![]() |
Spinnakers...Doug really doesn't know
Navigator wrote:
Checking up on Doug's clear assertion (below) I find that Doug is not correct. North say their fastest spinnaker is a radial and that 2003 Lightning world champions use them. http://www.northsailsod.com/class/li...lightning.html "For top performance and durability, we offer the R-2 and the RC-1 spinnakers. Both spinnakers are fill radial with fully glued seams for smoothness and resistance to snags. Both are built from AirX fabric." Please quote the part that says specifically which spinnakers the 2003 World (or for that matter the 2003 NA) champs use. In fact it says specifically that the R-2 and RC-1 are *reaching* spinnakers. You know the difference between reaching and running, yes? If you looked further down that same page you find the Bruin and another cross cut runner. "The Bruin has long been recognized for the downwind performer that it is. Slightly flatter in the middle for 1998, the Bruim is much more an all-around performer with little sacrifice to its proven broad reaching and running performance." Gee, you must be wetting your pants thinking that you've *finally* shown me wrong, for once. Of course, you almost were a man and admitted your mistake about those big old wooden ships, but now that's all behind you, eh? Back to the same old bluff & bluster for Navvie! Fresh Breezes (to them wot kin use 'em)- Doug King |
Spinnakers...Doug really doesn't know
DSK wrote: Navigator wrote: Checking up on Doug's clear assertion (below) I find that Doug is not correct. North say their fastest spinnaker is a radial and that 2003 Lightning world champions use them. http://www.northsailsod.com/class/li...lightning.html "For top performance and durability, we offer the R-2 and the RC-1 spinnakers. Both spinnakers are fill radial with fully glued seams for smoothness and resistance to snags. Both are built from AirX fabric." Back to the same old bluff & bluster for Doug King |
Spinnakers...
Navigator wrote:
Back to the same old bluff & bluster for Doug King Is it "bluff and bluster" that North builds cross cut spinnakers and says themselves that they are faster for running and broad reaching? It's right on their web site, right one the exact page you quoted! Possibly you missed the bit about "reaching" and "pole a foot off the forestay." Or maybe you didn't grasp what it means? DSK |
Spinnakers...
DSK wrote: Back to the same old bluff & bluster for Doug King |
Spinnakers...
Navigator wrote:
DSK wrote: Back to the same old bluff & bluster for Doug King Well, let's see: Navigator wrote: I was there Except that you didn't know where you were. And you didn't know what ship you were talking about. But you were very eager to try and prove that everybody else was stupid. Now you're back to spinnakers. On and on and on you go, even quoting a sailmakers web site, except that it proved you wrong so you had to go hunting for something else. Then you combed the Internet looking for race results with my name... before that, you were threatening to email some naval architects to try and prove how I didn't know about stability... didn't pan out for you either... The list goes on and on. Don't you have anything better to do? Do you think your department might consider this behavior embarassing? DSK |
Spinnakers...
OzOne wrote in message ... On Thu, 6 May 2004 23:35:52 +0100, "Donal" scribbled thusly: My personal experience is that the boat in first place has his sails trimmed correctly. Is it different in NZ? Just to put a finer point on it, I have seen many races where a boat will fly to the top mark and round first either by pure boat speed of that lucky shift only to be completely swamped when the following fleet consumes her air leaving her floundering as they cruise on by. I agree! However, in this case, I believe that Doug went on to win the race. Regards Donal -- |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com