|
There you have it, Folks.
The Numb-Nutted gNomes of kNighted Nowhere have responded as expected. That is
when shown how and why RDF is not even close to 2* accuracy they start running in circles trying to catch their short tails, all while proclaiming apples are green and pixie dust tastes like chicken. Other people might say, "Gee thanks. I always wondered how that worked. I learned something today". But not N^5. The silly little Neutered Nabobs didn't learn anything because it was all too far beyond them. So they popped another tube of glue and nattered on, neighing at each other as the nullset ninnies they are. Jesus, and I gave them three days to google up enough info to write an explanation themselves. had they been able to do that they might have claimed they really did No. But Nummies they are, they nosedived. Again. Anyone wanna ask N^5 just how they used their claimed paper sextant in the moisture of a fog to tell position? If any of them did actually plow through the granite ledges in a fog off Maine, they got lucky even if they didn't know it. God takes care of fools and little children. |
There you have it, Folks.
All you did was embarrass yourself, jaxie. But you're used to that, aren't you?
"JAXAshby" wrote in message ... The Numb-Nutted gNomes of kNighted Nowhere have responded as expected. That is when shown how and why RDF is not even close to 2* accuracy they start running in circles trying to catch their short tails, all while proclaiming apples are green and pixie dust tastes like chicken. Other people might say, "Gee thanks. I always wondered how that worked. I learned something today". But not N^5. The silly little Neutered Nabobs didn't learn anything because it was all too far beyond them. So they popped another tube of glue and nattered on, neighing at each other as the nullset ninnies they are. Jesus, and I gave them three days to google up enough info to write an explanation themselves. had they been able to do that they might have claimed they really did No. But Nummies they are, they nosedived. Again. Anyone wanna ask N^5 just how they used their claimed paper sextant in the moisture of a fog to tell position? If any of them did actually plow through the granite ledges in a fog off Maine, they got lucky even if they didn't know it. God takes care of fools and little children. |
There you have it, Folks.
jeffies, one of the problems of trying to treat a rumdum like as a human of at
least ordinary intelligence is that you don't catch on even as quickly as mongrel dog learning to pee on the newspaper. if indeed you did thread your way through the granite ledges in a Maine fog as you say you did, you are lucky to have survived. unfortunately, you are too dumb to know how lucky. What a shame. All you did was embarrass yourself, jaxie. But you're used to that, aren't you? "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... The Numb-Nutted gNomes of kNighted Nowhere have responded as expected. That is when shown how and why RDF is not even close to 2* accuracy they start running in circles trying to catch their short tails, all while proclaiming apples are green and pixie dust tastes like chicken. Other people might say, "Gee thanks. I always wondered how that worked. I learned something today". But not N^5. The silly little Neutered Nabobs didn't learn anything because it was all too far beyond them. So they popped another tube of glue and nattered on, neighing at each other as the nullset ninnies they are. Jesus, and I gave them three days to google up enough info to write an explanation themselves. had they been able to do that they might have claimed they really did No. But Nummies they are, they nosedived. Again. Anyone wanna ask N^5 just how they used their claimed paper sextant in the moisture of a fog to tell position? If any of them did actually plow through the granite ledges in a fog off Maine, they got lucky even if they didn't know it. God takes care of fools and little children. |
There you have it, Folks.
I see, as per usual, you couldn't answer my question. Why is that Jax?
Why is it you always avoid answering peoples questions? Can't "google" fast enough? Let's be blunt, you gave a BS dissertation on RDF, full of errors. The only thing anyone could hold you up as an example for, is an example of why a newbie should take a Power Squadron or CG aux. course. I must agree with others .... you are approaching "meltdown" far more quickly this time. otn |
There you have it, Folks.
you asked no question. you chased your tail hoping no one would realize you
didn't know RDF's were aligned by magnetic compass, so therefore could be no more accurate. duh. no wonder you pontificated. I see, as per usual, you couldn't answer my question. Why is that Jax? Why is it you always avoid answering peoples questions? Can't "google" fast enough? Let's be blunt, you gave a BS dissertation on RDF, full of errors. The only thing anyone could hold you up as an example for, is an example of why a newbie should take a Power Squadron or CG aux. course. I must agree with others .... you are approaching "meltdown" far more quickly this time. otn |
There you have it, Folks.
Sorry jaxie, when did I claim to "thread through granite ledges" using RDF?
This is your fantasy, possibly because you've never been to Maine. Are you actually claiming no one ever cruises Maine? Its impossible? Do Lobstermen stay at home when there's a possibility of fog? Are you softer than puppy ****? The funny thing is, you agreed completely with me when you said "if one is far enough away from known granite ledges not all that bad as compared to just bobbing around in the water." If its "not all that bad" for approaches, what have you been ranting about? "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... jeffies, one of the problems of trying to treat a rumdum like as a human of at least ordinary intelligence is that you don't catch on even as quickly as mongrel dog learning to pee on the newspaper. if indeed you did thread your way through the granite ledges in a Maine fog as you say you did, you are lucky to have survived. unfortunately, you are too dumb to know how lucky. What a shame. All you did was embarrass yourself, jaxie. But you're used to that, aren't you? "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... The Numb-Nutted gNomes of kNighted Nowhere have responded as expected. That is when shown how and why RDF is not even close to 2* accuracy they start running in circles trying to catch their short tails, all while proclaiming apples are green and pixie dust tastes like chicken. Other people might say, "Gee thanks. I always wondered how that worked. I learned something today". But not N^5. The silly little Neutered Nabobs didn't learn anything because it was all too far beyond them. So they popped another tube of glue and nattered on, neighing at each other as the nullset ninnies they are. Jesus, and I gave them three days to google up enough info to write an explanation themselves. had they been able to do that they might have claimed they really did No. But Nummies they are, they nosedived. Again. Anyone wanna ask N^5 just how they used their claimed paper sextant in the moisture of a fog to tell position? If any of them did actually plow through the granite ledges in a fog off Maine, they got lucky even if they didn't know it. God takes care of fools and little children. |
There you have it, Folks.
JAXAshby wrote: you asked no question. you chased your tail hoping no one would realize you didn't know RDF's were aligned by magnetic compass, so therefore could be no more accurate. duh. no wonder you pontificated. LOL, glad I was waiting to the end of this session to plonk you.... Yes I did ask a question. To repeat: What does "Ships didn't have mobile radio compasses, so they weren't aligned each time they were used" refer to (it's your statement)....care to answer? As to your other statement .... RDF's signals could be taken either using magnetic or gyro or fluxgate compasses, and the accuracy was dependent on a number of factors, but with any of the three, could well fall into the ranges stated. New question: How the hell did you think anyone plotted an RDF bearing if they didn't "align" it with the compass? otn ... you will be plonked, but I'll hold to see if you can make any reasonable response. |
There you have it, Folks.
jeffies, chasing his tail in circles, writes:
Sorry jaxie, when did I claim to "thread through granite ledges" using RDF? This is your fantasy, possibly because you've never been to Maine. Are you actually claiming no one ever cruises Maine? Its impossible? Do Lobstermen stay at home when there's a possibility of fog? Are you softer than puppy ****? The funny thing is, you agreed completely with me when you said "if one is far enough away from known granite ledges not all that bad as compared to just bobbing around in the water." If its "not all that bad" for approaches, what have you been ranting about? "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... jeffies, one of the problems of trying to treat a rumdum like as a human of at least ordinary intelligence is that you don't catch on even as quickly as mongrel dog learning to pee on the newspaper. if indeed you did thread your way through the granite ledges in a Maine fog as you say you did, you are lucky to have survived. unfortunately, you are too dumb to know how lucky. What a shame. All you did was embarrass yourself, jaxie. But you're used to that, aren't you? "JAXAshby" wrote in message ... The Numb-Nutted gNomes of kNighted Nowhere have responded as expected. That is when shown how and why RDF is not even close to 2* accuracy they start running in circles trying to catch their short tails, all while proclaiming apples are green and pixie dust tastes like chicken. Other people might say, "Gee thanks. I always wondered how that worked. I learned something today". But not N^5. The silly little Neutered Nabobs didn't learn anything because it was all too far beyond them. So they popped another tube of glue and nattered on, neighing at each other as the nullset ninnies they are. Jesus, and I gave them three days to google up enough info to write an explanation themselves. had they been able to do that they might have claimed they really did No. But Nummies they are, they nosedived. Again. Anyone wanna ask N^5 just how they used their claimed paper sextant in the moisture of a fog to tell position? If any of them did actually plow through the granite ledges in a fog off Maine, they got lucky even if they didn't know it. God takes care of fools and little children. |
There you have it, Folks.
ignorant fool over the nee, chasing his tail in circles, writes the trash
below: you asked no question. you chased your tail hoping no one would realize you didn't know RDF's were aligned by magnetic compass, so therefore could be no more accurate. duh. no wonder you pontificated. LOL, glad I was waiting to the end of this session to plonk you.... Yes I did ask a question. To repeat: What does "Ships didn't have mobile radio compasses, so they weren't aligned each time they were used" refer to (it's your statement)....care to answer? As to your other statement .... RDF's signals could be taken either using magnetic or gyro or fluxgate compasses, and the accuracy was dependent on a number of factors, but with any of the three, could well fall into the ranges stated. New question: How the hell did you think anyone plotted an RDF bearing if they didn't "align" it with the compass? otn ... you will be plonked, but I'll hold to see if you can make any reasonable response. |
There you have it, Folks.
As expected, unable to answer some simple questions .... plonk
otn JAXAshby wrote: ignorant fool over the nee, chasing his tail in circles, writes the trash below: you asked no question. you chased your tail hoping no one would realize you didn't know RDF's were aligned by magnetic compass, so therefore could be no more accurate. duh. no wonder you pontificated. LOL, glad I was waiting to the end of this session to plonk you.... Yes I did ask a question. To repeat: What does "Ships didn't have mobile radio compasses, so they weren't aligned each time they were used" refer to (it's your statement)....care to answer? As to your other statement .... RDF's signals could be taken either using magnetic or gyro or fluxgate compasses, and the accuracy was dependent on a number of factors, but with any of the three, could well fall into the ranges stated. New question: How the hell did you think anyone plotted an RDF bearing if they didn't "align" it with the compass? otn ... you will be plonked, but I'll hold to see if you can make any reasonable response. |
There you have it, Folks.
you asked no questions. you did nothing but pontificate, and you did so
clearly showing one and all you do not understand the technique nor how it works. you are a cookbook navigator trying to claim the cake bakes because the light is on inside the oven. As expected, unable to answer some simple questions .... plonk otn JAXAshby wrote: ignorant fool over the nee, chasing his tail in circles, writes the trash below: you asked no question. you chased your tail hoping no one would realize you didn't know RDF's were aligned by magnetic compass, so therefore could be no more accurate. duh. no wonder you pontificated. LOL, glad I was waiting to the end of this session to plonk you.... Yes I did ask a question. To repeat: What does "Ships didn't have mobile radio compasses, so they weren't aligned each time they were used" refer to (it's your statement)....care to answer? As to your other statement .... RDF's signals could be taken either using magnetic or gyro or fluxgate compasses, and the accuracy was dependent on a number of factors, but with any of the three, could well fall into the ranges stated. New question: How the hell did you think anyone plotted an RDF bearing if they didn't "align" it with the compass? otn ... you will be plonked, but I'll hold to see if you can make any reasonable response. |
There you have it, Folks.
Subject: There you have it, Folks.
From: (JAXAshby) Hey Jaxass, read your post and follow through to his. I see TWO (2) very distinct questions. Now, either you're blind, or you don't understand the (?) mark. Shen you asked no questions. you did nothing but pontificate, and you did so clearly showing one and all you do not understand the technique nor how it works. you are a cookbook navigator trying to claim the cake bakes because the light is on inside the oven. As expected, unable to answer some simple questions .... plonk otn JAXAshby wrote: ignorant fool over the nee, chasing his tail in circles, writes the trash below: you asked no question. you chased your tail hoping no one would realize you didn't know RDF's were aligned by magnetic compass, so therefore could be no more accurate. duh. no wonder you pontificated. LOL, glad I was waiting to the end of this session to plonk you.... Yes I did ask a question. To repeat: What does "Ships didn't have mobile radio compasses, so they weren't aligned each time they were used" refer to (it's your statement)....care to answer? As to your other statement .... RDF's signals could be taken either using magnetic or gyro or fluxgate compasses, and the accuracy was dependent on a number of factors, but with any of the three, could well fall into the ranges stated. New question: How the hell did you think anyone plotted an RDF bearing if they didn't "align" it with the compass? otn ... you will be plonked, but I'll hold to see if you can make any reasonable response. |
There you have it, Folks.
ah, now I see the problem shen. you don't know what the English word
"question" means. Or else you confuse it with the English word "pontificate". not enough years in high school for you, shen. you should have stayed a few more. Hey Jaxass, read your post and follow through to his. I see TWO (2) very distinct questions. Now, either you're blind, or you don't understand the (?) mark. Shen you asked no questions. you did nothing but pontificate, and you did so clearly showing one and all you do not understand the technique nor how it works. you are a cookbook navigator trying to claim the cake bakes because the light is on inside the oven. As expected, unable to answer some simple questions .... plonk otn JAXAshby wrote: ignorant fool over the nee, chasing his tail in circles, writes the trash below: you asked no question. you chased your tail hoping no one would realize you didn't know RDF's were aligned by magnetic compass, so therefore could be no more accurate. duh. no wonder you pontificated. LOL, glad I was waiting to the end of this session to plonk you.... Yes I did ask a question. To repeat: What does "Ships didn't have mobile radio compasses, so they weren't aligned each time they were used" refer to (it's your statement)....care to answer? As to your other statement .... RDF's signals could be taken either using magnetic or gyro or fluxgate compasses, and the accuracy was dependent on a number of factors, but with any of the three, could well fall into the ranges stated. New question: How the hell did you think anyone plotted an RDF bearing if they didn't "align" it with the compass? otn ... you will be plonked, but I'll hold to see if you can make any reasonable response. |
There you have it, Folks.
Subject: There you have it, Folks.
From: (JAXAshby) Date: 03/11/2004 10:50 Pacific Standard That sounds like Jaxspeak for "duh, I done know da answer". Shen ah, now I see the problem shen. you don't know what the English word "question" means. Or else you confuse it with the English word "pontificate". not enough years in high school for you, shen. you should have stayed a few more. |
There you have it, Folks.
"JAXAshby" wrote in message ... jeffies, chasing his tail in circles, writes: And??? Did you have anything to contribute? Eh, Jax? Of course not! Regards Donal -- |
There you have it, Folks.
Actually, it's jaxass speak for "I never graduated from grade school."
-- "j" ganz @@ www.sailnow.com "Shen44" wrote in message ... Subject: There you have it, Folks. From: (JAXAshby) Date: 03/11/2004 10:50 Pacific Standard That sounds like Jaxspeak for "duh, I done know da answer". Shen ah, now I see the problem shen. you don't know what the English word "question" means. Or else you confuse it with the English word "pontificate". not enough years in high school for you, shen. you should have stayed a few more. |
There you have it, Folks.
"JAXAshby" wrote in message ... ah, now I see the problem shen. you don't know what the English word "question" means. Or else you confuse it with the English word "pontificate". Jax, you must be the most stupid individual who has ever managed to connect his computer to Usenet. Otn asked you the following *question*. ============================== "How the hell did you think anyone plotted an RDF bearing if they didn't "align" it with the compass?" ============================== Are you able to answer his question? Or are you really dumb enough to think that we will be bamboozled by your lame attempts at a smokescreen? Otn asked a question. There was no hint of pontification at all in his question. Why don't you answer him? BTW, I've asked you a question. I didn't pontificate. Regards Donal -- not enough years in high school for you, shen. you should have stayed a few more. Hey Jaxass, read your post and follow through to his. I see TWO (2) very distinct questions. Now, either you're blind, or you don't understand the (?) mark. Shen you asked no questions. you did nothing but pontificate, and you did so clearly showing one and all you do not understand the technique nor how it works. you are a cookbook navigator trying to claim the cake bakes because the light is on inside the oven. As expected, unable to answer some simple questions .... plonk otn JAXAshby wrote: ignorant fool over the nee, chasing his tail in circles, writes the trash below: you asked no question. you chased your tail hoping no one would realize you didn't know RDF's were aligned by magnetic compass, so therefore could be no more accurate. duh. no wonder you pontificated. LOL, glad I was waiting to the end of this session to plonk you.... Yes I did ask a question. To repeat: What does "Ships didn't have mobile radio compasses, so they weren't aligned each time they were used" refer to (it's your statement)....care to answer? As to your other statement .... RDF's signals could be taken either using magnetic or gyro or fluxgate compasses, and the accuracy was dependent on a number of factors, but with any of the three, could well fall into the ranges stated. New question: How the hell did you think anyone plotted an RDF bearing if they didn't "align" it with the compass? otn ... you will be plonked, but I'll hold to see if you can make any reasonable response. |
There you have it, Folks.
actually, donny, I just did an explanation of how radio compasses worked and
how to figure accuracy of output so as to not hit the granite ledges off a fog bound Maine coast. you can go look it up, if you wish. particularly if there is potential you might some day actually sail and sail a big ocean all the way left, and do it on a boat without gazillions of electronic thingies onboard. the thread is interesing in at least one respect because we had one poster here, jeffies I believe it was, who claimed to have used a paper sextant in the fog to tell his position. not sure how he kept the paper from falling apart in the moisture, but he said it worked just fine. This he knew because he didn't hit any granite ledges. Did you have anything to contribute? Eh, Jax? |
There you have it, Folks.
are you really dumb enough to think
that we will be bamboozled? BTW, I've asked you a question. I didn't pontificate. Regards Donal -- Answer to your question: I don't believe you have the capability to keep a single thought in your head long enough to be bambozzled. I believe that even if I were so inclined it would be waste of effort to even try. not enough years in high school for you, shen. you should have stayed a few more. Hey Jaxass, read your post and follow through to his. I see TWO (2) very distinct questions. Now, either you're blind, or you don't understand the (?) mark. Shen you asked no questions. you did nothing but pontificate, and you did so clearly showing one and all you do not understand the technique nor how it works. you are a cookbook navigator trying to claim the cake bakes because the light is on inside the oven. As expected, unable to answer some simple questions .... plonk otn JAXAshby wrote: ignorant fool over the nee, chasing his tail in circles, writes the trash below: you asked no question. you chased your tail hoping no one would realize you didn't know RDF's were aligned by magnetic compass, so therefore could be no more accurate. duh. no wonder you pontificated. LOL, glad I was waiting to the end of this session to plonk you.... Yes I did ask a question. To repeat: What does "Ships didn't have mobile radio compasses, so they weren't aligned each time they were used" refer to (it's your statement)....care to answer? As to your other statement .... RDF's signals could be taken either using magnetic or gyro or fluxgate compasses, and the accuracy was dependent on a number of factors, but with any of the three, could well fall into the ranges stated. New question: How the hell did you think anyone plotted an RDF bearing if they didn't "align" it with the compass? otn ... you will be plonked, but I'll hold to see if you can make any reasonable response. |
There you have it, Folks.
Subject: There you have it, Folks.
From: (JAXAshby) actually, donny, I just did an explanation of how radio compasses worked and how to figure accuracy of output so as to not hit the granite ledges off a fog bound Maine coast. .....and it was full of errors, that otn pointed out, none of which you could counter.(uh-uh, if you didn't counter them, you couldn't counter them, pure and simple). you can go look it up, if you wish. particularly if there is potential you might some day actually sail and sail a big ocean all the way left, and do it on a boat without gazillions of electronic thingies onboard. LOL We all ready know that electronic gizmos don't help YOU any, ole "get's lost rounding Cape Hatteras Jax" with three GPS's. the thread is interesing in at least one respect because we had one poster here, jeffies I believe it was, who claimed to have used a paper sextant in the fog to tell his position. not sure how he kept the paper from falling apart in the moisture, but he said it worked just fine. This he knew because he didn't hit any granite ledges. hmmmmm I think I'm beginning to see your problem ..... most of your brain centers are not functioning. There is help for this. Shen |
There you have it, Folks.
JAXAshby wrote:
are you really dumb enough to think that we will be bamboozled? BTW, I've asked you a question. I didn't pontificate. Regards Donal -- Answer to your question: I don't believe you have the capability to keep a single thought in your head long enough to be bambozzled. I believe that even if I were so inclined it would be waste of effort to even try. "That's one small step for a man, one giant sidestep for Jax." Cheers Marty |
There you have it, Folks.
see? who the hell could bambozzle martybaxter? he can't even understand what
he read. how is anyone going to confuse him? are you really dumb enough to think that we will be bamboozled? BTW, I've asked you a question. I didn't pontificate. Regards Donal -- Answer to your question: I don't believe you have the capability to keep a single thought in your head long enough to be bambozzled. I believe that even if I were so inclined it would be waste of effort to even try. "That's one small step for a man, one giant sidestep for Jax." Cheers Marty |
There you have it, Folks.
"JAXAshby" wrote in message ... actually, donny, I just did an explanation of how radio compasses worked Radio compasses??? and how to figure accuracy of output so as to not hit the granite ledges off a fog bound Maine coast. I think that nobody will take you seriously about navigation issues until you learn to get better that 10 miles accuracy out of multiple GPS sets. you can go look it up, if you wish. LOL! That's very funny. Only a lunatic would waste time trying to find you that you were correct about anything. particularly if there is potential you might some day actually sail and sail a big ocean all the way left, and do it on a boat without gazillions of electronic thingies onboard. the thread is interesing in at least one respect because we had one poster here, jeffies I believe it was, who claimed to have used a paper sextant in the fog to tell his position. not sure how he kept the paper from falling apart in the moisture, but he said it worked just fine. This he knew because he didn't hit any granite ledges. He's in good company, don't you think? After all, you failed to hit any ledges when you found that your three GPS's all had a user error of at least 10 miles. Regards Donal -- |
There you have it, Folks.
"JAXAshby" wrote in message ... are you really dumb enough to think that we will be bamboozled? BTW, I've asked you a question. I didn't pontificate. Answer to your question: I don't believe you have the capability to keep a single thought in your head long enough to be bambozzled. I believe that even if I were so inclined it would be waste of effort to even try. That wasn't an answer to my question. Let's try again! The question was- "Are you really dumb enough to think that we will be bamboozled by your lame attempts at a smokescreen?" Let's break this question down into small, bite sized, componenents. First, I asked if you were dumb. Are you? Secondly, I suggested that your previous answer was a smokescreen, or a "sidestep". Thirdly, I wanted to know if you were so incredibly stupid, that you thought that we wouldn't recognise your pathetic attempts to retain some personal dignity by diverting attention from the question. No doubt, you will answer this post with another demonstration of your superior intellect!!! ... or perhaps you will finally recognise the fact that there are times when you should keep quiet. Regards Donal -- |
There you have it, Folks.
donny, the answer IS:
I think you are too dumb to be bambozzled, and so -- even if I were inclinded to try to bambozzle you, which I am not -- I would not try because it would be a waste of effort because you are too dumb to be bambozzled. Don't understand it yet? jeffies wife will explain it to you. That wasn't an answer to my question. Let's try again! The question was- "Are you really dumb enough to think that we will be bamboozled by your lame attempts at a smokescreen?" Let's break this question down into small, bite sized, componenents. First, I asked if you were dumb. Are you? Secondly, I suggested that your previous answer was a smokescreen, or a "sidestep". Thirdly, I wanted to know if you were so incredibly stupid, that you thought that we wouldn't recognise your pathetic attempts to retain some personal dignity by diverting attention from the question. No doubt, you will answer this post with another demonstration of your superior intellect!!! ... or perhaps you will finally recognise the fact that there are times when you should keep quiet. Regards Donal -- |
There you have it, Folks.
Subject: There you have it, Folks.
From: "Donal" In either case..... not bloody bloomin likely. Shen No doubt, you will answer this post with another demonstration of your superior intellect!!! ... or perhaps you will finally recognise the fact that there are times when you should keep quiet. Regards Donal -- |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:45 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com