Or we'll spend the 8 years after Bush is gone trying to sail under Hillary's
rule!

In article ,
Recobee wrote:
Or we'll spend the 8 years after Bush is gone trying to sail under Hillary's
rule!

This logic almost makes me want to vote for Bush... almost.




--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message

In article ,
Recobee wrote:
Or we'll spend the 8 years after Bush is gone trying to sail under
Hillary's
rule!

This logic almost makes me want to vote for Bush... almost.

You'd be banished for life from the Bay Area, Jon.

Max

In article . net,
Maxprop wrote:

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message

In article ,
Recobee wrote:
Or we'll spend the 8 years after Bush is gone trying to sail under
Hillary's
rule!

This logic almost makes me want to vote for Bush... almost.

You'd be banished for life from the Bay Area, Jon.

Not if Hillary got elected. g




--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message

Maxprop wrote:

You'd be banished for life from the Bay Area, Jon.

Not if Hillary got elected. g

My brother and his circle of friends--all Bay Area liberals, plus a moderate
or two--like Kerry but are still somewhat afraid of Hillary as a candidate.
They seem to believe that she is still unelectable.

Strange that you favor her over Kerry, because Kerry tends more toward the
left wing than even she. Kerry has a Senate voting record that couldn't be
construed as a moderate one by any measure. Hillary, OTOH, would be far
more believable as a moderate than Kerry. I disagree with my brother and
his cronies--she'll be electable in four years.

Max

In article . net,
Maxprop wrote:

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message

Maxprop wrote:

You'd be banished for life from the Bay Area, Jon.

Not if Hillary got elected. g

My brother and his circle of friends--all Bay Area liberals, plus a moderate
or two--like Kerry but are still somewhat afraid of Hillary as a candidate.
They seem to believe that she is still unelectable.

Strange that you favor her over Kerry, because Kerry tends more toward the
left wing than even she. Kerry has a Senate voting record that couldn't be
construed as a moderate one by any measure. Hillary, OTOH, would be far
more believable as a moderate than Kerry. I disagree with my brother and
his cronies--she'll be electable in four years.

Not that strange. We get Bill again for free. g


--
Jonathan Ganz (j gan z @ $ail no w.c=o=m)
http://www.sailnow.com
"If there's no wind, row."

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message

Not that strange. We get Bill again for free. g

Bwahahahahahaha. What you mean is that you get Hillary AGAIN.

Max

Nothing wrong with Hillary it's win-win for the Democrats. At the very
least and probably very best they would finally have a man in charge and as
bonus they get to shed fifty plus years of anti-military stance. After all
is said and done or until the women of the country are made truly equal
military service does NOT count for a woman candidate. Now if they can just
keep Wrangell from running his mouth about starting up the draft. . .. .
Hillary should be home free.





"Maxprop" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message

Not that strange. We get Bill again for free. g

Bwahahahahahaha. What you mean is that you get Hillary AGAIN.

Max

Yep. Bill was a great president because he had a great wife.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Maxprop" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message

Not that strange. We get Bill again for free. g

Bwahahahahahaha. What you mean is that you get Hillary AGAIN.

Max

Micheal,

Don't think so! GOP has McCain just waiting to go against Hillary.
I don't think the Dems have any one to beat him!

Ole Thom