BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   Boat Building (https://www.boatbanter.com/boat-building/)
-   -   sail horsepower? (https://www.boatbanter.com/boat-building/6235-sail-horsepower.html)

William R. Watt October 30th 03 07:13 PM

sail horsepower?
 

Is there a formula relating boat sail area, wind speed, and
horsepower?

The best I can find at the public library are some ranges, ie
hp/sq ft of sail area = 0.015 @ 7-10 kt
0.020 @ 11-16 kt
0.040 @ 17-21 kt
0.070 @ 22-27 kt

I'm trying to get a better idea of how much sail I'd have to put
on a light 15 foot plywood cabin cruiser with appropriate
underwater shape, whose total weight with one occupant and a
week's gear (including accumulated human waste) is 630 lb., to get
it to plane in less than a full gale. TF Jones says 1 hp to plane
each 40-50 pounds.

For comparison, the above table applied to an Albacore racing
dingy (250 lb) with two people aboard (300 lb) and 125 sq ft of
sail says the wind has to be off the above scale for the boat to
plane.

I also found general wind power formulae in books at the library for
generating electicity but there are constants in the formulae, eg
efficiency, which I don't know for boat sails.

I've looked at numbers for several racing boats of about the same
displacement in library books to compare sail sizes but I'd like
to do the calculation for this boat if I can manage it.


--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
William R Watt National Capital FreeNet Ottawa's free community network
homepage: www.ncf.ca/~ag384/top.htm
warning: non-freenet email must have "notspam" in subject or it's returned

bowgus October 31st 03 12:40 AM

sail horsepower?
 
Well ... there's wind ... and there's apparent wind ... and there's a broad
reach (eeehaaaaa on my windsurfer) ... and there's cats that don't tip and
don't lose wind ... and there's displacement hulls that tip and lose wind.
I'm not even a sailor ... but it's obvious to me ... there's a lot more more
to this than windspeed.

"William R. Watt" wrote in message
...

Is there a formula relating boat sail area, wind speed, and
horsepower?

The best I can find at the public library are some ranges, ie
hp/sq ft of sail area = 0.015 @ 7-10 kt
0.020 @ 11-16 kt
0.040 @ 17-21 kt
0.070 @ 22-27 kt

I'm trying to get a better idea of how much sail I'd have to put
on a light 15 foot plywood cabin cruiser with appropriate
underwater shape, whose total weight with one occupant and a
week's gear (including accumulated human waste) is 630 lb., to get
it to plane in less than a full gale. TF Jones says 1 hp to plane
each 40-50 pounds.

For comparison, the above table applied to an Albacore racing
dingy (250 lb) with two people aboard (300 lb) and 125 sq ft of
sail says the wind has to be off the above scale for the boat to
plane.

I also found general wind power formulae in books at the library for
generating electicity but there are constants in the formulae, eg
efficiency, which I don't know for boat sails.

I've looked at numbers for several racing boats of about the same
displacement in library books to compare sail sizes but I'd like
to do the calculation for this boat if I can manage it.


--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

----
William R Watt National Capital FreeNet Ottawa's free community

network
homepage: www.ncf.ca/~ag384/top.htm
warning: non-freenet email must have "notspam" in subject or it's returned




Rodney Myrvaagnes October 31st 03 04:46 AM

sail horsepower?
 
On 30 Oct 2003 19:13:45 GMT, (William R.
Watt) wrote:


Is there a formula relating boat sail area, wind speed, and
horsepower?

The best I can find at the public library are some ranges, ie
hp/sq ft of sail area = 0.015 @ 7-10 kt
0.020 @ 11-16 kt
0.040 @ 17-21 kt
0.070 @ 22-27 kt

I'm trying to get a better idea of how much sail I'd have to put
on a light 15 foot plywood cabin cruiser with appropriate
underwater shape, whose total weight with one occupant and a
week's gear (including accumulated human waste) is 630 lb., to get
it to plane in less than a full gale. TF Jones says 1 hp to plane
each 40-50 pounds.

For comparison, the above table applied to an Albacore racing
dingy (250 lb) with two people aboard (300 lb) and 125 sq ft of
sail says the wind has to be off the above scale for the boat to
plane.


A 505 dinghy weighs 286 lbs (min) plus two crew and planes in smooth
water in less than 10 kts of breeze. Its main is 117 ft **2, jib 55,
IIRC. The old spinnaker was 210 but they changed to a larger one
recently.

A Thistle weighs closer to what you are proposing (500 lbs, I think).
If you can find a local fleet you can probably observe when they start
to plane.

These boats are sailed very actively. Just sitting in the cockpit
makes planing more difficult. I don't think equivalent hp is likely to
be a useful concept for your purpose.


I also found general wind power formulae in books at the library for
generating electicity but there are constants in the formulae, eg
efficiency, which I don't know for boat sails.

I've looked at numbers for several racing boats of about the same
displacement in library books to compare sail sizes but I'd like
to do the calculation for this boat if I can manage it.



Rodney Myrvaagnes NYC J36 Gjo/a

"Religious wisdom is to wisdom as military music is to music."

William R. Watt October 31st 03 03:28 PM

sail horsepower?
 
thanks for the comments.

for planing purposes angle of heel isn't important. there isn't any. since
the boat can be assumed to be on a beam reach the full horsepower of the sail
can be used in the calculation.

I've planed Albacores. The planing wind speed I got using the numbers
available does seem high, but then I never had a wind speed (apparent)
indicator in the boat.

When someone designs a planing boat, and there are light displacement
planing cruisers although much larger displacment that this tiny one I'm
playing around with, he or she has to use a formula for predicting sail
area for the boat to plane. That's what I'm looking for.

I'm having a good time working out all the numbers with the Plue Peter and
Carlson hull programs (and my own skiff program) and comparing them to
numbers in boat design books from the library. I want to put a description
of the design project on my website. I see lots of descriptions of amateur
building projects on websites, but none of an amateur design project.

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
William R Watt National Capital FreeNet Ottawa's free community network
homepage: www.ncf.ca/~ag384/top.htm
warning: non-freenet email must have "notspam" in subject or it's returned

Terry Spragg October 31st 03 03:32 PM

sail horsepower?
 
As large as a sail is, if it is not a rigid foil, parts of it
will not be working while a section in the middle will.

Sail twist is a method used to automatically reduce power in
gusty windy conditions: The top part luffs, the middle is about
right, the bottom section is stalled. Very common in cruising
sails, very easy to see who has a tight leech and flat sails, who
is just plonking along, who is racing hard, who has reefed early,
who needs to reef now, etc.

Just look at the tell tales which should be everywhere, about a
foot apart.

A boom vang will tighten the leech, flatten the sail (as opposed
to let it twist, not wrt the camber, or depth of the airfoil
shape, but the conformance to a continuous angle of attack from
the top to the bottom of the sail.) With a tight vang, the entire
sail performance more closely approaches consistant efficiency
from top to bottom, but it requires constant attention to keep
the boat going to the max. Boats with large sails and tight
leeches react instantly to shifts and gusts, and need instant
attention to main sheets, or they get depowered or dumped,
broached, turned upwind, spun around and even tacked
uncontrollably.

Power boaters do not understand this, that a moment's
inattention, like when a flying fish lands in your eye, can
result in a 180 degree course change and the sailor hanging by
the neck in the mainsheet, clobbered by the boom, and still
trying to get his contact lens back. It's all perfectly routine
for an experienced sailor.

Sails with enough twist sag a little more in a gust, luffing more
at the top, and reducing the amount of sail in the middle
actually working at top efficiency, reducing the power increase
otherwise generated by a gust on a 'flat', or 'stiff' sail,
resulting in less weather helm than might otherwise occur, and
giving a more sea kindly, 'forgiving' ride.

It's all in the sail trim, lad.

Further, a sailboat in motion in a 10 kt true wind may see an
apparant wind on board of anywhere from say 5 kt when going
downwind, to perhaps 20 kt if really boiling along upwind.

The hp / sq meter figures do not take this apparant wind effect
into account, but only calculate one absolute value.

Once the boat has gathered way, the doubled apparant wind yields
4 times the power, or is that 8 times as much, dependant on
twist? Some aerodynamacist mathematician should know if power
increases as the square or the cube of the airspeed, which is the
speed at the sail, or apparant wind. Sailors more taste it than
cook by recipie. Finding 'the groove' is done by buttock feel.
Er, sorry;-)

The planing hull shape might be more important than the sail
area. The most efficient planing hull might be one that traps a
big bubble of air under it at speed. Ask any hovercraft driver.

I would be interested to see a sailboat with a bunch of tall
pipes connected through the hull to a point well above the
waterline, with some sort of sensor in each pipe to measure
airflow, pressure and suction against the hull at speed,
investigating the way a hull's shape can affect hydrostatic
pressure, and co-incidentally, friction against the hull. Could
pumping air under a hull reduce drag? Ask any air hockey puck.

P.C. will expound that Viking boat hull shapes have air tunnels
on either side of the keel, and benefit when air is trapped under
the hull at speed, regardless of how it was constructed.

Terry K

"William R. Watt" wrote:

Is there a formula relating boat sail area, wind speed, and
horsepower?

The best I can find at the public library are some ranges, ie
hp/sq ft of sail area = 0.015 @ 7-10 kt
0.020 @ 11-16 kt
0.040 @ 17-21 kt
0.070 @ 22-27 kt

I'm trying to get a better idea of how much sail I'd have to put
on a light 15 foot plywood cabin cruiser with appropriate
underwater shape, whose total weight with one occupant and a
week's gear (including accumulated human waste) is 630 lb., to get
it to plane in less than a full gale. TF Jones says 1 hp to plane
each 40-50 pounds.

For comparison, the above table applied to an Albacore racing
dingy (250 lb) with two people aboard (300 lb) and 125 sq ft of
sail says the wind has to be off the above scale for the boat to
plane.

I also found general wind power formulae in books at the library for
generating electicity but there are constants in the formulae, eg
efficiency, which I don't know for boat sails.

I've looked at numbers for several racing boats of about the same
displacement in library books to compare sail sizes but I'd like
to do the calculation for this boat if I can manage it.

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
William R Watt National Capital FreeNet Ottawa's free community network
homepage: www.ncf.ca/~ag384/top.htm
warning: non-freenet email must have "notspam" in subject or it's returned


--
Terry K - My email address is MY PROPERTY, and is protected by
copyright legislation. Permission to reproduce it is
specifically denied for mass mailing and unrequested
solicitations. Reproduction or conveyance for any unauthorised
purpose is THEFT and PLAGIARISM. Abuse is Invasion of privacy
and harassment. Abusers may be prosecuted. -This notice footer
released to public domain. Spamspoof salad by spamchock -
SofDevCo


William R. Watt November 1st 03 01:28 PM

sail horsepower?
 
Terry Spragg ) writes:

It's all in the sail trim, lad.


there's none of that stuff on a beam reach


Further, a sailboat in motion in a 10 kt true wind may see an
apparant wind on board of anywhere from say 5 kt when going
downwind, to perhaps 20 kt if really boiling along upwind.


wind speed is wind speed. its a simple matter to calcuate apparent wind
and add it to ambient wind speed and use that in teh formual, in fact it
can be included in the formual, whatever it is.

I would be interested to see a sailboat with a bunch of tall
pipes connected through the hull to a point well above the
waterline, with some sort of sensor in each pipe to measure
airflow, pressure and suction against the hull at speed,
investigating the way a hull's shape can affect hydrostatic
pressure, and co-incidentally, friction against the hull. Could
pumping air under a hull reduce drag? Ask any air hockey puck.

P.C. will expound that Viking boat hull shapes have air tunnels
on either side of the keel, and benefit when air is trapped under
the hull at speed, regardless of how it was constructed.


thanks but I'm not designing a cathedral hull.
in teh 1920's MIt did some tests on sails with primative equipment that
you oudl dupicate if you want. one neat thing they did was to put a smoake
bomb on the end of a pole and stick it out from various parts of the boat.
they made a film of it. you coudl do it with a camcorder. you'd need
someone in a powerboat with a walkie-talkie to record views from outside
the boat.

no, there's got to be a formula relating wind speed, sail area, and
horsepower.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
William R Watt National Capital FreeNet Ottawa's free community network
homepage: www.ncf.ca/~ag384/top.htm
warning: non-freenet email must have "notspam" in subject or it's returned

Glenn Ashmore November 1st 03 02:11 PM

sail horsepower?
 


William R. Watt wrote:

no, there's got to be a formula relating wind speed, sail area, and
horsepower.


THe formula for wind pressure perpindicular to a flat surface is
P = 1/2p × V² the p is the specific mass of the air which varies due to
temperature and humidity but somewhere around .0022 but that is just the
beginning. There are other rather complicated formulas for calculating
lift and drag that are way over my head.


In Dave Gerr's book there is a sort of rule of thumb wind speed/HP
table: At 9-10 Kn a sail can produce .015 HP/sq. ft. At 13-15 Kn it is
..020 HP and at 19-21 Kn .040 HP.

--
Glenn Ashmore

I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack
there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com
Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com


Matt/Meribeth Pedersen November 1st 03 04:41 PM

sail horsepower?
 
Frank Bethwaite's book "High Performance Sailing"
has some info about planing potential, sail area and
weight. I don't have my copy any more but it may
be at your library.
Matt


no, there's got to be a formula relating wind speed, sail area, and
horsepower.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

----
William R Watt National Capital FreeNet Ottawa's free community

network



William R. Watt November 1st 03 05:39 PM

sail horsepower?
 
Glenn Ashmore ) writes:

THe formula for wind pressure perpindicular to a flat surface is
P = 1/2p × V² the p is the specific mass of the air which varies due to
temperature and humidity but somewhere around .0022 but that is just the
beginning. There are other rather complicated formulas for calculating
lift and drag that are way over my head.


I'm sure its all been worked out by aeronautical engineers, but for higher
relative wind speeds. :)

In Dave Gerr's book there is a sort of rule of thumb wind speed/HP
table: At 9-10 Kn a sail can produce .015 HP/sq. ft. At 13-15 Kn it is
.020 HP and at 19-21 Kn .040 HP.


thanks. I have that. Its the best info for sails I have been able to find
to work with so far, but a bit course.



--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
William R Watt National Capital FreeNet Ottawa's free community network
homepage: www.ncf.ca/~ag384/top.htm
warning: non-freenet email must have "notspam" in subject or it's returned

Old Nick November 1st 03 11:08 PM

sail horsepower?
 
On 1 Nov 2003 13:28:49 GMT, (William R.
Watt) wrote something
.......and in reply I say!:

Bill....if I may address you as such...

You ask for power formulae for a _sail_...then argue?

Terry Spragg ) writes:

It's all in the sail trim, lad.


************************************************** ****************************************
Until I do the other one,this one means nothing
Nick White --- HEAD:Hertz Music

remove ns from my header address to reply via email

!!
")
_/ )
( )
_//- \__/

William R. Watt November 2nd 03 04:09 PM

sail horsepower?
 
Old Nick ) writes:
On 1 Nov 2003 13:28:49 GMT, (William R.
Watt) wrote something
......and in reply I say!:

Bill....if I may address you as such...

You ask for power formulae for a _sail_...then argue?


clarify. some responses did not address the question.
you can go back and re-read the original question if you like.

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
William R Watt National Capital FreeNet Ottawa's free community network
homepage:
www.ncf.ca/~ag384/top.htm
warning: non-freenet email must have "notspam" in subject or it's returned

William R. Watt November 2nd 03 06:09 PM

sail horsepower?
 
I scaned diagrams of a possible sprit sail and put them on my website. So
far I just use the wetted surface and displacment to determine the sail
area. I still have more calculations to do for it. There's a sail cutting
diagram too. To use as much of the sail material and to keep the centre of
effort low I did not follow the recommended proportions in John Leather's
"Spritsails and Lugsails". I drew a sail more like older less efficient
sprit sails. BTW if you chose the length of the foot and leach then you
can use Leather's proportions to find the head and luff independent of the
mast length, although he relates them all to mast length. Maybe I'll
describe that in the design text later.

the diagrams are at www.ncf.ca/~ag384/Solo15.htm. I won't link it to my
home page until its finished which could be quite a while yet. Its still
very rough. I'm spending as much time trying to figure out how to use the
computer as I am trying to work out the design of the boat. :)




--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
William R Watt National Capital FreeNet Ottawa's free community network
homepage: www.ncf.ca/~ag384/top.htm
warning: non-freenet email must have "notspam" in subject or it's returned

Rodney Myrvaagnes November 3rd 03 12:41 AM

sail horsepower?
 
On 1 Nov 2003 13:28:49 GMT, (William R.
Watt) wrote:


no, there's got to be a formula relating wind speed, sail area, and
horsepower.
--


Such a formula could be generated, In fact, a vast family of such
formulas could be generated, all equally valid, and all giving
different results.

The assumptions required to generate such a formula swamp any results
that might be derived from it.


Rodney Myrvaagnes NYC J36 Gjo/a

"Religious wisdom is to wisdom as military music is to music."

William R. Watt November 3rd 03 01:54 PM

sail horsepower?
 
Rodney Myrvaagnes ) writes:
On 1 Nov 2003 13:28:49 GMT, (William R.
Watt) wrote:


no, there's got to be a formula relating wind speed, sail area, and
horsepower.
--


Such a formula could be generated, In fact, a vast family of such
formulas could be generated, all equally valid, and all giving
different results.

The assumptions required to generate such a formula swamp any results
that might be derived from it.


yes, but that's true of most things in nature and yet applied mathematics
works. for example, formulae are used to design aeroplane wings. the two
approaches used are to make the most appropriate assumptions and verify by
testing. the results only have to be accurate enough to be effective
design tools.






--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
William R Watt National Capital FreeNet Ottawa's free community network
homepage:
www.ncf.ca/~ag384/top.htm
warning: non-freenet email must have "notspam" in subject or it's returned

Glenn Ashmore November 3rd 03 02:13 PM

sail horsepower?
 


William R. Watt wrote:

yes, but that's true of most things in nature and yet applied mathematics
works. for example, formulae are used to design aeroplane wings. the two
approaches used are to make the most appropriate assumptions and verify by
testing. the results only have to be accurate enough to be effective
design tools.


I don't know that that is a valid comparison. Aerodynamic formulas for
aircraft calculate the amount of horsepower required to overcome drag
and provide lift but that is not what you are after. Also aircraft
foils operate in a very limited angle of attack and with predictable
wind speeds.

If a single horsepower factor for a particular sail area/wind speed
existed the polars developed from VPP programs would be circular. You
can't take a single horsepower and compare it to the horsepower
delivered to a prop. The propeller delivers all its power in one
benificial direction. Wind force on sails has a lift and drag component
and the net benificial power varies depending on the direction of the
lift to the relative heading you want to steer. That is constantly
varying. You might determine an equivelent horsepower for one wind
speed and one aparent wind angle but it would be valid for only that
condition.

--
Glenn Ashmore

I'm building a 45' cutter in strip/composite. Watch my progress (or lack
there of) at: http://www.rutuonline.com
Shameless Commercial Division: http://www.spade-anchor-us.com


Rodney Myrvaagnes November 3rd 03 05:38 PM

sail horsepower?
 
On 3 Nov 2003 13:54:29 GMT, (William R.
Watt) wrote:

Rodney Myrvaagnes ) writes:
On 1 Nov 2003 13:28:49 GMT,
(William R.
Watt) wrote:


no, there's got to be a formula relating wind speed, sail area, and
horsepower.
--


Such a formula could be generated, In fact, a vast family of such
formulas could be generated, all equally valid, and all giving
different results.

The assumptions required to generate such a formula swamp any results
that might be derived from it.


yes, but that's true of most things in nature and yet applied mathematics
works. for example, formulae are used to design aeroplane wings. the two
approaches used are to make the most appropriate assumptions and verify by
testing. the results only have to be accurate enough to be effective
design tools.


I am tryng to be helpful. The noise in the set of reasonable
assumptions will produce output noise many times the size of the
signal. An airplane wing is used in one medium away from boundaries.

You could empirically derive some formula from the performance of a
rogallo type hang glider well off the ground. It would, however, be
close to useless for predicting a sailboat's behavior in the real
situation of a water/air boundary, with its normally height-dependent
wind-velocity vector.

I hope the next questions don't offend.

How skilled a sailor are you?

Can you enter a local club one-design race and be fairly sure you
won't come in last?

Have you ever felt the difference a new sail makes?



Rodney Myrvaagnes NYC J36 Gjo/a

"Religious wisdom is to wisdom as military music is to music."

William R. Watt November 3rd 03 08:23 PM

sail horsepower?
 
first comment: the angle of the sail to the apparent wind is naturally
assumed to be 22.5 deg (I think that's it) for max lift. the angle of the
sail to the course of the planing boat is naturally assumed to be 90 deg
on a beam reach for max power. the angle of heel when planing is naturally
assumed to be zero as the boat will be planed flat. the sails are assumed
to be new. that's how applied math works. the assumptions made are an
idealized standard. they don't have to include variables for skill or
equipment wear. all I'm looikng for is the power of the sail. the
resistance of the boat is a separate calculation, or tank test.

second comment: Oh yes, I've planed a dingy, in the middle of the night in
a 24 hour race by observing the angle of some boats swinging free on their
moorings in the moonlight and going wide on the downwind leg and screaming
past the the gybe mark on a plane thereby gaining several boat lengths on
the hot shots in the other boats. The sails were not new. Our pickup team
did not come last against the hand picked hot shots. We came second last.
I also recall observing the progress of a pleasure sailor and swinging
accross the back of a fleet of racing dingys to overtake them from the
rear and round the gybe mark on the inside screaming "ROOM, ROOM" with
great gusto. What a mess. Sailing speed has more to do with reading winds
and currents than boat speed. That why its so hard to beat the locals.
However that should not prevent us while in the boat design stage from
calculating the sail area needed for planing the boat when we do get
'round to reading the winds and currents.

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
William R Watt National Capital FreeNet Ottawa's free community network
homepage: www.ncf.ca/~ag384/top.htm
warning: non-freenet email must have "notspam" in subject or it's returned

Rodney Myrvaagnes November 3rd 03 11:46 PM

sail horsepower?
 
On 3 Nov 2003 20:23:46 GMT, (William R.
Watt) wrote:

first comment: the angle of the sail to the apparent wind is naturally
assumed to be 22.5 deg (I think that's it) for max lift. the angle of the
sail to the course of the planing boat is naturally assumed to be 90 deg
on a beam reach for max power. the angle of heel when planing is naturally
assumed to be zero as the boat will be planed flat. the sails are assumed
to be new. that's how applied math works. the assumptions made are an
idealized standard. they don't have to include variables for skill or
equipment wear. all I'm looikng for is the power of the sail. the
resistance of the boat is a separate calculation, or tank test.

second comment: Oh yes, I've planed a dingy, in the middle of the night in
a 24 hour race by observing the angle of some boats swinging free on their
moorings in the moonlight and going wide on the downwind leg and screaming
past the the gybe mark on a plane thereby gaining several boat lengths on
the hot shots in the other boats. The sails were not new. Our pickup team
did not come last against the hand picked hot shots. We came second last.
I also recall observing the progress of a pleasure sailor and swinging
accross the back of a fleet of racing dingys to overtake them from the
rear and round the gybe mark on the inside screaming "ROOM, ROOM" with
great gusto. What a mess. Sailing speed has more to do with reading winds
and currents than boat speed. That why its so hard to beat the locals.
However that should not prevent us while in the boat design stage from
calculating the sail area needed for planing the boat when we do get
'round to reading the winds and currents.



OK, that is enough that you should have observed that the delivered
'horsepower' fluctuated by at least an order of magnituded over a
fairly short timespan. Perhaps you would get closer to real questions
if you started with loaded weights and sail areas of common planing
boats.

For example, a Snipe, with very small sails and a quite heavy hull,
can still plane under ideal conditions. So can a J 24. But neither
does so often enough to be a common occurrence.

50-year old designs like 505 and FD can plane under ordinary
conditions, and routinely do so. They are much lighter for their sail
areas than the Snipe and J 24.

More modern designs, like the Bethwaite 18-ft skiff and the 49er,
plane almost all the time as far as I can tell watching them go.
Unfortunately for your purpose, these make use of high-tech materials
to make the dead weight small compared to the movable ballast (crew).
They also carry sail area that could only be manageable with a very
sophisticated rig.

You could find out the relevant ratios (sail area/dsiplacement,
displacement/area of planing surface, displacement/length) for all of
these, and try to pack what you want into a weight that fits your
desires.

You will end up looking at carbon fiber composite and a very spartan
interior. But at no time in this process will a horsepower formula
help you.





Rodney Myrvaagnes NYC J36 Gjo/a

"WooWooism lives" Anon grafitto on the base of the Cuttyhunk breakwater light

William R. Watt November 4th 03 02:05 PM

sail horsepower?
 
Rodney Myrvaagnes ) writes:

OK, that is enough that you should have observed that the delivered
'horsepower' fluctuated by at least an order of magnituded over a
fairly short timespan.


that's why I'm looking for a formula relating sail area and wind speed to sail
horespower. its wind speed one uses to make any particular boat plane.


Perhaps you would get closer to real questions
if you started with loaded weights and sail areas of common planing
boats.



yes, that's the old way. but as you point out different boats have
different resistance at different wind speeds. if I had a formula for sail
horsepower at different wind speeds I woudl knwo what wind speed and sail
area is needed to pane a hull with a known resistance (pounds) at a given
wind speed. as we know from the lenght to speed formual resistance
increases with boat speed.

however TF Jones says it takes 1 hp for every 40-50 lns displacement to
plan a "good" planing hull and I would use that instead of trying to
determine the resistance of a particular hull under desing. I'll assume it
is sufficietn for my purpose.

its actually possible to predict if a boat will plane given sufficient
sail power. my problem is finding the horsepower of the sail. that's what
I'm lookign for. I have teh table GA notes is in Gerr's book. I forget
where I saw it. I've taken notes from quite a few books.

I do have the formula for pressure per square foot of sail at any wind speed
(pressure = 0.004 times square of wind speed) over some reasonable range
of wind speeds for sailing. I don't know how the 0.004 constant was
derived. I think maybe I can work something out with that.


For example, a Snipe, with very small sails and a quite heavy hull,
can still plane under ideal conditions. So can a J 24. But neither
does so often enough to be a common occurrence.

50-year old designs like 505 and FD can plane under ordinary
conditions, and routinely do so. They are much lighter for their sail
areas than the Snipe and J 24.

More modern designs, like the Bethwaite 18-ft skiff and the 49er,
plane almost all the time as far as I can tell watching them go.
Unfortunately for your purpose, these make use of high-tech materials
to make the dead weight small compared to the movable ballast (crew).
They also carry sail area that could only be manageable with a very
sophisticated rig.

You could find out the relevant ratios (sail area/dsiplacement,
displacement/area of planing surface, displacement/length) for all of
these, and try to pack what you want into a weight that fits your
desires.

You will end up looking at carbon fiber composite and a very spartan
interior. But at no time in this process will a horsepower formula
help you.


oh yes it will. wind power is what gets the boat to plane. :)

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
William R Watt National Capital FreeNet Ottawa's free community network
homepage: www.ncf.ca/~ag384/top.htm
warning: non-freenet email must have "notspam" in subject or it's returned

Rodney Myrvaagnes November 4th 03 06:30 PM

sail horsepower?
 
On 4 Nov 2003 14:05:19 GMT, (William R.
Watt) wrote:


You will end up looking at carbon fiber composite and a very spartan
interior. But at no time in this process will a horsepower formula
help you.


oh yes it will. wind power is what gets the boat to plane. :)

Have it your way. I tried to help.



Rodney Myrvaagnes NYC J36 Gjo/a

"WooWooism lives" Anon grafitto on the base of the Cuttyhunk breakwater light

Old Nick November 4th 03 10:40 PM

sail horsepower?
 
On 2 Nov 2003 16:09:57 GMT, (William R.
Watt) wrote something
.......and in reply I say!:

Old Nick ) writes:
On 1 Nov 2003 13:28:49 GMT,
(William R.
Watt) wrote something
......and in reply I say!:

Bill....if I may address you as such...

You ask for power formulae for a _sail_...then argue?


clarify.


A sail cannot be quantified. Too many variables.

some responses did not address the question.



hmmm... they may not have _answered_ it....

you can go back and re-read the original question if you like.



No need. AFAICS, the reason there is such a spread is that conditions
apply.
************************************************** ****************************************
Until I do the other one,this one means nothing
Nick White --- HEAD:Hertz Music

remove ns from my header address to reply via email

!!
")
_/ )
( )
_//- \__/

William R. Watt November 5th 03 02:36 AM

sail horsepower?
 
thank you all for the informative discussion.

Henry Miller ("Sailing Yacht Design" (1965) also disagrees with me,
writing "As the driving medium, the size of the sail plan obviously should
bear some relationship to the resistance of the hull. Unfortunately there
is no direct means of evaluating the driving force that can be produced by
a given size sail plan under specific wind conditions." That seems odd to
me. Surely a somewhat idealized model can be described mathematically and
boundary values computed. I'm having a samilar problem comparing heeling
force of the sail to righting moment of the hull and crew to see how much
sail to carry. The books discuss the Dellenbaugh the angle I was asking about
in an earlier thread and another method both of which depend on
measurements taken from the dynamics of the completed hull or model. I must
declare I'm disappointed. I think I'll keep working on these analytically
to see if I can get any useful numbers.

I appreciate the need to compare with data from exsisting boats to check
any calculations. I realize its the practice among yacht designers to use
comparisons where they can't calculate numbers analytically. I've got lots
of data on specific day sailers and light crusiers to use, and some
scatterplot summaries of data on daysailers and light cruisers, all from
books at the public library. The design I'm playing with appears to be
reasonable by comparison. As I work on the design I have to answer a lot
of questions which refine my ideas about how the boat will be used and
under what conditions. Its interesting to try and come up with a roomy
ultralight cruiser with sufficient power and response to work the shifty
winds on inland lakes and rivers like the waters we have on the Rideau
system, hopefully without resorting to auxilliary power.

--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
William R Watt National Capital FreeNet Ottawa's free community network
homepage: www.ncf.ca/~ag384/top.htm
warning: non-freenet email must have "notspam" in subject or it's returned


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com