BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   ASA (https://www.boatbanter.com/asa/)
-   -   WONDERFUL AND BRILLIANT THINKING! (https://www.boatbanter.com/asa/20318-wonderful-brilliant-thinking.html)

Bob Crantz July 12th 04 03:57 AM

WONDERFUL AND BRILLIANT THINKING!
 
NOW HERE'S SOME GREAT WRITING, OBVIOUSLY DONE BY A GREAT MIND!

UPPER KEYS NEWSPAPER, LETTER TO EDITOR
READ ON!


"Children, play nice," harangues the hapless playground attendant. "Speed
limit: 55 mph," proclaims the bullet-riddled highway sign. "Sinners,
repent," admonishes the ostentatious clergyman. "More government is
better," proselytizes the libidinous liberal. "Less government is better,"
affirms the affable conservative. "Peace, love and flower power," exhales
the herb-smoking hippy.

"Don't be mean-spirited; write nice," pens the pious editor.

Year after year of haranguing, proclaiming, admonishing, proselytizing,
affirming, exhaling, and penning, has changed nothing. People still act like
people. One can't produce a silk purse from a sow's ear.

After reading your editorial, I find myself wondering who gave a mere child
the wisdom and experience to be the arbiter of mean-spirited, sarcastic,
abusive, and negative? Young editors haven't spent enough time in the world
to have perspective on those words in this old man's humble opinion.

While I applaud your policy of not censoring opinion letters, I find myself
appalled by your logic. You state, concerning writers of "mean-spirited"
letters, that you agree with some of your best friends who label them
jealous of the wealthy and having nothing productive to contribute. You
actually befriend people who say mean-spirited things while decrying those
who write the same? Duh! And, how's calling the USA an "embarrassment"
anything but mean-spirited and a clear case of pot calling kettle black? So,
welcome to the club, dear.

The trend in newspapers to censor the opinions of writers whose views don't
support an editor's agenda is treating readers like children. It turns a
newspaper into a propaganda flyer. It's inane and unprofessional. It drives
readers away. An editor's primary concern should be to ensure the news and
editorial content is timely, accurate and grammatically correct. Nice won't
sell as many papers as facts, controversy and uncensored feedback from
readers (excluding libel and profanity, of course).

That you can say opinion letters "abuse" the First Amendment demonstrates a
serious misunderstanding on your behalf. Have you not read the First
Amendment? It says, "Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press."

Young lady, may I remind you a newspaper is not "Congress" and the First
Amendment has little to do with opinion letters in newspapers, nor does it
govern an editor's excluding, slanting or censoring material. One has a
right to speak but no right to be heard. Only morality allows the hearing of
speech - all speech, even so-called hate speech.

Immorality disallows the hearing of speech. You appear to know this
intrinsically. Please realize it, for it's a rare gift in one so young.

So, good on you for standing on high moral ground. You've allowed those of
us who don't fear reality to see it reflected in your paper. Your morals
place you head and shoulders above at least one other local editor, and
counteract some illogic and naivety born of tender years. Keep up the good
work and keep hearing. We need you.

Neal Warren
Tavernier





Joe July 12th 04 06:06 PM

WONDERFUL AND BRILLIANT THINKING!
 
"Bob Crantz" wrote in message hlink.net...
NOW HERE'S SOME GREAT WRITING, OBVIOUSLY DONE BY A GREAT MIND!


Yes but not from the real Capt. Neal. for we all know he is crusing the islands.


Joe



UPPER KEYS NEWSPAPER, LETTER TO EDITOR
READ ON!


"Children, play nice," harangues the hapless playground attendant. "Speed
limit: 55 mph," proclaims the bullet-riddled highway sign. "Sinners,
repent," admonishes the ostentatious clergyman. "More government is
better," proselytizes the libidinous liberal. "Less government is better,"
affirms the affable conservative. "Peace, love and flower power," exhales
the herb-smoking hippy.

"Don't be mean-spirited; write nice," pens the pious editor.

Year after year of haranguing, proclaiming, admonishing, proselytizing,
affirming, exhaling, and penning, has changed nothing. People still act like
people. One can't produce a silk purse from a sow's ear.

After reading your editorial, I find myself wondering who gave a mere child
the wisdom and experience to be the arbiter of mean-spirited, sarcastic,
abusive, and negative? Young editors haven't spent enough time in the world
to have perspective on those words in this old man's humble opinion.

While I applaud your policy of not censoring opinion letters, I find myself
appalled by your logic. You state, concerning writers of "mean-spirited"
letters, that you agree with some of your best friends who label them
jealous of the wealthy and having nothing productive to contribute. You
actually befriend people who say mean-spirited things while decrying those
who write the same? Duh! And, how's calling the USA an "embarrassment"
anything but mean-spirited and a clear case of pot calling kettle black? So,
welcome to the club, dear.

The trend in newspapers to censor the opinions of writers whose views don't
support an editor's agenda is treating readers like children. It turns a
newspaper into a propaganda flyer. It's inane and unprofessional. It drives
readers away. An editor's primary concern should be to ensure the news and
editorial content is timely, accurate and grammatically correct. Nice won't
sell as many papers as facts, controversy and uncensored feedback from
readers (excluding libel and profanity, of course).

That you can say opinion letters "abuse" the First Amendment demonstrates a
serious misunderstanding on your behalf. Have you not read the First
Amendment? It says, "Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press."

Young lady, may I remind you a newspaper is not "Congress" and the First
Amendment has little to do with opinion letters in newspapers, nor does it
govern an editor's excluding, slanting or censoring material. One has a
right to speak but no right to be heard. Only morality allows the hearing of
speech - all speech, even so-called hate speech.

Immorality disallows the hearing of speech. You appear to know this
intrinsically. Please realize it, for it's a rare gift in one so young.

So, good on you for standing on high moral ground. You've allowed those of
us who don't fear reality to see it reflected in your paper. Your morals
place you head and shoulders above at least one other local editor, and
counteract some illogic and naivety born of tender years. Keep up the good
work and keep hearing. We need you.

Neal Warren
Tavernier


Bob Crantz July 14th 04 01:00 AM

WONDERFUL AND BRILLIANT THINKING!
 
It WaS WRITTen iN junE


"Joe" wrote in message
om...
"Bob Crantz" wrote in message

hlink.net...
NOW HERE'S SOME GREAT WRITING, OBVIOUSLY DONE BY A GREAT MIND!


Yes but not from the real Capt. Neal. for we all know he is crusing the

islands.


Joe



UPPER KEYS NEWSPAPER, LETTER TO EDITOR
READ ON!


"Children, play nice," harangues the hapless playground attendant.

"Speed
limit: 55 mph," proclaims the bullet-riddled highway sign. "Sinners,
repent," admonishes the ostentatious clergyman. "More government is
better," proselytizes the libidinous liberal. "Less government is

better,"
affirms the affable conservative. "Peace, love and flower power,"

exhales
the herb-smoking hippy.

"Don't be mean-spirited; write nice," pens the pious editor.

Year after year of haranguing, proclaiming, admonishing, proselytizing,
affirming, exhaling, and penning, has changed nothing. People still act

like
people. One can't produce a silk purse from a sow's ear.

After reading your editorial, I find myself wondering who gave a mere

child
the wisdom and experience to be the arbiter of mean-spirited, sarcastic,
abusive, and negative? Young editors haven't spent enough time in the

world
to have perspective on those words in this old man's humble opinion.

While I applaud your policy of not censoring opinion letters, I find

myself
appalled by your logic. You state, concerning writers of "mean-spirited"
letters, that you agree with some of your best friends who label them
jealous of the wealthy and having nothing productive to contribute. You
actually befriend people who say mean-spirited things while decrying

those
who write the same? Duh! And, how's calling the USA an "embarrassment"
anything but mean-spirited and a clear case of pot calling kettle black?

So,
welcome to the club, dear.

The trend in newspapers to censor the opinions of writers whose views

don't
support an editor's agenda is treating readers like children. It turns a
newspaper into a propaganda flyer. It's inane and unprofessional. It

drives
readers away. An editor's primary concern should be to ensure the news

and
editorial content is timely, accurate and grammatically correct. Nice

won't
sell as many papers as facts, controversy and uncensored feedback from
readers (excluding libel and profanity, of course).

That you can say opinion letters "abuse" the First Amendment

demonstrates a
serious misunderstanding on your behalf. Have you not read the First
Amendment? It says, "Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom

of
speech, or of the press."

Young lady, may I remind you a newspaper is not "Congress" and the First
Amendment has little to do with opinion letters in newspapers, nor does

it
govern an editor's excluding, slanting or censoring material. One has a
right to speak but no right to be heard. Only morality allows the

hearing of
speech - all speech, even so-called hate speech.

Immorality disallows the hearing of speech. You appear to know this
intrinsically. Please realize it, for it's a rare gift in one so young.

So, good on you for standing on high moral ground. You've allowed those

of
us who don't fear reality to see it reflected in your paper. Your morals
place you head and shoulders above at least one other local editor, and
counteract some illogic and naivety born of tender years. Keep up the

good
work and keep hearing. We need you.

Neal Warren
Tavernier




katysails July 14th 04 01:07 AM

WONDERFUL AND BRILLIANT THINKING!
 
He's really getting dotty in his old age....if he thinks that's going to
work as a pick-up line, he's way far gone....

--
katysails
s/v Chanteuse
Kirie Elite 32
http://katysails.tripod.com

"Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax
and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.712 / Virus Database: 468 - Release Date: 6/27/2004



Bob Crantz July 14th 04 03:14 AM

WONDERFUL AND BRILLIANT THINKING!
 
TADPOLE:
All that I prophesied: desertion, want!. . .
His letters now make him fresh enemies!--
Attacking the sham nobles, sham devout,
Sham brave,--the thieving authors,--all the world!

KATY:
Ah! but his logic still holds them all in check;
None get the better of him.

THE NAVIGATOR (shaking his head):
Time will show!

TADPOLE:
Ah, but I fear for him--not man's attack,--
Solitude--hunger--cold December days,
That wolf-like steal into his chamber drear:--
Lo! the assassins that I fear for him!
Each day he tightens by one hole his belt:
That poor nose--tinted like old ivory:
He has retained one shabby suit of serge.

THE NAVIGATOR:
Ay, there is one who has no prize of Fortune!--
Yet is not to be pitied!

TADPOLE (with a bitter smile):
My Lord Marshal!. . .

THE NAVIGATOR:
Pity him not! He has lived out his vows,
Free in his thoughts, as in his actions free!

TADPOLE (in the same tone):
My Lord!. . .

THE NAVIGATOR (haughtily):
True! I have all, and he has naught;. . .
Yet I were proud to take his hand!
(Bowing to Roxane):
Adieu!

KATY:
I go with you.

(The Navigator bows to Tadpole, and goes with Katy toward the steps.)

THE NAVIGATOR (pausing, while she goes up):
Ay, true,--I envy him.
Look you, when life is brimful of success
--Though the past hold no action foul--one feels
A thousand self-disgusts, of which the sum
Is not remorse, but a dim, vague unrest;
And, as one mounts the steps of worldly fame,
The Navigator's furred mantles trail within their folds
A sound of dead illusions, vain regrets,
A rustle--scarce a whisper--like as when,
Mounting the terrace steps, by your mourning robe
Sweeps in its train the dying autumn leaves.




katysails July 14th 04 12:27 PM

WONDERFUL AND BRILLIANT THINKING!
 
So why's Roxanne still hanging around? MC should be bowing to MOI!

--
katysails
s/v Chanteuse
Kirie Elite 32
http://katysails.tripod.com

"Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax
and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.712 / Virus Database: 468 - Release Date: 6/27/2004



Joe July 14th 04 06:30 PM

WONDERFUL AND BRILLIANT THINKING!
 
"Bob Crantz" wrote in message link.net...
It WaS WRITTen iN junE


weLL WhY dIDENt yOU sAy sO? aRE yOU CLAmING tHAT nEAl lIEd wHEn hE
SaId HE waS lEaViNg tO sAIL tHe iSLANdS fOR A yeAr?

tELL mE iT aINt sO bOB!

JoE



"Joe" wrote in message
om...
"Bob Crantz" wrote in message

hlink.net...
NOW HERE'S SOME GREAT WRITING, OBVIOUSLY DONE BY A GREAT MIND!


Yes but not from the real Capt. Neal. for we all know he is crusing the

islands.


Joe



UPPER KEYS NEWSPAPER, LETTER TO EDITOR
READ ON!


"Children, play nice," harangues the hapless playground attendant.

"Speed
limit: 55 mph," proclaims the bullet-riddled highway sign. "Sinners,
repent," admonishes the ostentatious clergyman. "More government is
better," proselytizes the libidinous liberal. "Less government is

better,"
affirms the affable conservative. "Peace, love and flower power,"

exhales
the herb-smoking hippy.

"Don't be mean-spirited; write nice," pens the pious editor.

Year after year of haranguing, proclaiming, admonishing, proselytizing,
affirming, exhaling, and penning, has changed nothing. People still act

like
people. One can't produce a silk purse from a sow's ear.

After reading your editorial, I find myself wondering who gave a mere

child
the wisdom and experience to be the arbiter of mean-spirited, sarcastic,
abusive, and negative? Young editors haven't spent enough time in the

world
to have perspective on those words in this old man's humble opinion.

While I applaud your policy of not censoring opinion letters, I find

myself
appalled by your logic. You state, concerning writers of "mean-spirited"
letters, that you agree with some of your best friends who label them
jealous of the wealthy and having nothing productive to contribute. You
actually befriend people who say mean-spirited things while decrying

those
who write the same? Duh! And, how's calling the USA an "embarrassment"
anything but mean-spirited and a clear case of pot calling kettle black?

So,
welcome to the club, dear.

The trend in newspapers to censor the opinions of writers whose views

don't
support an editor's agenda is treating readers like children. It turns a
newspaper into a propaganda flyer. It's inane and unprofessional. It

drives
readers away. An editor's primary concern should be to ensure the news

and
editorial content is timely, accurate and grammatically correct. Nice

won't
sell as many papers as facts, controversy and uncensored feedback from
readers (excluding libel and profanity, of course).

That you can say opinion letters "abuse" the First Amendment

demonstrates a
serious misunderstanding on your behalf. Have you not read the First
Amendment? It says, "Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom

of
speech, or of the press."

Young lady, may I remind you a newspaper is not "Congress" and the First
Amendment has little to do with opinion letters in newspapers, nor does

it
govern an editor's excluding, slanting or censoring material. One has a
right to speak but no right to be heard. Only morality allows the

hearing of
speech - all speech, even so-called hate speech.

Immorality disallows the hearing of speech. You appear to know this
intrinsically. Please realize it, for it's a rare gift in one so young.

So, good on you for standing on high moral ground. You've allowed those

of
us who don't fear reality to see it reflected in your paper. Your morals
place you head and shoulders above at least one other local editor, and
counteract some illogic and naivety born of tender years. Keep up the

good
work and keep hearing. We need you.

Neal Warren
Tavernier


Nav July 14th 04 11:02 PM

WONDERFUL AND BRILLIANT THINKING!
 
Huh?

Cheers

katysails wrote:

So why's Roxanne still hanging around? MC should be bowing to MOI!



katysails July 15th 04 04:19 AM

WONDERFUL AND BRILLIANT THINKING!
 

weLL WhY dIDENt yOU sAy sO? aRE yOU CLAmING tHAT nEAl lIEd wHEn hE
SaId HE waS lEaViNg tO sAIL tHe iSLANdS fOR A yeAr?

tELL mE iT aINt sO bOB!

Joe has finally let Ms Terry out of her closet.....
--
katysails
s/v Chanteuse
Kirie Elite 32
http://katysails.tripod.com

"Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax
and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.712 / Virus Database: 468 - Release Date: 6/27/2004



katysails July 15th 04 04:20 AM

WONDERFUL AND BRILLIANT THINKING!
 
Huh?

Referring to the plagiarism of Cyrano by Bob Crantz.....and you should bow
to me, you know...it's just that way....

--
katysails
s/v Chanteuse
Kirie Elite 32
http://katysails.tripod.com

"Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax
and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.712 / Virus Database: 468 - Release Date: 6/27/2004




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com