There's no question who bin-Laden would vote for. Johnboy Kerry has a
long
record of being weak on defense, from Vietnam & the Cold War to the
war on
terror.

I bet Ossama loves M Moore's Lieamentry as well. I heard he promised
Moore
a dozen virgins for his efforts.

And the insurgents in Iraq said they would sell him more footage of
beheading for his next flick. Moore did so well on this flick he
doubled the amount he is willing to pay for burning American corpses
caught on film.

Joe

Actually, you'd be wrong about that. The extremists want extremists
on the other side. That's common knowledge. Look at the Israel/Palistine
situation. Moderates aren't welcome. Extremists commonly attack
moderates in order to polarize the situation even more.

It's easy to fall into that logic trap. I guess that's what happens when
you stop thinking and start reacting.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Joe" wrote in message
om...
There's no question who bin-Laden would vote for. Johnboy Kerry has a
long
record of being weak on defense, from Vietnam & the Cold War to the
war on
terror.

I bet Ossama loves M Moore's Lieamentry as well. I heard he promised
Moore
a dozen virgins for his efforts.

And the insurgents in Iraq said they would sell him more footage of
beheading for his next flick. Moore did so well on this flick he
doubled the amount he is willing to pay for burning American corpses
caught on film.

Joe

"Joe" wrote
There's no question who bin-Laden would vote for. Johnboy Kerry....

Oh, I don't know - after all The Shrub backed off and cut Bin Laden some
slack to go after Saddam. Why? Nobody knows.

During 'Nam, LBJ then Slippery Dick diverted all the $$$ from defense R&D
and new procurement into ammo and bombs for their war. As a result the USSR
had better tanks and aircraft than our boys, who were still flying late 50s
designs. Funny, old "soft on defense" Carter re-started the R&D that
eventually gave the elder Bush tha ability to bitch slap Saddam into
submission in the first gulf war. Y'all may have heard how our sweet young
girls are swatting top terrorist leaders, like the dude who did the Cole,
from a nice safe console using UAV and missile technology began under a
liberal democrat?

But the Shrub everybody thinks is a friend of the military is acting just
like LBJ - delaying critical military R&D to pay for another war purported
to save people who don't want salvation. So, we have top military
scientists and engineers looking for work in private industry, never again
to return to DOD *if* and when the second village idiot from Texas goes home
and some 'soft on defense' Democrat refunds the programs. From that
viewpoint The Shrub is Bin Laden's right hand man.

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ...
Actually, you'd be wrong about that. The extremists want extremists
on the other side. That's common knowledge. Look at the Israel/Palistine
situation. Moderates aren't welcome. Extremists commonly attack
moderates in order to polarize the situation even more.


Wrong, Extremist want to attack easy targets that will not fight back.
Thats why they tie people up before the behead them. That why they
attack citizens not armys. Thats why they want Kerry.


Joe





It's easy to fall into that logic trap. I guess that's what happens when
you stop thinking and start reacting.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Joe" wrote in message
om...
There's no question who bin-Laden would vote for. Johnboy Kerry has a
long
record of being weak on defense, from Vietnam & the Cold War to the
war on
terror.

I bet Ossama loves M Moore's Lieamentry as well. I heard he promised
Moore
a dozen virgins for his efforts.

And the insurgents in Iraq said they would sell him more footage of
beheading for his next flick. Moore did so well on this flick he
doubled the amount he is willing to pay for burning American corpses
caught on film.

Joe

Nope... what you're talking about is easy targets of opportunity...
buildings
and such. When they assassinate someone, they go for their opposites, not
the people in the middle.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Joe" wrote in message
om...
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
Actually, you'd be wrong about that. The extremists want extremists
on the other side. That's common knowledge. Look at the Israel/Palistine
situation. Moderates aren't welcome. Extremists commonly attack
moderates in order to polarize the situation even more.


Wrong, Extremist want to attack easy targets that will not fight back.
Thats why they tie people up before the behead them. That why they
attack citizens not armys. Thats why they want Kerry.


Joe





It's easy to fall into that logic trap. I guess that's what happens when
you stop thinking and start reacting.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Joe" wrote in message
om...
There's no question who bin-Laden would vote for. Johnboy Kerry has a
long
record of being weak on defense, from Vietnam & the Cold War to the
war on
terror.

I bet Ossama loves M Moore's Lieamentry as well. I heard he promised
Moore
a dozen virgins for his efforts.

And the insurgents in Iraq said they would sell him more footage of
beheading for his next flick. Moore did so well on this flick he
doubled the amount he is willing to pay for burning American corpses
caught on film.

Joe

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote
..... When they assassinate someone, they go for their opposites, not
the people in the middle.


Were that true Sharon and Arafat would be long dead and Rabin still leading
Israel toward peace.

What keeps Sharon in power? Why the Palistinian terrorist threat of course!
And what turns ordinary Palistinians into terrorists? Why, the actions of
people like Sharon of course. Each would be politically dead without the
other. Why do you think the supply of drugs in the US never goes away
despite the WOD?

Vito, just because Sharon is still around, doesn't mean he's not the first
on the terrorists' list. What I was trying to say is that the terrorist tend
to go after anyone who is opposite of them in terms of extremism vs.
moderation, not extremism vs. extremism. The ordinary Palistinians
I suspect hate Sharon with a vengence, but the true extremists know
that their extreme agenda can only be satisfied if they have someone
to fight against. They will kill innocents and moderates to incite extremism
on the opposite side. Everyone knows that they hate Sharon and want
to kill him. But, it's easier to kill innocents and moderates and it does
more for their side. Don't forget Rabin was killed by an extremist Israelie
who was afraid peace would take hold. He said as much.

--
"j" ganz @@
www.sailnow.com

"Vito" wrote in message
...
"Jonathan Ganz" wrote
..... When they assassinate someone, they go for their opposites, not
the people in the middle.


Were that true Sharon and Arafat would be long dead and Rabin still
leading
Israel toward peace.

What keeps Sharon in power? Why the Palistinian terrorist threat of
course!
And what turns ordinary Palistinians into terrorists? Why, the actions of
people like Sharon of course. Each would be politically dead without the
other. Why do you think the supply of drugs in the US never goes away
despite the WOD?

"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...
Vito, just because Sharon is still around, doesn't mean he's not the first
on the terrorists' list. What I was trying to say is that the terrorist
tend
to go after anyone who is opposite of them in terms of extremism vs.
moderation, not extremism vs. extremism. The ordinary Palistinians
I suspect hate Sharon with a vengence, but the true extremists know
that their extreme agenda can only be satisfied if they have someone
to fight against. They will kill innocents and moderates to incite
extremism
on the opposite side. Everyone knows that they hate Sharon and want
to kill him. But, it's easier to kill innocents and moderates and it does
more for their side. Don't forget Rabin was killed by an extremist
Israelie
who was afraid peace would take hold. He said as much.

Yes, you're right.