| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#10
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
Hey Joe!
"Bob Crantz" wrote in message ... "Maxprop" wrote in message link.net... "Bob Crantz" wrote in message . .. Is light a particle or a wave? It is correctly described by both theories. Max Theories don't describe, they explain. So if light can at times be a particle (having mass)and at other times be a wave (pure energy) and two different forms of "descriptions" must be used (and applied appropriately a priori) something is amiss. Even more strange is that individual photons have only circular polarization. An ensemble is needed to get linear polarization. Seems to rule out a pure EM wave doesn't it? Throw in the fact that the phase of its wave function is altered by a abstraction called the vector potential (this supposedly has no physical meaning) and one can really begin to wonder. Unified theory? ahahahahahahahahahaaaaaa!!!!!!! Energy transfered without a media? ahahahahahahaaa!!!! Different rules for Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday? ahahahahahahaaaaa!!!!!! Aahahahahahahahahahahahaaaa!!!!!!! Amen! Does anyone really care? Max |
Threaded Mode
