But you scare us.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Bart Senior" wrote in message
. net...
My personal choice would be McCain.

Of the Democrats, I like Lieberman the best.

Niether of these two scare me.

"Maxprop" wrote

"Bart Senior" wrote in message

Limbaugh would be counting the day;'s until the next
election, and begin every day with telling everyone
"XX days of Kerry tyranny to go."

What do you think the extremist liberals will do,
when Kerry loses? They will scream the election
was fixed and start impeachment proceedings.

What the country needs right now is continuity,
not change.

What the country really needs is an administration that will unite
rather
than polarize the country. Sadly neither Bush nor Kerry will fit that
role.
Even worse, it will probably take another brutal attack by terrorists to
unite the country, but, as before, that unity will be short lived, with
recriminations starting soon afterward.

Katysails said it best: (to paraphrase) when one is faced with two
undesirable alternatives, stick with the one with which you are
familiar.
Bush.

Max

A fighter pilot that never showed up for his fitness physical.

He was a weak governer by design, since Texas has by
law weak governors.

Yes, you are a dumbass.

I'm glad I annoy you. It really makes my life worth living.

BTW, you have a piece of crap hunter that you pretend
to sail.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 18:09:05 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap:

Kerry served his country in VN. Bush barely served

He was a fighter pilot, dumbass. It takes years of training to become
a pilot, you stupid dumbass.

and didn't bother to show up for his physical. We're
still waiting to hear from Bush about that. Apparently,
he's not got much he wants to tell us. He was a weak
governer and is a terrible president. He and his father
can share the glory of being one-term presidents.


He was an excellant governor, and an excellant president, especially
in time of a crisis. And he was an excellant businessman. You're
just a gay liberal, who can't accept the truth.


Here's my prediction: After Kerry wins in November,
you and your right-wing wacko friends will be totally
silent.


Here's my prediction: After George W. Bush wins reelection, you put
the muzzle of a gun in your mouth, and put us out of your misery.





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

So, what you're saying is that it was ok for Bush to squander
his opportunity to be a pilot, which he did by failing to show
and was thus classified as unfit.

Basically, Bush decided that rather than lie about his alcohol
and drug abuse problem, he would just flake on the physical.
Typical for a drug addict... probably you should confirm
with Rush though.

Try and break in my house, and I'll put a cap in your ass as
you try and run away.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Bart Senior" wrote in message
. net...
"Horvath" wrote

On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 18:09:05 -0700, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote this crap:

Kerry served his country in VN. Bush barely served

He was a fighter pilot, dumbass. It takes years of training to become
a pilot, you stupid dumbass.

If I had a chance to be a fighter pilot, I'd pick
that over anything else. I couldn't qualify, because
of my eyesight. I was offered a back seat in an
F-4 with the Marines, maybe I should have taken
that.

and didn't bother to show up for his physical. We're
still waiting to hear from Bush about that. Apparently,
he's not got much he wants to tell us. He was a weak
governer and is a terrible president. He and his father
can share the glory of being one-term presidents.

Is Jon still whining about GWB's physical? Do you
know how many times I ducked things like that. I
got sick every time I had a flu shot and finally made
a deal with the fellow who gave shots. We'd talk
for 30 minutes, he'd pretend he forgot, and ask me if
he gave me the shot already, and I'd say yes, and he'd
send me on my way!

The reserves are even more relaxed than active duty.

Here's my prediction: After George W. Bush wins reelection, you put
the muzzle of a gun in your mouth, and put us out of your misery.

Jon doesn't have a gun. Maybe a water pistol.

Only sockpuppets like you.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Bald'n Fugley" wrote in message
...
Bart Senior wrote:
"Horvath" wrote
Here's my prediction: After George W. Bush wins reelection, you (Jon)
put
the muzzle of a gun in your mouth, and put us out of your misery.

Jon doesn't have a gun. Maybe a water pistol.

Scared of guns?

hahahahahaha.... please don't tell him to do that! It's just
too much fun!

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Maxprop" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Horvath" wrote in message


dumbass.
dumbass.

You certainly like that term, doncha? Why not shut up and quit making
conservatives look so stupid.

Max

We shall see.....

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Maxprop" wrote in message
hlink.net...

"Bart Senior" wrote in message

And they want to believe Kerry is not an extremist
liberal when the facts show he is. They will accept bias
voting record information over the polls of numerous
groups.

I don't really believe Kerry is an extremist liberal, but he certainly is
about as far left as anyone in the Senate these days, by virtue of his
voting record. That said, he has a long way to go to be as extreme as
Michael Moore. But in this particular campaign there is so much rhetoric
coming from the far left--Kerry really has not distanced himself from the
likes of Moore, Franken, and Dean--that it is easy to equate the
Kerry/Edwards campaign with the extremists.

The numerous groups who track voting records look
at the entire bill being voted on and then access whether
it is good or bad for that particular group. And they
give a rating of 0 to 100. Kerry popped out as tied at
one extreme with 93. That makes him extremist.

It makes him ostensibly the most liberal senator, but an extremist?

They
don't want to accept that fact that he is a liberal. Not
proud of it, and wants to paint hmself as something he
is not.

It would be tough to paint Kerry as anything other than a liberal. He
certainly is no centrist, nor is John E. This is the most liberal ticket
the democrats have had since McGovern.

And he wants to run on a shaky war record, like
he is some kind of a hero, when he cowardly bailed out
after only four months of combat duty.

This is what I find so scary, as do so many others.

GWB is having a tough enough time. He needs our
support, and four more years to accomplish something.
We don't need to change watch now.

It's double or nothing.

Traditionally liberals have a tough time getting elected in this country,
at
least since LBJ. Even Clinton saw this and placed his campaign rhetoric
only slightly left of center. Kerry simply has too much baggage to pass
himself off as a centrist. He is a liberal, and he seems to make no bones
about it. If one is for bigger government and higher taxes, he's their
man.

Max

Not even close... the right-wing hate machine is just getting
revved up.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Maxprop" wrote in message
link.net...

"thunder" wrote in message

On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 14:36:17 +0000, Bart Senior wrote:


Now Moore is really scary. If Kerry has denounced him, I'd feel a lot
better about Kerry. When he didn't I had to place him over there with
Moore. Kerry really isolated him from much of America with that.

Now, Swift Boat Veterans for Truth is really scary. If Bush had
denounced
them, I'd feel a lot better about Bush. When he didn't, I had to place
him over there with Spaeth. Bush really isolated himself from much of
America with that.

Guess that makes both sides about even, eh?

Max

So, you think it was ok for him to just sit there??? Is that what
you would have done? My pet goat seems like it rises to his
level of an urgent national matter. Have you seen the film of
him? He looked like a deer in the headlights.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Maxprop" wrote in message
link.net...

"Bart Senior" wrote in message


"Bart Senior" wrote in message

I don't really believe Kerry is an extremist liberal, but he certainly
is
about as far left as anyone in the Senate these days, by virtue of his
voting record. That said, he has a long way to go to be as extreme as
Michael Moore. But in this particular campaign there is so much
rhetoric

I was comparing Kerry to his cohorts in Congress.
You are right, he is nowhere as extremist as Moore.

coming from the far left--Kerry really has not distanced himself from
the
likes of Moore, Franken, and Dean--that it is easy to equate the
Kerry/Edwards campaign with the extremists.
]
Now Moore is really scary. If Kerry has denounced
him, I'd feel a lot better about Kerry. When he didn't
I had to place him over there with Moore. Kerry really
isolated him(self) from much of America with that.

I agree to a point. The other day Kerry was voicing his outrage that W
spent 7 more minutes reading to school children after being informed that
the WTC had been attacked. THAT is right out of F911. Kerry claims that
HE
would have excused himself and gotten down to business. Doing what????
What could seven minutes have allowed him to do, especially since everyone
was waiting for more info at that point. Kerry's bone of contention is a
very minor point at best, and one without any particular merit. But he
has
so little to work with this campaign that he'll jump on anything,
including
something as silly as this. But he needs to use caution: if the middle
ground folks (that vaunted "undecided" zone) think he's associated with
the
LW extremists, he could hurt himself more than help. My personal take:
Bush demonstrated calm and cool under fire. Rather than simply react, he
continued his job at hand and then left. The left loves to call
conservatives "reactionaries." Hmmm.

It makes him ostensibly the most liberal senator, but an extremist?

If he is at one extreme in the Senate, then how far to the left
would he go if unchecked? Since he won't declare his position,
or take the NPAT test, we have no idea what he will do!

. . . which is precisely what scares me most about him. With a democrat
majority in one or both houses, he could dismanted much of the good works
of
many past presidents and congresses. He could plunge us into even greater
debt at the government feeding trough for those who choose not to be
productive. He could dismantle an already abbreviated military. And he
could clog the Supreme Court with liberals for another several decades.
THAT is what scares me most. The Constitution could ultimately end up
being
as unimportant as Bill Clinton's book, God could be a word not allowed to
be
spoken in public, and Roe vs. Wade could be expanded to include children
up
to and including one year of age, if undesirable to their parents. :-o
(Sorry, there's no emoticon for 'tongue-in-cheek,' but you get my drift.)

It would be tough to paint Kerry as anything other than a liberal. He

That is what they are trying to do. It's funny because hear we have
a man, that is extremely liberal, who won the party nominiation
because of this, and yet tries to hide it.

You really think so? That's akin to attempting to hide an elephant behind
the drapes. Only the pathologically stupid would take Kerry or Edwards
for
centrists. If they are trying to talk the centrist talk, then it's
contingent upon the Bush campaign to point out the truth.

Max

On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 15:40:43 GMT, "Maxprop"
wrote this crap:


"Horvath" wrote in message


dumbass.
dumbass.

You certainly like that term, doncha? Why not shut up and quit making
conservatives look so stupid.

Max



Don't tell me what to do, dumbass.





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!

That's right Max, don't tell him what to do. Please!

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Horvath" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 15:40:43 GMT, "Maxprop"
wrote this crap:


"Horvath" wrote in message


dumbass.
dumbass.

You certainly like that term, doncha? Why not shut up and quit making
conservatives look so stupid.

Max



Don't tell me what to do, dumbass.





Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now!