Bwaaaaaahahhahahahahahhahahhaahaaa!
 

hehhe. Re-read Chaucer; he believed underwear is for keeping **** off the
inside of one's pants!
Scout

OzOne wrote
"Underwear is called underwear for a reason," said Republican
politician John Reid.

You are truely obsesed with the US. And for good reason, seeing how you owe
your freedom to her.

Lonny


OzOne wrote in message ...

Republican conservatives!
Bwaaaahahahhahahahahahahaaa!

Pull your dacks up - or face $50 fine
10:17 AM February 10

Failing to pull up your pants in Virginia could cost you a $US50 ($65)
fine if legislators in the southern US state have their way.

The House chamber in Virginia's General Assembly has voted 60-34 in
favour of the so-called "droopy drawers" Bill to penalise people who
wear their pants too low, exposing their boxer shorts or G-strings in
a "lewd or indecent manner".

"Underwear is called underwear for a reason," said Republican
politician John Reid.

"Most of us would identify this as the coarsening of society."
http://tinyurl.com/5n6nk


Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.

Lonny Bruce wrote:

You are truely obsesed with the US. And for good reason, seeing how you owe
your freedom to her.

You think? Do you owe your freedom to the Russians?

Cheers
Marty

Lonny Bruce wrote:
You are truely obsesed with the US. And for good reason, seeing how
you owe your freedom to her.


Martin Baxter wrote:
You think? Do you owe your freedom to the Russians?


No, of course not. Lonny "Well-Versed In History" owes his freedom (as
does every American) to the French!

DSK

We owe our Freedom to the second amendment and firearms owned by citizens in
general.

The firearm is the symbol of freedom.

"DSK" wrote in message
...
Lonny Bruce wrote:
You are truely obsesed with the US. And for good reason, seeing how
you owe your freedom to her.


Martin Baxter wrote:
You think? Do you owe your freedom to the Russians?


No, of course not. Lonny "Well-Versed In History" owes his freedom (as
does every American) to the French!

DSK

Gilligan wrote:
We owe our Freedom to the second amendment and firearms owned by citizens in
general.

The firearm is the symbol of freedom.

We also owe our freedom to the First Amendment, so don't skip over that
part too quickly.

DSK

"DSK" wrote in message

Gilligan wrote:
We owe our Freedom to the second amendment and firearms owned by citizens
in
general.

The firearm is the symbol of freedom.

We also owe our freedom to the First Amendment, so don't skip over that
part too quickly.

It is conceivable that the First Amendment may someday owe its perpetuation
to the Second Amendment.

Max

Stupid law, but then again, I'd vote for it.
Bart

OzOne wrote

Republican conservatives!
Bwaaaahahahhahahahahahahaaa!

Pull your dacks up - or face $50 fine
10:17 AM February 10

Failing to pull up your pants in Virginia could cost you a $US50 ($65)
fine if legislators in the southern US state have their way.

The House chamber in Virginia's General Assembly has voted 60-34 in
favour of the so-called "droopy drawers" Bill to penalise people who
wear their pants too low, exposing their boxer shorts or G-strings in
a "lewd or indecent manner".

Yes, but while the 1st ammendment gets the full support
of liberals, they constantly try to destroy the 2nd.

Perhaps the conservatives should chip away at the 1st
every time the liberals chip away at the 2nd.

"DSK" wrote

Gilligan wrote:
We owe our Freedom to the second amendment and firearms owned by
citizens in
general.

The firearm is the symbol of freedom.

We also owe our freedom to the First Amendment, so don't skip over that
part too quickly.

DSK

Now that is even funnier.

Chances are more likely that the 2nd will fall first, and then
the 1st.

"Maxprop" wrote


"DSK" wrote in message

Gilligan wrote:
We owe our Freedom to the second amendment and firearms owned by
citizens
in
general.

The firearm is the symbol of freedom.

We also owe our freedom to the First Amendment, so don't skip over that
part too quickly.

It is conceivable that the First Amendment may someday owe its
perpetuation
to the Second Amendment.

Max

You mean the one that talks about a "well regulated militia"? Got it.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Bart Senior" wrote in message
...
Yes, but while the 1st ammendment gets the full support
of liberals, they constantly try to destroy the 2nd.

Perhaps the conservatives should chip away at the 1st
every time the liberals chip away at the 2nd.

"DSK" wrote

Gilligan wrote:
We owe our Freedom to the second amendment and firearms owned by
citizens in
general.

The firearm is the symbol of freedom.

We also owe our freedom to the First Amendment, so don't skip over that
part too quickly.

DSK

With all due respect Oz,
1. I think we've paid the French back and then some.
2. Their hatred for England was their real motivation to help us 200+ years
ago.
Scout

OzOne wrote in message ...
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 01:04:07 -0500, "Bart Senior"
scribbled thusly:

Now that is funny!

Are you really that ignorant of American history,

Or is the American dislike of the French because they owe them for
their freedom?
http://tinyurl.com/4enr9




Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.

No, of course not. Lonny "Well-Versed In History" owes his freedom (as
does every American) to the French!


Bart Senior wrote:
Now that is funny!


It's also completely and totally true.


http://xenophongroup.com/mcjoynt/bonnel.htm

If you don't have time to read the whole thing, this covers the basics

http://xenophongroup.com/mcjoynt/bonnel.htm#capes

If it were not for the French Navy, the American armies would not have
been able to force Cornwallis to surrender. I'd be drinking tea instead
of coffee right now.

DSK

Scout wrote:
With all due respect Oz,
1. I think we've paid the French back and then some.
2. Their hatred for England was their real motivation to help us 200+ years
ago.

Agreed on both points. But it doesn't change the facts.

BTW it's been cool for us ex-colonials to diss the French since day 1.
For example see what Mark Twain has to say about them.

DSK

On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:28:00 +1100, OzOne wrote this crap:

On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 01:01:31 -0500, "Bart Senior"
scribbled thusly:

Stupid law, but then again, I'd vote for it.
Bart

Next they'll be banning bikinis!

I'm in favor of that. Make all beaches nude beaches.





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 19:21:06 +1100, OzOne wrote this crap:


Republican conservatives!
Bwaaaahahahhahahahahahahaaa!

Pull your dacks up - or face $50 fine
10:17 AM February 10

Failing to pull up your pants in Virginia could cost you a $US50 ($65)
fine if legislators in the southern US state have their way.

The House chamber in Virginia's General Assembly has voted 60-34 in
favour of the so-called "droopy drawers" Bill to penalise people who
wear their pants too low, exposing their boxer shorts or G-strings in
a "lewd or indecent manner".

"Underwear is called underwear for a reason," said Republican
politician John Reid.


I'm in favor of just banning underwear.





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

Most schools now have a 'non-droopy pants' rule.

SV

"Bart Senior" wrote in message
...
Stupid law, but then again, I'd vote for it.
Bart

OzOne wrote

Republican conservatives!
Bwaaaahahahhahahahahahahaaa!

Pull your dacks up - or face $50 fine
10:17 AM February 10

Failing to pull up your pants in Virginia could cost you a $US50
($65)
fine if legislators in the southern US state have their way.

The House chamber in Virginia's General Assembly has voted 60-34
in
favour of the so-called "droopy drawers" Bill to penalise people
who
wear their pants too low, exposing their boxer shorts or G-strings
in
a "lewd or indecent manner".

"DSK" wrote in message news:

If it were not for the French Navy, the American armies would not
have
been able to force Cornwallis to surrender. I'd be drinking tea
instead
of coffee right now.


Doug's right, see the movie 'The Patriot'.

SV

"Horvath" wrote

Next they'll be banning bikinis!

I'm in favor of that. Make all beaches nude beaches.


Puuuleeeese, keep your top on, Horvy! What if Jon sees you?

"Scott Vernon" wrote in message

Doug's right, see the movie 'The Patriot'.

You mean if it weren't for the damned Frenchies... you'd all be Canadians
right now!!!

Damned those French *******s!

CM

Capt. Mooron wrote:
You mean if it weren't for the damned Frenchies... you'd all be Canadians
right now!!!

Damned those French *******s!


What are you talking about.... was Canada planning to invade the U.S.?
Maybe because we have better beer & real football? Or just to have a
place to get away from the Quebecois?

DSK

"DSK" wrote in message
...
Capt. Mooron wrote:
You mean if it weren't for the damned Frenchies... you'd all be Canadians
right now!!!

Damned those French *******s!


What are you talking about.... was Canada planning to invade the U.S.?
Maybe because we have better beer & real football? Or just to have a place
to get away from the Quebecois?

Canada was loyal British held territory.... if you had lost the war of
independence... you may have been annexed by the crown....

Then the French came to your rescue.....

CM

"DSK" wrote in message
...
Capt. Mooron wrote:
You mean if it weren't for the damned Frenchies... you'd all be Canadians
right now!!!

Damned those French *******s!


What are you talking about.... was Canada planning to invade the U.S.?
Maybe because we have better beer & real football? Or just to have a place
to get away from the Quebecois?

Oh Doug... BTW... Canada did invade the USA... and burned your Whitehouse to
the ground. We didn't like the beer and left.

CM

Capt. Mooron wrote:
Canada was loyal British held territory.... if you had lost the war of
independence... you may have been annexed by the crown....


We were already colonies at that time... or do you mean the American
colonies would have lost what little self-governance they already had?

Then the French came to your rescue.....


It's already been pointed out, the French had their own score to settle
and we just piggybacked.

Seems pretty obvious to me that the American colonies would not have
remained subject to English rule for very long anyway. Too stubborn, too
many foreigners, and too much religious resentment against the Church of
England. If Washington and Franklin hadn't managed to slither out from
under, the individual colonies would have required more and more troops
to occupy & pacify... England would have gone bankrupt trying to hold
on. The individual colonies would have declared independence and fought
English troops, and probably each other, and not become a unified
country for another 50 years if then.

Meanwhile, then Napoleon would have held on to the Louisiana
territories, and remained Emperor for another ten years, maybe more,
maybe even established a dynasty. You can play wolrd history as you like
from there.

Regards
Doug King

"DSK" wrote in message

What are you talking about.... was Canada planning to invade the U.S.?
Maybe because we have better beer

Are you serious? After Coors merged with Molson?


Max

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message

Then the French came to your rescue.....

Yeah. What happened in the intervening centuries since?

Max