![]() |
Liberals Rally Around Bush
"Capt. JG" wrote in message ... Yes, they're all tax free, but it seems like there should be some limits and stiffer requirements. Some of the charities only really give a small percentage of what they bring in to the people they claim they're helping. Yup. The United Way has distributed less than 10% of its collected funds in some past years. They're doing somewhat better now, but they've had to cook the books to make the program look more efficient. My take: if a charity can't legitimately show that it distributes 70% of its revenues, it should not be tax exempt. Max |
Liberals Rally Around Bush
"Dave" wrote in message ... On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 11:06:19 -0400, Charlie Morgan said: Eliminate all music from every source and see what happens. Then, if there is still anything left, remove all visual art. There's a reason I said it depends very much on what you call art. There's no doubt the entertainment industry is a significant economic engine. Most of its output, however, I wouldn't dignify with the word "art." Thank you. Max |
Liberals Rally Around Bush
Oh come on. You're going to claim that because I used the phrase 1/2 of
Manhattan, you're going to take that so literally that 2000+ properties is insignificant?? You're just being obviously obtuse to what? provoke an argument? Why don't you for once respond in the spirit of the discussion. -- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Dave" wrote in message ... Hate to burst your little bubble, Jon, but there are more than 4,000 buildings in Manhattan. (4,000 is of course the magic number required to make your statement true.) On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:04:44 -0700, "Capt. JG" said: Do you deny that they own huge chunks of the city? They're one of the major landowners, have been for a long time. One of the many, many articles that give you a number for their vast holdings... http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...C0A9669582 60 "Besides the Roman Catholic Church, which owns 2,000 buildings in New York City..." But, of course, you don't believe the NY Times, right? |
Liberals Rally Around Bush
Thanks for answering the question.
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Dave" wrote in message ... On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 21:04:39 -0700, "Capt. JG" said: Oh come on. You're going to claim that because I used the phrase 1/2 of Manhattan, you're going to take that so literally that 2000+ properties is insignificant?? You weren't even in the right ballpark. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com