Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default using bunker fuel

Howdy group,
All the yachtsmen I know who run a diesel use only 'diesel fuel', which
is light and expensive. However, in the merchant navy we use bunker
fuel whenever we're going to be running the engine for a long time,
without varying RPM.

It's thicker than molasses at room temperature, but when suitably
heated, it runs enough to be used in a diesel engine. It also costs a
fraction of regular 'diesel fuel' (aka "Champagne"). The engine is
started with light diesel fuel until it's running hot enough, then the
fuel mixture is gradually changed over to bunker. If the ship comes to
manoeuvering conditions, then the mixture is switched back to light
fuel. They always go back to light fuel before shutting off the engine,
too, to 'clean' the insides for the next start-up.

Now I'm wondering why we don't do this in cruising yachts, where the
engine is running constantly for days, especially considering the fuel
prices of late. All one would need is a heated holding tank and a way
of adjusting the fuel mixture. Then again, I'm not a marine engineer.
Am I missing something?

Regards,
-Max

  #2   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi

In the old day's there was plenty petrol engines that had a double
caburator , to switch between petrol and the heavier petrolium ( a
ligther sort of Diesel fuel ) .
For an old fasion 4 stroke slow running marine petrol engine, this also
work best, if the fuel are pre-heated, usealy by the petrolium tube
turned around the exhoust pipe , but also the air intake running thru
the exchoust pipe, help a lot pre-heating the more heavy fuel, when a
switch turn the gasolin chamber of the caburator to standby, and the
fuel was taken from the opposite chamber with petrolium.
------- the problems was the same ; the engine had to be started with
petrol on, but warm it ran well enough on the cheaper petrolium, and
the double caburator, made it so that only a switch needed to instantly
turn off the petrolium side so the engine would run more safe , say
when entering a harbour.

  #3   Report Post  
Evan Gatehouse
 
Posts: n/a
Default

wrote:
Howdy group,
All the yachtsmen I know who run a diesel use only 'diesel fuel', which
is light and expensive. However, in the merchant navy we use bunker
fuel whenever we're going to be running the engine for a long time,
without varying RPM.

It's thicker than molasses at room temperature, but when suitably
heated, it runs enough to be used in a diesel engine. It also costs a
fraction of regular 'diesel fuel' (aka "Champagne"). The engine is
started with light diesel fuel until it's running hot enough, then the
fuel mixture is gradually changed over to bunker. If the ship comes to
manoeuvering conditions, then the mixture is switched back to light
fuel. They always go back to light fuel before shutting off the engine,
too, to 'clean' the insides for the next start-up.

Now I'm wondering why we don't do this in cruising yachts, where the
engine is running constantly for days, especially considering the fuel
prices of late. All one would need is a heated holding tank and a way
of adjusting the fuel mixture. Then again, I'm not a marine engineer.
Am I missing something?

Regards,
-Max


THere's more than the heated day tank, you need separators
to deal with the sludge, a place for the sludge (sludge
tank), etc. etc. Most pleasure sailboats turn off the
engine and sail so you don't have a ready source of heat to
keep the fuel tank warm....

Oh, small engines just won't run on heavy fuel either. The
fuel pump on a small (say 50 HP) engine pumps out such tiny
amounts of fuel with each stroke that it probably couldn't
meter it if it were heavy fuel.

Evan Gatehouse

  #4   Report Post  
Drew Dalgleish
 
Posts: n/a
Default

OK I'll let all my chemistry ignorance hang out and ask. Would it be
practical to brew your own deisel by mixing bunker with regular
gasoline? Would the savings be worth it?

wrote:
Howdy group,
All the yachtsmen I know who run a diesel use only 'diesel fuel', which
is light and expensive. However, in the merchant navy we use bunker
fuel whenever we're going to be running the engine for a long time,
without varying RPM.

It's thicker than molasses at room temperature, but when suitably
heated, it runs enough to be used in a diesel engine. It also costs a
fraction of regular 'diesel fuel' (aka "Champagne"). The engine is
started with light diesel fuel until it's running hot enough, then the
fuel mixture is gradually changed over to bunker. If the ship comes to
manoeuvering conditions, then the mixture is switched back to light
fuel. They always go back to light fuel before shutting off the engine,
too, to 'clean' the insides for the next start-up.

Now I'm wondering why we don't do this in cruising yachts, where the
engine is running constantly for days, especially considering the fuel
prices of late. All one would need is a heated holding tank and a way
of adjusting the fuel mixture. Then again, I'm not a marine engineer.
Am I missing something?

Regards,
-Max


THere's more than the heated day tank, you need separators
to deal with the sludge, a place for the sludge (sludge
tank), etc. etc. Most pleasure sailboats turn off the
engine and sail so you don't have a ready source of heat to
keep the fuel tank warm....

Oh, small engines just won't run on heavy fuel either. The
fuel pump on a small (say 50 HP) engine pumps out such tiny
amounts of fuel with each stroke that it probably couldn't
meter it if it were heavy fuel.

Evan Gatehouse


  #5   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Proberly not, as the more heavy fuel also carry acids and sulfur there
simply are more dirt in the heavy fuels, something that is no problem
in a huge ships engine undertaking maintaince on regular times ,where
the pistons are houled and the rings cleaned every 2 month and, you
easily end up with an engine blocked by unburned remains, valves that
will not close well, all in all , what you think you save can add extra
costs while the engine suffer. ---- beside when the engine are not made
for the fuel the smoke can turn out to be a major problem.
Also even the old slow running engines are made for a particular fuel,
the jets in the carburator aswell as the spray holes in the diesel
engine, are made so that a wrong fuel will only caurse trouble , the
engine will turn out being very "dirty" and esp. more modern engines
will soon fail or the engine will soon be vorn out.



  #6   Report Post  
Drew Dalgleish
 
Posts: n/a
Default

that makes sense thanks

Proberly not, as the more heavy fuel also carry acids and sulfur there
simply are more dirt in the heavy fuels, something that is no problem
in a huge ships engine undertaking maintaince on regular times ,where
the pistons are houled and the rings cleaned every 2 month and, you
easily end up with an engine blocked by unburned remains, valves that
will not close well, all in all , what you think you save can add extra
costs while the engine suffer. ---- beside when the engine are not made
for the fuel the smoke can turn out to be a major problem.
Also even the old slow running engines are made for a particular fuel,
the jets in the carburator aswell as the spray holes in the diesel
engine, are made so that a wrong fuel will only caurse trouble , the
engine will turn out being very "dirty" and esp. more modern engines
will soon fail or the engine will soon be vorn out.


  #7   Report Post  
Roger Derby
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I don't know the chemical gotchas, but I'd suggest that

1) Finding Bunker C in the amounts you want and

2) avoiding the highway taxes and other costs levied on gasoline

would probably leave you spending more, not less. Particularly if your
time is worth anything.

You'd end up wiser, but grubby.

Roger

http://home.earthlink.net/~derbyrm

"Drew Dalgleish" wrote in message
...
OK I'll let all my chemistry ignorance hang out and ask. Would it be
practical to brew your own diesel by mixing bunker with regular
gasoline? Would the savings be worth it?



  #9   Report Post  
Dave Cannell
 
Posts: n/a
Default

For burning cooking oil in your diesel engine try the following sites.

http://www.greasel.com
http://www.greascar.com
http://www.greasecar.com

I suspect anything that runs straight cooking oil will need duplicate fuel
systems so they can start and finish on diesel rather than cooking oil.
Bio-diesel is another story though, I think that can be run straight.

I have a friend in western MA who is running straight cooking oil thru the
summer. He'll start using his double fuel system about the end of
September so the fuel will flow well enough to get to the engine. Part of
the conversion consists of heaters for the fuel tank and lines. Some of
the heaters are hot-water, others electrical.

Pirate_Dave
---
In article ,
mac wrote:
In article .com,
wrote:

Howdy group,
All the yachtsmen I know who run a diesel use only 'diesel fuel', which
is light and expensive. However, in the merchant navy we use bunker
fuel whenever we're going to be running the engine for a long time,
without varying RPM.

It's thicker than molasses at room temperature, but when suitably
heated, it runs enough to be used in a diesel engine. It also costs a
fraction of regular 'diesel fuel' (aka "Champagne"). The engine is
started with light diesel fuel until it's running hot enough, then the
fuel mixture is gradually changed over to bunker. If the ship comes to
manoeuvering conditions, then the mixture is switched back to light
fuel. They always go back to light fuel before shutting off the engine,
too, to 'clean' the insides for the next start-up.

Now I'm wondering why we don't do this in cruising yachts, where the
engine is running constantly for days, especially considering the fuel
prices of late. All one would need is a heated holding tank and a way
of adjusting the fuel mixture. Then again, I'm not a marine engineer.
Am I missing something?

Regards,
-Max


have you guys seen Bio-diesel? make friends with the owner of the "fish
shack" and get his old fry oil. google for bio-diesel and get the
strainer/filter and engine kit. think you start the engine on regular
diesel, then switch over. exhaust might smell like french fries.

  #10   Report Post  
dazed and confuzzed
 
Posts: n/a
Default


You can also burn a mix in the summertime. My Dodge/Cummins likes a
70/30 mix of peanut oil (used)/diesel until the temp drops below 40 deg F.


then it's straight diesel/biodiesel.

Be careful what additives you use if using biodiesel in the winter. Some
meant for petrodiesel don't work well with biodiesel.

Dave Cannell wrote:

For burning cooking oil in your diesel engine try the following sites.

http://www.greasel.com
http://www.greascar.com
http://www.greasecar.com

I suspect anything that runs straight cooking oil will need duplicate fuel
systems so they can start and finish on diesel rather than cooking oil.
Bio-diesel is another story though, I think that can be run straight.

I have a friend in western MA who is running straight cooking oil thru the
summer. He'll start using his double fuel system about the end of
September so the fuel will flow well enough to get to the engine. Part of
the conversion consists of heaters for the fuel tank and lines. Some of
the heaters are hot-water, others electrical.

Pirate_Dave
---
In article ,
mac wrote:

In article .com,
wrote:


Howdy group,
All the yachtsmen I know who run a diesel use only 'diesel fuel', which
is light and expensive. However, in the merchant navy we use bunker
fuel whenever we're going to be running the engine for a long time,
without varying RPM.

It's thicker than molasses at room temperature, but when suitably
heated, it runs enough to be used in a diesel engine. It also costs a
fraction of regular 'diesel fuel' (aka "Champagne"). The engine is
started with light diesel fuel until it's running hot enough, then the
fuel mixture is gradually changed over to bunker. If the ship comes to
manoeuvering conditions, then the mixture is switched back to light
fuel. They always go back to light fuel before shutting off the engine,
too, to 'clean' the insides for the next start-up.

Now I'm wondering why we don't do this in cruising yachts, where the
engine is running constantly for days, especially considering the fuel
prices of late. All one would need is a heated holding tank and a way
of adjusting the fuel mixture. Then again, I'm not a marine engineer.
Am I missing something?

Regards,
-Max


have you guys seen Bio-diesel? make friends with the owner of the "fish
shack" and get his old fry oil. google for bio-diesel and get the
strainer/filter and engine kit. think you start the engine on regular
diesel, then switch over. exhaust might smell like french fries.



--
“No battle plan survives first contact with the enemy”
Sun Tzu



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Let there be heat! Gould 0738 General 4 November 29th 04 01:41 AM
Diesel Fuel Decontamination Units Give Stored Fuel Longer Life. John T. Nightingale General 6 February 20th 04 02:28 PM
Diesel Fuel Decontamination Units Give Stored Fuel Longer Life. John T. Nightingale Boat Building 7 February 19th 04 08:00 PM
ANNOUNCEMENT: Diesel Fuel Decontamination Units Give Stored Fuel Longer Life. John T. Nightingale Marketplace 0 February 19th 04 04:48 PM
fuel delivery problem on outboard? help Russell Hermansen General 9 October 7th 03 01:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017