| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"MC" wrote in message ... Donal wrote: Films rarely manage to capture more than a tiny percentage of the brilliance of a good book. Sometimes they can be much more. Perhaps you should look beyond the 'plot' and consider the cinematography... At a physical data content level a film generally contians far more data than a book. I only consider the "experience". I am not one of the literatii. I believe that a book, or film, should entertain, or inform. I have never seen a film that entertained me more than the book. In fact, whenever I have seen the film of a book that I have read, it was a total dissappointment. IMHO, the cinematography and special effects should compliment the film in a totally passive way. If you are reduced to admiring the technical production of a movie, then I would say that the movie was a complete failure - or perhaps you are as shallow as Bobsprit! Regards Donal -- Cheers |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| A Commodores Meanderings | General | |||
| ) OT ) Bush's "needless war" | General | |||
| 2004 WHITEWATER TRIPS AT A HUGH DISCOUNT! | UK Paddle | |||
| BOOK NOW FOR 2004 WHITEWATER TRIPS AT A HUGH DISCOUNT! | Touring | |||