's better than steel. It seems rather silly to repair a polyester and glass boat which is old with epoxy and the latest high tech fabrics. Why not try resin infusion too John "Jim Conlin" wrote in message ... I figure it'd be somewhat over $10/ft^2. Core-cell $4- maybe 4 laminations of: 12 oz. knitted Glass $10/yd = $.80/ft^2/ply epoxy $70/gal = $.60/ft^2/ply paint $1/ft^2 plus abrasives, peel ply, fillers, vacuum bag consumables "DSK" wrote in message et... Lew Hodgett wrote: You haven't priced materials lately, have you? Think OIL. Actually, I have- am buying materials for a carbon fiber rowing dinghy. But I think you grossly (very grossly) overestimated the cost & amount of materials needed for replacing core on a 20' deck. It's not going to be free, that's not what I'm saying. DSK |
Balsa deck core
Matt:
Some figures taken from West Epoxy web site where they did tests on bonding strength of epoxy and polyester. Tensile strength of original glass 26,198 PSI Tensile strength of poly repair 18,460 PSI Tensile of epoxy repair 21,404 PSI Therefore polyester has a strength 13% less than epoxy at a cost of about 500% more. "Matt Colie" wrote in message ... John, Any part, piece -whatever of any racing yacht can fail at any time, I mentioned "Tomahawk" because I knew some of the cast involved and it was a polyester bond that failed in this case and caused the loss of the vessel. The way many boats are built today anything can fall off. I agree that there is no substitute for proper practice. My problem with polyester is simple, the bond strength is poor. If you can do it all as a wet assembly, that is fine, but if you need to put pieces together - polyester can be problems. I have done whole boats with poly and vinylester (which is another animal). I completely agree that it has its place. Most of them are in a mold. See the beginning paragraph 13% difference. If a guy is going to work under less than ideal conditions and do small patches (less than a mold section), I always that they look at the additional cost of epoxy. If you could get p or vest resin that had nice little measuring pumps and was as well behaved, I still would be hard pressed to advise it for repairs. Polyester isn't that fussy but I use a Nalge dispenser and never had a problem. At the prices I pay 5 gallons (the smallest we buy) of poly is about 85$us, vinyl is about 140$us and 250$us for gallon mix - includes harder of epoxy. The way any job works, labor is the big cost and the labor to use gallons of resin is a big number. The only problem with epoxy for repairs that require cosmetic surfacing is taht you have to do a intermediate coat of vinyl to bond the polyester gelcoat to the epoxy. Gelcoat will just fall right out of an epoxy patch - given half a chance - it will has been know to do the same to a poly repair but vinylester is good enough to bond the two. And - when it come to the failures of super-lights - I don't even count them as real. Like the ICAA boat that folded and sank off San Diego. There is a reason why the shipwrights that I knew as a child worked the way that they did. I have come to understand that all the wouldful new analysis stuff like FEA, CFD and such are nice, but the people that have been out there better not use it to determine what the sea can do. Matt Colie My main problem with epoxy is the people who think it's the holy grail, I think anyone who recommends epoxy to repair a deck on a 25 year old 20 foot boat has either too much money or has been reading too many newsgroups. I would think that the boat that started this discussion could be repaired at minimum cost and be as strong as the good side of the deck. No more is needed. John John M wrote: Matt: Actually I don't do repairs on cars. You mention Tomahawk and her "polyester patch job" how about the other five boats that lost their masts or the eight that were damaged or for that matter the 96 that dropped out. All polyester patches? There are many boats built down to a price that will have parts falling off. But think off all the plain old polyester and glass boats that have been around the world with little or no problems. Which brings to mind a British catamaran whose name escapes me at present, that was built for a round the world record attempt in 1999 or 2000. Built of prepreg epoxy, carbon fiber all the latest high tech. On its first test run in weather that wasn't to bad its bows fell off. I won't blame the epoxy or carbon fiber. My point is epoxy and polyester have their place but nothing replaces proper building practices. With prices of epoxy at $74 a gallon and polyester at $105 for 5 gallons it's hard to believe there is only a $200 difference in a $5000 job. John "Matt Colie" wrote in message ... John, Do you do body repairs with window screen and plastic filler? You can make it look just as good as steel? If you would go to sea in a boat patched with polyester, be my guest. One of the famous ones in the book is "Tomahawk". She sank during a Bayview Mackinac in the mid 80's. That was a polyester patch job. A clients mast came down when it buckled at the spreaders because the tabbing for the anchor for the lower came away from the hull side. I helped recover a sloop that lost its steering because one of the turning blocks came adrift. Those last two were both bond failures of parts installed at teh builders yard. We are set up for resin infusion in several versions (skrimp, spike and texp2) but none are well suited to most non-molded assemblies (that most repairs). Epoxy is used in repairs for two reasons, it has cohesive and adhesive bond properties that far exceed that of poly or vinylesters. We specialize in fixing things - once. Our clients only talk to us if they want a first class job. We clould save the client 1or 200$ on a 5k$ job by using cheap materials. We use only epoxy. You can do what you want, but some of are not interested in doing it ont he cheap - cheap is the price of low value. Matt Colie John M wrote: Just wondering do you guys that use epoxy for everything also use titanium for auto body repairs after all it's better than steel. It seems rather silly to repair a polyester and glass boat which is old with epoxy and the latest high tech fabrics. Why not try resin infusion too John "Jim Conlin" wrote in message ... I figure it'd be somewhat over $10/ft^2. Core-cell $4- maybe 4 laminations of: 12 oz. knitted Glass $10/yd = $.80/ft^2/ply epoxy $70/gal = $.60/ft^2/ply paint $1/ft^2 plus abrasives, peel ply, fillers, vacuum bag consumables "DSK" wrote in message . net... Lew Hodgett wrote: You haven't priced materials lately, have you? Think OIL. Actually, I have- am buying materials for a carbon fiber rowing dinghy. But I think you grossly (very grossly) overestimated the cost & amount of materials needed for replacing core on a 20' deck. It's not going to be free, that's not what I'm saying. DSK |
Balsa deck core
John,
The numbers you quote are (again) for a repair done under ideal conditions. Please use whatever materials you choose to do the repairs on YOUR boat. I/we have a reputation to maintain and can not afford to work on the cheap. In four plus decades of doing boat repair (I did not start with plastic), I have had some experience that I care to share so that other might benefit. As stated below, the epoxy is going to be something like 5~7% of the job cost. - I still don't know why you pay more than the retail price for epoxy. Try going to Boat/West they will have adeal for you. I have had to clean up after too many mix failures with poly and have never had one with epoxy run from a pump set. We even used to mix poly on a balanace, and we still had a crash set. I have had to repair numerous bond failures (never my own) in poly assemblies (as described prior). I assign no supernatural powers to epoxy. I mearly state that it is a much better material for the DYI owner repair. My own personal sloop is the first of its class (hull#1). It is twenty-four years old. It is still competitive and I am expecting it to be my last boat. The repairs the out friend Michiel is outlining are about 5mh/ft2 and he could lose a lot of that if he has a mix or bond failure. I don't like to give work away. Matt Colie John M wrote: Matt: Some figures taken from West Epoxy web site where they did tests on bonding strength of epoxy and polyester. Tensile strength of original glass 26,198 PSI Tensile strength of poly repair 18,460 PSI Tensile of epoxy repair 21,404 PSI Therefore polyester has a strength 13% less than epoxy at a cost of about 500% more. "Matt Colie" wrote in message ... John, Any part, piece -whatever of any racing yacht can fail at any time, I mentioned "Tomahawk" because I knew some of the cast involved and it was a polyester bond that failed in this case and caused the loss of the vessel. The way many boats are built today anything can fall off. I agree that there is no substitute for proper practice. My problem with polyester is simple, the bond strength is poor. If you can do it all as a wet assembly, that is fine, but if you need to put pieces together - polyester can be problems. I have done whole boats with poly and vinylester (which is another animal). I completely agree that it has its place. Most of them are in a mold. See the beginning paragraph 13% difference. If a guy is going to work under less than ideal conditions and do small patches (less than a mold section), I always that they look at the additional cost of epoxy. If you could get p or vest resin that had nice little measuring pumps and was as well behaved, I still would be hard pressed to advise it for repairs. Polyester isn't that fussy but I use a Nalge dispenser and never had a problem. At the prices I pay 5 gallons (the smallest we buy) of poly is about 85$us, vinyl is about 140$us and 250$us for gallon mix - includes harder of epoxy. The way any job works, labor is the big cost and the labor to use gallons of resin is a big number. The only problem with epoxy for repairs that require cosmetic surfacing is taht you have to do a intermediate coat of vinyl to bond the polyester gelcoat to the epoxy. Gelcoat will just fall right out of an epoxy patch - given half a chance - it will has been know to do the same to a poly repair but vinylester is good enough to bond the two. And - when it come to the failures of super-lights - I don't even count them as real. Like the ICAA boat that folded and sank off San Diego. There is a reason why the shipwrights that I knew as a child worked the way that they did. I have come to understand that all the wouldful new analysis stuff like FEA, CFD and such are nice, but the people that have been out there better not use it to determine what the sea can do. Matt Colie My main problem with epoxy is the people who think it's the holy grail, I think anyone who recommends epoxy to repair a deck on a 25 year old 20 foot boat has either too much money or has been reading too many newsgroups. I would think that the boat that started this discussion could be repaired at minimum cost and be as strong as the good side of the deck. No more is needed. John John M wrote: Matt: Actually I don't do repairs on cars. You mention Tomahawk and her "polyester patch job" how about the other five boats that lost their masts or the eight that were damaged or for that matter the 96 that dropped out. All polyester patches? There are many boats built down to a price that will have parts falling off. But think off all the plain old polyester and glass boats that have been around the world with little or no problems. Which brings to mind a British catamaran whose name escapes me at present, that was built for a round the world record attempt in 1999 or 2000. Built of prepreg epoxy, carbon fiber all the latest high tech. On its first test run in weather that wasn't to bad its bows fell off. I won't blame the epoxy or carbon fiber. My point is epoxy and polyester have their place but nothing replaces proper building practices. With prices of epoxy at $74 a gallon and polyester at $105 for 5 gallons it's hard to believe there is only a $200 difference in a $5000 job. John "Matt Colie" wrote in message ... John, Do you do body repairs with window screen and plastic filler? You can make it look just as good as steel? If you would go to sea in a boat patched with polyester, be my guest. One of the famous ones in the book is "Tomahawk". She sank during a Bayview Mackinac in the mid 80's. That was a polyester patch job. A clients mast came down when it buckled at the spreaders because the tabbing for the anchor for the lower came away from the hull side. I helped recover a sloop that lost its steering because one of the turning blocks came adrift. Those last two were both bond failures of parts installed at teh builders yard. We are set up for resin infusion in several versions (skrimp, spike and texp2) but none are well suited to most non-molded assemblies (that most repairs). Epoxy is used in repairs for two reasons, it has cohesive and adhesive bond properties that far exceed that of poly or vinylesters. We specialize in fixing things - once. Our clients only talk to us if they want a first class job. We clould save the client 1or 200$ on a 5k$ job by using cheap materials. We use only epoxy. You can do what you want, but some of are not interested in doing it ont he cheap - cheap is the price of low value. Matt Colie John M wrote: Just wondering do you guys that use epoxy for everything also use titanium for auto body repairs after all it's better than steel. It seems rather silly to repair a polyester and glass boat which is old with epoxy and the latest high tech fabrics. Why not try resin infusion too John "Jim Conlin" wrote in message ... I figure it'd be somewhat over $10/ft^2. Core-cell $4- maybe 4 laminations of: 12 oz. knitted Glass $10/yd = $.80/ft^2/ply epoxy $70/gal = $.60/ft^2/ply paint $1/ft^2 plus abrasives, peel ply, fillers, vacuum bag consumables "DSK" wrote in message .net... Lew Hodgett wrote: You haven't priced materials lately, have you? Think OIL. Actually, I have- am buying materials for a carbon fiber rowing dinghy. But I think you grossly (very grossly) overestimated the cost & amount of materials needed for replacing core on a 20' deck. It's not going to be free, that's not what I'm saying. DSK |
Balsa deck core
Michiel,
Discussion is always valuable. As I often remark (to clients that find the proposal that they have just received to be overwhelming), thinking is the cheapest and most valuable thing to do. In the time this discussion has ben on the wire, I have contracted to do a very similar job. I will gladdly write a quote for this job if you are in 1hr striking range from the highway exit nearest Detroit River Light. I do, however, have confidence that the assmebled quote will be more than you were expecting. Good Luck with the job, keep us informed. Matt Colie Michiel wrote: Hehe, I had no idea this would set off such a discussion! This is great stuff.. lots of input. Thanks! Too bad I can't make you guys fix the boat for me.. I think it would already be done! Michiel On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 21:06:57 -0500, "John M" wrote: Matt: Some figures taken from West Epoxy web site where they did tests on bonding strength of epoxy and polyester. Tensile strength of original glass 26,198 PSI Tensile strength of poly repair 18,460 PSI Tensile of epoxy repair 21,404 PSI Therefore polyester has a strength 13% less than epoxy at a cost of about 500% more. "Matt Colie" wrote in message ... John, Any part, piece -whatever of any racing yacht can fail at any time, I mentioned "Tomahawk" because I knew some of the cast involved and it was a polyester bond that failed in this case and caused the loss of the vessel. The way many boats are built today anything can fall off. I agree that there is no substitute for proper practice. My problem with polyester is simple, the bond strength is poor. If you can do it all as a wet assembly, that is fine, but if you need to put pieces together - polyester can be problems. I have done whole boats with poly and vinylester (which is another animal). I completely agree that it has its place. Most of them are in a mold. See the beginning paragraph 13% difference. If a guy is going to work under less than ideal conditions and do small patches (less than a mold section), I always that they look at the additional cost of epoxy. If you could get p or vest resin that had nice little measuring pumps and was as well behaved, I still would be hard pressed to advise it for repairs. Polyester isn't that fussy but I use a Nalge dispenser and never had a problem. At the prices I pay 5 gallons (the smallest we buy) of poly is about 85$us, vinyl is about 140$us and 250$us for gallon mix - includes harder of epoxy. The way any job works, labor is the big cost and the labor to use gallons of resin is a big number. The only problem with epoxy for repairs that require cosmetic surfacing is taht you have to do a intermediate coat of vinyl to bond the polyester gelcoat to the epoxy. Gelcoat will just fall right out of an epoxy patch - given half a chance - it will has been know to do the same to a poly repair but vinylester is good enough to bond the two. And - when it come to the failures of super-lights - I don't even count them as real. Like the ICAA boat that folded and sank off San Diego. There is a reason why the shipwrights that I knew as a child worked the way that they did. I have come to understand that all the wouldful new analysis stuff like FEA, CFD and such are nice, but the people that have been out there better not use it to determine what the sea can do. Matt Colie My main problem with epoxy is the people who think it's the holy grail, I think anyone who recommends epoxy to repair a deck on a 25 year old 20 foot boat has either too much money or has been reading too many newsgroups. I would think that the boat that started this discussion could be repaired at minimum cost and be as strong as the good side of the deck. No more is needed. John John M wrote: Matt: Actually I don't do repairs on cars. You mention Tomahawk and her "polyester patch job" how about the other five boats that lost their masts or the eight that were damaged or for that matter the 96 that dropped out. All polyester patches? There are many boats built down to a price that will have parts falling off. But think off all the plain old polyester and glass boats that have been around the world with little or no problems. Which brings to mind a British catamaran whose name escapes me at present, that was built for a round the world record attempt in 1999 or 2000. Built of prepreg epoxy, carbon fiber all the latest high tech. On its first test run in weather that wasn't to bad its bows fell off. I won't blame the epoxy or carbon fiber. My point is epoxy and polyester have their place but nothing replaces proper building practices. With prices of epoxy at $74 a gallon and polyester at $105 for 5 gallons it's hard to believe there is only a $200 difference in a $5000 job. John "Matt Colie" wrote in message ... John, Do you do body repairs with window screen and plastic filler? You can make it look just as good as steel? If you would go to sea in a boat patched with polyester, be my guest. One of the famous ones in the book is "Tomahawk". She sank during a Bayview Mackinac in the mid 80's. That was a polyester patch job. A clients mast came down when it buckled at the spreaders because the tabbing for the anchor for the lower came away from the hull side. I helped recover a sloop that lost its steering because one of the turning blocks came adrift. Those last two were both bond failures of parts installed at teh builders yard. We are set up for resin infusion in several versions (skrimp, spike and texp2) but none are well suited to most non-molded assemblies (that most repairs). Epoxy is used in repairs for two reasons, it has cohesive and adhesive bond properties that far exceed that of poly or vinylesters. We specialize in fixing things - once. Our clients only talk to us if they want a first class job. We clould save the client 1or 200$ on a 5k$ job by using cheap materials. We use only epoxy. You can do what you want, but some of are not interested in doing it ont he cheap - cheap is the price of low value. Matt Colie John M wrote: Just wondering do you guys that use epoxy for everything also use titanium for auto body repairs after all it's better than steel. It seems rather silly to repair a polyester and glass boat which is old with epoxy and the latest high tech fabrics. Why not try resin infusion too John "Jim Conlin" wrote in message ... I figure it'd be somewhat over $10/ft^2. Core-cell $4- maybe 4 laminations of: 12 oz. knitted Glass $10/yd = $.80/ft^2/ply epoxy $70/gal = $.60/ft^2/ply paint $1/ft^2 plus abrasives, peel ply, fillers, vacuum bag consumables "DSK" wrote in message h.net... Lew Hodgett wrote: You haven't priced materials lately, have you? Think OIL. Actually, I have- am buying materials for a carbon fiber rowing dinghy. But I think you grossly (very grossly) overestimated the cost & amount of materials needed for replacing core on a 20' deck. It's not going to be free, that's not what I'm saying. DSK |
Balsa deck core
John M wrote:
Matt: Some figures taken from West Epoxy web site where they did tests on bonding strength of epoxy and polyester. Tensile strength of original glass 26,198 PSI Tensile strength of poly repair 18,460 PSI Tensile of epoxy repair 21,404 PSI Therefore polyester has a strength 13% less than epoxy at a cost of about 500% more. "Matt Colie" wrote in message ... John, Any part, piece -whatever of any racing yacht can fail at any time, I mentioned "Tomahawk" because I knew some of the cast involved and it was a polyester bond that failed in this case and caused the loss of the vessel. The way many boats are built today anything can fall off. I agree that there is no substitute for proper practice. My problem with polyester is simple, the bond strength is poor. If you can do it all as a wet assembly, that is fine, but if you need to put pieces together - polyester can be problems. I have done whole boats with poly and vinylester (which is another animal). I completely agree that it has its place. Most of them are in a mold. See the beginning paragraph 13% difference. If a guy is going to work under less than ideal conditions and do small patches (less than a mold section), I always that they look at the additional cost of epoxy. If you could get p or vest resin that had nice little measuring pumps and was as well behaved, I still would be hard pressed to advise it for repairs. Polyester isn't that fussy but I use a Nalge dispenser and never had a problem. At the prices I pay 5 gallons (the smallest we buy) of poly is about 85$us, vinyl is about 140$us and 250$us for gallon mix - includes harder of epoxy. The way any job works, labor is the big cost and the labor to use gallons of resin is a big number. The only problem with epoxy for repairs that require cosmetic surfacing is taht you have to do a intermediate coat of vinyl to bond the polyester gelcoat to the epoxy. Gelcoat will just fall right out of an epoxy patch - given half a chance - it will has been know to do the same to a poly repair but vinylester is good enough to bond the two. And - when it come to the failures of super-lights - I don't even count them as real. Like the ICAA boat that folded and sank off San Diego. There is a reason why the shipwrights that I knew as a child worked the way that they did. I have come to understand that all the wouldful new analysis stuff like FEA, CFD and such are nice, but the people that have been out there better not use it to determine what the sea can do. Matt Colie My main problem with epoxy is the people who think it's the holy grail, I think anyone who recommends epoxy to repair a deck on a 25 year old 20 foot boat has either too much money or has been reading too many newsgroups. I would think that the boat that started this discussion could be repaired at minimum cost and be as strong as the good side of the deck. No more is needed. John John M wrote: Matt: Actually I don't do repairs on cars. You mention Tomahawk and her "polyester patch job" how about the other five boats that lost their masts or the eight that were damaged or for that matter the 96 that dropped out. All polyester patches? There are many boats built down to a price that will have parts falling off. But think off all the plain old polyester and glass boats that have been around the world with little or no problems. Which brings to mind a British catamaran whose name escapes me at present, that was built for a round the world record attempt in 1999 or 2000. Built of prepreg epoxy, carbon fiber all the latest high tech. On its first test run in weather that wasn't to bad its bows fell off. I won't blame the epoxy or carbon fiber. My point is epoxy and polyester have their place but nothing replaces proper building practices. With prices of epoxy at $74 a gallon and polyester at $105 for 5 gallons it's hard to believe there is only a $200 difference in a $5000 job. John "Matt Colie" wrote in message ... John, Do you do body repairs with window screen and plastic filler? You can make it look just as good as steel? If you would go to sea in a boat patched with polyester, be my guest. One of the famous ones in the book is "Tomahawk". She sank during a Bayview Mackinac in the mid 80's. That was a polyester patch job. A clients mast came down when it buckled at the spreaders because the tabbing for the anchor for the lower came away from the hull side. I helped recover a sloop that lost its steering because one of the turning blocks came adrift. Those last two were both bond failures of parts installed at teh builders yard. We are set up for resin infusion in several versions (skrimp, spike and texp2) but none are well suited to most non-molded assemblies (that most repairs). Epoxy is used in repairs for two reasons, it has cohesive and adhesive bond properties that far exceed that of poly or vinylesters. We specialize in fixing things - once. Our clients only talk to us if they want a first class job. We clould save the client 1or 200$ on a 5k$ job by using cheap materials. We use only epoxy. You can do what you want, but some of are not interested in doing it ont he cheap - cheap is the price of low value. Matt Colie John M wrote: Just wondering do you guys that use epoxy for everything also use titanium for auto body repairs after all it's better than steel. It seems rather silly to repair a polyester and glass boat which is old with epoxy and the latest high tech fabrics. Why not try resin infusion too John "Jim Conlin" wrote in message ... I figure it'd be somewhat over $10/ft^2. Core-cell $4- maybe 4 laminations of: 12 oz. knitted Glass $10/yd = $.80/ft^2/ply epoxy $70/gal = $.60/ft^2/ply paint $1/ft^2 plus abrasives, peel ply, fillers, vacuum bag consumables "DSK" wrote in message .net... Lew Hodgett wrote: You haven't priced materials lately, have you? Think OIL. Actually, I have- am buying materials for a carbon fiber rowing dinghy. But I think you grossly (very grossly) overestimated the cost & amount of materials needed for replacing core on a 20' deck. It's not going to be free, that's not what I'm saying. DSK All this puts me in mind of patching an old goatskin water bladder with a piece of new leather. Also, cost benefit analysis, proper surface preparation, who knows what? All ties in with chemical bond curing. How about contact cement or other "primer" over old poly, followed by more poly / glass? Terry K |
Balsa deck core
Terry
Please note I never said the epoxy repair would not be stronger than the same in polyester. Lets take this to the extreme and say epoxy is 100 times stronger and many think this is the case. Why on a 25 year old boat would anybody want one side to be 100 times stronger than the original deck. I think I did mention proper workmanship counts which precludes contact cement. No doubt Matts repair will be stronger and probably prettier than mine but strong enough is strong enough. John " All this puts me in mind of patching an old goatskin water bladder with a piece of new leather. Also, cost benefit analysis, proper surface preparation, who knows what? All ties in with chemical bond curing. How about contact cement or other "primer" over old poly, followed by more poly / glass? Terry K |
Balsa deck core
Terry K said
All this puts me in mind of patching an old goatskin water bladder with a piece of new leather. Also, cost benefit analysis, proper surface preparation, who knows what? All ties in with chemical bond curing. How about contact cement or other "primer" over old poly, followed by more poly / glass? John M wrote: Terry Please note I never said the epoxy repair would not be stronger than the same in polyester. Lets take this to the extreme and say epoxy is 100 times stronger and many think this is the case. Why on a 25 year old boat would anybody want one side to be 100 times stronger than the original deck. I think I did mention proper workmanship counts which precludes contact cement. No doubt Matts repair will be stronger and probably prettier than mine but strong enough is strong enough. John My sentiment, too. With whom are you in dispute? I am interested in knowing if there might be a primer of some sort that might improve the mere 13,000 lb(whatever!) per sq inch bond of poly on poly that is supposedly not sufficient to be trustworthy when compared to 18,000 (whatever!) epoxy glue. How did the old guys work up the nerve to trust oakum and white lead jammed in all those lapstrake planks? Wonder what it's bond strength was, 10 lbs per sq inch? The nails would each contribute, what, 200 lbs per nail? Could structure and configuration and application have anything to do with it? My HR28 seemed quite happy with the approx 9:1 taper, one sided, one splot, external conical wad patch over a removed 1.5" thru hull hole, with one layer of glass inside just for worries sake, as per the Gougeon brothers advice. Of course, the HR was about 1/4" thick solid glass, and some will say, built like a brick tank to begin with. (Cobham armour, anyone?) Neither welded titanium nor epoxy could have performed better in any imaginable circumstace. After the boat was destroyed by arson and nearby glass burned and melted, the patch was still unnoticable, still trustworthy, still about 5 bucks cheaper, still gelcoatable, if one wanted to gelcoat under bottom paint. Another gold plating option unexcercised. I can not see where using a thinner epoxy splot would actually save any appreciable weight, either. Of course, new construction maxi racers, engineered all to hell for every imagined marginal advantage doesn't exactly reccommend itself either, after what seems to happen to aramid and carbon fibre racing boats exposed to one inch higher or one knot faster waves and winds than designed up against. This epoxy thing seems like a sickness, mania, or sales hype to me. My whacko buddy was rabid about Mission brand speakers being unarguably, vastly superior while arguing in his commonly bewildered, strangely motivated state. My test equipment was irrelevant in that it did not appreciate subjective, sensible colour of sound, and phase, or something. I simply maintained that the possible .00001% undetectable "improvement" over my old EPIs was irrelevant to the application, cost benefit wise, considering the way premium prices. He went incohate, popped his wads! Too much meth? Stock in the company? Or, just innocent testosterone? I would really like to believe, but no epistle has arrived, as yet, and the light required to see such epistle remains dark. As far as the material for replacement core is concerned, balsa is primarily spacer. It's strength really isn't appreciable. Old plywood scraps is as good or stronger, if a little heavier, if kept dry. Small pieces, isolated by plasic dams is adequate, at least. Terry K |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:54 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com