![]() |
Hey, Bart
Video of Dutchman system, which, while promotional, will allow you to
see why it has some issues. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8EPk...elated&search= RB 35s5 NY |
Hey, Bart
Capt. Rob wrote: Video of Dutchman system, which, while promotional, will allow you to see why it has some issues. ??? What issues? This video just shows how it works. You are talking nonsense again. Please remember to take your medication. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8EPk...elated&search= North Sails is the largest sail manufacturer in the world. They think the Dutchman System is the best sail flaking system and give supportable reasons in a side-by side comparison. The winner is clear. The link to the North Sails forum discusses the issues. The issues listed at North Sails are minor compared to what it does for you. They rate it the number one system available. That is all I have to say on the subject. Thanks for the video, and remember to take your meds, it will help you control your urge to shove your unsupported foot in you mouth. |
Hey, Bart
North Sails is the largest sail manufacturer in the world. Do you think North will sell you a Doyle Stackpack? Like I said. Ask people who used both systems and you'll have a clear winner. Or search online for comparisons in forums. Stackpack is prefered. RB 35s5 NY |
Hey, Bart
Total nonsense. The system is much better off the wind, and perhaps a few
flicks of the wrist is needed to get it to flake perfectly. I've used them for years on several different boats. Never had a problem. Never had a batten get caught in it. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Bart" wrote in message oups.com... Capt. Rob wrote: Video of Dutchman system, which, while promotional, will allow you to see why it has some issues. ??? What issues? This video just shows how it works. You are talking nonsense again. Please remember to take your medication. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8EPk...elated&search= North Sails is the largest sail manufacturer in the world. They think the Dutchman System is the best sail flaking system and give supportable reasons in a side-by side comparison. The winner is clear. The link to the North Sails forum discusses the issues. The issues listed at North Sails are minor compared to what it does for you. They rate it the number one system available. That is all I have to say on the subject. Thanks for the video, and remember to take your meds, it will help you control your urge to shove your unsupported foot in you mouth. |
Hey, Bart
Capt. JG wrote:
Total nonsense. The system is much better off the wind, and perhaps a few flicks of the wrist is needed to get it to flake perfectly. I've used them for years on several different boats. Never had a problem. Never had a batten get caught in it. We have Lazy Jacks...now...you want to talk about battens catching We have to do maneuvers both raising and lowering the main so we don't catch...better than nothing at all, though and having the main slide all over the coachtop.... |
Hey, Bart
I never liked LJs after the first couple of times using them... better than
nothing, and they work if you know what you're dealing with. Stack packs are nice, but I hate sailing around with all that fabric flapping in the breeze. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "katy" wrote in message ... Capt. JG wrote: Total nonsense. The system is much better off the wind, and perhaps a few flicks of the wrist is needed to get it to flake perfectly. I've used them for years on several different boats. Never had a problem. Never had a batten get caught in it. We have Lazy Jacks...now...you want to talk about battens catching We have to do maneuvers both raising and lowering the main so we don't catch...better than nothing at all, though and having the main slide all over the coachtop.... |
Hey, Bart
katy wrote:
Capt. JG wrote: Total nonsense. The system is much better off the wind, and perhaps a few flicks of the wrist is needed to get it to flake perfectly. I've used them for years on several different boats. Never had a problem. Never had a batten get caught in it. We have Lazy Jacks...now...you want to talk about battens catching We have to do maneuvers both raising and lowering the main so we don't catch...better than nothing at all, though and having the main slide all over the coachtop.... Why do you have the lazy jacks deployed while raising the main? On my boat I stow them at the mast while raising the sail and while under way. Then I deploy them just before I drop the sail. I haven't had it catch a batten while dropping the sail (so far...). --Alan |
Hey, Bart
Alan Gomes wrote:
katy wrote: Capt. JG wrote: Total nonsense. The system is much better off the wind, and perhaps a few flicks of the wrist is needed to get it to flake perfectly. I've used them for years on several different boats. Never had a problem. Never had a batten get caught in it. We have Lazy Jacks...now...you want to talk about battens catching We have to do maneuvers both raising and lowering the main so we don't catch...better than nothing at all, though and having the main slide all over the coachtop.... Why do you have the lazy jacks deployed while raising the main? On my boat I stow them at the mast while raising the sail and while under way. Then I deploy them just before I drop the sail. I haven't had it catch a batten while dropping the sail (so far...). --Alan Vecause they are permanent...you cannot deploy and undeploy them without having to unthread the whole thing and having to stand on the boom to rethread back through the blocks. There is not enough line to draw the whole thing back to the mast...and since out main is old, we've found that pulling the system taut in some situations keeps the main from bagging out...a consolation prize until we can afford a new main.... |
Hey, Bart
Total nonsense. The system is much better off the wind, and perhaps a
few flicks of the wrist is needed to get it to flake perfectly. I wonder if Ganzy has even used both systems. I notice no one can dispute the points I made. Chafing is reported even by North. So is the dirt problem. Read the forums and lots of folks cut the system down when sails age. You STILL have to battle the sail cover on. The Stackpack is superior. I've given plenty of reasons why. Let's see some intelligent discussion on it if you think otherwise. As I said...both are excellent. The Doyle system is just easier and neater. In fact, when the Stackpack is reefed, there's no sail material hanging out. Very nice indeed. Dutchman has licensed it's system and Doyle has not, so you see more of the Dutchman system. RB 35s5 NY |
Hey, Bart
Katy,
Lazy Jacks and Batten fouling. It sure does! I did correct it somewhat by attaching the "Jacks" to the boom with clips so that I could secure the the whole system at the mast during Main Sail hoisting. I preferred the jacks to the the "Dutchman" because of changing the Mains on Race Nights. A lite air main was awful nice on drifter nights but you had to get them off fast if the wind pick up. Katy, you can correct the batten fouling with two bungy cords at the :goose neck so that as you release tension on your jacks they will be automatically be drawn forward. By the way; You can see your "Cat" in the third attachment in the signature. http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ILLDRINKTOTHAT http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomPage http://community.webtv.net/tassail/IDONTFEELGOOD |
Hey, Bart
Dave wrote: Sorry, meant to say the "Doyle" system, not the "North" system in my previous post. Dave, the Dutchman is sold everywhere...or pretty much. The Doyle Stack pack is patented and only sold through Doyle. Lots of lofts like North won't even mention the stackpack for that reason, since they can't sell it. Of COURSE they told Bart it's the best. Ask folks who've used both and look online at forum comments. But beyond that, looking at both systems, it's a simple pick to use the one that requires no sail mods, keeps the sail clean and ends the sail cover hassle. Again...both are very nice, but the Doyle has clear advantages that the Dutchman loses points on. RB 35s5 NY |
Hey, Bart
Thom Stewart wrote:
Katy, Lazy Jacks and Batten fouling. It sure does! I did correct it somewhat by attaching the "Jacks" to the boom with clips so that I could secure the the whole system at the mast during Main Sail hoisting. I preferred the jacks to the the "Dutchman" because of changing the Mains on Race Nights. A lite air main was awful nice on drifter nights but you had to get them off fast if the wind pick up. Katy, you can correct the batten fouling with two bungy cords at the :goose neck so that as you release tension on your jacks they will be automatically be drawn forward. By the way; You can see your "Cat" in the third attachment in the signature. http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ILLDRINKTOTHAT http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomPage http://community.webtv.net/tassail/IDONTFEELGOOD hahahaha...that is the most obscene cat picture in the world.... I suspect that the previous owners of Chanteuse hacked off the excess line on the LH's...they will not loosen to the point of being able to do that...would end up with the bitter end flying through the block above...when we get a new main, I'll probably replace that line... |
Hey, Bart
Dave wrote:
On 4 Oct 2006 10:38:09 -0700, "Capt. Rob" ? said: ?Dave, the Dutchman is sold everywhere...or pretty much. The Doyle Stack ?pack is patented and only sold through Doyle. Methinks there's a great deal you need to learn [snip superfluous words]. Methinks you've hit the nail on the head! Cheers Marty ------------ And now a word from our sponsor --------------------- For a secure high performance FTP using SSL/TLS encryption upgrade to SurgeFTP ---- See http://netwinsite.com/sponsor/sponsor_surgeftp.htm ---- |
Hey, Bart
Nutsy,
Have you ever seen a Doyle Stack Pak on a racing boat in a race? I don't think so. The biggest objection I have to them, is the ungodly amount of windage they create on a Main that you are paying good Dollars to make efficient. Easy Yes; better than nothing???? Your boat really would suffer badly with a Sack Pak. Your larger Main is your primary driving engine and a Stack Pak flapping around the Boom with connected Lazy Jack would be a bad thing Ole Thom;--- Beach bum |
Hey, Bart
Yes, in fact, a reputable sailmaker would not recommend them for tired
sails. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Dave" wrote in message ... On 4 Oct 2006 10:38:09 -0700, "Capt. Rob" said: Ask folks who've used both and look online at forum comments. I do keep an eye out for comments on that topic. Generally, what I see favors the Dutchman except in the case of old sails. My limited direct experience with the Dutchman system points the same direction. |
Hey, Bart
Me thinks you all have nails IN the head. Excerpt from Doylesuperyacht: "This was soon followed by the introduction of the fully battened, self stowing, patented STACKPACK mainsail system." Look it up. RB 35s5 NY |
Hey, Bart
Dave...I've seen NO ONE in any forum pick a Dutchman over Stackpack. But that asside, why not address the points I made? 1) Stackpack keeps the sail completely covered. Dutchman does not. 2) Stackpack does not poke holes in the sail. Dutchman mods the sail with holes and plastic fittings. 3) Stackpack works well, even as the sail becomes older. Dutchman has problems with older sails. 4) Stackpack allows for quick removal of the entire covered main. 5) Stackpack can be removed for racing (That's correct, Thom). Dutchman is a mess to remove. 6) Stackpack allows for neater reefing. Dutchman reefing is messy by comparison/ 7) Stackpack never chafes. Dutchman can chafe. 8) Stackpack will work with more than one main...your current inventory. Dutchman requires EACH sail to be modded. That's a LOT of strikes against the dutchman. You can argue a few, but not all. Doyle Stackpack is the winner for a cruising boat. While the Doyle system can be removed for racing, I'd pick neither on a boat that was to be campaigned. As for Thom's worries about windage, it's really minimal, just a few inches higher than the covered main at the mast and barely any higher as it goes aft. The Sweden 39 owner, which has a pretty big rig, has had absolutley no problems with it and he's on M dock where there's more wind at the slips. He had the Dutchman system as I did before. RB 35s5 NY |
Hey, Bart
Thom Stewart wrote:
Katy, Lazy Jacks and Batten fouling. It sure does! I did correct it somewhat by attaching the "Jacks" to the boom with clips so that I could secure the the whole system at the mast during Main Sail hoisting. Th eonly problem with that is the main falls all over the place when you un-do the lazy jacks. I preferred the jacks to the the "Dutchman" because of changing the Mains on Race Nights. A lite air main was awful nice on drifter nights but you had to get them off fast if the wind pick up. Katy, you can correct the batten fouling with two bungy cords at the :goose neck so that as you release tension on your jacks they will be automatically be drawn forward. Another way is to secure the lazy jacks a short ways outboard of the mast on the spreaders. Handling full battens sails with lazy jacks can be a bit of a PITA but imho they're worth it. The Dutchman system keeps the sail totally under control at all times. DSK |
Hey, Bart
Do I correctly understand you to claim that both of you had Dutchman systems installed on your present boats, and removed them to replace them with your Doyle system? I removed my dutchman system. It's in my dockbox. He removed the system because he carries more than one main and races. As I said, for the Dutchman you need to convert each sail. The stackpack allows use of any main without mods. I notice that no one has addressed the points I made in favor of the Stackpack. Here they are again and I'd like to see someone, ANYONE refute these: 1) Stackpack keeps the sail completely covered. Dutchman does not. 2) Stackpack does not poke holes in the sail. Dutchman mods the sail with holes and plastic fittings. 3) Stackpack works well, even as the sail becomes older. Dutchman has problems with older sails. 4) Stackpack allows for quick removal of the entire covered main. 5) Stackpack can be removed for racing (That's correct, Thom). Dutchman is a mess to remove. 6) Stackpack allows for neater reefing. Dutchman reefing is messy by comparison/ 7) Stackpack never chafes. Dutchman can chafe. 8) Stackpack will work with more than one main...your current inventory. Dutchman requires EACH sail to be modded. Well? RB |
Hey, Bart
Not my experience. In fact, from what I saw of the Dutchman, you drop the sail and didn't even have to touch it further before putting on the cover. It simply falls into place neatly flaked on the boom. Like any system, even the Dutchman needs some help from time to time and it can out of whack from the wind when coming down. After a few years of regular sailing it can really lose it's flaking snap. The Doyle system continues to work well, even with older mains. Of course the Doyle doesn't have the step of putting on the cover at all and when it's zipped up, it's really sealed. When the Doyle system is reefed, the excess sail is neatly hidden in the cover! Anyone want to tackle the other points....here they are AGAIN! 1) Stackpack keeps the sail completely covered. Dutchman does not. 2) Stackpack does not poke holes in the sail. Dutchman mods the sail with holes and plastic fittings. 3) Stackpack works well, even as the sail becomes older. Dutchman has problems with older sails. 4) Stackpack allows for quick removal of the entire covered main. 5) Stackpack can be removed for racing (That's correct, Thom). Dutchman is a mess to remove. 6) Stackpack allows for neater reefing. Dutchman reefing is messy by comparison/ 7) Stackpack never chafes. Dutchman can chafe. 8) Stackpack will work with more than one main...your current inventory. Dutchman requires EACH sail to be modded. RB 35s5 NY |
Hey, Bart
My experience also. No system is perfect, but the Dutchman is easy and
efficient. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Dave" wrote in message ... On 4 Oct 2006 15:55:31 -0700, "Capt. Rob" said: 6) Stackpack allows for neater reefing. Dutchman reefing is messy by comparison/ Not my experience. In fact, from what I saw of the Dutchman, you drop the sail and didn't even have to touch it further before putting on the cover. It simply falls into place neatly flaked on the boom. |
Hey, Bart
Nutsy?
I know you can remove a Stack Pak BUT Nutsy; how do you handle the "JACK LINES" when you re-install it on the Furled Main? Nutsy, I do believe I'm addressing one of your DA points. |
Hey, Bart
I know you can remove a Stack Pak BUT Nutsy; how do you handle the "JACK LINES" when you re-install it on the Furled Main? You can order with the canvas holes clipped so that you just open them, slip the jack lines through and close them up again. AGAIN...both systems are great, but the Doyle Stackpack is more flexible, lasts for the whole life of the sail and is a LOT easier to use. RB 35s5 NY |
Hey, Bart
"Swab Rob" wrote in message oups.com.. .. But beyond that, looking at both systems, it's a simple pick Yulp a very simple pick, as always, do the opposite of what Bob recommends. Scotty |
Hey, Bart
Yulp a very simple pick, as always, do the opposite of what Bob recommends. Yes, you bought the opposite camera, right??!!! RB 35s5 NY |
Hey, Bart
"Capt. Rob" wrote in message oups.com.. .. Yulp a very simple pick, as always, do the opposite of what Bob recommends. caveat; when it comes to sailing stuff. Yes, you bought the opposite camera, right??!!! You are wrong!!!! SBV |
Hey, Bart
"Scotty" wrote in "Swab Rob" wrote But beyond that, looking at both systems, it's a simple pick Yulp a very simple pick, as always, do the opposite of what Bob recommends. Scotty An astute observation Scotty. He has such a dependent need to be noticed that he choses the opposite of the correct viewpoint. My 8 year old niece used to do this. Fortunately she grew out of it. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com