LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13   Report Post  
Barry Palmer
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hull speed theory?

Mathematical modelling, even with things as simple as earth surface gravity,
always involves a hypothesis regarding the physical principles involved. If
the apparent results line up with the hypothesis, the "theory" could be said to
be correct.

In the case of Hobie Cat versus 45 footer, one only has to look at the theory
in a different way, one that takes slenderness into account. Obviously, as a
given hull becomes finer, less wavemaking potential exists, and load carrying
ability of the hull diminishes. As the extreme of a knife edge in the water is
approached, load carrying capability approaches zero, and friction with the
water becomes the dominant drag force, making wave drag less relevant, as
friction becomes greater and greate compared to wave drag.

The opposite extreme is found in hovercraft, where there is little friction (in
smooth water), and the body making the wave is broad, and wave making theory
comes into play, with friction of minor concern. (High drag in rough water is
a problem with hovercraft, which may be overcomeable, but not at all explored
by the industry.)

To analyse the wave making problem on my surface skimmers, I took a different
approach from classical marine analysis, and got roughly the same results. I
assumed the craft influences a semi-circle section of water under it and gives
that body of water a downwards force, the vertical momentum of which is the
dynamic lift on the hull, as lift from displacement diminishes as forward speed
builds. Whadiya know, it works for broad barge-like hull bottoms with no
friction.

After all, the theory of earth surface gravity breaks down when you start to
get away from the earth's surface, yet we use the theory in many engineering
endeavors. (When you leave the planet, Neutonian physics "theory" breaks
down.)



Subject: Hull speed theory?
From: (JAXAshby)
Date: 7/20/03 5:52 AM Pacific Daylight Time
Message-id:

it ain't any theory whatsoever. It was merely a "scientific" explanation
given
to 19th century British naval brass to "help" them understand why putting 2x
the power in a boat didn't make the boat go 2x the speed.

The "theory" sounded scientific and it had numbers in it and it was called a
theory so the brass accepted it.

most sailboats built in the last several decades will easily exceed
"theoretical" hull speed. in fact, a deep vee hullled Hobie cat
(displacement
hull by any standard) at 18 feet will under many points of of sail easily
pass
a 45 foot sailboat (also a displacement hull for most every 45 sailboat out
there).



Barry Palmer, for A
HREF="http://members.aol.com/sevtec/sev/skmr.html"Sevtec/A
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cathodic Protection for Aluminum Hull - Need Help Matt Lang General 9 July 25th 04 07:02 PM
"Hull speed" is voodoo science JAXAshby General 37 May 9th 04 01:07 AM
Dean stands up to Anti-Christian bigots -rick- General 5 January 12th 04 03:54 PM
Selecting HP for given hull (outboard) roy General 13 October 6th 03 03:06 AM
Can Tow from Florida to Northeast for $$ NOYB General 106 September 24th 03 01:57 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:47 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017