Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is absolute consensus. Human beings are a significant contributor, and
it's obvious if you look at the data. All reputable scientists understand that. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Bart" wrote in message ups.com... I think the Global Warming debate is whether mankind is a significant factor. Too often scientist use the media to further there own careers. While scientists with opposing viewpoints are ignored and treated like dirt. There is no consensus. It is clear the dominant factor is the sun--not man. With orbital tilt, wobble and other factors being directly related to the amount of sunlight incident on the earth determining the temperature of the earth. Next comes volcano's. It was one of these that caused the Ross Ice shelf to break off--not man. And volcano's have been proven to cause cooling. Do you blame man for causing volcano's? All the land mass on the earth--every continent can fit into the area of the Pacific Ocean with room left over for another South America. That is just the Pacific Ocean. The ocean surface is huge. The influence of man is very minor compared to other factors. The earth will always be either warming or cooling. Since cooling tends to happen more rapidly, we should be thankful the current trend is for warming. If you don't like it, lobby for nuking unstable volcano's to set them going again. A small amout of dust in the air will end global warming. I am not opposed to sensible measures to ensure we don't destroy and pollute our planet. I am opposed to letting the media decide to sensationalize global warming for the Liberal political agenda. Walt wrote: Bart wrote: A bit of ash in the air in the northern latitudes might just start the next ice age. Liberals prepare to change sides to global coolilng. Helms A-Lee! Um, the difference between the sides on the global warming issue is not liberal vs. conservative, but rather science vs. non-science. Please get your terms right. Thank you. Yes, it's possible that the scientific consensus may change. Right now it's overwhelmingly in one direction - and one potential volcano eruption won't change that. Although if it does blow we'll see a short cooling period like we did after Mt St Helens. http://www.ktva.com/alaska/ci_4381772 Interesting article. //Walt |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Latest From Me | UK Paddle |