Wilbur Hubbard wrote:

There are sailboats and there are sailboats. Your boat should be a
reflection of your own life's ambition. If you are just a poor schmuck
living in a double-wide in Pennsylvania then anything you can come up
with to sail I say more power to you. A working man has to do what he
can to get out on the water and should realize even an unnoteworthy
vessel is better than no vessel at all.


Keeping this in mind, don't you think it would be wise for a lawyer to
show up in this group with boat having a quality name. A Hinckley, a
Swan, a Wauquiez, a Morris, an Oyster, a Contest. You get the picture.
Could you honestly have much confidence in a lawyer who could not afford
one of the above or was so ignorant that he sailed a MacGregor 26?
---------------------------------------------------------------------

To anyone who hasn't realized it, Wilbur (or whoever he is) posted the
initial note trolling in an attempt to get a response from me (the only
lawyer on the ng who owns a MacGregor). Since I didn't take the bait, he
was stuck with all the indignant responses from everyone else and more
or less made an ass of himself. Sorry, Wilbur. - Better luck next time!

As for my legal practice, although I'm technically retired, I have all
the work I can handle, thank you.

Jim

"JimC" wrote in message
. net...


To anyone who hasn't realized it, Wilbur (or whoever he
is) posted the
initial note trolling in an attempt to get a response from
me (the only
lawyer in the USA dumb enough to own a MacGregor).


oh, don't be so hard on yourself, I'm sure there's one or
two more out there.



As for my legal practice, although I'm technically
retarded, I have all
the work I can handle, thank you.


Good for you.

Scotty

Scotty wrote:

"JimC" wrote in message
. net...


To anyone who hasn't realized it, Wilbur (or whoever he

is) posted the

initial note trolling in an attempt to get a response from

me



As for my legal practice, I

the work I can handle, thank you.



Good for you.

Scotty

Thanks for the kind words Scotty. Sorry you had to sell your Mac.

Jim

JimC wrote:


Scotty wrote:

"JimC" wrote in message
. net...


To anyone who hasn't realized it, Wilbur (or whoever he


is) posted the

initial note trolling in an attempt to get a response from


me


As for my legal practice, I


the work I can handle, thank you.




Good for you.

Scotty


Thanks for the kind words Scotty. Sorry you had to sell your Mac.

Jim



He's not...

"JimC" wrote in message
news

Thanks for the kind words Scotty. Sorry you had to sell
your Mac.

You're welcome. Oh, and I didn't have to sell my Mac, I
wanted to.

Scotty

Scotty wrote:
"JimC" wrote in message
news
Thanks for the kind words Scotty. Sorry you had to sell

your Mac.

You're welcome. Oh, and I didn't have to sell my Mac, I
wanted to.

Scotty



At the time, maybe. - But I've seen several notes you posted since then
that suggest you had some good times on your Mack.

Jim

"JimC" wrote in

You're welcome. Oh, and I didn't have to sell my Mac, I
wanted to.

Scotty



At the time, maybe. - But I've seen several notes you
posted since then
that suggest you had some good times on your Mack.


We had some *great* times on the old Mac.

What's your point?

Scotty

Scotty wrote:

"JimC" wrote in

You're welcome. Oh, and I didn't have to sell my Mac, I
wanted to.

Scotty



At the time, maybe. - But I've seen several notes you

posted since then

that suggest you had some good times on your Mack.



We had some *great* times on the old Mac.

What's your point?

Scotty

My point is that, in view of the "great times" you had on your Mac, you
should acknowledge that a Mac can be great fun. - (I never see anything
like that in any of your notes to or about me, which makes your notes
highly misrepresentative and misleading.)

As I have said many times, I'm only attempting to bring a semblance of
balance to discussion of the Macs that seem to delight a small vocal
minority on this ng. I'm not saying that the Macs don't have limitations.

OK. I answered in a rational, reasonable manner. Big mistake, right?. -
Bash away Scotty.


Jim

Scotty's sarcastic notes didn't address the gist of my original note, of
course. (They never do. - He seems to be afraid to actually get into a
discussion relating to the substance of what was posted. Like a spoiled
little brat, if he doesn't like the gist of the discussion, he hides
behind his snide, cutesy remarks so he won't have to actually respond to
what was said. - Knowing that if he did, he would get his ass kicked.)

But in any event, does anyone doubt what was stated in my post regarding
Wilbur's problems?

Jim




JimC wrote:



Wilbur Hubbard wrote:

There are sailboats and there are sailboats. Your boat should be a
reflection of your own life's ambition. If you are just a poor schmuck
living in a double-wide in Pennsylvania then anything you can come up
with to sail I say more power to you. A working man has to do what he
can to get out on the water and should realize even an unnoteworthy
vessel is better than no vessel at all.



Keeping this in mind, don't you think it would be wise for a lawyer to
show up in this group with boat having a quality name. A Hinckley, a
Swan, a Wauquiez, a Morris, an Oyster, a Contest. You get the picture.
Could you honestly have much confidence in a lawyer who could not
afford one of the above or was so ignorant that he sailed a MacGregor
26? ---------------------------------------------------------------------


To anyone who hasn't realized it, Wilbur (or whoever he is) posted the
initial note trolling in an attempt to get a response from me (the only
lawyer on the ng who owns a MacGregor). Since I didn't take the bait, he
was stuck with all the indignant responses from everyone else and more
or less made an ass of himself. Sorry, Wilbur. - Better luck next time!

As for my legal practice, although I'm technically retired, I have all
the work I can handle, thank you.

Jim

JimC wrote:
Scotty's sarcastic notes didn't address the gist of my original note, of
course. (They never do. - He seems to be afraid to actually get into a
discussion relating to the substance of what was posted. Like a spoiled
little brat, if he doesn't like the gist of the discussion, he hides
behind his snide, cutesy remarks so he won't have to actually respond to
what was said. - Knowing that if he did, he would get his ass kicked.)

But in any event, does anyone doubt what was stated in my post regarding
Wilbur's problems?

Jim




JimC wrote:



Wilbur Hubbard wrote:

There are sailboats and there are sailboats. Your boat should be a
reflection of your own life's ambition. If you are just a poor
schmuck living in a double-wide in Pennsylvania then anything you can
come up with to sail I say more power to you. A working man has to do
what he can to get out on the water and should realize even an
unnoteworthy vessel is better than no vessel at all.




Keeping this in mind, don't you think it would be wise for a lawyer
to show up in this group with boat having a quality name. A Hinckley,
a Swan, a Wauquiez, a Morris, an Oyster, a Contest. You get the
picture. Could you honestly have much confidence in a lawyer who
could not afford one of the above or was so ignorant that he sailed a
MacGregor 26?
---------------------------------------------------------------------



To anyone who hasn't realized it, Wilbur (or whoever he is) posted the
initial note trolling in an attempt to get a response from me (the
only lawyer on the ng who owns a MacGregor). Since I didn't take the
bait, he was stuck with all the indignant responses from everyone else
and more or less made an ass of himself. Sorry, Wilbur. - Better luck
next time!

As for my legal practice, although I'm technically retired, I have all
the work I can handle, thank you.

Jim

Take a pill, Jim...you're sounding strident...