"Capt. Rob" wrote in message
oups.com...

I had a feeling you'd post that link. Those are not for the new Sedona.
It's an all new Minivan that has about as nothing in common with the
old one.

If you'd like to see what owners are saying....

http://autos.msn.com/research/userre...?modelid=12019

It's the highest rated car of ANY kind on MSN reviews.

But let's try Edmunds....

http://www.edmunds.com/new/2006/kia/..._consumer.html

Skoda also scores very highly in customer satisfaction reviews.

However, your accountant doesn't drive a Skoda. He doesn't drive a Sedona
for the same reason. Have you ever seen a sucessful film director in a
Skoda or a Kia? Of course not!! Both cars signify failure. I cannot
believe that you are driving a Kia. I bet that you really drive a Lexus!



Regards


Donal
--

However, your accountant doesn't drive a Skoda. He doesn't drive a Sedona
for the same reason.


Actually, my accountant sails a J35 and drives the old Sedona for
moving people and sailing gear. It's about as good as a dodge caravan.
My attorney sails a Tayana 48 DS and loves our Sedona so much he's
trying to dump out of his Jeep lease early. As you can read for
yourself, the new Sedona is a whole new minivan and a serious stab at
the class leaders, besting them in several areas. But didn't you just
say I only follow tried and true items....yet I bought one of the very
1st Subaru Tribeca's and Sedonas....Hmmmm.
Looks like I shot down every one of your trolls...with ease as usual.
Why did you trade to a powerboat?


RB
35s5
NY

I cannot
believe that you are driving a Kia. I bet that you really drive a
Lexus!



Donal...we can clearly learn a lot from you. Please direct us to a page
showing the current Lexus minivan. I must have missed it.


RB
35s5
NY

Speaking of cars...Did I mention that I bought one of these for my
wife a few months back?
http://www.mynrma.com.au/peugeot_407_st_hdi.asp


We call that spousal abuse here.


RB
35s5
NY

Then you'd be ignorant of quality vehicles.



Yeah...some quality. The name just rolls off the tongue. Dealer network
ran from the USA with the highest level of major failures since Yugo
hit the streets.
No thanks.



RB
35s5
NY

That was a long time ago...when they were trying to match the quality
of US cars ;-)


Mission accomplished!


RB
35s5
NY

OzOne wrote:
Speaking of cars...Did I mention that I bought one of these for my
wife a few months back?
http://www.mynrma.com.au/peugeot_407_st_hdi.asp


The six speed manual? Now that's cool.

Our "new" car, the Toyota Camry we bought a few years back,
just turned over 105k miles and still in showroom shape. I'm
going to wait a few more years and buy a hybrid.

Regards
Doug King

The six speed manual? Now that's cool.



Mys Terry wrote:
Yeah. That engine must have a very narrow power band to need 6 speeds.
Is it also available with a dump truck body?


If ya can't find 'em, grind 'em.

Why assume a narrow power band, why not a higher top speed
and better passing gear? I drove a 5 speed for year that
topped out at ~150 and wished many times for a sixth gear.

OTOH if the wife stalking is a bit slow this morning and you
obviously have no intelligent comment to make, why not.

DSK

Why assume a narrow power band, why not a higher top speed
and better passing gear? I drove a 5 speed for year that
topped out at ~150 and wished many times for a sixth gear.


Doug, read the reviews for the 407. It does indeed have a pretty poor
and narrow powerband. The 6 speed tranny is a downstream from a much
better engine config.


RB
35s5
NY

Mys Terry wrote:
Sure Doug. What car were you driving 150 mph, and which video arcade
was it?


You're the stalker, why don't you know? Not very good at it?

That car was a 911S, the manual said it should do 155 IIRC.

A six shift would have been very handy in the higher speed
range for hills & for passing. Nobody ever complained the
901 series had "a narrow power band" and the S had bigger
pots anyway.

DSK