Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Having a hanked on a 25% on that did not need reefing in high winds.
Joe |
#2
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
This would have required planning that he was obviously incapable of doing.
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Joe" wrote in message ups.com... Having a hanked on a 25% on that did not need reefing in high winds. Joe |
#3
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe wrote:
Having a hanked on a 25% on that did not need reefing in high winds. And I guess having one of those magic forestays that can have a sailed hanked onto it from the cockpit would help a lot, too. DSK |
#4
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thinking ahead, then relying on near fail proof equipment next.
Yes.... in that order. Joe |
#5
![]()
posted to alt.sailing.asa
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Only this loser probably had 140 on his furler as his
only headsail. He could have rigged a downhaul for his jib. I've heard of people doing that, but I've never seen anyone using such a system. "Joe" wrote Having a hanked on a 25% on that did not need reefing in high winds. Joe |