A suggestion.Flonkers don't write Laws; Leyland is a Flonker
 

Maybe "Sock Puppet" would like to explain "Forgery vs Frogery" once
again?

Then again maybe "good old Sock" may want to see what real people in a
real Court of Law think bout it :^)

LP seems to have some strong views on the subject; Let's hear from her?

OT

Thom Stewart wrote:
Maybe "Sock Puppet" would like to explain "Forgery vs Frogery" once
again?

Then again maybe "good old Sock" may want to see what real people in a
real Court of Law think bout it :^)

LP seems to have some strong views on the subject; Let's hear from her?

OT

Why would you want to invite them back? I'm thinking you really
enjoyed the invasion!

Thom Stewart wrote:
Maybe "Sock Puppet" would like to explain "Forgery vs Frogery" once
again?

Hi, Thom. Glad you're back.

Then again maybe "good old Sock" may want to see what real people in a
real Court of Law think bout it :^)

Sure! (I _think_ you're referring to me via a poke at my nym.)

Here's my interpretation (Disclaimer: IANAL - I Am Not A Lawyer)

A frogery can be likened to a *parody* of well known people offered by
comedians on stages all across the planet. (In the Usenet context, the
"well known person" is often the self-appointed authority figure. :^)

It's also akin to a cartoonist drawing a caricature of a cowboy
riding a horse into the town of Petrolgulf with his six-shooter a-blazing
and labeling it "George W. Bish, President of The World."

--
,,,
..oo
c
- Soque

You're Right Jeff,

I really don't want them but I just couldn't leave the hot button alone.

Thanks for the advice. It's time to re-build the group; hopefully to
what it was.

Ole Thom