Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Howdy group,
All the yachtsmen I know who run a diesel use only 'diesel fuel', which is light and expensive. However, in the merchant navy we use bunker fuel whenever we're going to be running the engine for a long time, without varying RPM. It's thicker than molasses at room temperature, but when suitably heated, it runs enough to be used in a diesel engine. It also costs a fraction of regular 'diesel fuel' (aka "Champagne"). The engine is started with light diesel fuel until it's running hot enough, then the fuel mixture is gradually changed over to bunker. If the ship comes to manoeuvering conditions, then the mixture is switched back to light fuel. They always go back to light fuel before shutting off the engine, too, to 'clean' the insides for the next start-up. Now I'm wondering why we don't do this in cruising yachts, where the engine is running constantly for days, especially considering the fuel prices of late. All one would need is a heated holding tank and a way of adjusting the fuel mixture. Then again, I'm not a marine engineer. Am I missing something? Regards, -Max |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi
In the old day's there was plenty petrol engines that had a double caburator , to switch between petrol and the heavier petrolium ( a ligther sort of Diesel fuel ) . For an old fasion 4 stroke slow running marine petrol engine, this also work best, if the fuel are pre-heated, usealy by the petrolium tube turned around the exhoust pipe , but also the air intake running thru the exchoust pipe, help a lot pre-heating the more heavy fuel, when a switch turn the gasolin chamber of the caburator to standby, and the fuel was taken from the opposite chamber with petrolium. ------- the problems was the same ; the engine had to be started with petrol on, but warm it ran well enough on the cheaper petrolium, and the double caburator, made it so that only a switch needed to instantly turn off the petrolium side so the engine would run more safe , say when entering a harbour. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
OK I'll let all my chemistry ignorance hang out and ask. Would it be
practical to brew your own deisel by mixing bunker with regular gasoline? Would the savings be worth it? wrote: Howdy group, All the yachtsmen I know who run a diesel use only 'diesel fuel', which is light and expensive. However, in the merchant navy we use bunker fuel whenever we're going to be running the engine for a long time, without varying RPM. It's thicker than molasses at room temperature, but when suitably heated, it runs enough to be used in a diesel engine. It also costs a fraction of regular 'diesel fuel' (aka "Champagne"). The engine is started with light diesel fuel until it's running hot enough, then the fuel mixture is gradually changed over to bunker. If the ship comes to manoeuvering conditions, then the mixture is switched back to light fuel. They always go back to light fuel before shutting off the engine, too, to 'clean' the insides for the next start-up. Now I'm wondering why we don't do this in cruising yachts, where the engine is running constantly for days, especially considering the fuel prices of late. All one would need is a heated holding tank and a way of adjusting the fuel mixture. Then again, I'm not a marine engineer. Am I missing something? Regards, -Max THere's more than the heated day tank, you need separators to deal with the sludge, a place for the sludge (sludge tank), etc. etc. Most pleasure sailboats turn off the engine and sail so you don't have a ready source of heat to keep the fuel tank warm.... Oh, small engines just won't run on heavy fuel either. The fuel pump on a small (say 50 HP) engine pumps out such tiny amounts of fuel with each stroke that it probably couldn't meter it if it were heavy fuel. Evan Gatehouse |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Proberly not, as the more heavy fuel also carry acids and sulfur there
simply are more dirt in the heavy fuels, something that is no problem in a huge ships engine undertaking maintaince on regular times ,where the pistons are houled and the rings cleaned every 2 month and, you easily end up with an engine blocked by unburned remains, valves that will not close well, all in all , what you think you save can add extra costs while the engine suffer. ---- beside when the engine are not made for the fuel the smoke can turn out to be a major problem. Also even the old slow running engines are made for a particular fuel, the jets in the carburator aswell as the spray holes in the diesel engine, are made so that a wrong fuel will only caurse trouble , the engine will turn out being very "dirty" and esp. more modern engines will soon fail or the engine will soon be vorn out. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
that makes sense thanks
Proberly not, as the more heavy fuel also carry acids and sulfur there simply are more dirt in the heavy fuels, something that is no problem in a huge ships engine undertaking maintaince on regular times ,where the pistons are houled and the rings cleaned every 2 month and, you easily end up with an engine blocked by unburned remains, valves that will not close well, all in all , what you think you save can add extra costs while the engine suffer. ---- beside when the engine are not made for the fuel the smoke can turn out to be a major problem. Also even the old slow running engines are made for a particular fuel, the jets in the carburator aswell as the spray holes in the diesel engine, are made so that a wrong fuel will only caurse trouble , the engine will turn out being very "dirty" and esp. more modern engines will soon fail or the engine will soon be vorn out. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know the chemical gotchas, but I'd suggest that
1) Finding Bunker C in the amounts you want and 2) avoiding the highway taxes and other costs levied on gasoline would probably leave you spending more, not less. Particularly if your time is worth anything. You'd end up wiser, but grubby. Roger http://home.earthlink.net/~derbyrm "Drew Dalgleish" wrote in message ... OK I'll let all my chemistry ignorance hang out and ask. Would it be practical to brew your own diesel by mixing bunker with regular gasoline? Would the savings be worth it? |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() You can also burn a mix in the summertime. My Dodge/Cummins likes a 70/30 mix of peanut oil (used)/diesel until the temp drops below 40 deg F. then it's straight diesel/biodiesel. Be careful what additives you use if using biodiesel in the winter. Some meant for petrodiesel don't work well with biodiesel. Dave Cannell wrote: For burning cooking oil in your diesel engine try the following sites. http://www.greasel.com http://www.greascar.com http://www.greasecar.com I suspect anything that runs straight cooking oil will need duplicate fuel systems so they can start and finish on diesel rather than cooking oil. Bio-diesel is another story though, I think that can be run straight. I have a friend in western MA who is running straight cooking oil thru the summer. He'll start using his double fuel system about the end of September so the fuel will flow well enough to get to the engine. Part of the conversion consists of heaters for the fuel tank and lines. Some of the heaters are hot-water, others electrical. Pirate_Dave --- In article , mac wrote: In article .com, wrote: Howdy group, All the yachtsmen I know who run a diesel use only 'diesel fuel', which is light and expensive. However, in the merchant navy we use bunker fuel whenever we're going to be running the engine for a long time, without varying RPM. It's thicker than molasses at room temperature, but when suitably heated, it runs enough to be used in a diesel engine. It also costs a fraction of regular 'diesel fuel' (aka "Champagne"). The engine is started with light diesel fuel until it's running hot enough, then the fuel mixture is gradually changed over to bunker. If the ship comes to manoeuvering conditions, then the mixture is switched back to light fuel. They always go back to light fuel before shutting off the engine, too, to 'clean' the insides for the next start-up. Now I'm wondering why we don't do this in cruising yachts, where the engine is running constantly for days, especially considering the fuel prices of late. All one would need is a heated holding tank and a way of adjusting the fuel mixture. Then again, I'm not a marine engineer. Am I missing something? Regards, -Max have you guys seen Bio-diesel? make friends with the owner of the "fish shack" and get his old fry oil. google for bio-diesel and get the strainer/filter and engine kit. think you start the engine on regular diesel, then switch over. exhaust might smell like french fries. -- “No battle plan survives first contact with the enemy” Sun Tzu |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Let there be heat! | General | |||
Diesel Fuel Decontamination Units Give Stored Fuel Longer Life. | General | |||
Diesel Fuel Decontamination Units Give Stored Fuel Longer Life. | Boat Building | |||
ANNOUNCEMENT: Diesel Fuel Decontamination Units Give Stored Fuel Longer Life. | Marketplace | |||
fuel delivery problem on outboard? help | General |