Revolt of the Generals
 

In article , Dave
wrote:

On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 08:46:16 -0600, "Bob Crantz"
said:

B attempts to trivialize A. C supports A. If B is true then A and C are
false.

Sorry, Bob it ain't worth effort to try and parse that.

Wasn't that difficult but then I had to learn predicate logic, not
chop-logic as is mandatory in law school.

PDW

Revolt of the Generals
 

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006 18:02:35 -0400, DSK said:

Bob Crantz wrote:
hehehehe!!!

The troop withdrawal was an error on the part of the WSJ. They retracted
it
today.

Jumped a little too fast to defend Rummy for something he didn't do, eh?


But you just *know* that WSJ op-ed article was totally 'fair
& balanced' as well as 100% accurate, right?

Sometimes I think Dave is working to be President Bush's
next pick for the Supreme Court.

Hmm. I'm puzzled. I have no idea what troop withdrawal he's talking about.
Nor do I find a retraction of anything in today's Journal, which I have in
front of me. The only correction they published today has to do with an
error in a review of a book entitled "Why People Die by Suicide" which
appeared on April 15. So what troop withdrawal is he talking about, and
where does this supposed retraction appear in the paper?

You supplied the numbers and date on the troop reduction for the Marine
Corps. Where did you get the data from?

Rumsfeld never talked about a troop withdrawal. But you defended him on it.
It's obvious you have no idea what he is talking about.

Revolt of the Generals
 

Sometimes I think Dave is working to be President Bush's next pick for the
Supreme Court.


Bob Crantz wrote:
He's a Bushbot. He took it hook, line and sinker to defend Rummy even though
Rummy did nothing wrong. That's the problem with the Bushbots. There's no
critical thinking, criticism is not acceptable and they destroy the
critics - even if they are loyal Republicans.

Heck, they even went after AARP for not ballyhooing their
plan to loot Social Security.


... Bush and his minions has done
more to destroy the Republican party(and America) than anyone else.


This explains it so perfectly, it's scary:

http://www.workingforchange.com/comic.cfm?itemid=19635

DSK

Revolt of the Generals
 

Republican Spin:

"Of three thousand retired generals only a half dozen have been critical of
the handling of Iraq by Rumsfeld"

Three thousand generals:

Over one thousand in medical, supply and support who can offer no valid
opinion.

Fifteen hundred working for defense contractors, if they spoke up they'd
lose government business. Their business is continuing the war.

Five hundred on life support.

That doesn't leave too many left.

Funny, though, that the ones who did criticize operated in theater with very
recent commands. Yet their word is negated by the absence of speech from
hundreds of retired supply clerks and generals on respirators.

With that kind of logic one could not prove the sky is blue because the
occupants of a cemetery can't confirm it!

The Republican spin is getting desperate.

Medicare prescription program costs over twice what the administration said
= Bush lied!

Compassionate Conservative = Bush lied!

Swears, on a Bible, to uphold the Constitution = Bush lied!

Spending goes through the roof, Bush claims he is Republican = Bush lied!

Operation gridlock full steam ahead!

Amen!

Revolt of the Generals
 

"DSK" wrote in message
...
Sometimes I think Dave is working to be President Bush's next pick for
the Supreme Court.


Bob Crantz wrote:
He's a Bushbot. He took it hook, line and sinker to defend Rummy even
though Rummy did nothing wrong. That's the problem with the Bushbots.
There's no critical thinking, criticism is not acceptable and they
destroy the critics - even if they are loyal Republicans.

Heck, they even went after AARP for not ballyhooing their plan to loot
Social Security.


... Bush and his minions has done more to destroy the Republican
party(and America) than anyone else.


This explains it so perfectly, it's scary:

http://www.workingforchange.com/comic.cfm?itemid=19635

DSK


It's Rumsfeld and the Pentagon that want to reduce the force numbers because
of costs and Congress won't have it:

http://www.navyleague.org/sea_power/apr06-08.php

Remember, this is the free spending Republican Congress and George "what is
a veto" Bush.

Bush = no vetoes ever = wimp!