Not at all. I can be wrong, but I'm not this time.


Capt. Mooron wrote:
Yeah Yeah Yaeh... that's what you say all the time... but you have never
admitted to being wrong ...

Yes I have

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...8d0348ebae8034

or

http://tinyurl.com/3rj9r

But it was a long time ago

... even when _I_ proved you wrong!! Which I have
done countless times.

Really? When? You mean like your claim that *no* lifting beam is ever
supported at 25% or less of it's length?
;)


I on the other hand am never wrong..... I may have been given erroneous
info.. but I'm never wrong.


Ever watch 'Casablanca'?
"I was misinformed."

If you can fool enough people, you can get a high-paying job in politics!

DSK

Gee Whiz... I must have been subject to erroneous information again! :-)

CM

"DSK" wrote in message
...
Not at all. I can be wrong, but I'm not this time.


Capt. Mooron wrote:
Yeah Yeah Yaeh... that's what you say all the time... but you have never
admitted to being wrong ...

Yes I have

http://groups-beta.google.com/group/...8d0348ebae8034

or

http://tinyurl.com/3rj9r

But it was a long time ago

... even when _I_ proved you wrong!! Which I have done countless times.

Really? When? You mean like your claim that *no* lifting beam is ever
supported at 25% or less of it's length?
;)


I on the other hand am never wrong..... I may have been given erroneous
info.. but I'm never wrong.


Ever watch 'Casablanca'?
"I was misinformed."

If you can fool enough people, you can get a high-paying job in politics!

DSK

wrote in message
...
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:21:38 +0100, "Edgar" wrote:


wrote in message
.. .
Please explain precisely what the logic is for WASP England to maintain
a
Queen
and Royal family. Why doesn't every democracy have the same?

If you think England is WASP then you have not visited lately. Parts of
some
cities have become no-go areas for WASP's.
And you certainly haven't been watching any BBC news bulletins.

So, you are saying that England maintains a royal family at the
insistance of who?

BB
I never said anything about the Royal Family

"DSK" wrote in message

... The Japanese culture is incredibly different from ours. I
do not find it at all incongruous for them to be technically advanced,
and at
the same time very backwards or even foolishly dogmatic in another area.
They
believe in living manifestations of god. You don't.

Maxprop wrote:
Well said.


In other words, you and BittyBill-Bob want to think those clever little
Nips are still quite doofusses, so you can keep your sense of racial
superiority intact.

The universe is what it is, not what you wish it to be.

That admonition would best be acknowledged by you, rather than by Bill or
me. You seem to be the one in denial of cultural fact.

Max

Maxprop wrote:
... You seem to be the one in denial of cultural fact.


Am I the one claiming it's a "cultural fact" that all Japanese sincerely
believed their Emperor was a god?

DSK

"DSK" wrote in message

Maxprop wrote:
... You seem to be the one in denial of cultural fact.


Am I the one claiming it's a "cultural fact" that all Japanese sincerely
believed their Emperor was a god?

No, nor am I. But you've flatly denied that some, perhaps most, of the
Japanese during WWII regarded their emperor as a one might a deity. This is
demonstrative of a closed mind and the inability to accept that not everyone
believes what you believe. This is the pinnacle of arrogance.

I'd be inclined to advise you to give up a losing argument, but your sort of
bull-headed arrogance leaves no room for self-doubt. So be it.

Max

Hey Donal! Fix your clock, dummy!

"Jeff Morris" wrote in message
...
Hey Donal! Fix your clock, dummy!

Please accept my humble apologies. I hope that this post does not cause you
further consternation.

I've become used to checking the date & time. This was the first time that
the bloody time zone was wrong!!!

If you send me some money, then I'll buy a new computer. That would make
both of us happy.

Regards


Donal
--

Am I the one claiming it's a "cultural fact" that all Japanese sincerely
believed their Emperor was a god?


Maxprop wrote:
No, nor am I. But you've flatly denied that some, perhaps most, of the
Japanese during WWII regarded their emperor as a one might a deity.

Observe closely, class. Here's a major backpedal.

The original statement which I disagreed with: "The Japanese worshipped
their Emperor as a god."

No "some, perhaps most"... no "regarded as one might a deity"...

Maxprop wrote:
... This is
demonstrative of a closed mind and the inability to accept that not everyone
believes what you believe. This is the pinnacle of arrogance.
I'd be inclined to advise you to give up a losing argument

I'd be inclined to advise you that the truth doesn't care about who wins
or loses arguments.

Did you go back and re-read the prior thread and realize that 1- your
statements sound absurd and 2- you're agreeing with BittyBill/Bubbles
and decide to go into backpedal mode?

DSK

"DSK" wrote in message

Am I the one claiming it's a "cultural fact" that all Japanese sincerely
believed their Emperor was a god?


Maxprop wrote:
No, nor am I. But you've flatly denied that some, perhaps most, of the
Japanese during WWII regarded their emperor as a one might a deity.

Observe closely, class. Here's a major backpedal.

The original statement which I disagreed with: "The Japanese worshipped
their Emperor as a god."

No "some, perhaps most"... no "regarded as one might a deity"...

Maxprop wrote:
... This is demonstrative of a closed mind and the inability to accept
that not everyone believes what you believe. This is the pinnacle of
arrogance.
I'd be inclined to advise you to give up a losing argument

I'd be inclined to advise you that the truth doesn't care about who wins
or loses arguments.

Did you go back and re-read the prior thread and realize that 1- your
statements sound absurd and 2- you're agreeing with BittyBill/Bubbles and
decide to go into backpedal mode?

Actually I didn't spend any time thinking about this at all. Your arrogant
approach to everything you post is annoying and boring, and not worth the
time to respond. See ya.

Max

"Donal" wrote in message

"Maxprop" wrote in message


Where Hitler and his regime are concerned, there is very little white
showing. You can laud the man for what you perceive as his praiseworthy
accomplishments. I'll just condemn him as one of the most evil men ever
to
have lived. And we'll leave it at that.

In the late thirties, the German people had enormous admiration for him.
He
brought great prosperity to Germany, and some badly needed international
respect(fear).

No accounting for taste or good (bad) judgment. The Germans ate lots of
crow following their defeat.

Bush and Hitler are similar in most respects - apart from intelligence!!

What utter bull****. Only a complete idiot would believe that. If the shoe
fits . . .

Max

Maxprop wrote:
Actually I didn't spend any time thinking about this at all.

I already knew that.

... Your arrogant
approach to everything you post is annoying and boring

You only think I'm arrogant & annoying because I always prove you wrong.
Don't you just hate that?

... and not worth the
time to respond.

Then why did you?

DSK

"Maxprop" wrote in message
nk.net...


Bush and Hitler are similar in most respects - apart from intelligence!!

What utter bull****. Only a complete idiot would believe that. If the
shoe
fits . . .

OK, I admit that I was wrong. Hitler didn't think that he could excercise
control over the whole planet.



Regards


Donal
--

"Donal" wrote in message

OK, I admit that I was wrong. Hitler didn't think that he could excercise
control over the whole planet.

I believe that is exactly what he thought Donal!

CM

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message

"Donal" wrote in message

OK, I admit that I was wrong. Hitler didn't think that he could
excercise
control over the whole planet.

I believe that is exactly what he thought Donal!

Don't bother, CM. Donal's brand of absurdity is beyond redemption. One can
hope he doesn't really believe this crap. Sadly, I suspect he does.

Max

"Maxprop" wrote in message
nk.net...

Actually I didn't spend any time thinking about this at all. Your
arrogant
approach to everything you post is annoying and boring, and not worth the
time to respond.

That's the best response that I've ever seen on asa! ...... "not worth the
time to respond. "


Good one Max! I didn't realise that you had such a self deprecating sense
of humour.



Regards


Donal
--

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news:fGANd.9203$K54.5721@edtnps84...

"Donal" wrote in message

OK, I admit that I was wrong. Hitler didn't think that he could
excercise
control over the whole planet.

I believe that is exactly what he thought Donal!

He never wanted to wage war against Britian. He had hoped for an alliance.
His plan was that Germany would rule Europe, and that Britian would rule the
rest of the world.



Regards


Donal
--

"Donal" wrote in message
...

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news:fGANd.9203$K54.5721@edtnps84...

"Donal" wrote in message

OK, I admit that I was wrong. Hitler didn't think that he could
excercise
control over the whole planet.

I believe that is exactly what he thought Donal!

He never wanted to wage war against Britian. He had hoped for an
alliance.
His plan was that Germany would rule Europe, and that Britian would rule
the
rest of the world.

Obviously he never thought that one through... did he?

CM

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news:jC2Od.39997$gA4.23149@edtnps89...

"Donal" wrote in message
...

"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message
news:fGANd.9203$K54.5721@edtnps84...

"Donal" wrote in message

He never wanted to wage war against Britian. He had hoped for an
alliance.
His plan was that Germany would rule Europe, and that Britian would rule
the
rest of the world.

Obviously he never thought that one through... did he?

Not quite!!!


Regards

Donal
--

I don't think the Jews had any way to fight back
as they were dragged off to be murdered.

These people certainly won't let that happen to them.
http://www.jpfo.org/



OzOne wrote
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 21:08:48 GMT, "Capt. Mooron"
scribbled thusly:

"This year will go down in history- for the first time, a civilized nation
has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more
efficient,
and the world will follow our lead into the future!"

ADOLPH HITLER, 1935



Way to go..... Eh?



CM

Dunno Mooron, do you have any statistics that show it didn't work?

The rest of course is history.


Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.

Good justification to eliminate gun registration.

OzOne wrote
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 23:08:09 GMT, "Maxprop"
scribbled thusly:

Um, how would one know? Statistics were meaningless, once The War began.
But I suspect it was completely successful. Own a gun, get eliminated by
the Gestapo. Simple.

Cool, so if you owned a gun the Govt would send someone around to sort
you out?

Oh wait--you weren't advocating that here, were you???

Maybe your fraidy cat police could learn from that.


Max




Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.

Actually, many did... as in the Warsaw ghetto, but I doubt it mattered as
most of them were murdered anyway.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Bart Senior" wrote in message
...
I don't think the Jews had any way to fight back
as they were dragged off to be murdered.

These people certainly won't let that happen to them.
http://www.jpfo.org/



OzOne wrote
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 21:08:48 GMT, "Capt. Mooron"
scribbled thusly:

"This year will go down in history- for the first time, a civilized
nation
has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more
efficient,
and the world will follow our lead into the future!"

ADOLPH HITLER, 1935



Way to go..... Eh?



CM

Dunno Mooron, do you have any statistics that show it didn't work?

The rest of course is history.


Oz1...of the 3 twins.

I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you.