Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

So, you're just being closed-minded... judge a book by its cover.

And, it's not a belief. It's a fact.



Yes...and we are responsible for the same rate of warming on
Mars...yep...right....and no..I'm not judging a book by its cover..I have
over the years seen his work and have amde my own evaluation....he is a
cess pool of misinformation and not much above the level of a National
Enquirer reproter...



Yes, you are. You didn't watch the show. You didn't listen to the debate.
You have no idea what went on.


Excuse me...I did listen to the debate...I watched the show sporadically
because it was boting as heck and was an obvious media thing....get a
life, Jon...go chew your nails or something...

"katy" wrote in message
...
Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

So, you're just being closed-minded... judge a book by its cover.

And, it's not a belief. It's a fact.



Yes...and we are responsible for the same rate of warming on
Mars...yep...right....and no..I'm not judging a book by its cover..I have
over the years seen his work and have amde my own evaluation....he is a
cess pool of misinformation and not much above the level of a National
Enquirer reproter...



Yes, you are. You didn't watch the show. You didn't listen to the debate.
You have no idea what went on.


Excuse me...I did listen to the debate...I watched the show sporadically
because it was boting as heck and was an obvious media thing....get a
life, Jon...go chew your nails or something...


You said, "I watched about 10 minutes of it at the beginning and 10 at the
end..." So, did you or didn't you watch the debate after the show?

It wasn't boring at all, and you would have realized that if you had
bothered to watch.

You started this Katy. I said there's a real possibility that Jesus' bones
are actually buried in Jerusalem, and you tried to debunk even having the
discussion.

Chew away!


--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

Capt. JG wrote:
"katy" wrote in message
...

Capt. JG wrote:

"katy" wrote in message
...


So, you're just being closed-minded... judge a book by its cover.

And, it's not a belief. It's a fact.



Yes...and we are responsible for the same rate of warming on
Mars...yep...right....and no..I'm not judging a book by its cover..I have
over the years seen his work and have amde my own evaluation....he is a
cess pool of misinformation and not much above the level of a National
Enquirer reproter...



Yes, you are. You didn't watch the show. You didn't listen to the debate.
You have no idea what went on.


Excuse me...I did listen to the debate...I watched the show sporadically
because it was boting as heck and was an obvious media thing....get a
life, Jon...go chew your nails or something...



You said, "I watched about 10 minutes of it at the beginning and 10 at the
end..." So, did you or didn't you watch the debate after the show?

It wasn't boring at all, and you would have realized that if you had
bothered to watch.

You started this Katy. I said there's a real possibility that Jesus' bones
are actually buried in Jerusalem, and you tried to debunk even having the
discussion.

Chew away!


I said specifically I watched the first 10 minutes of the show and the
last 10 miinutes and flipped back and forth while it was on to see if it
got any better...and the debate was AFTER the show...nit THE show...and
it doesn't really matter whether Jesus is buried in Jerusalem or
not...it has nothing to do with faith..the Ascension wasn't put into
theological dogma until the 5th century when Augustine decided that it
should be important and that it was apostolic in nature...whether He did
or didn't ascend has nothing to do with HIS message or the fact that He
died for mankind's sins...that He rose from the Dead is the vistory, not
that He may or may not have ascended bodily into wherever heaven might
be..or whatever Heaven might be...so finding His bones proves one
thing...He was there...He existed...finding His bones has little to do
with His message, which is the important thing...it is what Jesus said,
and what He did while on earth that is Christianity, not all the
foldetol people have decided to append to His life...byt ehe way, I am
an apostate Catholic...I do not adhere to Augfustinian thought or
Pauline theology..I am of the opinion that Pelagius was the correct
theologian and that if it had not been for the fact that Ausgustine was
a Bishop and had tremendous political sway, we would all be practicing
Christianity the way Pelagius descrived it...

In article ,
katy wrote:
I said specifically I watched the first 10 minutes of the show and the
last 10 miinutes and flipped back and forth while it was on to see if it
got any better...and the debate was AFTER the show...nit THE show...and
it doesn't really matter whether Jesus is buried in Jerusalem or
not...it has nothing to do with faith..the Ascension wasn't put into
theological dogma until the 5th century when Augustine decided that it
should be important and that it was apostolic in nature...whether He did
or didn't ascend has nothing to do with HIS message or the fact that He
died for mankind's sins...that He rose from the Dead is the vistory, not
that He may or may not have ascended bodily into wherever heaven might
be..or whatever Heaven might be...so finding His bones proves one
thing...He was there...He existed...finding His bones has little to do
with His message, which is the important thing...it is what Jesus said,
and what He did while on earth that is Christianity, not all the
foldetol people have decided to append to His life...byt ehe way, I am
an apostate Catholic...I do not adhere to Augfustinian thought or
Pauline theology..I am of the opinion that Pelagius was the correct
theologian and that if it had not been for the fact that Ausgustine was
a Bishop and had tremendous political sway, we would all be practicing
Christianity the way Pelagius descrived it...

If you had actually listened to the debate, you would have heard at
least one of the theologians say that not having his bones ascend
would put his faith in question.

This argument of yours sounds like you're arguing about how many
angels can live on the end of pin. It would be funny if you weren't so
serious.

--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com

Jonathan Ganz wrote:
In article ,
katy wrote:

I said specifically I watched the first 10 minutes of the show and the
last 10 miinutes and flipped back and forth while it was on to see if it
got any better...and the debate was AFTER the show...nit THE show...and
it doesn't really matter whether Jesus is buried in Jerusalem or
not...it has nothing to do with faith..the Ascension wasn't put into
theological dogma until the 5th century when Augustine decided that it
should be important and that it was apostolic in nature...whether He did
or didn't ascend has nothing to do with HIS message or the fact that He
died for mankind's sins...that He rose from the Dead is the vistory, not
that He may or may not have ascended bodily into wherever heaven might
be..or whatever Heaven might be...so finding His bones proves one
thing...He was there...He existed...finding His bones has little to do
with His message, which is the important thing...it is what Jesus said,
and what He did while on earth that is Christianity, not all the
foldetol people have decided to append to His life...byt ehe way, I am
an apostate Catholic...I do not adhere to Augfustinian thought or
Pauline theology..I am of the opinion that Pelagius was the correct
theologian and that if it had not been for the fact that Ausgustine was
a Bishop and had tremendous political sway, we would all be practicing
Christianity the way Pelagius descrived it...


If you had actually listened to the debate, you would have heard at
least one of the theologians say that not having his bones ascend
would put his faith in question.

This argument of yours sounds like you're arguing about how many
angels can live on the end of pin. It would be funny if you weren't so
serious.


ummm....we are talking about 2 different documentaries....I did not even
know there was a Geraldo Jesus documentary. I thought you were referring
to Al capone and the sealed up wall...

In article ,
katy wrote:
Jonathan Ganz wrote:
In article ,
katy wrote:

If you had actually listened to the debate, you would have heard at
least one of the theologians say that not having his bones ascend
would put his faith in question.

This argument of yours sounds like you're arguing about how many
angels can live on the end of pin. It would be funny if you weren't so
serious.


ummm....we are talking about 2 different documentaries....I did not even
know there was a Geraldo Jesus documentary. I thought you were referring
to Al capone and the sealed up wall...

You missed it! See....


--
Capt. JG @@
www.sailnow.com

Jonathan Ganz wrote:
In article ,
katy wrote:

Jonathan Ganz wrote:

In article ,
katy wrote:

If you had actually listened to the debate, you would have heard at
least one of the theologians say that not having his bones ascend
would put his faith in question.

This argument of yours sounds like you're arguing about how many
angels can live on the end of pin. It would be funny if you weren't so
serious.


ummm....we are talking about 2 different documentaries....I did not even
know there was a Geraldo Jesus documentary. I thought you were referring
to Al capone and the sealed up wall...


You missed it! See....


He's still a yellow journalist...