http://www.suntimes.com/output/laney...t-laney29.html

a teaser: This from a soldier who served with Kerry on Kerry's
boat.

"I had confrontations with him there. He nearly got us rammed by the VC one night because he wasn't watching the helm. I heard the
motor coming close, turned on the spotlight, and the boat was only 90 feet away, coming fast. The VC was aiming an AK47 at us. I
shot him out of the boat. We pulled a woman and a baby off the boat. Kerry wrote it up that we captured two VC and killed four more
on the beach. None of that was true. The only thing true on Kerry's report was the date. The woman was catatonic and wouldn't call
her baby VC and there were no VC on the beach. If we had seen that report before Kerry sent it up the chain of command, he would
have been court-martialed and never allowed to run for office. And that's just the San Pan incident. There was much more. He is a
self-aggrandizing bold-faced liar. I believe he caused the extension of that war."

In article ,
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Capt._Neal=AE?= wrote:
http://www.suntimes.com/output/laney...t-laney29.html


Sounds to me like you're trying to prop up something that ALREADY
won. I wonder why....

--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

Crapton,

First of all; If he served on Kerry's boat, he couldn't have been a
solder!!!

Ole Thom

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:51:37 -0500, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Capt._Neal=AE?= wrote:

http://www.suntimes.com/output/laney...t-laney29.html

Interesting, of the ten men that served with Kerry, only *one* did not
support him. But of course, he is the truthful one. Biased?

http://www.dailykos.com/comments/200...0311/48764/6#6