Bob Crantz wrote:
Something must be up. In general, (pun aside) these are men of honor and
duty. The fact so many of them have spoken up (not a common occurence, ever)
says something is astray.


And while there has often been background grumbling about
mismanagement of a war, AFAIK there hasn't been so many
senior people agreeing on so much, so specifically.


Did you know that the Rumsfield/Bush agenda was to REDUCE the size of the
beloved Marine Corps?


They didn't think they needed 'em.


Has oil revenues from Iraq paid for the occupation? Remember, that was
Rumsfeld's plan.


Well, he got the idea from the "New American Century" guys
who were unabashed imperialists back in the 1990s. One of
the things they hate Clinton for is that they told him to
invade Iraq and he wouldn't listen.


Bush and the Bushbots are trigger happy, very quick to shoot the messenger.


That's because their aim is too poor to shoot the cause,
which is always further away.


Compassionate Conservative = Outspend the Liberals


On advertising.

Next stop - War with Iran!

Glory to God!


That's right, maybe we can reverse the age-old historic
dictum about getting involved in a land war in Asia.

DSK