Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Research shows that many diseases can be cured - not just suppressed but
cured using your own stem cells - but how to get enough to do the job? The answer is to strip a cell - say a frog egg of its DNA, replace it with yours and do a little well proven medical hocus pocus and the cell begins to divide and redivide into *your* stem cells - cells that can repair damaged tissues to cure diabetes, parkinsons, et al. Why aren't we pursueing this? Because the religious right thinks it is wrong and they control enough US politicians to prevent it happening in the USA. Thank goodness the rest of the world disagrees. NITED NATIONS, Nov. 19 - Faced with polarizing division in the 191-member General Assembly, the United States on Friday abandoned its aggressively pursued attempt to obtain a United Nations treaty banning all human cloning, including that done in the name of medical research. The outcome - an agreement to come up with a nonbinding declaration against cloning to reproduce humans - fell far short of the American goal and represented a setback for President Bush. He called for a worldwide ban on all cloning when he addressed the United Nations General Assembly in August, and he made limiting stem cell and other related research an issue in his presidential campaign. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Let's talk facts . . .
Bush fails again? Bwahahahahahha. It wasn't the President who lost the 2000 and 2004 elections. Where are you living? The land of Oz? The current state of affairs with respect to stem cell research has nothing to do with the so-called religious right. Only liberal bigots think such weird thoughts. It's all about economics. For your information the best source of adult stem cells in from adipose tissue (fat) which most Americans have in abundance. The best way to cure ourselves is to use our own stem cells for the job, not killing fetuses. There is no ban on private research into stem cells to fight and cure disease. There is a govt. ban on spending tax dollars on fetal stem cell research but only on new lines of fetal cells which would be gotten by destroying fetuses. (murdering babies). There is no government ban on spending tax money on existing lines of fetal stem cell research. As a matter of fact, President Bush has signed appropriations larger than his predecessor on fetal stem cell research on existing lines. Idiots like John Edwards who claimed if it weren't for George W. Bush, cripple people would be getting out of their wheelchairs and walking are just that - IDIOTS. There is no research to date on ANY kind of stem cells that shows broken spinal cords can be fused back together and made wholly functional again. Stop being so damned gullible and ignorant. CN "Vito" wrote in message ... Research shows that many diseases can be cured - not just suppressed but cured using your own stem cells - but how to get enough to do the job? The answer is to strip a cell - say a frog egg of its DNA, replace it with yours and do a little well proven medical hocus pocus and the cell begins to divide and redivide into *your* stem cells - cells that can repair damaged tissues to cure diabetes, parkinsons, et al. Why aren't we pursueing this? Because the religious right thinks it is wrong and they control enough US politicians to prevent it happening in the USA. Thank goodness the rest of the world disagrees. NITED NATIONS, Nov. 19 - Faced with polarizing division in the 191-member General Assembly, the United States on Friday abandoned its aggressively pursued attempt to obtain a United Nations treaty banning all human cloning, including that done in the name of medical research. The outcome - an agreement to come up with a nonbinding declaration against cloning to reproduce humans - fell far short of the American goal and represented a setback for President Bush. He called for a worldwide ban on all cloning when he addressed the United Nations General Assembly in August, and he made limiting stem cell and other related research an issue in his presidential campaign. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Capt. Neal®" wrote in message
... Let's talk facts . . . Bush fails again? Bwahahahahahha. It wasn't the President who lost the 2000 and 2004 elections. Where are you living? The land of Oz? Bush wasn't elected the first time. He was chosen by the Supreme Court. The current state of affairs with respect to stem cell research has nothing to do with the so-called religious right. Only liberal bigots think such weird thoughts. Absolutely does. Their view is that anything that could possibly, in some remote corner of the universe, where the laws of physics and biology don't apply, should be banned. They also believe that the Earth is only 6000 years old, and that creationism is comparable to the theory of evolution. It's all about economics. For your information the best source of adult stem cells in from adipose tissue (fat) which most Americans have in abundance. The best way to cure ourselves is to use our own stem cells for the job, not killing fetuses. Like I said... There is no ban on private research into stem cells to fight and cure disease. There is a govt. ban on spending tax dollars on fetal stem cell research but only on new lines of fetal cells which would be gotten by destroying fetuses. (murdering babies). You need to have a better understanding of the issue before you open your hole. There is no government ban on spending tax money on existing lines of fetal stem cell research. As a matter of fact, President Bush has signed appropriations larger than his predecessor on fetal stem cell research on existing lines. No, you're just an idiot. Idiots like John Edwards who claimed if it weren't for George W. Bush, cripple people would be getting out of their wheelchairs and walking are just that - IDIOTS. There is no research to date on ANY kind of stem cells that shows broken spinal cords can be fused back together and made wholly functional again. To date, there's every indication that stem cells can do wonderous things. But, according to your logic, if something doesn't work now, it will never work. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ... Bush wasn't elected the first time. He was chosen by the Supreme Court. Wrong! Yet another tired, incorrect liberal saw use to keep from having to admit defeat. The FACT is the electoral college of the United States of America elected George W. Bush. The Supreme court simply advised the supreme court of Florida - a liberal bunch like your ninth circuit court of appeals - that they errored in their writing election law from the bench and that the certified election results from Florida would stand. The current state of affairs with respect to stem cell research has nothing to do with the so-called religious right. Only liberal bigots think such weird thoughts. Absolutely does. Their view is that anything that could possibly, in some remote corner of the universe, where the laws of physics and biology don't apply, should be banned. They also believe that the Earth is only 6000 years old, and that creationism is comparable to the theory of evolution. Your OPINION! A few believe that nonsense but many have a more enlightened view. At any rate they do not control the government purse strings. Like I said... You haven't said squat. Glip rejoinders don't an argument make. There is no ban on private research into stem cells to fight and cure disease. There is a govt. ban on spending tax dollars on fetal stem cell research but only on new lines of fetal cells which would be gotten by destroying fetuses. (murdering babies). You need to have a better understanding of the issue before you open your hole. It is clear I understand it way, way better than you dol There is no government ban on spending tax money on existing lines of fetal stem cell research. As a matter of fact, President Bush has signed appropriations larger than his predecessor on fetal stem cell research on existing lines. No, you're just an idiot. Yes sir, another fine, reasoned argument. Typical liberal, however, when all else fails resort to simple name calling with no evidence to back it up. Idiots like John Edwards who claimed if it weren't for George W. Bush, cripple people would be getting out of their wheelchairs and walking are just that - IDIOTS. There is no research to date on ANY kind of stem cells that shows broken spinal cords can be fused back together and made wholly functional again. To date, there's every indication that stem cells can do wonderous things. But, according to your logic, if something doesn't work now, it will never work. Not so, according to my logic, most Americans and their President who they voted into office don't think it's right to spend tax dollars killing babies. Praise the Lord for that victory of sanity over barbarism. Pixie dust has been known to do wonderous things so does that mean we should spend our tax dollars on it even if it is gotten by killing babies? CN |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Capt. Neal®" wrote
Idiots like John Edwards who claimed if it weren't for George W. Bush, cripple people would be getting out of their wheelchairs and walking are just that - IDIOTS. Apparently the majority of the country didn't fall for that BS. Only gullible, idiot liberal cry babies like BBob ganz fell for it. Stop being so damned gullible and ignorant. he can't help it. -- Scott Vernon Plowville Pa _/)__/)_/)_ |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 13:35:32 -0800, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap: "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message ... Let's talk facts . . . Bush fails again? Bwahahahahahha. It wasn't the President who lost the 2000 and 2004 elections. Where are you living? The land of Oz? Bush wasn't elected the first time. He was chosen by the Supreme Court. That's a lie. The Supreme Court doesn't have that ability, Jon-boy. Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now! |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Horvath" wrote in message
... On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 13:35:32 -0800, "Jonathan Ganz" wrote this crap: "Capt. Neal®" wrote in message ... Let's talk facts . . . Bush fails again? Bwahahahahahha. It wasn't the President who lost the 2000 and 2004 elections. Where are you living? The land of Oz? Bush wasn't elected the first time. He was chosen by the Supreme Court. I'm gay. Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now! |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Unlike the ignorant truck-driver types who lapped it up.
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... "Capt. Neal®" wrote Idiots like John Edwards who claimed if it weren't for George W. Bush, cripple people would be getting out of their wheelchairs and walking are just that - IDIOTS. Apparently the majority of the country didn't fall for that BS. Only gullible, idiot liberal cry babies like BBob ganz fell for it. Stop being so damned gullible and ignorant. he can't help it. -- Scott Vernon Plowville Pa _/)__/)_/)_ |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 19:21:53 -0800, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap: I'm gay. Shut up. Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now! |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Capt. Neal®" wrote The current state of affairs with respect to stem cell research has nothing to do with the so-called religious right. Oh BS. That's a bald face lie and you know it. It's all about economics. For your information the best source of adult stem cells in from adipose tissue (fat) which most Americans have in abundance. The best way to cure ourselves is to use our own stem cells for the job, not killing fetuses. Wrong again! There are not enough stem cells in the fat to be useful. Fact is the best way to grow my stem cells is to begin a clone - on that will never become anything but a blob of stem cells. There is no ban on private research into stem cells to fight and cure disease. There is a govt. ban on spending tax dollars on fetal stem cell research but only on new lines of fetal cells which would be gotten by destroying fetuses. (murdering babies). Who says a cloned lump of stem cells is a baby? Why the nazis on the religious right who still believe the world is flat. If a fetus is a baby then a tadpole is a frog I ate 3 chickens for breakfast. There is no government ban on spending tax money on existing lines of fetal stem cell research. Political smoke and mirrors to cover up J-freak interference in science. There is no research to date on ANY kind of stem cells that shows broken spinal cords can be fused back together and made wholly functional again. It's not about spinal cords - it is about diabetes and a dozen other diseases. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|