![]() |
Sail Aerodynamics
OK, in that case prove it. You explain 1- how tip vortex forms 2- your calculations as to which represents a greater energy loss... flow effects across the upper main from a frac jib, or combined tip vortex from main + masthead jib. If you can't explain it clearly, then you're bluffing. There is no third alternative, is there? MC wrote: There is. That it would be a complete waste of my time trying to post something you do not have the education to understand. In other words, it's #2... .... As for the answers to these questions #1 has already been posted by Jax Umm... no. I asked "Of A or B, which is better" and Jax said "yes and no." ... and others Like who? ... many times Golly, you can't count either. ... and #2 has no answer unless you define the exact masthead rig and fractional rig for comparison. OK then, what factors would affect which one is better? ...you might wonder why all the rig test show that optimal AC genoa heads are near masthead. I had that in mind, but those boats are influenced by measurement rules also. .... Pay me the money you owe me You got that backwards too... par for the course. .....and I'll even have student here run it in our advanced yacht sail design wind tunnel facility for free for you. Oh boy... will you really do that? Put it on the list for right after they run a simulation of a wave approaching a hull from astern to show how the transom keeps a wave out... maybe they'll explain 'reserve bouyancy'... right after they finish laughing... DSK |
Sail Aerodynamics
According to the world of Doug: Oh boy... will you really do that? Put it on the list for right after they run a simulation of a wave approaching a hull from astern to show how the transom keeps a wave out... So, now we know you have never ever sailed offshore in a big sea. Open transoms are not generally acceptable for really just one reason Doug, even with no difference in 'buoyancy'. Can you really not imagine a sea overtaking a running boat? The stern really doesn't rise immediately you know! In some cases it even goes over the transom and can hit the helm and even companion washboards. What on earth do you think stops it? You've got Adlard Coles Heavy Weather right? Have a look at the boat being overtaken by a wave. What a typical know it all dinghy sailor you are. Cheers |
Sail Aerodynamics
read it again, dougie. And again, if need be. And again. And again. And
again ... JAXAshby wrote: dougies, I gave you the answer. read it again. And again, if you need to. And again. And again. Slow dow, Jax, you're backpeddling so fast you're almost out of sight Wouldn't it be easier to be honest... just admit you don't have a clue. You'll feel better and your therapist will be proud of you. DSK |
Sail Aerodynamics
He won't get it. He'ss incapable of original thought and his
comprehension suffers accordingly. Cheers JAXAshby wrote: read it again, dougie. And again, if need be. And again. And again. And again ... JAXAshby wrote: dougies, I gave you the answer. read it again. And again, if you need to. And again. And again. Slow dow, Jax, you're backpeddling so fast you're almost out of sight Wouldn't it be easier to be honest... just admit you don't have a clue. You'll feel better and your therapist will be proud of you. DSK |
Sail Aerodynamics
DSK wrote: OK, in that case prove it. You explain 1- how tip vortex forms 2- your calculations as to which represents a greater energy loss... flow effects across the upper main from a frac jib, or combined tip vortex from main + masthead jib. If you can't explain it clearly, then you're bluffing. There is no third alternative, is there? MC wrote: There is. That it would be a complete waste of my time trying to post something you do not have the education to understand. In other words, it's #2... Nope, its exactly as I wrote. I won't waste my time explain any complicated problems to someone who is incapable of undertstanding them. That's why I only try to simplify a few thing that you might begin to get the idea. Of course I'm probably wasting my time with a bigot. Cheers |
Sail Aerodynamics
DSK wrote: ... and #2 has no answer unless you define the exact masthead rig and fractional rig for comparison. OK then, what factors would affect which one is better? Rig geometry of course! This reminds me of children who are too lazy/stupid to frame a question properly and don't really want to know the answer but just get attention. They just keep saying "But why..." Cheers |
Sail Aerodynamics
MC wrote:
So, now we know you have never ever sailed offshore in a big sea. Sure, whatever you say. You're as right about this as you are about aerodynamics... oh wait, you haven't said anything substantive about aerodynamics, in fact you are vigorously dodging any & all questions... ..... Open transoms are not generally acceptable for really just one reason Doug, What you mean to say is that open transoms are not acceptable to _you_. Oddly enough many others have sailed lots of sea miles with them. So your comments about how terrible they are show your ownlack of experience and comprehension. .... What a typical know it all dinghy sailor you are. This thread is following the classic pattern... MC bluffs, he blunders, he dodges & prevaricates... then he starts with insults. It becomes obvious that he can't answer the question. Does this pattern fulfill a psychological need for you, Navvie? How many times will you be driven to repeat it? DSK |
Sail Aerodynamics
OK then, what factors would affect which one is better?
MC wrote: Rig geometry of course! Now we are getting somewhere. What rig geometery would favor a frac rig (remembering the issue of jib head tip vortex)? Would aspect ratio be significant (again, just a reminder, jib head tip vortex)? How about the head angle of each sail respectively? ... This reminds me of children who are too lazy/stupid to frame a question properly and don't really want to know the answer but just get attention. They just keep saying "But why..." So, even your toddlers are asking you questions that you don't know the answer to? All you have to do MC is supply a coherent answer to the question. DSK |
Sail Aerodynamics
oh wait, you haven't said anything substantive about
aerodynamics, but I did. I also said you had read a single book or article written by a guy who didn't even know that the plural of vortex is votices. |
Sail Aerodynamics
What rig geometery would favor a frac rig (remembering the issue of jib
head tip vortex)? in the context of jib tip vortices, a masthead rig would be better. Would aspect ratio be significant (again, just a reminder, jib head tip vortex)? Of course. How about the head angle of each sail respectively? WTF are you talking about? dougies, give it up for the cripes sakes. you read a single article by a numskull about vortices and now you are trying to play expert. Go read a few dozen more books. A good start would be check a few of the books offered by the EAA, mostly decent books written for the amateur. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:03 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com