![]() |
New Zealand outlaws smacking of children
New Zealand effectively outlawed smacking children on Wednesday...
"It is about our children and what I believe is their God-given right to grow up secure in the love of their family, valued as equal citizens to the rest of us and without the constant threat of legalised violence being used against them," the law's sponsor, Sue Bradford of the Green Party, said in parliament. The law change, first proposed in 2005, had been strongly opposed by conservative family and church groups, who said it would make criminals of parents. Opponents held public marches and rallies outside parliament. Mainstream church groups and child welfare organisations had strongly supported the change. http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/new...995227390.html |
New Zealand outlaws smacking of children
"jlrogers" wrote in message . .. New Zealand effectively outlawed smacking children on Wednesday... "It is about our children and what I believe is their God-given right to grow up secure in the love of their family, valued as equal citizens to the rest of us and without the constant threat of legalised violence being used against them," the law's sponsor, Sue Bradford of the Green Party, said in parliament. The law change, first proposed in 2005, had been strongly opposed by conservative family and church groups, who said it would make criminals of parents. Opponents held public marches and rallies outside parliament. Mainstream church groups and child welfare organisations had strongly supported the change. http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/new...995227390.html Typical of most such laws, the interpretation of what constitutes "smacking" is anyone's guess. Max |
New Zealand outlaws smacking of children
"jlrogers" wrote in message . .. New Zealand effectively outlawed smacking children on Wednesday... Thursday through Tuesday is still good though, right? Scotty |
New Zealand outlaws smacking of children
"Scotty" wrote in message . .. "jlrogers" wrote in message . .. New Zealand effectively outlawed smacking children on Wednesday... Thursday through Tuesday is still good though, right? Only in months that end in 'y,' 'h,' 'l,' 'e,' 't,' and 'r.' Max |
New Zealand outlaws smacking of children
"Maxprop" wrote in message link.net.. .. "Scotty" wrote in message . .. "jlrogers" wrote in message . .. New Zealand effectively outlawed smacking children on Wednesday... Thursday through Tuesday is still good though, right? Only in months that end in 'y,' 'h,' 'l,' 'e,' 't,' and 'r.' What does one do during the other months? |
New Zealand outlaws smacking of children
Scotty wrote:
"Maxprop" wrote in message link.net.. . "Scotty" wrote in message m... "jlrogers" wrote in message et... New Zealand effectively outlawed smacking children on Wednesday... Thursday through Tuesday is still good though, right? Only in months that end in 'y,' 'h,' 'l,' 'e,' 't,' and 'r.' What does one do during the other months? Drown them.... |
New Zealand outlaws smacking of children
"Scotty" wrote in message . .. "Maxprop" wrote in message link.net.. . "Scotty" wrote in message . .. "jlrogers" wrote in message . .. New Zealand effectively outlawed smacking children on Wednesday... Thursday through Tuesday is still good though, right? Only in months that end in 'y,' 'h,' 'l,' 'e,' 't,' and 'r.' What does one do during the other months? Smack adults. Max |
New Zealand outlaws smacking of children
"katy" wrote in message ... Scotty wrote: "Maxprop" wrote in message link.net.. . "Scotty" wrote in message om... "jlrogers" wrote in message . net... New Zealand effectively outlawed smacking children on Wednesday... Thursday through Tuesday is still good though, right? Only in months that end in 'y,' 'h,' 'l,' 'e,' 't,' and 'r.' What does one do during the other months? Drown them.... Wo, Katy. You have a fight with Mr. Sails tonight or something??? Max |
New Zealand outlaws smacking of children
Maxprop wrote:
"katy" wrote in message ... Scotty wrote: "Maxprop" wrote in message rthlink.net.. . "Scotty" wrote in message news:nPWdnXyx1_nyDdbbnZ2dnUVZ_vyunZ2d@dejazzd. com... "jlrogers" wrote in message .net... New Zealand effectively outlawed smacking children on Wednesday... Thursday through Tuesday is still good though, right? Only in months that end in 'y,' 'h,' 'l,' 'e,' 't,' and 'r.' What does one do during the other months? Drown them.... Wo, Katy. You have a fight with Mr. Sails tonight or something??? Max Hey..makes as much sense as not smacking them..might as well drown them if they;'re going to take away parents rights to raise their children...they'll all grow up to be spoiled brats...good thing they live on a little island...maybe someone will put a fence up around it to keep them in once they're ruined...maybe they should import some officials from Bangkokj to straighten them out...maybe we should export willow switches under the guise that they're a decorative item...(I'm taking a swift approach to this problem...) |
New Zealand outlaws smacking of children
On May 16, 7:13 am, "jlrogers" wrote:
New Zealand effectively outlawed smacking children on Wednesday... "It is about our children and what I believe is their God-given right to grow up secure in the love of their family, valued as equal citizens to the rest of us and without the constant threat of legalised violence being used against them," the law's sponsor, Sue Bradford of the Green Party, said in parliament. The law change, first proposed in 2005, had been strongly opposed by conservative family and church groups, who said it would make criminals of parents. Opponents held public marches and rallies outside parliament. Mainstream church groups and child welfare organisations had strongly supported the change. http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/new...acking-of-chil... What if one good smack at the right time is all that is needed to straighten out a kid. This is another example of liberalism at it's worst. Parents won't stop smacking their kids if they deserve it. And worse what happens if the kids call the cops. If I was a parent and they did that, I'd say sure, your take him and support him. |
New Zealand outlaws smacking of children
"Bart" wrote in message
oups.com... On May 16, 7:13 am, "jlrogers" wrote: New Zealand effectively outlawed smacking children on Wednesday... "It is about our children and what I believe is their God-given right to grow up secure in the love of their family, valued as equal citizens to the rest of us and without the constant threat of legalised violence being used against them," the law's sponsor, Sue Bradford of the Green Party, said in parliament. The law change, first proposed in 2005, had been strongly opposed by conservative family and church groups, who said it would make criminals of parents. Opponents held public marches and rallies outside parliament. Mainstream church groups and child welfare organisations had strongly supported the change. http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/new...acking-of-chil... What if one good smack at the right time is all that is needed to straighten out a kid. This is another example of liberalism at it's worst. Parents won't stop smacking their kids if they deserve it. And worse what happens if the kids call the cops. If I was a parent and they did that, I'd say sure, your take him and support him. Beating a child is never effective as a solution to behavior problems. While outlawing it is stupid, the concept of doing it is also stupid. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
New Zealand outlaws smacking of children
"Capt. JG" wrote in message ... " Beating off is effective as a solution to behavior problems. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.or.later.com Oiy! |
New Zealand outlaws smacking of children
"Scotty" wrote in message ... "Capt. JG" wrote in message ... " Beating off is effective as a solution to behavior problems. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.or.later.com Oiy! Gaynz beats off children? Isn't that against the law? Wilbur Hubbard |
New Zealand outlaws smacking of children
"Scotty" wrote in message
... Beating off is effective as a solution to behavior problems. Oiy! -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
New Zealand outlaws smacking of children
"katy" wrote in message ... Maxprop wrote: "katy" wrote in message ... Scotty wrote: "Maxprop" wrote in message arthlink.net.. . "Scotty" wrote in message news:nPWdnXyx1_nyDdbbnZ2dnUVZ_vyunZ2d@dejazzd .com... "jlrogers" wrote in message y.net... New Zealand effectively outlawed smacking children on Wednesday... Thursday through Tuesday is still good though, right? Only in months that end in 'y,' 'h,' 'l,' 'e,' 't,' and 'r.' What does one do during the other months? Drown them.... Wo, Katy. You have a fight with Mr. Sails tonight or something??? Max Hey..makes as much sense as not smacking them..might as well drown them if they;'re going to take away parents rights to raise their children...they'll all grow up to be spoiled brats...good thing they live on a little island...maybe someone will put a fence up around it to keep them in once they're ruined...maybe they should import some officials from Bangkokj to straighten them out...maybe we should export willow switches under the guise that they're a decorative item...(I'm taking a swift approach to this problem...) Okay, I get your point. Had me worried there for a moment. Spare the rod, spoil the child. Applied 100 years ago, and still applicable today. Max |
New Zealand outlaws smacking of children
"Capt. JG" wrote in message ... "Bart" wrote in message oups.com... On May 16, 7:13 am, "jlrogers" wrote: New Zealand effectively outlawed smacking children on Wednesday... "It is about our children and what I believe is their God-given right to grow up secure in the love of their family, valued as equal citizens to the rest of us and without the constant threat of legalised violence being used against them," the law's sponsor, Sue Bradford of the Green Party, said in parliament. The law change, first proposed in 2005, had been strongly opposed by conservative family and church groups, who said it would make criminals of parents. Opponents held public marches and rallies outside parliament. Mainstream church groups and child welfare organisations had strongly supported the change. http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/new...acking-of-chil... What if one good smack at the right time is all that is needed to straighten out a kid. This is another example of liberalism at it's worst. Parents won't stop smacking their kids if they deserve it. And worse what happens if the kids call the cops. If I was a parent and they did that, I'd say sure, your take him and support him. Beating a child is never effective as a solution to behavior problems. While outlawing it is stupid, the concept of doing it is also stupid. What do you qualify as "beating a child?" Is a quick swat to the butt "beating" in your vernacular? If so, I'm beginning to see what went wrong with you. g Max |
New Zealand outlaws smacking of children
"Maxprop" wrote in message
link.net... "Capt. JG" wrote in message ... "Bart" wrote in message oups.com... On May 16, 7:13 am, "jlrogers" wrote: New Zealand effectively outlawed smacking children on Wednesday... "It is about our children and what I believe is their God-given right to grow up secure in the love of their family, valued as equal citizens to the rest of us and without the constant threat of legalised violence being used against them," the law's sponsor, Sue Bradford of the Green Party, said in parliament. The law change, first proposed in 2005, had been strongly opposed by conservative family and church groups, who said it would make criminals of parents. Opponents held public marches and rallies outside parliament. Mainstream church groups and child welfare organisations had strongly supported the change. http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/new...acking-of-chil... What if one good smack at the right time is all that is needed to straighten out a kid. This is another example of liberalism at it's worst. Parents won't stop smacking their kids if they deserve it. And worse what happens if the kids call the cops. If I was a parent and they did that, I'd say sure, your take him and support him. Beating a child is never effective as a solution to behavior problems. While outlawing it is stupid, the concept of doing it is also stupid. What do you qualify as "beating a child?" Is a quick swat to the butt "beating" in your vernacular? If so, I'm beginning to see what went wrong with you. g A quick swat on the butt for a baby/toddler might be excessively harsh and painful. Hitting a child is never a good idea. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com |
New Zealand outlaws smacking of children
"Capt. JG" wrote in message ... "Maxprop" wrote in message link.net... "Capt. JG" wrote in message ... "Bart" wrote in message oups.com... On May 16, 7:13 am, "jlrogers" wrote: New Zealand effectively outlawed smacking children on Wednesday... "It is about our children and what I believe is their God-given right to grow up secure in the love of their family, valued as equal citizens to the rest of us and without the constant threat of legalised violence being used against them," the law's sponsor, Sue Bradford of the Green Party, said in parliament. The law change, first proposed in 2005, had been strongly opposed by conservative family and church groups, who said it would make criminals of parents. Opponents held public marches and rallies outside parliament. Mainstream church groups and child welfare organisations had strongly supported the change. http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/new...acking-of-chil... What if one good smack at the right time is all that is needed to straighten out a kid. This is another example of liberalism at it's worst. Parents won't stop smacking their kids if they deserve it. And worse what happens if the kids call the cops. If I was a parent and they did that, I'd say sure, your take him and support him. Beating a child is never effective as a solution to behavior problems. While outlawing it is stupid, the concept of doing it is also stupid. What do you qualify as "beating a child?" Is a quick swat to the butt "beating" in your vernacular? If so, I'm beginning to see what went wrong with you. g A quick swat on the butt for a baby/toddler might be excessively harsh and painful. Hitting a child is never a good idea. Since the definition of "child" encompasses teens, I'd disagree. Both my mother and father spanked me--Dad with his bare hand, and Mom with one of Dad's oak fraternity paddles--and it was an effective attitude readjustment every time. As a result of the spankings I became neither a child-abuser with my own daughter, nor did I develop any antipathy for my parents. To the contrary, I gained respect for their word and their rules. I had it coming. Benjamin Spock wrote--over 30 years ago--that spanking a child is tantamount to abuse, and will result in children becoming sociopathic. So America quit paddling the kids. The net result has been several generations of adults who cannot or will not accept authority of any form. Many of these adults are uniformly unsuccessful in their lives. Max |
New Zealand outlaws smacking of children
"Maxprop" wrote in message link.net.. .. Since the definition of "child" encompasses teens, I'd disagree. Both my mother and father spanked me--Dad with his bare hand, and Mom with one of Dad's oak fraternity paddles--and it was an effective attitude readjustment every time. As a result of the spankings I became neither a child-abuser with my own daughter, nor did I develop any antipathy for my parents. To the contrary, I gained respect for their word and their rules. I had it coming. Benjamin Spock wrote--over 30 years ago--that spanking a child is tantamount to abuse, and will result in children becoming sociopathic. So America quit paddling the kids. The net result has been several generations of adults who cannot or will not accept authority of any form. Many of these adults are uniformly unsuccessful in their lives. 'BB Morgan' is a perfect example of this type of failure. SBV |
New Zealand outlaws smacking of children
"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message ... On Thu, 17 May 2007 19:28:39 -0700, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Maxprop" wrote in message thlink.net... "Capt. JG" wrote in message ... "Bart" wrote in message oups.com... On May 16, 7:13 am, "jlrogers" wrote: New Zealand effectively outlawed smacking children on Wednesday... "It is about our children and what I believe is their God-given right to grow up secure in the love of their family, valued as equal citizens to the rest of us and without the constant threat of legalised violence being used against them," the law's sponsor, Sue Bradford of the Green Party, said in parliament. The law change, first proposed in 2005, had been strongly opposed by conservative family and church groups, who said it would make criminals of parents. Opponents held public marches and rallies outside parliament. Mainstream church groups and child welfare organisations had strongly supported the change. http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/new...acking-of-chil... What if one good smack at the right time is all that is needed to straighten out a kid. This is another example of liberalism at it's worst. Parents won't stop smacking their kids if they deserve it. And worse what happens if the kids call the cops. If I was a parent and they did that, I'd say sure, your take him and support him. Beating a child is never effective as a solution to behavior problems. While outlawing it is stupid, the concept of doing it is also stupid. What do you qualify as "beating a child?" Is a quick swat to the butt "beating" in your vernacular? If so, I'm beginning to see what went wrong with you. g A quick swat on the butt for a baby/toddler might be excessively harsh and painful. Hitting a child is never a good idea. Children learn exactly what you teach them. Hitting them teaches them that that is the way to get what you want from others. So who was it that beat the **** outta you? Mom? Dad? Your siblings? Max |
New Zealand outlaws smacking of children
Maxprop wrote:
"katy" wrote in message ... Maxprop wrote: "katy" wrote in message ... Scotty wrote: "Maxprop" wrote in message . earthlink.net.. . "Scotty" wrote in message news:nPWdnXyx1_nyDdbbnZ2dnUVZ_vyunZ2d@dejazz d.com... "jlrogers" wrote in message gy.net... New Zealand effectively outlawed smacking children on Wednesday... Thursday through Tuesday is still good though, right? Only in months that end in 'y,' 'h,' 'l,' 'e,' 't,' and 'r.' What does one do during the other months? Drown them.... Wo, Katy. You have a fight with Mr. Sails tonight or something??? Max Hey..makes as much sense as not smacking them..might as well drown them if they;'re going to take away parents rights to raise their children...they'll all grow up to be spoiled brats...good thing they live on a little island...maybe someone will put a fence up around it to keep them in once they're ruined...maybe they should import some officials from Bangkokj to straighten them out...maybe we should export willow switches under the guise that they're a decorative item...(I'm taking a swift approach to this problem...) Okay, I get your point. Had me worried there for a moment. Unfortunately, the Kiwis migrate to Australia. Fortunately, most of them stay in Sydney. PDW |
New Zealand outlaws smacking of children
"Maxprop" wrote in message link.net.. .. A quick swat on the butt for a baby/toddler might be excessively harsh and painful. Hitting a child is never a good idea. Children learn exactly what you teach them. Hitting them teaches them that that is the way to get what you want from others. So who was it that beat the **** outta you? Mom? Dad? Your siblings? the little girl next door? |
New Zealand outlaws smacking of children
"PDW" wrote in message ... Maxprop wrote: "katy" wrote in message ... Maxprop wrote: "katy" wrote in message ... Scotty wrote: "Maxprop" wrote in message .earthlink.net.. . "Scotty" wrote in message news:nPWdnXyx1_nyDdbbnZ2dnUVZ_vyunZ2d@dejaz zd.com... "jlrogers" wrote in message igy.net... New Zealand effectively outlawed smacking children on Wednesday... Thursday through Tuesday is still good though, right? Only in months that end in 'y,' 'h,' 'l,' 'e,' 't,' and 'r.' What does one do during the other months? Drown them.... Wo, Katy. You have a fight with Mr. Sails tonight or something??? Max Hey..makes as much sense as not smacking them..might as well drown them if they;'re going to take away parents rights to raise their children...they'll all grow up to be spoiled brats...good thing they live on a little island...maybe someone will put a fence up around it to keep them in once they're ruined...maybe they should import some officials from Bangkokj to straighten them out...maybe we should export willow switches under the guise that they're a decorative item...(I'm taking a swift approach to this problem...) Okay, I get your point. Had me worried there for a moment. Unfortunately, the Kiwis migrate to Australia. Fortunately, most of them stay in Sydney. I was told they look a lot like dingos, and it's legal to shoot them in Oz, isn't it? Max |
New Zealand outlaws smacking of children
"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message ... On Mon, 21 May 2007 04:02:59 GMT, "Maxprop" wrote: "Charlie Morgan" wrote in message . .. On Thu, 17 May 2007 19:28:39 -0700, "Capt. JG" wrote: "Maxprop" wrote in message arthlink.net... "Capt. JG" wrote in message ... "Bart" wrote in message oups.com... On May 16, 7:13 am, "jlrogers" wrote: New Zealand effectively outlawed smacking children on Wednesday... "It is about our children and what I believe is their God-given right to grow up secure in the love of their family, valued as equal citizens to the rest of us and without the constant threat of legalised violence being used against them," the law's sponsor, Sue Bradford of the Green Party, said in parliament. The law change, first proposed in 2005, had been strongly opposed by conservative family and church groups, who said it would make criminals of parents. Opponents held public marches and rallies outside parliament. Mainstream church groups and child welfare organisations had strongly supported the change. http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/new...acking-of-chil... What if one good smack at the right time is all that is needed to straighten out a kid. This is another example of liberalism at it's worst. Parents won't stop smacking their kids if they deserve it. And worse what happens if the kids call the cops. If I was a parent and they did that, I'd say sure, your take him and support him. Beating a child is never effective as a solution to behavior problems. While outlawing it is stupid, the concept of doing it is also stupid. What do you qualify as "beating a child?" Is a quick swat to the butt "beating" in your vernacular? If so, I'm beginning to see what went wrong with you. g A quick swat on the butt for a baby/toddler might be excessively harsh and painful. Hitting a child is never a good idea. Children learn exactly what you teach them. Hitting them teaches them that that is the way to get what you want from others. So who was it that beat the **** outta you? Mom? Dad? Your siblings? Max I'm in a hurry, can you process these photos in 45 minutes? You seem to know a lot about such things. How long have you been a greeter at Wal-Mart? Max |
New Zealand outlaws smacking of children
"Scotty" wrote in message . .. "Maxprop" wrote in message link.net.. . A quick swat on the butt for a baby/toddler might be excessively harsh and painful. Hitting a child is never a good idea. Children learn exactly what you teach them. Hitting them teaches them that that is the way to get what you want from others. So who was it that beat the **** outta you? Mom? Dad? Your siblings? the little girl next door? Wow, that was an unfair fight. Poor BB . . . Max |
New Zealand outlaws smacking of children
"Charlie Morgan" wrote in message ... On Mon, 21 May 2007 21:24:56 GMT, "Maxprop" wrote: "Scotty" wrote in message m... "Maxprop" wrote in message link.net.. . A quick swat on the butt for a baby/toddler might be excessively harsh and painful. Hitting a child is never a good idea. Children learn exactly what you teach them. Hitting them teaches them that that is the way to get what you want from others. So who was it that beat the **** outta you? Mom? Dad? Your siblings? the little girl next door? Wow, that was an unfair fight. Poor BB . . . Max Poor Jeff Coppes, contact lens sales associate. Couldn't even get through REAL medical school. Now he has a contact lens business with two locations. Not even on his own, and not in a high traffic mall. His two locations are shared by a group of losers who couldn't make anything of themselves on their own. How sad is that? Is he on food stamps, too? I've seen his photo online. He looks like Archie Bunker except with absolutely no color and NO facial muscle tone. In other words, he's a puff pastry, not a man. His stories of fast cars, motorcycles and such smack of even more fantasy. If you saw what he looked like, you'd laugh at what he writes here. He's a phoney. Only someone as scatter brained as Katy would buy into his nonsense. Fake, fake, fake. Don't let me stop you from making a greater fool of yourself than everyone already knows you to be. Knock yourself out. Max |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com