Sorry, but I didn't post this. You need to check the headers, as these
asshole are now forging my address.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Red Cloud®" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:03:41 -0400, "JG" |id wrote:

Just killfile nellie. He's a liar and a thief.

Jon,

In the past, I have suggested to you that you should either stop
responding to
certain people who wind you up, or if you can't resist, killfile them. You
have
always ignored that advice. Why should I take the same advice from you?

I'll deal with Nellie any way I see fit. I have a feeling he will find
himself
on the outs with the flonkers soon enough. I think he's overstepped some
boundaries with them already. They really don't need him. He's running
around
usenet acting like HE owns databasix. How long before they decide that
he's not
really "one of them"?

rusty redcloud

"Capt. Neal®" wrote:

"Horvath" wrote:
Heh Heh! It compliments that double-wide in the background.

**** you and the horse you rode in on . . . That 'Double Wide' and lot was
appraised at over five
million dollars four years ago.

Wonder what my house would bring being on the same property?

LP

No, you didn't. If you want them to go away, you need to ignore them. I did
not write most of the posts. John is correct. You need to check the headers.
They're getting desperate.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Red Cloud®" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 22:22:28 GMT, "John Cairns"

wrote:


"Red Cloud®" wrote in message
. ..
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:03:41 -0400, "JG" |id wrote:

Just killfile nellie. He's a liar and a thief.

Jon,

In the past, I have suggested to you that you should either stop
responding to
certain people who wind you up, or if you can't resist, killfile them.
You
have
always ignored that advice. Why should I take the same advice from you?

I'll deal with Nellie any way I see fit. I have a feeling he will find
himself
on the outs with the flonkers soon enough. I think he's overstepped some
boundaries with them already. They really don't need him. He's running
around
usenet acting like HE owns databasix. How long before they decide that
he's not
really "one of them"?

rusty redcloud

Uh, you need to check the addy there, red.

John Cairns


Don't worry, John. I did.

rusty

In article ,
"Scotty" wrote:

I was just ragging on Neal. Didn't see the cross posts.
I had an RD350 several decades ago, fun little bike.

And it blew the Suzies away. I had the R5-B. Did an honest 106 -- once.
(well, okay, twice)

--
Jere Lull
Xan-a-Deux ('73 Tanzer 28 #4 out of Tolchester, MD)
Xan's Pages: http://members.dca.net/jerelull/X-Main.html
Our BVI FAQs (290+ pics) http://homepage.mac.com/jerelull/BVI/

"JG" wrote:
Sorry, but I didn't post this. You need to check the headers, as these
asshole are now forging my address.

Can't get them tossed and now your ****ed?

You brought this upon yourself, dude, but you had help from katysails.

LP

On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 21:43:40 -0500, "Lady Pilot"
wrote this crap:


"Capt. Neal®" wrote:

"Horvath" wrote:
Heh Heh! It compliments that double-wide in the background.

**** you and the horse you rode in on . . . That 'Double Wide' and lot was
appraised at over five
million dollars four years ago.

Wonder what my house would bring being on the same property?

LP



Over *ONE* MILLION* DOLLARS!






This post is 100% free of steroids

That brings back some memories.
My first street bike was a 1978 GS550E. Bought it new and probably spent
more on "Mothers" polish than I did on the bike!
Rode it from East Kansas to the Oregon coast in 3 days and could still walk
when I got there, didn't leave an oil slick, and didn't have to do
maintenance 6 times on the way. Back in '78 there weren't any yuppies on
Harleys
MMC
"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
...
Almost as much fun as messing around with boats . . .

http://captneal.homestead.com/GT380.html

CN

Then why did you say you did check them, and then said that I should mellow
out??

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Red Cloud®" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:44:01 -0700, "JG" wrote:

No, you didn't. If you want them to go away, you need to ignore them. I
did
not write most of the posts. John is correct. You need to check the
headers.
They're getting desperate.

You are getting as dopey as the flinkers. Do you really think anyone other
than
a few of the really slow turkeys here think those posts came from you? Get
a
grip, if possible.

rusty redcloud

Sorry, but just because I use outcrap doesn't mean I don't display full
header info when I need to. I've been mellow now for quite a while, whereas
others haven't been. It's still not clear why you responded to the post.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Red Cloud©" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:05:08 -0700, "JG" wrote:

Then why did you say you did check them, and then said that I should
mellow
out??

Jon,

Unlike you, I use a real, dedicated newsreader. To see full headers, I
merely hit the "H" key on my keyboard. I then hit the "H" key a second
time and the headers magically disappear until the next time I want to
see them. There is no reason for me NOT to check headers, as it is so
easy to do.

The advice for you to mellow out remains in effect, now, and in the
future.

rusty redcloud

What's your point here? Don't you think it's enough already with stupid,
hatefilled responses?

Whatever... get a life.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Red Cloud©" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 09:43:18 -0700, "JG" wrote:

Sorry, but just because I use outcrap doesn't mean I don't display full
header info when I need to. I've been mellow now for quite a while,
whereas
others haven't been. It's still not clear why you responded to the post.

Yes, it is POSSIBLE to look at headers with Outlook, but it's not a
matter of tapping a key. I can turn headers on and off on the fly. I
don't need to go into pull down menus and change settings. You gay
folks are sure non-technical! LOL

rusty redcloud.