![]() |
Sail construction
Neal & others,
I added a few more pictures on the Home Page. Neal I added a picture of my clew corner on page 3 Also a picture of a Christmas Gift from my crew of Ladies on my new Coffee Mug And for all a picture of the New Harken's Furler. My Dog just came out to tell me is time for bed; Good Night All, Ole Thom http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomsHomePage |
Where's the pic of your homemade 'ATN Tacker'?
Scotty "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Neal & others, I added a few more pictures on the Home Page. Neal I added a picture of my clew corner on page 3 Also a picture of a Christmas Gift from my crew of Ladies on my new Coffee Mug And for all a picture of the New Harken's Furler. My Dog just came out to tell me is time for bed; Good Night All, Ole Thom http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomsHomePage |
Nice pics but I don't see much of anything but shoddy workmanship on the clew
of your mainsail. Sure there is some webbing sloppily sewn to the somewhat weak and puny clew patch but that means little or nothing. http://captneal.homestead.com/newsails.html Please note how the clew of my mainsail works as a system. The bolt rope has plenty of holding power which spreads the load while the sliding slug is attached firmly with webbing. There are eight (count 'em, eight) layers of 6.9 oz American made Dacron reinforcing the clew and the clew cringle is machine pressed through all eight layers. The layers get progressively larger so that the largest patch is a full three feet from the clew itself. The sail will tear in half at it's mid point long before this sturdy clew is even stretched significantly. CN "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Neal & others, I added a few more pictures on the Home Page. Neal I added a picture of my clew corner on page 3 Also a picture of a Christmas Gift from my crew of Ladies on my new Coffee Mug And for all a picture of the New Harken's Furler. My Dog just came out to tell me is time for bed; Good Night All, Ole Thom http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomsHomePage |
"Capt. Neal®" wrote The sail will tear in half at it's mid point long before this sturdy clew is even stretched significantly. That's what you get for being cheap. SV |
Good American sailcloth lovingly sewn in Hong Kong using a combination of
machine and hand-stitching from dedicated Chinese factory workers produces a product superior to the North Sail, for example, that is farmed out to Mexican and commie Korean workers who have never even seen a sail boat. CN "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... "Capt. Neal®" wrote The sail will tear in half at it's mid point long before this sturdy clew is even stretched significantly. That's what you get for being cheap. SV |
Neal,
I'm not sure you truly understand your main sail. That bolt rope on the foot of a shelved main give NO SUPPORT! A shelved main is a free footed main and anchored only at the TACK and the CLEW. That shelve is an elastic material which is designed to let the full airflow shape of the sail continue to the bottom of the sail. It is the assure that the air doesn't form a vortex at the Boom. The material is meant to be loose enough to let sail shape carry to the foot of the sail. All those layers of of cloth mean didderly without the stitching to prevent the shearing action that take place at the Clew corner. The slug is a nice feature but a Clew Strap is something you should install. With a free footed sail an awful lot of strain is put on the Boom slut. Neal, my friend, you have a weak Clew on that sail. Ole Thom P/S Neal, stop kidding yourself that the shelve is working as a system for STRENGTH. It isn't!! http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomsHomePage |
Thom, I'm not sure you understand MY shelf-footed main. It has no elastic material comprising the shelf. It has the same 6.9oz Dacron as the rest of the sail. It is the shape of the panel that constitutes the shelf foot that gives it it's shape. The bolt rope definitely gives the foot of the sail support as it slides into the internal track in the boom. Note in the photo how the sliding slug and the bolt rope line up. Both keep the foot onto the boom and have the added virtue of spreading out the forces over a greater area than with a clew only like your set-up. My friend you have a weak understanding of my clew and sails in general. Anybody who can even abide a roll-up headsail proves he has low standards and is willing to compromise performance for convenience, which convenience leads to all sorts of additional problems usually at the very worst times. And, of course, all those layers at the clew patch are sewn together. Done properly, which they are, those webbing straps are as unnecessary as tits on a boar hog. CN "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Neal, I'm not sure you truly understand your main sail. That bolt rope on the foot of a shelved main give NO SUPPORT! A shelved main is a free footed main and anchored only at the TACK and the CLEW. That shelve is an elastic material which is designed to let the full airflow shape of the sail continue to the bottom of the sail. It is the assure that the air doesn't form a vortex at the Boom. The material is meant to be loose enough to let sail shape carry to the foot of the sail. All those layers of of cloth mean didderly without the stitching to prevent the shearing action that take place at the Clew corner. The slug is a nice feature but a Clew Strap is something you should install. With a free footed sail an awful lot of strain is put on the Boom slut. Neal, my friend, you have a weak Clew on that sail. Ole Thom P/S Neal, stop kidding yourself that the shelve is working as a system for STRENGTH. It isn't!! http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomsHomePage |
Well Neal,
You're proven you inability to accept the truth about the action of a "Wing Keel", the fact of a low profile PH, the advantage of a furler on a cruising boat, and now the actual operation of your own Main Sail. The scope of your known ignorance continues to grow. Explanation seems hopeless. I will try, once again, to enlighten you. Your SHELVE, it has excess material so that as the foot of the sail forms its curve there is no resistance applied by the shelve. As you flatten your sail, the shelve folds on itself. This is what I refereed to as an elastic action. If you knew what the hell the shelve is doing you wouldn't be jumping to WRONG conclusions. Your sail's foot is only supported at the TACK and CLEW. You have the same support as you would have if the sail was REEFED. There would be no support from the Folded Part of the sail. That is the best example I can think of right now. Neal, your new main IS A FREE FOOTED sail/ with a shelve. Why can't you understand that a shelve give no more support to the foot of the sail than the reefed section of the sail http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomsHomePage |
Comments to help assist you in overcoming your misconceptions are
interspersed below. "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Well Neal, You're proven you inability to accept the truth about the action of a "Wing Keel", the fact of a low profile PH, the advantage of a furler on a cruising boat, and now the actual operation of your own Main Sail. The scope of your known ignorance continues to grow. Explanation seems hopeless. You don't have a wing keel. You have a keel with end plates. In order for it to be a wing keel the end plates must have a NACA foil section to them. You have silly flat plates that are NOT wings. I will try, once again, to enlighten you. Your SHELVE, it has excess material so that as the foot of the sail forms its curve there is no resistance applied by the shelve. No resistance? Is that why the mainsail will stay put even if their is only an aft force placed on the clew? If your argument was correct the sail would also need downward force at the clew. Make no mistake, a shelf-footed sail with a boltrope in the boom has it's shape maintained by the foot and clew and not the clew alone as you suggest. As you flatten your sail, the shelve folds on itself. This is what I refereed to as an elastic action. If you knew what the hell the shelve is doing you wouldn't be jumping to WRONG conclusions. I don't jump to wrong conclusions. It is presumptious of you to assume you know more about my mainsail that I know about it. But, the do say old farts get set in their ways so I forgive you your ignorance and haughtiness. Your sail's foot is only supported at the TACK and CLEW. You have the same support as you would have if the sail was REEFED. There would be no support from the Folded Part of the sail. That is the best example I can think of right now. Wrong, again. The foot is supported by the bolt rope as well as by the clew. Do you forget all about air pressure? Neal, your new main IS A FREE FOOTED sail/ with a shelve. Why can't you understand that a shelve give no more support to the foot of the sail than the reefed section of the sail Why can't you understand you are looking it the entire picture and seeing only a few pixels? CN |
I doubt you even know what a seaway is. . .
CN "Dave" wrote in message ... On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:33:27 -0500, Capt. Neal® said: Anybody who can even abide a roll-up headsail proves he has low standards and is willing to compromise performance for convenience, which convenience leads to all sorts of additional problems usually at the very worst times. LOL. You have an incredible ability to make virtue of necessity. Can't afford roller furling? Claim you do without it for improved sail shape. Can't afford the hardware to control your halyards from the cockpit? Pretend it's a virtue to have to run to the mast to drop your sails. BTW, on my old boat I used to store the halyard ends as you do while underway. When they came loose in a seaway I learned to put a shock cord sail stop around them. Dave |
"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
Good American sailcloth lovingly sewn in Hong Kong using a combination of machine and hand-stitching from dedicated Chinese factory workers produces a product superior to the North Sail, for example, that is farmed out to Mexican and commie Korean workers who have never even seen a sail boat. Are you saying that the Chinese aren't commies? |
"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
I'm not sure you understand MY shelf-footed main. It has no elastic material comprising the shelf. It has the same 6.9oz Dacron as the rest of the sail. It is the shape of the panel that constitutes the shelf foot that gives it it's shape. Only when the outhaul is set such that the sail can belly out to the extent allowed by the shelf foot. Tighten the outhaul, and the shelf foot becomes a loose 'bag' along the boom. |
Last time I looked, Hong Kong was a free, capitalist society
with no commies in charge of anything. Hong Kong used to be a British Colony. Good Grief! CN "Wally" wrote in message . .. "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message Good American sailcloth lovingly sewn in Hong Kong using a combination of machine and hand-stitching from dedicated Chinese factory workers produces a product superior to the North Sail, for example, that is farmed out to Mexican and commie Korean workers who have never even seen a sail boat. Are you saying that the Chinese aren't commies? |
If I desired to pull my outhaul all the way out so the sail is flat then
why would I bother having a shelf foot. The shape of the main is optimal with the shelf in place. CN "Wally" wrote in message . .. "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message I'm not sure you understand MY shelf-footed main. It has no elastic material comprising the shelf. It has the same 6.9oz Dacron as the rest of the sail. It is the shape of the panel that constitutes the shelf foot that gives it it's shape. Only when the outhaul is set such that the sail can belly out to the extent allowed by the shelf foot. Tighten the outhaul, and the shelf foot becomes a loose 'bag' along the boom. |
OK Neal,
You've proven your point of ignorance. I admit to my inability to show you the obvious. This is rather like your insisting on the air being heavier in a Low Pressure Area because of the moisture (G) I failed to show you the error of your way there also. I still try but I'm learning to call it quits after trying If your happy; so be it! OT http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomsHomePage |
Nice try Wally,
I would like Crappy to get the concept. Can't believe he doesn't understand. Ole Thom http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomsHomePage |
"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
If I desired to pull my outhaul all the way out so the sail is flat then why would I bother having a shelf foot. The shape of the main is optimal with the shelf in place. I thought the idea was to use the outhaul to flatten the main in heavy wind; and let it out for more belly in light wind. |
Wrong Again Crapton;
Hong Kong is now a part of China under the Communist Gov. control. OT http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomsHomePage |
"Thom Stewart" wrote in message news:671-41F6B9B9-
I would like Crappy to get the concept. Can't believe he doesn't understand. When a sweet, innocent, fresh-faced n00b can grasp it, it shows how much of a blowhard the Crapton is. |
That may be a racing mentality but for cruisers, one reefs in heavy wind.
CN "Wally" wrote in message . .. "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message If I desired to pull my outhaul all the way out so the sail is flat then why would I bother having a shelf foot. The shape of the main is optimal with the shelf in place. I thought the idea was to use the outhaul to flatten the main in heavy wind; and let it out for more belly in light wind. |
Sorry, Thom. You are wrong again.
http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/...k/geos/hk.html "Occupied by the UK in 1841, Hong Kong was formally ceded by China the following year; various adjacent lands were added later in the 19th century. Pursuant to an agreement signed by China and the UK on 19 December 1984, Hong Kong became the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR) of China on 1 July 1997. In this agreement, China has promised that, under its "one country, two systems" formula, China's socialist economic system will not be imposed on Hong Kong and that Hong Kong will enjoy a high degree of autonomy in all matters except foreign and defense affairs for the next 50 years. " CN "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Wrong Again Crapton; Hong Kong is now a part of China under the Communist Gov. control. OT http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomsHomePage |
"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
That may be a racing mentality but for cruisers, one reefs in heavy wind. So, short of reefing, you're saying that there's only one required sail shape for everythng up to, say, 20 knots, regardles of point of sailing? And that the outhaul is redundant insofar as it offers adjustment of the sail's belly? |
|
Slot, not slut . . .
"Remco Moedt" wrote in message ... On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:30:44 -0800, (Thom Stewart) wrote: With a free footed sail an awful lot of strain is put on the Boom slut. Now, English isn't my first (or second) language....but somehow I've a feeling there's a typo somewhere...if not, please fill me in. Cheers! Remco |
Last time I looked, Hong Kong was a free, capitalist society
with no commies in charge of anything. Hong Kong used to be a British Colony. Good Grief! CN ah, you are a bit behind the times. |
"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
Exactly correct. The designed shape of a mainsail for cruising does not have to be adjusted, either flattened or fattened in the normal wind range. My mainsail needs to be reefed around twenty knots on the first reef and around thirty five knots on the second reef. Why does your boat have an outhaul, then? Racers fool around with flattening sails but they argue about it. Some claim a full sail is best in light wind and others claim you should flatten the sail in light wind. I would be interested to hear why flattening the sail in light winds is better than fattening it. From the racing I've seen it doesn't seem to make much of a difference. I say, keep the designed shape of the sail and don't fool around with it because to do so only makes it less efficient. How many airplane wings change their shape in the cruising speed range? Answer, none! Invalid comparison. A plane wing that's designed for a slow plane is fatter than one for a fast plane. Every plane fattens its wings, by means of the flaps, for take-off and landing - much slower than its cruising speed, whatever that might be. The range of winds that a sailboat might find itself in doesn't equate to a notion of 'cruising speed range' - sailboats experience a wide range of wind speeds. and have to set the profile of the sail that's appropriate for the current wind speed. That's why they have outhauls. |
OzOne wrote I believe that Cappy is a set and forget sailor. I wonder what he'll do as the sail shape changes with wind strength Check the anchor and open another beer? |
|
Old age and its effects can be understood and forgiven. Being a total asshole willingly cannot. Get lost, asshole! CN wrote in message ... On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:28:55 -0500, Capt. Neal® wrote: Sorry, Thom. You are wrong again. http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/...k/geos/hk.html "Occupied by the UK in 1841, Hong Kong was formally ceded by China the following year; various adjacent lands were added later in the 19th century. Pursuant to an agreement signed by China and the UK on 19 December 1984, Hong Kong became the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR) of China on 1 July 1997. In this agreement, China has promised that, under its "one country, two systems" formula, China's socialist economic system will not be imposed on Hong Kong and that Hong Kong will enjoy a high degree of autonomy in all matters except foreign and defense affairs for the next 50 years. " CN Thom has already demonstrated very completely that he has no grasp of geography or navigation. He insists that he took a trip in a boat through places that simply don't exist. When called on it, he dug himself even deeper with corrections to his original statement that were even more incorrect. He just kept piling more errors on top of errors. He even made up a story about what he "thought" was the reason Shelter Island was so named. Wrong again! He was a dullard when younger, and now that he is getting senile, it's really hopeless. BB "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Wrong Again Crapton; Hong Kong is now a part of China under the Communist Gov. control. OT http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomsHomePage |
Remco,
I sail with a female crew but not a SLUT among them' A typo! excuse me. Ole Thom http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomsHomePage |
Wally,
Neal may not move the outhaul because he doesn't want add any stress to that Clew corner and the skimpy stitching. I can see his point but I don't think it will help in the long run. Ole Thom http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomsHomePage |
Maybe he's worried his galvanized pipe boom will bend , back to
straight. Scotty "Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Wally, Neal may not move the outhaul because he doesn't want add any stress to that Clew corner and the skimpy stitching. I can see his point but I don't think it will help in the long run. Ole Thom http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomsHomePage |
Neal,
That freedom of the Hong Kong people granted by the Chinese Communist Gov is the reason for the Cargo Containers Loaded with the refugees from Hong Kong trying to get into our West Coast and Canada, I guess they just can't stand that much Freedom. I can't seem to remember people fleeing like that under the British Rule, mostly because it wasn't happening. Ole Thom http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomsHomePage |
Neal.
Thanks for speaking up for the Old Man but you're just talking back to 'Net Static with distorted repeats of sent post. Simply tune it out. You can't use logic with STATIC. Tune it out! Ole Thom http://community.webtv.net/tassail/ThomsHomePage |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com