![]() |
I decided
Marty wrote: JimC wrote: Out of curiosity, I asked the MacGregor discussion group whether anyone had heard of a Mac 26 breaking up and/or sinking in heavy seas. (Many of the Mac owners have taken their boats offshore.) No one had heard of any such incidence. As you say, there are thousands out there, all over the world and in all types of conditions. Well Jim, to use your tack, please provide reliable evidence of a Mac26 surviving an open ocean passage that involves a significant storm, duration greater that 48hrs, oh hell I'd settle for 24. Hi Marty. Before I respond to your note, would you please show me any note I posted stating that the Mac is suitable for use on an open ocean passage of any kind? Seems to me that what I stated was that I wouldn't want to take mine 200 miles offshore. Nevertheless, the Mac's do have positive floatation, and they don't have a heavy keel that would drag the boat quickly to the bottom if the hull were compromised. Marty, so far, no one has provided ANY EVIDENCE AT ALL of one breaking apart and sinking under ANY conditions, offshore, inshore, heavy weather, squalls, drunk skipper, collisions. No one. Nada. Despite the thousands of Macs out there. As stated above, the Mac 26 is one of, if not the most popular series of sailboats ever made, with thousands still in use both in the US and in various foreign countries. And many Mac 26 owners (in the US and in foreign waters) have taken their boats offshore, though few are used in open crossings. In view of the thousands of Mac26s out there, if the Macs did have a tendency to break up and sink, under stress of any kind, it would be impossible to keep that tendency a secret. - Yet so far, no one (on this ng or on the Mac owners ng) has heard of ANY Mac26 breaking up and sinking, in heavy weather conditions, collisions, or other forms of stress. Secondly, remember that I wasn't the one who posted statements to the effect that the Macs would break up and sink in severe conditions. Those statements were posted by Ganz, with vacuous support from several others. Since Ganz and his friends posted those assertions, Ganz and his friends are the ones who should be providing evidence and proof supporting their theories. - They haven't, of course, and they clearly are unable to do so. Have a nice evening. Jim |
I decided
Capt. JG wrote: "JimC" wrote in message ... Assuming the boat can't sink (which I seriously doubt - given the pounding it would endure, it would likely break up), --- Any evidence or proof to back up that statement Capt? No? Is there any proof that if I go after it with a sawsall it'll remain intact? No. it would be dismasted for sure. Any evidence or proof to support that assertion Capt?.... No? Like I said, you know next to nothing about boats. That is certainly my assertion, and the proof is what you bought and then claim it's going to do fine offshore in storm conditions. Don't believe I said that, Ganz. - Could you please point out the particular note in which I said it would "do fine offshore in storm conditions?" What I said was that you have provided no evidence that it would break up and sink. Then, (not that sailing would have ever been an option), your only chance for survival would be below decks, while the boat rolled over and over and over, perhaps even pitchpolling from time to time. Any evidence or proof to back up that particular assertion Capt? ....No? See other thread parts. This is boring. In other words, you have no answer? It would be like being in a washing machine with heavy and sharp objects. You'd find yourself in a non-habitable environment of flying hazards including yourself that would break your bones into mush. LOL. Not so funny if you happen to be there. In desperation to escape, you would vacate the premises, and then either be thrown off the boat by the wave action or you would remove yourself from the boat deliberately. That's fascinating piece of fiction Capt. - Have you considered writing a novel? Read it as fact in a non-fiction book... actually several. A non-fiction book about a Mac 26M Ganz? Either way, you wouldn't survive. Great fiction Capt. Too bad you have no evidence or proof whatsoever to support it. Yeah, too bad. Once more Ganz, you do seem to have a fertile imagination and an interesting, colorful style of fiction writing. I would encourage you to give it a try. Jim |
I decided
Marty wrote: JimC wrote: keep that tendency a secret. - Yet so far, no one (on this ng or on the Mac owners ng) has even heard of ANY Mac26 breaking up and sinking, in heavy weather conditions, collisions, or other forms of stress. Nor has anyone posted any credible evidence of a Mac26m/x surviving such conditions. Perhaps because no one has been stupid enough to try it. Cheers Marty Marty, in view of the fact that no one, on this board or elsewhere, has posted any accounts of any of the thousands of Mac 26Ms breaking up and sinking under any conditions, as was initially claimed, do you really think they have such a propensity? Seems to me that since that was what was claimed, we should expect some proof or evidence of some sort from Ganz and his buddies. If Ganz would just post ten or so accounts of such Mac "sinkings," then I'll do my best to research the issue further. For the time being, though, it should be apparent that I'm responding to some 15 or so Mac-bashers simultaneously (not really difficult, but it does get to be time-consuming), so I don't have lots of free time for extensive research. In any event, have a nice evening Marty. Jim |
I decided
Marty wrote: JimC wrote: adequate. What I would do in the case of approaching severe weather conditions would be to form a towing bridle connected around the two bow chucks, Wow! Since you have all this experience on "big" sailboats, perhaps you could explain what a "bow chuck" is? - Cheers Marty -- Bow cleats -- Wow, Marty. You sure are smart, and you must be an old salt for sure. You sure did get me on that one, didn't you? Bet you're proud of yourself. (Incidentally, Marty, try responding simultaneously to 15 obviously frustrated Mac-bashers for a few days and see if you don't make a few mistakes.) Jim |
I decided
"JimC" wrote in message
... Marty wrote: JimC wrote: keep that tendency a secret. - Yet so far, no one (on this ng or on the Mac owners ng) has even heard of ANY Mac26 breaking up and sinking, in heavy weather conditions, collisions, or other forms of stress. Nor has anyone posted any credible evidence of a Mac26m/x surviving such conditions. Perhaps because no one has been stupid enough to try it. Cheers Marty Marty, in view of the fact that no one, on this board or elsewhere, has posted any accounts of any of the thousands of Mac 26Ms breaking up and sinking under any conditions, as was initially claimed, do you really think they have such a propensity? Seems to me that since that was what was claimed, we should expect some proof or evidence of some sort from Ganz and his buddies. If Ganz would just post ten or so accounts of such Mac "sinkings," then I'll do my best to research the issue further. For the time being, though, it should be apparent that I'm responding to some 15 or so Mac-bashers simultaneously (not really difficult, but it does get to be time-consuming), so I don't have lots of free time for extensive research. In any event, have a nice evening Marty. Jim Jim, Jim... it's not about bashing Macs, which is certainly easy to do. It's about the choices one makes. For some people, I'm sure you're one of them, and for some sailing locals and conditions, they're fine, perhaps even great. But, they're not for offshore, which should be obvious to anyone who has taken a look at the boat in general and the standing rigging in particular. Even you must admit that the rigging isn't comparable to a true offshore-capable boat. I suspect that you're not dumb enough to take your boat out in conditions that Joe and a few others here have taken their boats. If you are dumb enough, I hope you survive to put us all down properly. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
I decided
"JimC" wrote in message
... As stated above, the Mac 26 is one of, if not the most popular series of sailboats ever made, with thousands still in use both in the US and in various foreign countries. The Big Mac is the most popular burger ever. Doesn't mean I'd try and order one in an expensive restaurant. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
I decided
"JimC" wrote in message
... snipping Zzzzzz... this thread is dead Jim... LOL -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
I decided
Capt. JG wrote: "JimC" wrote in message . .. wrote: On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 10:56:29 -0600, JimC wrote: Wrong again Ganz. You are judging the Mac's rigging by what's necessary on a heavy keel boat. Because of it's small size and relative light weight, the cleats and bow fittings used on the Macs are entirely adequate. What I would do in the case of approaching severe weather conditions would be to form a towing bridle connected around the two bow chucks, with extensions to the mid-deck cleats, and then tie the sea anchor to the bridle. Jim You really must be damaged. Did I say this????? No... but please feel free to claim I did. Ganz, what you said was: There is no attachment point on a Mac26m that is anywhere near strong enough to attach a sea anchor. Do you have evidence supporting that particular assertion? Jim |
I decided
JimC wrote:
Marty wrote: JimC wrote: keep that tendency a secret. - Yet so far, no one (on this ng or on the Mac owners ng) has even heard of ANY Mac26 breaking up and sinking, in heavy weather conditions, collisions, or other forms of stress. Nor has anyone posted any credible evidence of a Mac26m/x surviving such conditions. Perhaps because no one has been stupid enough to try it. Cheers Marty Marty, in view of the fact that no one, on this board or elsewhere, has posted any accounts of any of the thousands of Mac 26Ms breaking up and sinking under any conditions, as was initially claimed, Whoa, stop! Who claimed that "thousands of Mac26Ms" broke up? Cheers Marty |
I decided
JimC wrote:
Marty wrote: JimC wrote: Out of curiosity, I asked the MacGregor discussion group whether anyone had heard of a Mac 26 breaking up and/or sinking in heavy seas. (Many of the Mac owners have taken their boats offshore.) No one had heard of any such incidence. As you say, there are thousands out there, all over the world and in all types of conditions. Well Jim, to use your tack, please provide reliable evidence of a Mac26 surviving an open ocean passage that involves a significant storm, duration greater that 48hrs, oh hell I'd settle for 24. Hi Marty. Before I respond to your note, would you please show me any note I posted stating that the Mac is suitable for use on an open ocean passage of any kind? You're being facetious right? Cheers Marty |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:13 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com