If you need a place to put the 17 terrorist your guys captured just let
us know.

We have plenty of room at Gitmo.

Joe

YOUR GOVERNMENT HAS TAKEN AWAY YOUR GUNS!

YOU ARE DEFENSELESS!!!




OzOne wrote in message ...
On 8 Nov 2005 14:20:38 -0800, "Joe"
scribbled thusly:

If you need a place to put the 17 terrorist your guys captured just let
us know.

We have plenty of room at Gitmo.

Joe

Heh heh, It'll be interesting to see what comes of that.
My guess....some were involved in drug manufacturing (the ones in
Sydney) and the rest just a tad too outspoken against GovCo.

It's now an offence to tell people that the Govt is doing a crappy job
and that you shouldn't vote for them.

Our PM like Bush has a whole lot of 'reform' agendas atm and is using
smoke and mirrors to get them thru.

We have always had the power to arrest anyone suspected of a planning
an act of terrorism but part of the scam by Govt was to introduce this
new crap to take the heat off the union busting industrial reforms he
has on the plate.


Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.

OzOne wrote:
You guys sure are lucky being armed .... what rounds do you use for
ghosts and boogie men?

Don't be silly. That's what the bayonet is for.

DSK

OzOne wrote in message ...
On Tue, 08 Nov 2005 23:30:38 GMT, "Bob Crantz"
scribbled thusly:

YOUR GOVERNMENT HAS TAKEN AWAY YOUR GUNS!

YOU ARE DEFENSELESS!!!


Yep defenseless against an imaginary threat.
You guys sure are lucky being armed .... what rounds do you use for
ghosts and boogie men?


Oz1...of the 3 twins.

Hey there, Oz. Did you see that San Francisco passed a ballot referendum to
ban handguns within the city limits? I think it's a mostly symbolic
gesture, largely unenforceable. I suspect a few folks will turn in their
pistols, but most will just harbor them as scofflaws. And no one will get
cited for anything unless he/she uses a handgun in his personal defense.
Then the bad guy will get probation (or a funeral) and the illicit gun owner
will go to prison for a couple o' years-to-life, depending upon the ultimate
condition of the perp.

Max

In article et,
Maxprop wrote:
Hey there, Oz. Did you see that San Francisco passed a ballot referendum to
ban handguns within the city limits? I think it's a mostly symbolic
gesture, largely unenforceable. I suspect a few folks will turn in their
pistols, but most will just harbor them as scofflaws. And no one will get
cited for anything unless he/she uses a handgun in his personal defense.
Then the bad guy will get probation (or a funeral) and the illicit gun owner
will go to prison for a couple o' years-to-life, depending upon the ultimate
condition of the perp.

And, ALL of Arnold's ballot measures FAILED. I'm sure he'd like to get
out his gun, but it would just get in the tabloids again.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com