In the Aftermath of September 11, 2001: Some Thoughts for Leftists and Terrorists
 

In the aftermath of September 11, 2001: some thoughts for leftists and terrorists
to consider. . .


As evidenced here in this group and elsewhere, leftists (liberals) in the U.S.A., before
and during this election cycle, have been having a field day bashing this great country
and her leaders. They say the war against Islamic fascist terrorists is immoral. They
label our government and soldiers immoral and accuse them of being mercenaries,
rapists, torturers, genocidal, imperialistic and irrational. The basis of this slander is
their own immorality. Let me explain why . . .

Whatever may be open to disagreement, there is one act of evil that may not, the act
that no man may commit against others and no man may sanction or forgive. So long
as men desire to live together, no man may initiate - do you hear me? no man may
start the use of physical force against others.

Too interpose the threat of physical destruction between a man and his perception
is to negate and paralyze his means of survival; to force him to act against his own
judgment, is like forcing him to act against his own sight. Whoever, to whatever
purpose or extent, initiates the use of force, is a killer acting on the premise of death
in a manner wider than murder: the premise of destroying man's capacity to live.

Do not open your mouth to tell me that your mind has convinced you of your right to
force my mind. Force and mind are opposites; morality ends where the gun begins.
When you declare that men are irrational animals and propose to treat them as such,
you define thereby your own character and can no longer claim the sanction of
reason - as no advocate of contradiction can claim it. There can be no "right" to
destroy the source of rights, the only means of judging right and wrong: the mind.

To force a man to drop his own mind and to accept your will as a substitute, with a
gun or bomb in place of a syllogism, with terror in place of proof, and death as the
final argument - is to attempt to exist in defiance of reality.

Be it a highwayman who confronts a traveler with the ultimatum: "Your money or
your life," or a politician who confronts a country with the ultimatum: "Your children's
education or your life," the meaning of the ultimatum is: "Your mind or your life" - and
neither is possible to man without the other.

If there are degrees of evil, it is hard to say who is the more contemptible: the
brute who assumes the right to force the mind of others or the moral degenerate
who grants to others the right to force his mind. That is the moral absolute one does
not leave open to debate. And this is where leftists join with absolute evil because
they do not fight the forcing of the mind.

I do not grant the terms of reason to men who propose to deprive me of reason. I do
not enter discussions with neighbors who think they can forbid me to think. I do not
place my moral sanction upon a murderer's wish to kill me. When a man attempts to
deal with me by force, - I answer him with force.

It is only as retaliation that force may be used and only against the man who starts
its use. No, I do not share his evil or sink to his concept of morality: I merely grant
him his choice, destruction - the only destruction he has a right to chose: his own.
He uses force to seize a value; I use it only to destroy destruction. A holdup man
seeks to gain wealth by killing me; I do not grow richer by killing a holdup man. I
seek no value by means of evil, nor do I surrender my values to evil.

This is how conservatives think. This is the very core of conservative philosophy.
This is how they think and this is how they attempt to live their lives. This is why
conservatives fight the good fight. Is this evil in your minds? If so you are a leftist.
You don't see evil because you embrace evil, you embody evil, you perpetuate it.
This is why leftists want conservatives dead. This is the reason behind the 9-11
attacks. This is the Islamic fascist terrorist creed. You leftists and liberals who
surrender your minds to such as these are dead already as far as conservatives
are concerned. We ask only that you not reach out of your graves and drag us
down with you.

Note: Thanks to Ayn Rand for much of the above. If you liked what you just
read, may I suggest you read "Atlas Shrugged." You are the people this world
must count upon in order that the mind survive. . .


Paladin
(Have Blue Water Yacht - Will Travel)


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

In the Aftermath of September 11, 2001: Some Thoughts for Leftists and Terrorists
 

Maybe you could write it in English next time? :-)

Cheers,
Ellen (Paladin is a Gilligan sock puppet?)


"Paladin" noneofyourbusiness.www wrote
| In the aftermath of September 11, 2001: some thoughts for leftists and terrorists
| to consider. . .
|
|
| As evidenced here in this group and elsewhere, leftists (liberals) in the U.S.A., before
| and during this election cycle, have been having a field day bashing this great country
| and her leaders. They say the war against Islamic fascist terrorists is immoral. They
| label our government and soldiers immoral and accuse them of being mercenaries,
| rapists, torturers, genocidal, imperialistic and irrational. The basis of this slander is
| their own immorality. Let me explain why . . .
|
| Whatever may be open to disagreement, there is one act of evil that may not, the act
| that no man may commit against others and no man may sanction or forgive. So long
| as men desire to live together, no man may initiate - do you hear me? no man may
| start the use of physical force against others.
|
| Too interpose the threat of physical destruction between a man and his perception
| is to negate and paralyze his means of survival; to force him to act against his own
| judgment, is like forcing him to act against his own sight. Whoever, to whatever
| purpose or extent, initiates the use of force, is a killer acting on the premise of death
| in a manner wider than murder: the premise of destroying man's capacity to live.
|
| Do not open your mouth to tell me that your mind has convinced you of your right to
| force my mind. Force and mind are opposites; morality ends where the gun begins.
| When you declare that men are irrational animals and propose to treat them as such,
| you define thereby your own character and can no longer claim the sanction of
| reason - as no advocate of contradiction can claim it. There can be no "right" to
| destroy the source of rights, the only means of judging right and wrong: the mind.
|
| To force a man to drop his own mind and to accept your will as a substitute, with a
| gun or bomb in place of a syllogism, with terror in place of proof, and death as the
| final argument - is to attempt to exist in defiance of reality.
|
| Be it a highwayman who confronts a traveler with the ultimatum: "Your money or
| your life," or a politician who confronts a country with the ultimatum: "Your children's
| education or your life," the meaning of the ultimatum is: "Your mind or your life" - and
| neither is possible to man without the other.
|
| If there are degrees of evil, it is hard to say who is the more contemptible: the
| brute who assumes the right to force the mind of others or the moral degenerate
| who grants to others the right to force his mind. That is the moral absolute one does
| not leave open to debate. And this is where leftists join with absolute evil because
| they do not fight the forcing of the mind.
|
| I do not grant the terms of reason to men who propose to deprive me of reason. I do
| not enter discussions with neighbors who think they can forbid me to think. I do not
| place my moral sanction upon a murderer's wish to kill me. When a man attempts to
| deal with me by force, - I answer him with force.
|
| It is only as retaliation that force may be used and only against the man who starts
| its use. No, I do not share his evil or sink to his concept of morality: I merely grant
| him his choice, destruction - the only destruction he has a right to chose: his own.
| He uses force to seize a value; I use it only to destroy destruction. A holdup man
| seeks to gain wealth by killing me; I do not grow richer by killing a holdup man. I
| seek no value by means of evil, nor do I surrender my values to evil.
|
| This is how conservatives think. This is the very core of conservative philosophy.
| This is how they think and this is how they attempt to live their lives. This is why
| conservatives fight the good fight. Is this evil in your minds? If so you are a leftist.
| You don't see evil because you embrace evil, you embody evil, you perpetuate it.
| This is why leftists want conservatives dead. This is the reason behind the 9-11
| attacks. This is the Islamic fascist terrorist creed. You leftists and liberals who
| surrender your minds to such as these are dead already as far as conservatives
| are concerned. We ask only that you not reach out of your graves and drag us
| down with you.
|
| Note: Thanks to Ayn Rand for much of the above. If you liked what you just
| read, may I suggest you read "Atlas Shrugged." You are the people this world
| must count upon in order that the mind survive. . .
|
|
| Paladin
| (Have Blue Water Yacht - Will Travel)
|
|
| --
| Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|

In the Aftermath of September 11, 2001: Some Thoughts forLefti...
 

Stupid Ramblings!! Neal; in the name of Paladin, stated this BS!
---------------------------------------------------
So long as men desire to live together, no man may initiate - do you
hear me? no man may start the use of physical force against others.
_________________________________

Can anyone familiar with the ASA Group, ever forget Neal & his ?Lady
Friend bringing the "Meows" into our group with the intent of destroying
it?

Does anyone not remember George 2nd initiating and invasion of Irag
with a lie about weapons of mass destruction? Does anyone not remember
Neal's defending "The Bush" for his action.

invasion of privacy, torture of people without trial, people being held
without being charged, etc----I can't go on without rambling, which I'll
not do.

If you're interested in ramblings, Neal & his "Sock Puppets" are in rare
form with useless, dumb ass, BS rambling. Read his posts or his puppets


http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ILLDRINKTOTHAT



http://community.webtv.net/tassail/AFATCATSLIFE

In the Aftermath of September 11, 2001: Some Thoughts forLefti...
 

"Thom Stewart" wrote in message ...
| Stupid Ramblings!! Neal; in the name of Paladin, stated this BS!
| ---------------------------------------------------
| So long as men desire to live together, no man may initiate - do you
| hear me? no man may start the use of physical force against others.
| _________________________________
|
| Can anyone familiar with the ASA Group, ever forget Neal & his ?Lady
| Friend bringing the "Meows" into our group with the intent of destroying
| it?


You have GOT to be kidding! Are you so mad that you confuse posting to a newsgroup with man-to-man
physical force? Is your mind so twisted with anger that you honestly cannot see a difference between
the two?

|
| Does anyone not remember George 2nd initiating and invasion of Irag
| with a lie about weapons of mass destruction? Does anyone not remember
| Neal's defending "The Bush" for his action.
|

The more pertinant question is does Ole Thom remember that the
United Nations and Congress gave Mr. Bush permission to use military
force to depose Saddam Hussein? If Mr. Bush lied about weapons of
mass destruction so did Congress. So did John Kerry and most other
Democrat leaders. So did the intelligence agencies of most of the
world's powers. So did the United Nations and its inspectors. Are
they all liars?

Capt. Neal was correct to defend the President of the United States
of America for doing what had to be done. Unlike spineless leftist
Democrats the president did not shirk his obligations to protect America
from terrorists to which Saddam Hussein gave moral, physical and
financial support. If there are still a few active brain cells left
in that skull of yours try being objective for once. Here, read
this - all of it: http://markhumphrys.com/iraq.war.html

|
| invasion of privacy, torture of people without trial, people being held
| without being charged, etc----I can't go on without rambling, which I'll
| not do.
|

If you do not go on rambling I am afraid you will not go on at all because
rambling is all you have demonstrated you are able to do anymore. Shame
on you for badmouthing this country, her Commander-in-Chief and her
soldiers on Veteran's Day of all times. You, sir, are no patriot! You are
a snivelling ingrate!


Paladin
(Have Blue Water Yacht - Will Travel)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

In the Aftermath of September 11, 2001: Some Thoughts forLefti...
 

http://www.objectivistcenter.org/ct-..._and_Iraq.aspx