Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bobsprit" wrote
Vito, you clearly never used a modern digital camera. Modern 6 MP and better match or exceed the capability of a 35MM camera. You are right. My 4.2 MP zoom is OK for snapshots used for web posting or newsprint where quality doesn't matter. It replaced my 35mm SLR that I used for essentially the same purposes - ie where quality didn't matter. Unless you're refering to 8X10 cameras which are less than practical. There is nothing so beautiful as a well concieved and executed 8x10 contact print with the lovely range of tones unachievable in miniture (35mm) film cameras or any digital camera I could afford. But you can compromise and still get acceptable quality out of a practical 4x5 and old Graphics can still be found in good shape. Not many pros used them these days. That's because customers have become inured to poor quality. Check out some old Life magazines and see what I mean. Your comment on contrast makes zero sense. A 5 Mp shot with a G5 can match contrast with a 35mm shot on Kodak F5 papers. That's because, like most minicam and digital tyros, you have no appreciation of contrast control. You point and shoot and take whatever your camera's computer gives you and deem it "good". But since you are reasonably intellegent your ignorance in this area can be cured by simply learning and understanding the Zone System. I suggest Ansel Adam's series on that subject. Works for color too, BTW. Get back to me when you can google up a clue. Yes, please do. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
No. No!!! Noooo!!! | ASA |