LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa
Joe
 
Posts: n/a
Default Throwing Sand in the Arabs Vasaline

It's not Nationalisation but an issue of national security.

In the cold war we did not let the Russians make propellors for our
submarines.
Or fuel for our trident missles now did we?

Joe

  #2   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa
Maxprop
 
Posts: n/a
Default Throwing Sand in the Arabs Vasaline


"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com...
It's not Nationalisation but an issue of national security.

In the cold war we did not let the Russians make propellors for our
submarines.
Or fuel for our trident missles now did we?


We were at odds with the Soviet Union then.

Are we at odds with the UAE now?

Max


  #3   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa
Joe
 
Posts: n/a
Default Throwing Sand in the Arabs Vasaline

Sort of..
They can not be trusted, and would chopp your head off in a heart beat
if it was in the best interest of the UAE.

They know how to protect themselves, did you see the posting on all
that is required to open a business in the UAE?

Even if we are not at odds with them ....allowing ANY foreign country
owned companies to run our ports is stupid. Something is totally ****ed
up if we need them here to do the job for us.

Hunter was right when he said "We seem to be our own worst enemies"
"We should require critical U.S. infrastructure to remain in U.S.
hands."

Do you dis-agree with Hunter?

Joe

  #4   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa
Bob Crantz
 
Posts: n/a
Default Throwing Sand in the Arabs Vasaline

The Ruskies make rocket engines for us now.

The US got some metallurgical technology from the Nazis in exchange for some
US technology.

The Japs were the only ones making low noise figure transistors for the US
military in the 70's and 80's.

Mitsubishi made the propeller milling equipment for US submarines.

Numerous Israeli companies make some very sophisticated missle radome
measurement and design equipment and sell to both the US and Red China.

Loral provided all the key info for China to upgrade their ICBM's aimed at
the US.





"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com...
It's not Nationalisation but an issue of national security.

In the cold war we did not let the Russians make propellors for our
submarines.
Or fuel for our trident missles now did we?

Joe



  #5   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa
Joe
 
Posts: n/a
Default Throwing Sand in the Arabs Vasaline

The Ruskies are our comrades now since we can crush them at any time.

Sounds like a trade with the Nazi's. We musta did better since we
crushed them.

Re training the Japs to make us transitor radios was needed to break
the cycle of imperial ignorance and worship.
I have no problem sourceing parts from other countries as a last
resort, but never turn over to them what we can do and rely on for
national security.

Proof on the Mitsubishi milling BS ?

We own Isreal.

Loral should be burned to the ground...... if true... and they knew
what they were doing IMO.
A stiff prison term at the least for it's decision makers.

Joe



  #6   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa
Bob Crantz
 
Posts: n/a
Default Throwing Sand in the Arabs Vasaline

Toshiba, not Mitsubishi on the 7 and 9 axis milling machines:

http://www.japanlaw.info/lawletter/april87/fdf.htm

http://cns.miis.edu/pubs/npr/vol04/41/gill41.pdf


US Companies improving Chinese missle capabilities:

http://biz.yahoo.com/e/050907/orfr.ob8-k.html

http://www.secinfo.com/dr89b.z21s.d.htm


Russian rocket engines on US military rockets:

http://www.fas.org/spp/military/prog...80730-eelv.htm

Loral, from the Library of Congress:

http://www.fas.org/spp/starwars/cong...980617-kan.htm

We own Israel? Read on about what we own:

http://www.ussliberty.org/


Joe, in case you haven't figured it out, US defense contractors routinely
give our enemies technologies so they can stay in business building even
better technologies. If the US was truly superior to its enemies (which it
could be) the defense industry would go out of business. Why do you think we
have wars so often?

As far as training the Japs to make transistors, they are the ones who never
needed training. Never has US semiconductor capabilities matched the
Japanese.

What about parts from other countries not as a last resort but because they
are simply the best? There is no second choice to the best.





"Joe" wrote in message
ups.com...
The Ruskies are our comrades now since we can crush them at any time.

Sounds like a trade with the Nazi's. We musta did better since we
crushed them.

Re training the Japs to make us transitor radios was needed to break
the cycle of imperial ignorance and worship.
I have no problem sourceing parts from other countries as a last
resort, but never turn over to them what we can do and rely on for
national security.

Proof on the Mitsubishi milling BS ?

We own Isreal.

Loral should be burned to the ground...... if true... and they knew
what they were doing IMO.
A stiff prison term at the least for it's decision makers.

Joe



  #7   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa
Peter Wiley
 
Posts: n/a
Default Throwing Sand in the Arabs Vasaline

In article et, Bob
Crantz wrote:

Toshiba, not Mitsubishi on the 7 and 9 axis milling machines:

http://www.japanlaw.info/lawletter/april87/fdf.htm

http://cns.miis.edu/pubs/npr/vol04/41/gill41.pdf


US Companies improving Chinese missle capabilities:

http://biz.yahoo.com/e/050907/orfr.ob8-k.html

http://www.secinfo.com/dr89b.z21s.d.htm


Russian rocket engines on US military rockets:

http://www.fas.org/spp/military/prog...80730-eelv.htm

Loral, from the Library of Congress:

http://www.fas.org/spp/starwars/cong...980617-kan.htm

We own Israel? Read on about what we own:

http://www.ussliberty.org/


Joe, in case you haven't figured it out, US defense contractors routinely
give our enemies technologies so they can stay in business building even
better technologies. If the US was truly superior to its enemies (which it
could be) the defense industry would go out of business. Why do you think we
have wars so often?

As far as training the Japs to make transistors, they are the ones who never
needed training. Never has US semiconductor capabilities matched the
Japanese.

What about parts from other countries not as a last resort but because they
are simply the best? There is no second choice to the best.


Wasn't it Heinlein that said there's nothing so expensive as a second
best military?

PDW
  #8   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa
Bob Crantz
 
Posts: n/a
Default Throwing Sand in the Arabs Vasaline


"Peter Wiley" wrote in message
. ..
In article et, Bob
Crantz wrote:

Toshiba, not Mitsubishi on the 7 and 9 axis milling machines:

http://www.japanlaw.info/lawletter/april87/fdf.htm

http://cns.miis.edu/pubs/npr/vol04/41/gill41.pdf


US Companies improving Chinese missle capabilities:

http://biz.yahoo.com/e/050907/orfr.ob8-k.html

http://www.secinfo.com/dr89b.z21s.d.htm


Russian rocket engines on US military rockets:

http://www.fas.org/spp/military/prog...80730-eelv.htm

Loral, from the Library of Congress:

http://www.fas.org/spp/starwars/cong...980617-kan.htm

We own Israel? Read on about what we own:

http://www.ussliberty.org/


Joe, in case you haven't figured it out, US defense contractors routinely
give our enemies technologies so they can stay in business building even
better technologies. If the US was truly superior to its enemies (which
it
could be) the defense industry would go out of business. Why do you think
we
have wars so often?

As far as training the Japs to make transistors, they are the ones who
never
needed training. Never has US semiconductor capabilities matched the
Japanese.

What about parts from other countries not as a last resort but because
they
are simply the best? There is no second choice to the best.


Wasn't it Heinlein that said there's nothing so expensive as a second
best military?


True, but who bears the expense? In today's world the US pays for the best
and second best militaries.


PDW



  #9   Report Post  
posted to alt.sailing.asa
Peter Wiley
 
Posts: n/a
Default Throwing Sand in the Arabs Vasaline

In article .com, Joe
wrote:

It's not Nationalisation but an issue of national security.


Yeah, Joe, sure it is. Anything can be made out to be national security.

I mean, you can't get more fundamental than food, can you? Why don't
you forbid foreign corporations or individuals from owning productive
agricultural land?

Then there's telecoms. Better reserve that for US only.

What about steel & other metals? Better do them too, just to be safe.

Etc.

Hypocrisy, Joe, pure hypocrisy.

PDW
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017