![]() |
Beneteau First
I'm looking at purchasing a Beneteau First, either a 25.7 or 27.7.
Has anyone any advice to give either positive or negative. How well do they stand up to sea conditions etc. -- Adrian Smith |
Beneteau First
'm looking at purchasing a Beneteau First, either a 25.7 or 27.7.
Has anyone any advice to give either positive or negative. Adirain, most of the folks here don't have any experience with newer boats like a 27.7. You need to join the Beneteau sailnet.com groups and ask there. My own experience is that the newer boats have less quality below, but this applies less to the boats you're looking at of course. Good luck, RB Beneteau 35s5 NY |
Beneteau First
"Capt. Rob" wrote in message oups.com... 'm looking at purchasing a Beneteau First, either a 25.7 or 27.7. Has anyone any advice to give either positive or negative. Adirain, most of the folks here don't have any experience with newer boats like a 27.7. You need to join the Beneteau sailnet.com groups and ask there. My own experience is that the newer boats have less quality below, but this applies less to the boats you're looking at of course. Good luck, RB Beneteau 35s5 NY Can't find anything on there about the new Beneteau Firsts, ie the 25.7 or 27.7. I'll keep looking and obviously ask questions there. Thanks for the tip. -- Adrian Smith |
Beneteau First
On 17 Jan 2006, "Adrian Smith" wrote:
I'm looking at purchasing a Beneteau First, either a 25.7 or 27.7. Has anyone any advice to give either positive or negative. How well do they stand up to sea conditions etc. Because there haven't been many sales of these newer boats in the U.S., you might do better pursuing questioning French and other European oriented sailing groups. The last most recent precursor sold/marketed in the U.S. was the 33.7, which is well built but was pretty much of a bust in terms of performance (in most conditions, it didn't sail faster than a well-sailed non-"First" series "cruising" oriented B331, its closest B-made boat in terms of size, etc.), although the well performing B 36.7 has become very popular in numerous parts of the U.S. |
Beneteau First
well built but was pretty much of a bust in terms of
performance (in most conditions, it didn't sail faster than a well-sailed non-"First" series "cruising" oriented B331, its closest B-made boat in terms of size, etc.), A first 33.7 will sail circles around any Oceanus 331 across the board. Check the specs, read the ratings and check with owners. They are vastly different performing boats. RB 35s5 NY |
Beneteau First
Adrian, I think you are looking at the right sort of boat
for a fun daysailor or weekender. You might want to check out this new design based on many sailors, and being built in China. The Flying Tiger 10-Meter http://www.mauisailingnews.com/ft10m/ http://www.sailmag.com/boatreviews/FlyingTiger/ I think the FT-10 will become a cult boat based on the interaction of the design with the sailing community, coupled with it's low production costs. And it fits in a shipping container--making it a worldwide sailor-- sort of. My feeling is the Bent-e-toads are not going to be very popular. 4850.16 lb weight for the 27.7 is a bit heavier than the FT-10 at 4300 lbs. It could be trailered with permits so each could travel. And it's beamy enough to provide some form stablity and useable space. I'm surprized the 27.7 doesn't have twin rudders like the 25.7 What is the price for these two? More than the FT-10 at $44k. I'd like to know more about these boats. If you find out anything more, please report back with your findings. "Adrian Smith" wrote I'm looking at purchasing a Beneteau First, either a 25.7 or 27.7. Has anyone any advice to give either positive or negative. How well do they stand up to sea conditions etc. -- Adrian Smith |
Beneteau First
What is the price for these two? More than the FT-10
at $44k. The FT-10 is no longer 44K. That was a pre-production price and it's done. It remains to be seen how the FT-10 will do or hold up. The FT-10 is also bigger than either of the Beneteaus of course. If the FT-10 is a dud it will be worth almost nothing. At least the Beneteau's will have some value being from a major builder. The layout of the larger FT-10 looks to be better for the occasional cruise. RB 35s5 NY |
Beneteau First
On 17 Jan 2006, "Capt. Rob" wrote:
well built but was pretty much of a bust in terms of performance (in most conditions, it didn't sail faster than a well-sailed non-"First" series "cruising" oriented B331, its closest B-made boat in terms of size, etc.), A first 33.7 will sail circles around any Oceanus 331 across the board. Check the specs, read the ratings and check with owners. They are vastly different performing boats. I don't have to check the specs because my statement you quote above is based on substantial direct experience sailing both (although the key sales guy for one of the two main B dealers in the area had also noted the what he termed "embarrassment" associated with this factoid). And, BTW, why do you think B isn't marketing the B 33.7 at least on the U.S. coasts except in the most passive of ways? |
Beneteau First
What is the price for these two? More than the FT-10
at $44k. I'm not even sure any dealers have plans to import either of these two. The Beneteau 10R Capt. Rob wrote: The FT-10 is no longer 44K. That was a pre-production price and it's done. IIRC that was the price before it was agreed that everybody wanted the carbon fiber mast. ... It remains to be seen how the FT-10 will do or hold up. The FT-10 is also bigger than either of the Beneteaus of course. If the FT-10 is a dud it will be worth almost nothing. At 80-something boats, it's already a bigger one-design class than many. And it's unlikely that a hi-tech sports boat will drop to "worth almost nothing." .... At least the Beneteau's will have some value being from a major builder. Spoken like a person who bases his opinion of a boat on the advertising. DSK |
Beneteau First
Spoken like a person who bases his opinion of a boat on the
advertising. Capt. Rob wrote: No, Doug. Spoken like a person who brokered three Beneteau's last year Yeah, I bet. ... But leave it to you to start a troll in yet another good sailing thread. Have you sailed an F25.7 or F27.7, which is what this thread started out as? No? Then why did you "troll" this thread, to share your opinion of their advertising layouts? We're interested in how the boats SAIL, not their relative marketing strategies. DSK |
Beneteau First
in yet another good sailing thread.
Have you sailed an F25.7 or F27.7, which is what this thread started out as? No, Doug. But I did sail a First 35s5, First 32s5 and a 33.7. I also own a 35s5. I also sailed on a J105 last season (just the once). You, on the other hand, sail a trawler and your last sailboat was a Hunter 19!!! I did three times the sailing you did last summer and I didn't even have a boat until October! My comments were not directed at you nor designed to start a fight as your's clearly are. You wanna be a big man, but you own a powerboat and never owned a boat as nice or as fast as mine. You're so bitter, it stinks like sour grapes in your every response to me. Live with it, Doug. You own a chunky trawler. I can't imagine why nor do I care much. I'm sorry for you, but it's not my problem. If anyone needs advice on a powerboat or low-end Hunter, you're thier man. Doug, you know some crap about boats, and a lot more about sailing. But when it comes to boats, design and details on actual cruising/racing boats I'm 100% certain you're full of ****. You still NEVER produced a boat to match the features of mine point for point within the parameters I gave and you don't even understand WHY you couldn't. RB 35s5 NY |
Beneteau First
We're interested in how the boats SAIL, not their relative
marketing strategies. Wrong again, Doug. And this just backs up everything I've said about you. The original question was about any advice positive or negative and how they stand up to sea conditions. Bart's opinion, while less than educated, was just fine. My opinion was based on being aboard the newer 1st series boats. I also let the fellow know that resale might be something to look into with a major builder vs. one less known. Where's the bad advice, Doug? You gave NOTHING because you knew nothing. You haven't been aboard these boats, but my small response still bugged you because it was more than you knew. Luckily I had the good sense to send him away from here to an area where he can speak to owners and folks who have sailed the boat. Again, more useful than anything you contributed. Oh, and guess what, Doug? I still own a nicer sailboat than you and I ALWAYS will. A liveaboard is next for us (When Thomas is five) and you can bet my wife would never want a trawler. RB 35s5 NY |
Beneteau First
I don't have to check the specs because my statement you quote above
is based on substantial direct experience sailing both Oh, I'd just "guess" that the 33.7 with more sail area, almost half a ton less disp. and a PHRF much lower than the 331 indicated it might be a far better performing boat. And, BTW, why do you think B isn't marketing the B 33.7 at least on the U.S. coasts except in the most passive of ways? Because it's out of production???? Live and learn. Okay, just live. RB 35s5 NY |
Beneteau LAST
Adrian Smith wrote: I'm looking at purchasing a Beneteau First, either a 25.7 or 27.7. Has anyone any advice to give either positive or negative. How well do they stand up to sea conditions etc. -- Adrian Smith After spending a day on my 35s5 I can only suggest you looks at other cheap production boats. Find something of quality that will last if taken out of the slip, beneteaus just are not up to the task. After all my 35s5 is just a stepping stone, I will sell it for a profit soon. You all will crap Mac Trucks when you see my next boat RB 35s5 Stepping Stone NY |
Beneteau First
Quit talking about things you don't understand
and could never comprehend. Get back to work swabbing! That meets your knowledge and capabilities. "Swabbie Robbie" wrote in message have some value being from a major builder. |
Beneteau First
Sea conditions? It's a day sailor!
Try sailing one Swabbie. Boat show tours don't count as being "on-board". You will never catch up to Doug in knowledge or experience. If you want to communication with Doug try supplication instead of weak, limp, and lame arguments. Remember Swabs start at the bottom and work up. You continue to dig yourself deeper into the mud and detritus. "Swabbie Robbie" wrote Wrong again, Doug. And this just backs up everything I've said about you. The original question was about any advice positive or negative and how they stand up to sea conditions. Bart's opinion, while less than educated, was just fine. My opinion was based on being aboard the newer 1st series boats. I also let the fellow know that resale might be |
Beneteau First
Quit talking about things you don't understand
and could never comprehend. Spoken by a guy who continues to try to assemble his boat from spare parts, rather than just buy a usable boat and go sailing. Good work, Bart! RB 35s5 NY |
Beneteau First
Adrian Smith wrote:
I'm looking at purchasing a Beneteau First, either a 25.7 or 27.7. Has anyone any advice to give either positive or negative. How well do they stand up to sea conditions etc. Hey, I cruised a 27.7 last summer for three days. The wind was between 5 and 20 kts, so I can't say how it handles in rough conditions, but under the weather me had, I really enjoyed sailing it! The boat is really fast compared to other 27-footers, especially on open winds. All the equipment on deck I found more than satisfactory. Cockpit is quite large for it's class, and it is widened in the aft to allow more space for the helmsman. Interior is, as I'm sure you know, a bit roughly made with little wood and plenty of GRP showing. The keel mechanism is easy to operate with the electonic hydraulic pump. Markus -- ELECTRICITY, n. The power that causes all natural phenomena not known to be caused by something else. -The Devil's Dictionary |
Beneteau LAST
"Capt. Rob" wrote in message
oups.com... Adrian Smith wrote: I'm looking at purchasing a Beneteau First, either a 25.7 or 27.7. Has anyone any advice to give either positive or negative. How well do they stand up to sea conditions etc. -- Adrian Smith After spending a day on my 35s5 I can only suggest you looks at other cheap production boats. Find something of quality that will last if taken out of the slip, beneteaus just are not up to the task. After all my 35s5 is just a stepping stone, I will sell it for a profit soon. You all will crap Mac Trucks when you see my next boat RB 35s5 Stepping Stone NY What won't last, are you talking about boat structure and essential equipment or the internal cosmetics etc. I am looking for a boat that is up to the job when sailing offshore, maybe a few nights on board but definately not to live aboard. The internal fitout of the First series is fairly basic but that's fine with me. -- Adrian Smith |
Beneteau First
..
"Markus Rautanen" wrote in message ... Adrian Smith wrote: I'm looking at purchasing a Beneteau First, either a 25.7 or 27.7. Has anyone any advice to give either positive or negative. How well do they stand up to sea conditions etc. Hey, I cruised a 27.7 last summer for three days. The wind was between 5 and 20 kts, so I can't say how it handles in rough conditions, but under the weather me had, I really enjoyed sailing it! The boat is really fast compared to other 27-footers, especially on open winds. All the equipment on deck I found more than satisfactory. Cockpit is quite large for it's class, and it is widened in the aft to allow more space for the helmsman. Interior is, as I'm sure you know, a bit roughly made with little wood and plenty of GRP showing. The keel mechanism is easy to operate with the electonic hydraulic pump. Markus -- ELECTRICITY, n. The power that causes all natural phenomena not known to be caused by something else. -The Devil's Dictionary Was this a chartered boat, if so where did you charter it from... If you don't mind me asking? -- Adrian Smith |
Beneteau First
Adrian Smith wrote:
Was this a chartered boat, if so where did you charter it from... If you don't mind me asking? Yep, it was a charter-boat. I Sailed it in the archipelago of Finland. That's in the Baltic sea between Sweden and Finland. I'm sure you're familiar with the region... ;) -- Markus |
Beneteau First
Adrian Smith wrote:
I'm looking at purchasing a Beneteau First, either a 25.7 or 27.7. Has anyone any advice to give either positive or negative. How well do they stand up to sea conditions etc. Markus Rautanen wrote: I cruised a 27.7 last summer for three days. The wind was between 5 and 20 kts, so I can't say how it handles in rough conditions heh heh some here would say that 20 knot winds were 'rough conditions.' ... but under the weather me had, I really enjoyed sailing it! The boat is really fast compared to other 27-footers, especially on open winds. All the equipment on deck I found more than satisfactory. Cockpit is quite large for it's class, and it is widened in the aft to allow more space for the helmsman. Interior is, as I'm sure you know, a bit roughly made with little wood and plenty of GRP showing. The keel mechanism is easy to operate with the electonic hydraulic pump. Now you've got me interested... the south east US has many shallow areas, a lifting keel is a great idea. I will tell you first that I have not sailed the Beneteau 25.7 or the 27.7, but I have sailed the 36.7 of the same model series. Right now I think they're importing the 34.7 as the "10R" maybe planning to build it in the US. The two boats have different proportions, the 27.7 is wider & flatter aft... it looks like the older Figaro design. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
Beneteau First
DSK wrote:
Markus Rautanen wrote: All the equipment on deck I found more than satisfactory. Cockpit is quite large for it's class, and it is widened in the aft to allow more space for the helmsman. Interior is, as I'm sure you know, a bit roughly made with little wood and plenty of GRP showing. The keel mechanism is easy to operate with the electonic hydraulic pump. Now you've got me interested... the south east US has many shallow areas, a lifting keel is a great idea. Yep, same here in Finland. However I'm slightly suspicious of the consept of a lifting keel. Would it bother me if I was considering buying a 27.7? Propably not. It's just a bit hard to think of it being structually as sound as a traditional keel - although Beneteau assures it is. And because it's lifting, I guess one is less likely to ground it since it's up when in the shallow areas... The mechanism seemed very simple (in a good way) and as I said, easy to use. Fresh Breezes- Doug King Breeze here is now certainly fresh, considering temperature is around -20 Celsius (about -5 Fahrenheit) :D -- Markus |
Beneteau First
Now you've got me interested... the south east US has many
shallow areas, a lifting keel is a great idea. Markus Rautanen wrote: Yep, same here in Finland. However I'm slightly suspicious of the consept of a lifting keel. Would it bother me if I was considering buying a 27.7? Propably not. It's just a bit hard to think of it being structually as sound as a traditional keel - although Beneteau assures it is. It's possible for it to be as strong, but you're right in that this will require additional work in design & construction... the biggest drawback IMHO is that it takes away a notable amount of interior room. And because it's lifting, I guess one is less likely to ground it since it's up when in the shallow areas... The mechanism seemed very simple (in a good way) and as I said, easy to use. A big plus. Simple is usually strong too. Question- is the up/down button located so the helmsman can use it? That is where it should be, I think. Around here, people say that shallow draft allows you to run aground in much more interesting places. Our current boat draws 1.1 meter and we like to explore. Fresh Breezes- Doug King Breeze here is now certainly fresh, considering temperature is around -20 Celsius (about -5 Fahrenheit) :D Brr-rrr! Too cold for my southern blood. I am hoping it will warm up a little here so I can finish fiberglassing our decks. This is unusual for North Carolina in January. I started wishing people "Fresh Breezes" in my internet correspondence about 11 years ago or so, it sounded friendly. By now my fingers type it automatically. DSK |
Beneteau First
DSK wrote:
It's possible for it to be as strong, but you're right in that this will require additional work in design & construction... the biggest drawback IMHO is that it takes away a notable amount of interior room. That's propably true in most cases, though I wouldn't know since 27.7 is the only lifting-keel boat I've sailed. In my opinion the design in 27.7 is such that the keelmechanism doesn't take much additional space. The well serves as a pedestal for the table and can be completely covered with it when the keel is down. A big plus. Simple is usually strong too. Question- is the up/down button located so the helmsman can use it? That is where it should be, I think. Nope, the button is located in the control-panel inside the boat. When the keel is down, it has to be secured in place by a pair of approx. 2" x 2" steel beams that (of course) have to be removed when you hoist the keel. So you have to go inside to hoist/lower the keel anyway. In my opinion it's these beams that "bond" the keel into the hull. If one would leave those out and ground the boat, the well would propably be damaged by the keel since it would be more free to rotate. Btw I think 27.7 is also available with manual hydraulic keel mechanism. I would go with the electric one :) Around here, people say that shallow draft allows you to run aground in much more interesting places. Our current boat draws 1.1 meter and we like to explore. Nicely put :D The 27.7 is around 65 cm keel up and 2,10 m keel down as far as I recollect... I started wishing people "Fresh Breezes" in my internet correspondence about 11 years ago or so, it sounded friendly. By now my fingers type it automatically. It sounds very frendly indeed - I'll propably have to steel it and use it myself... ;) -- Markus |
Beneteau First
I like the Figaro type designs. I'd trade my Etchells for
one. I'd love to sail one to check it out. I also like lifting keels. How can you argue with a shoal draft when you need it, and the ability to trailer it off a ramp? Still I wonder how well the lifting keel would hold up under heavy use. I know I'd get a lot more sailing in, at different venues, if I could trailer it somewhere for a weekend and launch it off a ramp, and rig it easily. The Figaro is just over 10' wide so that makes trailering a headache. I wish they kept the beam, at least under 10 feet, or better yet a bit narrower. That wide beam is nice but limits the other attributes of the boat. "DSK" wrote Now you've got me interested... the south east US has many shallow areas, a lifting keel is a great idea. I will tell you first that I have not sailed the Beneteau 25.7 or the 27.7, but I have sailed the 36.7 of the same model series. Right now I think they're importing the 34.7 as the "10R" maybe planning to build it in the US. The two boats have different proportions, the 27.7 is wider & flatter aft... it looks like the older Figaro design. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com