Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
David wrote:
Bart thanks so much for the input.... So you don't think the wider beam of the Catalina (10' 10" vs 8' 3") will allow the catalina to handle heavier seas than the Cascade? No, rather the opposite if anything. Wide beam gives initial stability but reduces reserve stability and increases the the chance of the boat inverting & staying that way. When it comes to seakindliness & heavy weather sailing, narrower is better. And this is just MHO but the Cascade is likely to be better built than the Catalina. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "DSK" wrote in message .. . No, rather the opposite if anything. Wide beam gives initial stability but reduces reserve stability and increases the the chance of the boat inverting & staying that way. When it comes to seakindliness & heavy weather sailing, narrower is better. How nice to read such a glowing endorsement of my boat. Max |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
1980 Cascade 29 | General |