Keep at it Joey. You're looking dumber and dumber. Any time you don't agree,
you call someone a bad little name.... ooooohhh... it's supposed to hurt
right... YOU'RE A LOSER

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com...
I think we have no doubt that that excited you.

U R so gay

Joe

I don't think google can help.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

OzOne wrote in message ...
On 2 Mar 2005 15:22:07 -0800, "Joe"
scribbled thusly:

Oz, I'd be interested to see if you tell the difference between your
ass and a hole in the ground.

Joe

So you don't know where Lebanon or Syria are on a map without Google!


Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.

"Joe" wrote
I bet the AARP membership drops by 55% this year.....

You're prolly right. Hitler used the same tactics successfully to get
elected.


BTW Capt. Elliot of the Swiftboat group was the commanding officer on
the USS Samuel Gompers AD-37 the same ship I served on. He's an
honorable man. Your just upset because he is not gay.

I don't know Capt Elliot but there in nothing honorable about the Swiftboat
PAC or their tactics. For all either of us knows Elliot is gay. After all
they just outed Lincoln. Is that why you like him?

"Joe" wrote in message
ps.com...
Geeeee we know Ossma the turd is trying to buddy up to Al Zawari.

We know Saddams men meet with AlQuedia members. And Terrorist training
camp were in Iraq.

No, we do not. Just the opposite. We know al Qaeda asked for camps and
Saddam refused. That's in the 9/11 report. If you have better evidence
please provide it.


I saw many cheering crowds, like the day that gawd ugly statue was torn
down in downtown Bagdad. snip

Yes, but now what kind of people have these cheering crowds elected?
Secularists committed to freedom? NO! They came in a distant third! They
elected radical Shiite Muslims with strong ties to Iran - men dedicated to
an "Islamic democracy" just like Irans wherein the elected officials serve
the ayatollahs and mullahs. They wouldn't know freedom if it hit the in the
ass.

So, what will we have achieved? We will have replaced a secular
dictetorship with a popular theocracy. If one practices strict Shiia Islam,
one will be more free than under Saddam. Otherwise, otherwise. Thats why
Sunnis are fighting back and Christians are fleeing in droves. Will this
new government allow al Qaeda camps? I dunno -- does Iran?

"Capt. Mooron" wrote

I don't need no stinkin' blindfold.... but if I absolutely had
to wear
one, I will staple two Maple leaves to my forehead.

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...

"Capt. Mooron" wrote

I don't need no stinkin' blindfold.... but if I absolutely had
to wear
one, I will staple two Maple leaves to my forehead.

Staples are for Yankee Pussies.... I'd use a Robertson Screws.

CM

"IN GOD WE TRUST!"

Freedom to chose is better than a Dictatorship.

Why you ask. Because most people want to do well and prosper. Everyone
deserves the chance to determine his or her own destiny. I have faith
in true democracy. Look what it did for Japan and Germany.

Joe

On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 09:55:04 -0600, Dave wrote:

On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:45:41 -0500, thunder said:

Really?

Yes, really. Those of us who are old enough remember when Lebanon was a
relatively stable and vibrant financial center, with an effective power
sharing arrangement among the three principal religious groups, standing
in sharp contrast to most of its neighbors. The arrangement was upset as a
result of the change in its demographics following the '67 Arab-Israeli
war.

Well, I remember Eisenhower sending the Marines to Lebanon. ;-) I'm not
disputing what you are saying, but unfortunately, that was quite some time
ago. Perhaps, I overstated Lebanon's historical disarray. Then again,
those that consider Lebanon's current situation a boon for democracy, are
discarding the facts. A ex-Prime Minister's assassination, a mob in the
streets, and a Druze leader who won't leave his mountaintop for fear of
being a target, does not bode well for democracy. Having watched
Lebanon's recent history, I wish the Lebanese well, but they have a long
slog ahead of them, before they reach their former "stable and vibrant"
status.

"Thom Stewart" wrote in message

"IN GOD WE TRUST!"

All others must pay in Cash, Blood or Oil.....

CM

Freedom to chose is what you give lip service to, but when it comes right
down to it, you're only interested in your version of freedom of speech and
thought. Anyone with any kind of differing viewpoint is immediately put down
both verbally and by law if you can do it. You're a hypocrite.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Joe" wrote in message
oups.com...
Freedom to chose is better than a Dictatorship.

Why you ask. Because most people want to do well and prosper. Everyone
deserves the chance to determine his or her own destiny. I have faith
in true democracy. Look what it did for Japan and Germany.

Joe

On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 09:29:57 -0500, Vito wrote:

Yes, but now what kind of people have these cheering crowds elected?
Secularists committed to freedom? NO! They came in a distant third!
They elected radical Shiite Muslims with strong ties to Iran - men
dedicated to an "Islamic democracy" just like Irans wherein the elected
officials serve the ayatollahs and mullahs. They wouldn't know freedom if
it hit the in the ass.

Only time will tell, but I hope you are wrong. Everything I have read
about Sistani, states that he would prefer a secular, inclusive form of
government. Granted, it could be BS, but he is Iraq's only hope.

For those that disregard the original reasons for the invasion of Iraq,
WMD's and Iraq's threat to America, and are willing to accept this mutated
causa belli, I would point out we have now shed as much American blood
bringing, a yet to be seen, democracy to Iraq, as we had in our own
Revolutionary War. With somewhere over 100 nations still needing
democracy, I suggest they sign up the sons and daughters today.

I'm sure plans are underway to attack Syria. That should "help" the Lebanese
people.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 09:55:04 -0600, Dave wrote:

On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:45:41 -0500, thunder
said:

Really?

Yes, really. Those of us who are old enough remember when Lebanon was a
relatively stable and vibrant financial center, with an effective power
sharing arrangement among the three principal religious groups, standing
in sharp contrast to most of its neighbors. The arrangement was upset as
a
result of the change in its demographics following the '67 Arab-Israeli
war.

Well, I remember Eisenhower sending the Marines to Lebanon. ;-) I'm not
disputing what you are saying, but unfortunately, that was quite some time
ago. Perhaps, I overstated Lebanon's historical disarray. Then again,
those that consider Lebanon's current situation a boon for democracy, are
discarding the facts. A ex-Prime Minister's assassination, a mob in the
streets, and a Druze leader who won't leave his mountaintop for fear of
being a target, does not bode well for democracy. Having watched
Lebanon's recent history, I wish the Lebanese well, but they have a long
slog ahead of them, before they reach their former "stable and vibrant"
status.

On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:49:16 -0800, JG wrote:

I'm sure plans are underway to attack Syria. That should "help" the
Lebanese people.

A curious repayment for some very helpful intelligence against al Qaeda.
One has to wonder who we are fighting against, and for.

http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/?030728fa_fact

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news:3RGVd.37885$ab2.19697@edtnps89...

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...

"Capt. Mooron" wrote

I don't need no stinkin' blindfold.... but if I absolutely
had
to wear
one, I will staple two Maple leaves to my forehead.

Staples are for Yankee Pussies.... I'd use a Robertson Screws.


Torqs are better, you hoser!

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news:3RGVd.37885$ab2.19697@edtnps89...

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...

"Capt. Mooron" wrote

I don't need no stinkin' blindfold.... but if I absolutely
had
to wear
one, I will staple two Maple leaves to my forehead.

Staples are for Yankee Pussies.... I'd use a Robertson Screws.


Torqs are better, you hoser!

The new pinhole torques or the old ones?

CM

"Capt. Mooron" wrote

Staples are for Yankee Pussies.... I'd use a Robertson Screws.


Torqs are better, you hoser!

The new pinhole torques or the old ones?


Torx Plus.

http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.c...=114660&page=1


SV

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message
...
"Capt. Mooron" wrote

Staples are for Yankee Pussies.... I'd use a Robertson Screws.


Torqs are better, you hoser!

The new pinhole torques or the old ones?


Torx Plus.

http://www.eng-tips.com/viewthread.c...=114660&page=1

Yeah... I've got a set of Torx Plus.... I found out one day that a standard
torque head wouldn't fit these newfangled things. I keep a set of Phillips,
Robertson , Torx and now Torx Plus .... the only screw I won't have or use
is the slotted.

CM