Oh the hypocrisy!!!!
 

Cries of "We shouldn't attack the candidates spouse!" come from the Obama
camp.

Yet the attacks came fast and furious from the Obama camp when the opponent
was Hillary Clinton and the spouse was Bill Clinton. Accusations of racism,
lying, bad temper and the like flew.

But now it's not ok.

It's obviously not out of an appeal to decency, but rather it is because
Michelle Obama is a liability. The Obama camp knows this and they know there
is something you don't know -yet.

But this isn't the first time Obama has flip flopped on issues of integrity
and principle. What about the pledge of using only public financing? Well,
when he saw it was to his political advantage to do otherwise he did. It's
to his political advantage to shut his wife up and keep her shut up. What is
there to hide? Why did he abandon his church of 20 years? Why is his wife
and church such big political liabilities?


Then there is the issue of Constitutional protections for Bin Laden. Would
Obama have been as equally consistent and extended those protections to
Adolph Hitler? Does Obama view the war on terror as a "police action"?

Here are a few more quotes from the Harvard educated lawyer:

http://www.mikefrancesa.com/wordpress/?p=778

Oh the hypocrisy!!!!
 

FYI:

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/20/op...in&oref=slogin



"Kapt Krunch" wrote in message
...
Cries of "We shouldn't attack the candidates spouse!" come from the Obama
camp.

Yet the attacks came fast and furious from the Obama camp when the
opponent was Hillary Clinton and the spouse was Bill Clinton. Accusations
of racism, lying, bad temper and the like flew.

But now it's not ok.

It's obviously not out of an appeal to decency, but rather it is because
Michelle Obama is a liability. The Obama camp knows this and they know
there is something you don't know -yet.

But this isn't the first time Obama has flip flopped on issues of
integrity and principle. What about the pledge of using only public
financing? Well, when he saw it was to his political advantage to do
otherwise he did. It's to his political advantage to shut his wife up and
keep her shut up. What is there to hide? Why did he abandon his church of
20 years? Why is his wife and church such big political liabilities?


Then there is the issue of Constitutional protections for Bin Laden. Would
Obama have been as equally consistent and extended those protections to
Adolph Hitler? Does Obama view the war on terror as a "police action"?

Here are a few more quotes from the Harvard educated lawyer:

http://www.mikefrancesa.com/wordpress/?p=778