![]() |
Found my next boat...
http://yachtworld.com/core/listing/p...oat_id=1417479
I was thinking of an Etchells, but they're so expensive I might as well get a boat with a cabin... a Tartan 10? Then I thought more along the lines of a Soverel 33... then a friend said, "No, Schock 35" Well, this is something completely different. There won't be a class at any regattas, but it looks like a lot of fun to sail. I wonder what the PHRF rating is? Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
Found my next boat...
Imagine if you took your years of frustration, sailing and sexual, and
allowed yourself the luxury of buying something so foolish and wonderful? I guess all you can do is imagine. There's nothing sadder than a Yachtworld sailor, like Doug. RB 35s5...the boat Doug would like to sail NY |
Found my next boat...
Schock 35 rates 72 on the Chesapeake. We have one in our fleet.
|
Found my next boat...
Cool looking cruiser! I bet she's fast with those junk sails,
eh Doug? Scotty "DSK" wrote in message ... http://yachtworld.com/core/listing/p...ail.jsp?boat_i d=1417479 I was thinking of an Etchells, but they're so expensive I might as well get a boat with a cabin... a Tartan 10? Then I thought more along the lines of a Soverel 33... then a friend said, "No, Schock 35" Well, this is something completely different. There won't be a class at any regattas, but it looks like a lot of fun to sail. I wonder what the PHRF rating is? Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
Found my next boat...
"DSK" wrote http://yachtworld.com/core/listing/p...oat_id=1417479 Pretty boat. I was thinking of an Etchells, but they're so expensive I might as well get a boat with a cabin... a Tartan 10? Then I thought more along the lines of a Soverel 33... then a friend said, "No, Schock 35" Lots of people trick out older Etchells and then can't sell them. I've seen many good deals on a non-competitive Etchells. You still get a blazing fast boat for a monohull. Well, this is something completely different. There won't be a class at any regattas, but it looks like a lot of fun to sail. I wonder what the PHRF rating is? |
Found my next boat...
rgnmstr wrote:
Schock 35 rates 72 on the Chesapeake. We have one in our fleet. They're fast and I like them more than the J-35, but have doubts about a Tom Schock product. What do you think of it? DSK |
Found my next boat...
Scotty wrote:
Cool looking cruiser! I bet she's fast with those junk sails, eh Doug? The proper technical term is "crap" sails. DSK |
Found my next boat...
Bart Senior wrote:
Lots of people trick out older Etchells and then can't sell them. I've seen many good deals on a non-competitive Etchells. That's true in a lot of one-designs, largely because most of the people that undertake the task don't pay enough attention to what it takes to make the boat truly competitive, or their craftsmanship is not quite up to it. There *is* such a thing as craftsmanship working with fiberglass, it is best displayed by building (or re-building) stuff that is strong & light rather than fancy-looking. ... You still get a blazing fast boat for a monohull. Yeah but why pay money for a boat that will only get waxed at regattas no matter how well you sail? Been there, done that, spent years fighting back. It's actually more work rebuilding a class boat than it would be to build from scratch, although you can do a lot of things a stock builder would not. Last few times we raced the Lightning, people were sure I'd done a lot of illegal stuff to it. I did pull a few tricks, but nothing forbidden by the class rules. And there's more in the bag, it's tempting to buy an old Lightning and start over. An Etchells is a big powerful complicated boat, it would be quite a challenge to stiffen an old boat without making it heavy, and add the rigging it would need. Not sure I want to go there, it's cheaper to just buy a race-worthy boat in the first place. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
Found my next boat...
They're fast and I like them more than the J-35, but have doubts
about a Tom Schock product. What do you think of it? They are supposed to be good boats and they are popular enough that Shock has started to build them again. You don't see that very often. Most people have a lot of respect for Shock as a builder. The one we sail against is fast although sometimes we correct over him. But that's the way it's supposed to work when you sail a good race. |
Found my next boat...
rgnmstr wrote:
They are supposed to be good boats and they are popular enough that Shock has started to build them again. You don't see that very often. I think that may be in response to a few (I'd bet very few) people that sail where there's a regular fleet, and want a new boat as opposed to rebuilding. Most people have a lot of respect for Shock as a builder. They've built some great boats... the old 23 dagger-keel boats are mostly still stiff & strong after 20+ years of hard sailing. They built an early IMS 40 that was great. OTOH I've also personally seen some really cheesy crap on their stock boats... back when we were shopping for a trailerable, the S-2023 had a lot of corners cut and some of the shoddiest wiring I've ever seen on a boat, and yes it came from the shop that way. Also seen two structural failures on their racing boats (one on a Schock 35 in fact) that made me think they were stoned or something when building it. At least Schock never used vermiculite, though! ... The one we sail against is fast although sometimes we correct over him. But that's the way it's supposed to work when you sail a good race. I've raced against them too... like the way they look, and they're fast... I've gotten the impression they're good light air boats, not so much in heavy air. There are enough around that they have a class at some of the NOODs, and I think for the money I like one better than the Soverel 33. DSK |
Found my next boat...
As long as the keel doesn't fall off!
Maybe you could post a link to the story. This Boobster wanna be sock puppet is a riot. |
Found my next boat...
DSK wrote:
rgnmstr wrote: Schock 35 rates 72 on the Chesapeake. We have one in our fleet. They're fast and I like them more than the J-35, but have doubts about a Tom Schock product. What do you think of it? DSK Aren't they a newer version of the Sanata 35 designed by Gary Mull (which was a great boat). |
Found my next boat...
You are SO busted as a know nothing!
So you posted a link to a photo of what appears to be a Ultimate 30. Not quite a production Shock. |
Found my next boat...
All I can say is, you CLEARLY know nothing about boats, if you don't
know about Schock's keel falling off his own boat, which was a schock 40. This has been WIDELY discussed industry wide. So you are saying that's a 40 footer in the photo you posted? |
Found my next boat...
rgnmstr wrote:
All I can say is, you CLEARLY know nothing about boats, if you don't know about Schock's keel falling off his own boat, which was a schock 40. This has been WIDELY discussed industry wide. So you are saying that's a 40 footer in the photo you posted? http://www.sailinganarchy.com/genera...hock40keel.htm Not a poor construction problem. |
Found my next boat...
The Shock 40 keel/rock problem is widely known. The fact that the
indian boy tried to use it as a bash of Shock boats just makes him look even more like the nimrod he is. As I stated previously most sailors have quite a bit of respect for W.D. Shock and their build quality. |
Found my next boat...
Gary wrote:
http://www.sailinganarchy.com/genera...hock40keel.htm Not a poor construction problem. Hmmm, is welding not a part of construction? Seems the design was ok but the flaw was in fabrication. Cheers Martin |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:15 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com