I meant incremental cost.

We're winning!

OzOne wrote in message ...
On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 12:05:21 GMT, "Bob Crantz"
scribbled thusly:


OzOne wrote in message
...

You do realise that you're nuts, Don't you?

Part of being nuts is that you don't realize it. Do you realize that
France
is the only country to have surrendered twice in WWII?

Tell me what that has to do with your unbalance?

You do recall that this war was started because your 'intelligence'
people weren't smart enough to believe what the French believed (that
there were no WMD) and that Shrub gave up the chase for Bin Laden to
pursue this other unfound objective?



The marginal cost to win in Iraq is so small, it's a slam dunk! Complete
victory in less than 3 years! Don't you agree?

Marginal cost?
You mean 30,000 people?

Victory? in 3 years.....You mean another 3 more years?....
seems to me Shrub was claiming victory quite a while back.

And still the body count climbs.
How many more "marginal" lives do you think it will cost?


You obviously are nuts!


Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.