![]() |
Hunter 36 Recommendations
Does anyone have experience or knowledge of the Hunter 36, 1980 model. I would prefer a 32 to 34-foot boat and would prefer an O'Day, Cal, Pearson, Newport, Islander, Tartan, C&C, Irwin, S-2, Columbia, etc., because I think those boats are probably better made and have better reputations, but there is a Hunter 36 in our area with the options I prefer that seems to be in good condition, at a reasonable price. In other words, most of the other boats are older, in poorer condition, and priced higher. My plan would be to use the boat for bay sailing and occasional coastal cruising but not for extended blue-water passages. Thanks, Jim |
Hunter 36 Recommendations
Don't Do It Jim.....
CM "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... Does anyone have experience or knowledge of the Hunter 36, 1980 model. I would prefer a 32 to 34-foot boat and would prefer an O'Day, Cal, Pearson, Newport, Islander, Tartan, C&C, Irwin, S-2, Columbia, etc., because I think those boats are probably better made and have better reputations, but there is a Hunter 36 in our area with the options I prefer that seems to be in good condition, at a reasonable price. In other words, most of the other boats are older, in poorer condition, and priced higher. My plan would be to use the boat for bay sailing and occasional coastal cruising but not for extended blue-water passages. Thanks, Jim |
Hunter 36 Recommendations
Stay away from old Hunters...they're piles of c**p compared to most of =
the other boats you listed. --=20 katysails s/v Chanteuse Kirie Elite 32 http://katysails.tripod.com "Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax and get used to the idea." - Robert A. Heinlein |
Hunter 36 Recommendations
You might want to read all of the Hunter reviews at SailNet's "boat check",
I found this one particularly interesting: "I hate this boat. I strongly recommend that you avoid it, and all Hunters for that matter. It leaks horribly, design flaws and poor construction are everywhere. Ex: The boat is extremely tender-- double reef in 15 knots of wind. The bilge is too shallow-the floor rots. The batteries are in the lazarette! The whole boat flexes causing leaks around windows, the mast, etc. The seacocks are of a dangerous design. DO NOT BE DECEIVED by a seemingly large interior, etc. Hunter should be ashamed of themselves. I strongly recommend that you buy a Catalina if you are looking for "a lot of boat for the money." AVOID ALL HUNTERS. " I heard someone comment about a Hunter after a race last season, I assumed that all of the badmouthing I'd heard in the past was somewhat unfounded, needless to say I was surprised when I heard this gentleman summarily dismiss Hunters as "garbage". I myself like the lines on the early Hunters, but have heard many dismiss these boats as "garbage", so I would proceed very carefully before considering one of these boats. Also keep in mind that asking prices are just that, asking prices. You might be surprised to find out what someone would sell their boat for after trying to sell it unsuccessfully for a year or so. John Cairns "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... Does anyone have experience or knowledge of the Hunter 36, 1980 model. I would prefer a 32 to 34-foot boat and would prefer an O'Day, Cal, Pearson, Newport, Islander, Tartan, C&C, Irwin, S-2, Columbia, etc., because I think those boats are probably better made and have better reputations, but there is a Hunter 36 in our area with the options I prefer that seems to be in good condition, at a reasonable price. In other words, most of the other boats are older, in poorer condition, and priced higher. My plan would be to use the boat for bay sailing and occasional coastal cruising but not for extended blue-water passages. Thanks, Jim |
Hunter 36 Recommendations
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:16:46 -0600, Jim Cate wrote
this crap: Does anyone have experience or knowledge of the Hunter 36, 1980 model. I would prefer a 32 to 34-foot boat and would prefer an O'Day, Cal, Pearson, Newport, Islander, Tartan, C&C, Irwin, S-2, Columbia, etc., because I think those boats are probably better made and have better reputations, but there is a Hunter 36 in our area with the options I prefer that seems to be in good condition, at a reasonable price. In other words, most of the other boats are older, in poorer condition, and priced higher. My plan would be to use the boat for bay sailing and occasional coastal cruising but not for extended blue-water passages. I occasionally race against a 1980 Hunter 34. An excellant all around boat, suitable for cruising, day sailing, and occasional racing. A very sturdy boat, also. It will last you a long time. Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now! |
Hunter 36 Recommendations
I'm convinced regarding the Hunter. I'll continue looking at other boats.
Jim John Cairns wrote: You might want to read all of the Hunter reviews at SailNet's "boat check", I found this one particularly interesting: "I hate this boat. I strongly recommend that you avoid it, and all Hunters for that matter. It leaks horribly, design flaws and poor construction are everywhere. Ex: The boat is extremely tender-- double reef in 15 knots of wind. The bilge is too shallow-the floor rots. The batteries are in the lazarette! The whole boat flexes causing leaks around windows, the mast, etc. The seacocks are of a dangerous design. DO NOT BE DECEIVED by a seemingly large interior, etc. Hunter should be ashamed of themselves. I strongly recommend that you buy a Catalina if you are looking for "a lot of boat for the money." AVOID ALL HUNTERS. " I heard someone comment about a Hunter after a race last season, I assumed that all of the badmouthing I'd heard in the past was somewhat unfounded, needless to say I was surprised when I heard this gentleman summarily dismiss Hunters as "garbage". I myself like the lines on the early Hunters, but have heard many dismiss these boats as "garbage", so I would proceed very carefully before considering one of these boats. Also keep in mind that asking prices are just that, asking prices. You might be surprised to find out what someone would sell their boat for after trying to sell it unsuccessfully for a year or so. John Cairns "Jim Cate" wrote in message ... Does anyone have experience or knowledge of the Hunter 36, 1980 model. I would prefer a 32 to 34-foot boat and would prefer an O'Day, Cal, Pearson, Newport, Islander, Tartan, C&C, Irwin, S-2, Columbia, etc., because I think those boats are probably better made and have better reputations, but there is a Hunter 36 in our area with the options I prefer that seems to be in good condition, at a reasonable price. In other words, most of the other boats are older, in poorer condition, and priced higher. My plan would be to use the boat for bay sailing and occasional coastal cruising but not for extended blue-water passages. Thanks, Jim |
Hunter 36 Recommendations
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:16:19 -0500, "John Cairns"
wrote this crap: You might want to read all of the Hunter reviews at SailNet's "boat check", I found this one particularly interesting: "I hate this boat. I strongly recommend that you avoid it, and all Hunters for that matter. It leaks horribly, design flaws and poor construction are everywhere. Ex: The boat is extremely tender-- double reef in 15 knots of wind. The bilge is too shallow-the floor rots. The batteries are in the lazarette! The whole boat flexes causing leaks around windows, the mast, etc. The seacocks are of a dangerous design. DO NOT BE DECEIVED by a seemingly large interior, etc. Hunter should be ashamed of themselves. I strongly recommend that you buy a Catalina if you are looking for "a lot of boat for the money." AVOID ALL HUNTERS. " What year and model Hunter were they talking about? Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now! |
Hunter 36 Recommendations
Horvath wrote: On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:16:19 -0500, "John Cairns" wrote this crap: You might want to read all of the Hunter reviews at SailNet's "boat check", I found this one particularly interesting: "I hate this boat. I strongly recommend that you avoid it, and all Hunters for that matter. It leaks horribly, design flaws and poor construction are everywhere. Ex: The boat is extremely tender-- double reef in 15 knots of wind. The bilge is too shallow-the floor rots. The batteries are in the lazarette! The whole boat flexes causing leaks around windows, the mast, etc. The seacocks are of a dangerous design. DO NOT BE DECEIVED by a seemingly large interior, etc. Hunter should be ashamed of themselves. I strongly recommend that you buy a Catalina if you are looking for "a lot of boat for the money." AVOID ALL HUNTERS. " What year and model Hunter were they talking about? It's a 1980 model, LOA 35'11", WL 29'6", draft 4'11", displ 13,500, AC, multiple sails and instruments. Jim |
Hunter 36 Recommendations
It doesn't matter. Yours is still a piece of crap.
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Horvath" wrote in message ... On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 19:16:19 -0500, "John Cairns" wrote this crap: You might want to read all of the Hunter reviews at SailNet's "boat check", I found this one particularly interesting: "I hate this boat. I strongly recommend that you avoid it, and all Hunters for that matter. It leaks horribly, design flaws and poor construction are everywhere. Ex: The boat is extremely tender-- double reef in 15 knots of wind. The bilge is too shallow-the floor rots. The batteries are in the lazarette! The whole boat flexes causing leaks around windows, the mast, etc. The seacocks are of a dangerous design. DO NOT BE DECEIVED by a seemingly large interior, etc. Hunter should be ashamed of themselves. I strongly recommend that you buy a Catalina if you are looking for "a lot of boat for the money." AVOID ALL HUNTERS. " What year and model Hunter were they talking about? Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now! |
Hunter 36 Recommendations
Hahahahaha Perfect. You really are an idiot.
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Horvath" wrote in message ... On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 16:16:46 -0600, Jim Cate wrote this crap: Does anyone have experience or knowledge of the Hunter 36, 1980 model. I would prefer a 32 to 34-foot boat and would prefer an O'Day, Cal, Pearson, Newport, Islander, Tartan, C&C, Irwin, S-2, Columbia, etc., because I think those boats are probably better made and have better reputations, but there is a Hunter 36 in our area with the options I prefer that seems to be in good condition, at a reasonable price. In other words, most of the other boats are older, in poorer condition, and priced higher. My plan would be to use the boat for bay sailing and occasional coastal cruising but not for extended blue-water passages. I occasionally race against a 1980 Hunter 34. An excellant all around boat, suitable for cruising, day sailing, and occasional racing. A very sturdy boat, also. It will last you a long time. Pathetic Earthlings! No one can save you now! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:21 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com