|
Go ahead, make my day
Remember when Reagan said that?
Take a look: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824 Who is the biggest wimp on that graph? Amen! |
Go ahead, make my day
"Bob Crantz" wrote in message nk.net... Remember when Reagan said that? Take a look: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824 Who is the biggest wimp on that graph? No surprises there. Max |
Go ahead, make my day
Bob Crantz wrote:
Remember when Reagan said that? Take a look: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824 Who is the biggest wimp on that graph? Amen! It's not valid unles you also know the composition of the House and Senate for cross-comparison... |
Go ahead, make my day
"katy" wrote in message ... Bob Crantz wrote: Remember when Reagan said that? Take a look: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824 Who is the biggest wimp on that graph? Amen! It's not valid unles you also know the composition of the House and Senate for cross-comparison... An excellent point. Instead of looking at the composition of the House and Senate, let's first look at the results: 1. Largest growth in federal spending in almost 40 years. 2. Another war on an undefined enemy. 3. Federal survillence of US citizens increased. 4. Police state powers increase. 5. Massive increases in entitlement spending. All these laws, entitlements, etc originate in the House or Senate. Bush can approve or disapprove of them. Republicans are the party of smaller government, self reliance and freedom. Bush is either not a Republican or a wimp. The choice is yours. Amen! PS I saw a giant Texas style beehive last night at Costco on an old blonde. I laughed and that of you. If I only had a camera. Glory! |
Go ahead, make my day
PS I saw a giant Texas style beehive last night at Costco on an old
blonde. I laughed and that of you. If I only had a camera. Glory! Did she have on PS I saw a giant Texas style beehive last night at Costco on an old blonde. I laughed and that of you. If I only had a camera. Glory! Was she wearing red patent leather Go Go boots? Joe |
Go ahead, make my day
Bob Crantz wrote:
"katy" wrote in message ... Bob Crantz wrote: Remember when Reagan said that? Take a look: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824 Who is the biggest wimp on that graph? Amen! It's not valid unles you also know the composition of the House and Senate for cross-comparison... An excellent point. Instead of looking at the composition of the House and Senate, let's first look at the results: 1. Largest growth in federal spending in almost 40 years. 2. Another war on an undefined enemy. 3. Federal survillence of US citizens increased. 4. Police state powers increase. 5. Massive increases in entitlement spending. All these laws, entitlements, etc originate in the House or Senate. Bush can approve or disapprove of them. Republicans are the party of smaller government, self reliance and freedom. Bush is either not a Republican or a wimp. The choice is yours. Amen! PS I saw a giant Texas style beehive last night at Costco on an old blonde. I laughed and that of you. If I only had a camera. Glory! There are no checks and balances when all branches if the government are on the same side... Since Congress is also Republican, and he is not vetoing them, it means that Congress has also drifted away from their own identification... |
Go ahead, make my day
"katy" wrote in message ... Bob Crantz wrote: "katy" wrote in message ... Bob Crantz wrote: Remember when Reagan said that? Take a look: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824 Who is the biggest wimp on that graph? Amen! It's not valid unles you also know the composition of the House and Senate for cross-comparison... An excellent point. Instead of looking at the composition of the House and Senate, let's first look at the results: 1. Largest growth in federal spending in almost 40 years. 2. Another war on an undefined enemy. 3. Federal survillence of US citizens increased. 4. Police state powers increase. 5. Massive increases in entitlement spending. All these laws, entitlements, etc originate in the House or Senate. Bush can approve or disapprove of them. Republicans are the party of smaller government, self reliance and freedom. Bush is either not a Republican or a wimp. The choice is yours. Amen! PS I saw a giant Texas style beehive last night at Costco on an old blonde. I laughed and that of you. If I only had a camera. Glory! There are no checks and balances when all branches if the government are on the same side... Since Congress is also Republican, and he is not vetoing them, it means that Congress has also drifted away from their own identification... Yet more brilliance! Vote for gridlock. Get politicians at each other's throats! Amen! |
Go ahead, make my day
In article et,
Bob Crantz wrote: Remember when Reagan said that? Take a look: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824 Who is the biggest wimp on that graph? Amen! Reagan... he just couldn't say yes. -- Capt. JG @@ www.sailnow.com |
Go ahead, make my day
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... In article et, Bob Crantz wrote: Remember when Reagan said that? Take a look: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824 Who is the biggest wimp on that graph? Amen! Reagan... he just couldn't say yes. I'm glad to see at least someone overwhelmingly approves of Bush. You must be a good Republican. There's too much Bush bashing going on. We're at war and must stand by our President no matter what. Lloyd Bonafide |
Go ahead, make my day
"katy" wrote in message ... Bob Crantz wrote: "katy" wrote in message ... Bob Crantz wrote: Remember when Reagan said that? Take a look: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824 Who is the biggest wimp on that graph? Amen! It's not valid unles you also know the composition of the House and Senate for cross-comparison... An excellent point. Instead of looking at the composition of the House and Senate, let's first look at the results: 1. Largest growth in federal spending in almost 40 years. 2. Another war on an undefined enemy. 3. Federal survillence of US citizens increased. 4. Police state powers increase. 5. Massive increases in entitlement spending. All these laws, entitlements, etc originate in the House or Senate. Bush can approve or disapprove of them. Republicans are the party of smaller government, self reliance and freedom. Bush is either not a Republican or a wimp. The choice is yours. Amen! PS I saw a giant Texas style beehive last night at Costco on an old blonde. I laughed and that of you. If I only had a camera. Glory! There are no checks and balances when all branches if the government are on the same side... Since Congress is also Republican, and he is not vetoing them, it means that Congress has also drifted away from their own identification... How can you say that, Katy? Kennedy, Johnson, and Carter all had democratically-controlled Congresses during their terms in office, and they exercised their vetos a number of times. Bush has completely lost perspective. He is pandering to those who wouldn't vote for him under any circumstances. I think he's doing this to attempt to improve his approval ratings. Foolish move, as his ratings haven't improved among those to whom he is pandering, and they've fallen precipitously with those of us who mistakenly took him to be a conservative republican. Max |
Go ahead, make my day
"Lloyd Bonafide" wrote in message . .. "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... In article et, Bob Crantz wrote: Remember when Reagan said that? Take a look: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824 Who is the biggest wimp on that graph? Amen! Reagan... he just couldn't say yes. I'm glad to see at least someone overwhelmingly approves of Bush. You must be a good Republican. There's too much Bush bashing going on. We're at war and must stand by our President no matter what. LOL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Max |
Go ahead, make my day
Maxprop wrote:
"katy" wrote in message ... Bob Crantz wrote: "katy" wrote in message ... Bob Crantz wrote: Remember when Reagan said that? Take a look: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824 Who is the biggest wimp on that graph? Amen! It's not valid unles you also know the composition of the House and Senate for cross-comparison... An excellent point. Instead of looking at the composition of the House and Senate, let's first look at the results: 1. Largest growth in federal spending in almost 40 years. 2. Another war on an undefined enemy. 3. Federal survillence of US citizens increased. 4. Police state powers increase. 5. Massive increases in entitlement spending. All these laws, entitlements, etc originate in the House or Senate. Bush can approve or disapprove of them. Republicans are the party of smaller government, self reliance and freedom. Bush is either not a Republican or a wimp. The choice is yours. Amen! PS I saw a giant Texas style beehive last night at Costco on an old blonde. I laughed and that of you. If I only had a camera. Glory! There are no checks and balances when all branches if the government are on the same side... Since Congress is also Republican, and he is not vetoing them, it means that Congress has also drifted away from their own identification... How can you say that, Katy? Kennedy, Johnson, and Carter all had democratically-controlled Congresses during their terms in office, and they exercised their vetos a number of times. Bush has completely lost perspective. He is pandering to those who wouldn't vote for him under any circumstances. I think he's doing this to attempt to improve his approval ratings. Foolish move, as his ratings haven't improved among those to whom he is pandering, and they've fallen precipitously with those of us who mistakenly took him to be a conservative republican. Max None of them had anywhere near the number of their constituents in Congress that Bush has. The problems in this country need ro be klaid down to all involved, not just one person. Congress is every bit as much as fault as the President... |
Go ahead, make my day
"Bob Crantz" wrote
Instead of looking at the composition of the House and Senate, let's first look at the results: 1. Largest growth in federal spending in almost 40 years. 2. Another war on an undefined enemy. 3. Federal survillence of US citizens increased. 4. Police state powers increase. 5. Massive increases in entitlement spending. All these laws, entitlements, etc originate in the House or Senate. Both of which were/are controlled by Republican majorities. Bush can approve or disapprove of them. Republicans are the party of smaller government, self reliance and freedom. Bush is either not a Republican or a wimp. The choice is yours. He is not a Republican AND a wimp. He is a National Socialist. |
Go ahead, make my day
"Bob Crantz" wrote
PS I saw a giant Texas style beehive last night at Costco on an old blonde. I was sitting on the bridge railing going into Tijuana one Sunday morning sharing a last pint of tequila and some lime & salt with a couple friends and some local kids eager to learn colloquial so-cal English so they could 'pass' when along came this huge fat woman in a moo-moo and beehive and began berating us for being ugly Americans. It was so bizarre nobody even laughed. |
Go ahead, make my day
"Maxprop" wrote
Bush has completely lost perspective. He is pandering to those who wouldn't vote for him under any circumstances. I think he's doing this to attempt to improve his approval ratings. Foolish move, as his ratings haven't improved among those to whom he is pandering, and they've fallen precipitously with those of us who mistakenly took him to be a conservative republican. Whatever led you to believe that Bush (or Reagan) were conservatives. Goldwater was a conservative. Bush is a National Socialist. The differences between him and, say, Schumer are the same as those dividing Hitler and Stalin. |
Go ahead, make my day
In article ,
Vito wrote: "Maxprop" wrote Bush has completely lost perspective. He is pandering to those who wouldn't vote for him under any circumstances. I think he's doing this to attempt to improve his approval ratings. Foolish move, as his ratings haven't improved among those to whom he is pandering, and they've fallen precipitously with those of us who mistakenly took him to be a conservative republican. Whatever led you to believe that Bush (or Reagan) were conservatives. Goldwater was a conservative. Bush is a National Socialist. The differences between him and, say, Schumer are the same as those dividing Hitler and Stalin. Schumer? I was thinking Frist. -- Capt. JG @@ www.sailnow.com |
Go ahead, make my day
"katy" wrote in message ... Maxprop wrote: "katy" wrote in message ... Bob Crantz wrote: "katy" wrote in message ... Bob Crantz wrote: Remember when Reagan said that? Take a look: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824 Who is the biggest wimp on that graph? Amen! It's not valid unles you also know the composition of the House and Senate for cross-comparison... An excellent point. Instead of looking at the composition of the House and Senate, let's first look at the results: 1. Largest growth in federal spending in almost 40 years. 2. Another war on an undefined enemy. 3. Federal survillence of US citizens increased. 4. Police state powers increase. 5. Massive increases in entitlement spending. All these laws, entitlements, etc originate in the House or Senate. Bush can approve or disapprove of them. Republicans are the party of smaller government, self reliance and freedom. Bush is either not a Republican or a wimp. The choice is yours. Amen! PS I saw a giant Texas style beehive last night at Costco on an old blonde. I laughed and that of you. If I only had a camera. Glory! There are no checks and balances when all branches if the government are on the same side... Since Congress is also Republican, and he is not vetoing them, it means that Congress has also drifted away from their own identification... How can you say that, Katy? Kennedy, Johnson, and Carter all had democratically-controlled Congresses during their terms in office, and they exercised their vetos a number of times. Bush has completely lost perspective. He is pandering to those who wouldn't vote for him under any circumstances. I think he's doing this to attempt to improve his approval ratings. Foolish move, as his ratings haven't improved among those to whom he is pandering, and they've fallen precipitously with those of us who mistakenly took him to be a conservative republican. Max None of them had anywhere near the number of their constituents in Congress that Bush has. The problems in this country need ro be klaid down to all involved, not just one person. Congress is every bit as much as fault as the President... I'd agree with that, Katy, except for the fact that the Prez is supposed to fulfill a leadership role, especially when Congress is largely favorable to him. He is pandering to Congress, too. By the way, W passed within ten feet of me today. Motorcade drove by at twice the speed limit and all the affected streets were closed for almost an hour. The big limo with the flags has such dark windows--I suspect the Prez was riding in any of the other vehicles, including the truck that looks like a swat team vehicle, rather than his limo. Security. Max |
Go ahead, make my day
A few days ago the shrub flew over the house after visitng NREL.
Shouldn't he be working? Amen! "Maxprop" wrote in message nk.net... "katy" wrote in message ... Maxprop wrote: "katy" wrote in message ... Bob Crantz wrote: "katy" wrote in message ... Bob Crantz wrote: Remember when Reagan said that? Take a look: http://www.freedom4um.com/cgi-bin/re...i?ArtNum=19824 Who is the biggest wimp on that graph? Amen! It's not valid unles you also know the composition of the House and Senate for cross-comparison... An excellent point. Instead of looking at the composition of the House and Senate, let's first look at the results: 1. Largest growth in federal spending in almost 40 years. 2. Another war on an undefined enemy. 3. Federal survillence of US citizens increased. 4. Police state powers increase. 5. Massive increases in entitlement spending. All these laws, entitlements, etc originate in the House or Senate. Bush can approve or disapprove of them. Republicans are the party of smaller government, self reliance and freedom. Bush is either not a Republican or a wimp. The choice is yours. Amen! PS I saw a giant Texas style beehive last night at Costco on an old blonde. I laughed and that of you. If I only had a camera. Glory! There are no checks and balances when all branches if the government are on the same side... Since Congress is also Republican, and he is not vetoing them, it means that Congress has also drifted away from their own identification... How can you say that, Katy? Kennedy, Johnson, and Carter all had democratically-controlled Congresses during their terms in office, and they exercised their vetos a number of times. Bush has completely lost perspective. He is pandering to those who wouldn't vote for him under any circumstances. I think he's doing this to attempt to improve his approval ratings. Foolish move, as his ratings haven't improved among those to whom he is pandering, and they've fallen precipitously with those of us who mistakenly took him to be a conservative republican. Max None of them had anywhere near the number of their constituents in Congress that Bush has. The problems in this country need ro be klaid down to all involved, not just one person. Congress is every bit as much as fault as the President... I'd agree with that, Katy, except for the fact that the Prez is supposed to fulfill a leadership role, especially when Congress is largely favorable to him. He is pandering to Congress, too. By the way, W passed within ten feet of me today. Motorcade drove by at twice the speed limit and all the affected streets were closed for almost an hour. The big limo with the flags has such dark windows--I suspect the Prez was riding in any of the other vehicles, including the truck that looks like a swat team vehicle, rather than his limo. Security. Max |
Go ahead, make my day
"Bob Crantz" wrote in message ink.net... A few days ago the shrub flew over the house after visitng NREL. Shouldn't he be working? He's campaigning . . . at US taxpayers' expense, of course. I guess every other prez has done the same thing, so it's not just him. Any idea what Air Force 1 flys for per hour? Max |
Go ahead, make my day
"Maxprop" wrote ... The big limo with the flags has such dark windows--I suspect the Prez was .... ......mooning you, and you didn't even see it? SV |
Go ahead, make my day
In article , OzOne wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 22:01:21 GMT, "Maxprop" scribbled thusly: hour. The big limo with the flags has such dark windows--I suspect the Prez was riding in any of the other vehicles, including the truck that looks like a swat team vehicle, rather than his limo. Security. Max Frightened little monkey.. Maybe if he puts his flight suit back on, he'll feel better. -- Capt. JG @@ www.sailnow.com |
Go ahead, make my day
$57,000
http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/atty...es/002382.html "Maxprop" wrote in message ink.net... "Bob Crantz" wrote in message ink.net... A few days ago the shrub flew over the house after visitng NREL. Shouldn't he be working? He's campaigning . . . at US taxpayers' expense, of course. I guess every other prez has done the same thing, so it's not just him. Any idea what Air Force 1 flys for per hour? Max |
Go ahead, make my day
"Scotty" wrote in message ... "Maxprop" wrote ... The big limo with the flags has such dark windows--I suspect the Prez was .... .....mooning you, and you didn't even see it? Well, I guess that would only be fair. We were mooning him. Max |
Go ahead, make my day
"Bob Crantz" wrote in message .net... "Maxprop" wrote in message Any idea what Air Force 1 flys for per hour? $57,000 http://www.pnionline.com/dnblog/atty...es/002382.html Well, I don't know about you, but that makes me feel a whole lot better, knowing my tax dollars are being well-spent. Max |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:45 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com