Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:41:15 -0500, "Vito" wrote: "Scotty" wrote in message ... I see where Awstrailia is contemplating a 2 child max law / tax. Any comments? Makes sense. Back circa 1947 agro-scientists developed a new type of rice that yeilded 7X as much food for the same land, et cetera. Starvation disappeared, right? Hell no! People just made more babies until now 7X as many are starving. Same goes for all the environmental band aids. It doesn't help to reduce individual polution, then make more individuals. Unless we control and reduce human population, nature will do it for us - prolly using less than happy methods. Could not agree more, Vito. We don't need more oil, nuke power, wars in odd places, or any of that stuff. If the population of the earth was cut by 70% there would be enough of everything for everybody, and the impacts of pollution would also shrink by 70%. I personally believe that man contributes to Global Cilmate change and a host of other ills, but I see reducing the population as the REAL cure for all of it. For openers, lets stop cheering research on ways to make people live longer. It may make some people feel good, but it is extremely counter-productive if you want the world to become a better place. We need less people. you could volunteer |