|
What world do they live in
They say the war on terror is just making the risk of terrorism worse.
Thats it's increasing terrorism. They think by killing and arresting terrorist we are just creating more terrorist. If thats true we should stop arresting thiefs, murders, rapist, child molestors evil dictaters ect..ect...ect... We are just creating more. What world are these idiots living on? htrae. How backwards can you get. ! pu ekaw lanoD yeh Joe |
What world do they live in
Hey, Joe....it occurs to me that you're a loser and a fraud.
Why don't you shut that stinky pie hole and give us all a rest? Thanks in advance, Capt RB |
What world do they live in
"Joe" wrote in message
om... They say the war on terror is just making the risk of terrorism worse. Thats it's increasing terrorism. They think by killing and arresting terrorist we are just creating more terrorist. Joe, as usual, you have the wrong end of the stick. Try to read what I actually write, instead of jumping to wild conclusions. I agree that killing, and arresting terrorists will reduce terrorism. Do you agree that killing innocent civilians will create great resentment? If thats true we should stop arresting thiefs, murders, rapist, child molestors evil dictaters ect..ect...ect... We are just creating more. You are beginning to sound a bit rabid. Nobody is trying to tell you that you shouldn't go after terrorists. Honestly! What world are these idiots living on? htrae. How backwards can you get. ! pu ekaw lanoD yeh That is about as backward as it gets. ..And *you* wrote it!!!!! Regards Donal -- |
What world do they live in
What an assinine argument.
"Joe" wrote in message om... No. Whomever "they" are are likely saying that when you alienate a huge percentage of the world's people, you reep what you sew. They say the war on terror is just making the risk of terrorism worse. Thats it's increasing terrorism. No. Whomever "they" are are likely saying that invading a country looking for WMDs that don't exist isn't the same thing as arresting and killing terrorists. They think by killing and arresting terrorist we are just creating more terrorist. Maybe in your world, but the rest of us try to make rational and logical associations. If thats true we should stop arresting thiefs, murders, rapist, child molestors evil dictaters ect..ect...ect... We are just creating more. See the part above after "Joe". What world are these idiots living on? htrae. Same answer. How backwards can you get. ! pu ekaw lanoD yeh Joe |
What world do they live in
|
What world do they live in
What world are these idiots (liberals) living in? Their world consists mainly of irrational fear and hatred. They FEAR what they don't understand which is just about everything but mainly they fear change. They are comfortable with the same old thing - the same old Democrat rhetoric and status quo of complaining about everything and doing nothing about anything but working to generate more fear and hatred which is the grease of the Democrat machine. The HATE what they don't understand which also is just about everything but they mainly hate themselves because they know they are afraid and weak. They believe the same old Democrat rhetoric that teaches them they are weak and are victims of sinister external forces they cannot control. But, they still retain a small shred of sanity so they turn the hatred they feel towards themselves and direct it towards what the Democrat party teaches them to hate - anybody and anything that erodes Democrat power. Thus they hate President Bush the most because Mr. Bush represents the greatest threat to Democrat power in this century. They are easy to figure out being so pathetic and weak. S.Simon "Joe" wrote in message om... They say the war on terror is just making the risk of terrorism worse. Thats it's increasing terrorism. They think by killing and arresting terrorist we are just creating more terrorist. If thats true we should stop arresting thiefs, murders, rapist, child molestors evil dictaters ect..ect...ect... We are just creating more. What world are these idiots living on? htrae. How backwards can you get. ! pu ekaw lanoD yeh Joe |
What world do they live in
That's closer. I'd say he's a threat to anyone with a significant
intellect too. Of course for him and his aides that's just jealousy. Cheers MC Simple Simon wrote: Thus they hate President Bush the most because Mr. Bush represents the greatest threat to US Democracy in this century. |
What world do they live in
Reduced to misquoting and producing a lie, I see.
I guess I should have included lying along with hatred and fear. They all go hand in hand. You liberals continue to dig your graves deeper and deeper. S.Simon "The_navigator©" wrote in message ... That's closer. I'd say he's a threat to anyone with a significant intellect too. Of course for him and his aides that's just jealousy. Cheers MC Simple Simon wrote: Thus they hate President Bush the most because Mr. Bush represents the greatest threat to US Democracy in this century. |
What world do they live in
Another liberal reduced to lying by misquoting.
Pathetic and not even original. Did you make up the same lie Navigator did or did you think it up on your own? S.Simon wrote in message ... On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:53:16 -0500, "Simple Simon" wrote: Thus they hate President Bush the most because Mr. Bush represents the greatest threat to Democracy in this century. S.Simon |
What world do they live in
Check the posting time Simple.
Cheers MC Simple Simon wrote: Another liberal reduced to lying by misquoting. Pathetic and not even original. Did you make up the same lie Navigator did or did you think it up on your own? S.Simon wrote in message ... On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:53:16 -0500, "Simple Simon" wrote: Thus they hate President Bush the most because Mr. Bush represents the greatest threat to Democracy in this century. S.Simon |
What world do they live in
"Simple Simon" wrote in message ... What world are these idiots (liberals) living in? Hey, Simple. You keep calling everyone who disagrees with you a "liberal". So I decided to look it up in Chambers Dictionary. liberal adj. generous; noble minded; broadminded; not bound by authority or traditional orthodoxy; looking to the general or broad sense rather than the literal; candid; free; free from restraint; [ etc. etc. ] Why do you feel the need to compliment everybody who disagrees with you? Perhaps you don't even know the meaning of the word "liberal"? Regards Donal -- |
What world do they live in
"Donal" wrote in message ...
"Joe" wrote in message om... They say the war on terror is just making the risk of terrorism worse. Thats it's increasing terrorism. They think by killing and arresting terrorist we are just creating more terrorist. Joe, as usual, you have the wrong end of the stick. Try to read what I actually write, instead of jumping to wild conclusions. I agree that killing, and arresting terrorists will reduce terrorism. Do you think saddam was not a terrorist? Someone that has murdered an estimated 3 million of his fellow country men. Geee, if thats not a terrorist I do not know what one is Donal. Do you agree that killing innocent civilians will create great resentment? Yes, But who should they resent? The guys trying to kill the terrorist, or the terrorist that chose to fight in an urban enviroment and put them at risk? I know if our president murdered 3 million of my fellow country men I would gladly be killed by accident if you brits were trying to get him. I would understand and forgive you, I would wish you success and have no ill feeling towards you. Can you understand that concept? If thats true we should stop arresting thiefs, murders, rapist, child molestors evil dictaters ect..ect...ect... We are just creating more. You are beginning to sound a bit rabid. Nobody is trying to tell you that you shouldn't go after terrorists. So now your supporting the USA efforts? Honestly! What world are these idiots living on? htrae. How backwards can you get. ! pu ekaw lanoD yeh That is about as backward as it gets. ..And *you* wrote it!!!!! I wanted to make sure you could read it. Regards Donal -- Regards, Joe |
What world do they live in
Well, you've been doing that here for the last couple of
years. Are you a liberal too? "Simple Simon" wrote in message ... Another liberal reduced to lying by misquoting. Pathetic and not even original. Did you make up the same lie Navigator did or did you think it up on your own? S.Simon wrote in message ... On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:53:16 -0500, "Simple Simon" wrote: Thus they hate President Bush the most because Mr. Bush represents the greatest threat to Democracy in this century. S.Simon |
What world do they live in
"Joe" wrote in message om... "Donal" wrote in message ... "Joe" wrote in message om... I agree that killing, and arresting terrorists will reduce terrorism. Do you think saddam was not a terrorist? Someone that has murdered an estimated 3 million of his fellow country men. Wonderful! You say "estimated??" What kind of evidence is that? How long was Saddam in power for? 20 years?? Each year, 28,000 people get killed by guns in the US. In a 20 year period that will be 560,000! In other words, about a sixth of the deaths that you accuse Saddam of. Bush *knows* this, and yet he does nothing to stop it. Now, I can see that you will say that Saddam is responsible for six times as many deaths as Bush. However, Saddam only started two wars in 20 years. Bush has started 2 wars in three years. How many people have died in those wars? If Bush carries on, he will soon catch up with Saddam. BTW, Bush has been making worrying noises about Syria, N. Korea and Iran. He isn't short of ideas!! Geee, if thats not a terrorist I do not know what one is Donal. I know that you don't. Someone who launches a war against a sovereign state on a false pretext, and in defiance of the UN, is a terrorist. Do you agree that killing innocent civilians will create great resentment? Yes, But who should they resent? The guys trying to kill the terrorist, or the terrorist that chose to fight in an urban enviroment and put them at risk? I know if our president murdered 3 million of my fellow country men I would gladly be killed by accident if you brits were trying to get him. I would understand and forgive you, I would wish you success and have no ill feeling towards you. Can you understand that concept? I understand what you are saying. I don't think that the woman who sees her husband killed and her 11 y/o son crippled for mis-understanding the instructions at a roadblock, will see it the same way. Nobody is trying to tell you that you shouldn't go after terrorists. So now your supporting the USA efforts? I supported them in Afghanistan.... not in Iraq. Regards Donal -- |
What world do they live in
"Donal" donut@ liberal ****** .com wrote
Each year, 28,000 people get killed by guns in the US. In a 20 year period that will be 560,000! Bush *knows* this, and yet he does nothing to stop it. What would you suggest he do? Each year 186,000 people get killed on the road. In a 20 year period that will be 3,720,000! And Bush knows this, too. SV |
What world do they live in
These deaths are easy to fix. Unfortunately, they're expensive both in $$
and politics. Fix for gun-related deaths... a number of thing to reducce the carnage... require gun locks on all new handguns made or imported into the US, legalize drugs, which will decrease the gang-related deaths (not that I care), increase the general level of education and improve the economy.. (crime in general has risen since Bushy took office, yet fell I believe every year Clinton was in office). Fix for highway deaths... get car manufactures to devise better cars that have more collision avoidence technology, improve the protection inside the vehicle, for larger SUV owners to pay hefty fees to own one (good for the environment also), make the bumpers a standard size (this one is in the works actually), set a speed limit and strictly enforce it (65, 75, doesn't matter) and reintroduce the minimum speed limit, and put more cops on the streets (works for gun-deaths too). "Scott Vernon" wrote in message ... "Donal" donut@ liberal ****** .com wrote Each year, 28,000 people get killed by guns in the US. In a 20 year period that will be 560,000! Bush *knows* this, and yet he does nothing to stop it. What would you suggest he do? Each year 186,000 people get killed on the road. In a 20 year period that will be 3,720,000! And Bush knows this, too. SV |
What world do they live in
Sure, he can claim that... just isn't true, however.
wrote in message ... On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 17:34:50 -0500, "Simple Simon" wrote: Another liberal reduced to lying by misquoting. Can you claim you haven't done the exact same thing many, many times? Gimme a break, doofus. BB S.Simon wrote in message ... On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:53:16 -0500, "Simple Simon" wrote: Thus they hate President Bush the most because Mr. Bush represents the greatest threat to Democracy in this century. S.Simon |
What world do they live in
Suzy is a babe, she run circles around the mermaid.
You must be jealous. "Joe" wrote in message om... (Bobsprit) wrote in message ... Hey, Joe....it occurs to me that you're a loser and a fraud. Why don't you shut that stinky pie hole and give us all a rest? Thanks in advance, Capt RB Whats wrong dummy, does the truth hurt. You are over and over and over being shown as a backwards loser, clinton lovin, American hating, loser. You are wrong about the economy, the war, your wifes boat purchace, and so on, your past postings prove it. So why dont you shut your bag licking scrotum jaw? Thanks in advance Capt Joe, USMM Master A real capt that owns his own boat, not a pansy boy the borrows his wifes boat when she give permission. |
What world do they live in
Think those notions are bizarre? How about the Muslim extremists fighting
democracy - the unholy idea that man can make his own laws vs GODS LAW ... as xlated by priests and ayatollahs of course. Or how about believing that a petty con man called Abie spotted the creator of the universe hoofing across the desert on his way to check on rumors and invited him in for a veal sandwich. Or that the same creator impregnated a 12 year old virgin to get a son that could be killed so he (god) could forgive us for previous sins. Or ....... (c: "Joe" wrote in message om... They say the war on terror is just making the risk of terrorism worse. Thats it's increasing terrorism. They think by killing and arresting terrorist we are just creating more terrorist. If thats true we should stop arresting thiefs, murders, rapist, child molestors evil dictaters ect..ect...ect... We are just creating more. What world are these idiots living on? htrae. How backwards can you get. ! pu ekaw lanoD yeh Joe |
What world do they live in
"Donal" wrote in message ...
"Joe" wrote in message om... "Donal" wrote in message ... "Joe" wrote in message om... I agree that killing, and arresting terrorists will reduce terrorism. Do you think saddam was not a terrorist? Someone that has murdered an estimated 3 million of his fellow country men. Wonderful! You say "estimated??" What kind of evidence is that? How long was Saddam in power for? 20 years?? 27 to be exact. Truly he was in power longer. He had his couison appointed president for 3 years before he gave the position to Saddam, But the whole time he was in power and his cous was just a stooge. Each year, 28,000 people get killed by guns in the US. In a 20 year period that will be 560,000! yeah and we just plow the under in mass graves. In other words, about a sixth of the deaths that you accuse Saddam of. Bush *knows* this, and yet he does nothing to stop it. Now, I can see that you will say that Saddam is responsible for six times as many deaths as Bush. However, Saddam only started two wars in 20 years. Bush has started 2 wars in three years. How many people have died in those wars? If Bush carries on, he will soon catch up with Saddam. BTW, Bush has been making worrying noises about Syria, N. Korea and Iran. He isn't short of ideas!! Great, Syrian N. Korea and Iran need to change. The dictator thing is so passa. It time for all men and women to have freedom on earth. Its a god given right. Geee, if thats not a terrorist I do not know what one is Donal. I know that you don't. Someone who launches a war against a sovereign state on a false pretext, and in defiance of the UN, is a terrorist. Guess you forgot about the UN resoluion 121. Ever member of the UN signed it. Nothoing false about it. Do you agree that killing innocent civilians will create great resentment? Yes, But who should they resent? The guys trying to kill the terrorist, or the terrorist that chose to fight in an urban enviroment and put them at risk? I know if our president murdered 3 million of my fellow country men I would gladly be killed by accident if you brits were trying to get him. I would understand and forgive you, I would wish you success and have no ill feeling towards you. Can you understand that concept? I understand what you are saying. I don't think that the woman who sees her husband killed and her 11 y/o son crippled for mis-understanding the instructions at a roadblock, will see it the same way. That is truly oneof the sad situations of war donel. If Saddam had allowed the inspectors to inspect, and followed the UN res those people would not have died. If you must blame someone blame Saddam for it, it's his fault. Nobody is trying to tell you that you shouldn't go after terrorists. So now your supporting the USA efforts? I supported them in Afghanistan.... not in Iraq. Regards Donal -- Joe |
What world do they live in
|
What world do they live in indeed
"Joe" wrote "Donal" wrote Each year, 28,000 people get killed by guns in the US. In a 20 year period that will be 560,000! Where did you (Donal?) dream up that number? The FBI's Crime in the United States estimated that 63% of the 15,980 US murders in 2001 were committed with firearms. That's 10,067, less than half your dream estimate. And before you say that 10,000 is still too many remember that our MDs' "medical misadventures" kill some 125,000 per year and like Saddam bury their victims. Are they terrorists or just grossly incompetent? Another thot: every time I see a celebration in some "repressed dictatorship" in the news I see poor enslaved citizens firing off their fully automatic assault rifles into the air and wonder about why all of us free peoples in the UK and America who are not allowed to possess such weapons. |
What world do they live in
"Jonathan Ganz" nonsense@liberal ******.com wrote ...
Fix for highway deaths... get car manufactures to devise better cars that have more collision avoidence technology, collision avoidence technology? WTF don't you learn how to drive! for larger SUV owners to pay hefty fees to own one they do, gas tax. |
What world do they live in
Yup, putting locks on houses has stopped burglury, Right?
Yup, especially if you buy really good locks and security. My alarm system cost more than your boat. Actually, the remote for the alarm cost more than your boat! Actually, the batteries for the remote for the alarm cost more than you boat! Actually, the drive to the store for the batteries.... Oh, never mind. RB |
What world do they live in
Donal,
There are gun deaths and car death and deaths by execution in this country but there are no mass graves for their removal. There are mass graves being found in Iraq and they are Iraqis in those graves. Those deaths in are country are caused by many different people . They are the victims of one man. Donal, your comparision makes no sense. Your post on "Liberal" though was a Zinger. Well done OT |
What world do they live in
MsTerryMermaid trumps Suzanne. Terry is hot.
Horvath's babe might be as sexy but I don't think he's posted a real picture of her - just some stripper babe he snuck a Polaroid of. Danny Taddae's babe is also hotter than Booby's. S.Simon Captain William Collin, Master of the barque Grimenza wrote in message ... On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 03:52:38 GMT, "Milos Forman" scribbled thusly: Suzy is a babe, she run circles around the mermaid. You must be jealous. And just in case you've forgotten, This is what the dwarf looks like http://hometown.aol.com/tertrnty/myh...e/profile.html Oz1...of the 3 twins. I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you. |
What world do they live in
"Joe" wrote in message om... That is truly oneof the sad situations of war donel. If Saddam had allowed the inspectors to inspect, and followed the UN res those people would not have died. If you must blame someone blame Saddam for it, it's his fault. That's like blaming the burglary victim because he didn't lock his house up. Look how Bush and Blair have changed their positions. A year ago, Saddam had long range WMD that posed an international threat. Now we are being told that he had short range battlefield WMD. Soon, we will be told that he had no illegal weapons at all. A year ago, Saddam was hosting Al Qaeda training camps. Now, we know that Bush has admitted that there is no evidence to back that claim up. A year ago, Saddam had mobile chemical facilities. Now we know that those trucks were built in Britain, and were used to fill artellirey balloons. A year ago, Saddam controlled one of the planet's biggest armies. Now we know that it was an under-equipped rabble, incapable of fighting a real war. So far, all the reasons that were used to justify the war, have been proved to be false. Bush led his country into war under false pretexts. You should be demanding his immediate resignation. Before the war, Bush did not try to convince anybody that war was justified by the fact that Saddan was evil. He sold the war on the basis that Saddam posed a threat. That threat existed because Saddan had WMD, and the intention to use them. Regards Donal -- |
What world do they live in indeed
"Vito" wrote in message ... "Joe" wrote "Donal" wrote Each year, 28,000 people get killed by guns in the US. In a 20 year period that will be 560,000! Where did you (Donal?) dream up that number? The FBI's Crime in the United States estimated that 63% of the 15,980 US murders in 2001 were committed with firearms. I didn't use the word murder. That's 10,067, less than half your dream estimate. And before you say that 10,000 is still too many remember that our MDs' "medical misadventures" kill some 125,000 per year and like Saddam bury their victims. Are they terrorists or just grossly incompetent? Do the victims care? Do their families? Was Saddam a terrorist? Is there a difference between a tyrant and a terrorist? Another thot: every time I see a celebration in some "repressed dictatorship" in the news I see poor enslaved citizens firing off their fully automatic assault rifles into the air and wonder about why all of us free peoples in the UK and America who are not allowed to possess such weapons. Perhaps you are misinterpreting what you are seeing on your TV screen. It's quite possible that many of these "spontaneous" demonstrations are in fact well organised. The people that you see firing the guns might not be ordinary citizens at all. They might be part of the state apparatus - don't you think? Regards Donal -- |
What world do they live in
"Thom Stewart" wrote in message ... Donal, There are gun deaths and car death and deaths by execution in this country but there are no mass graves for their removal. There are mass graves being found in Iraq and they are Iraqis in those graves. Those deaths in are country are caused by many different people . They are the victims of one man. Donal, your comparision makes no sense. Your post on "Liberal" though was a Zinger. Well done Thanks! I'm waiting for Simon's response. I suppose that I'll just have to keep waiting! Regards Donal -- |
What world do they live in
Suzy is a babe, she run circles around the mermaid.
You must be jealous. Thanks, Ozzy...and she's a wonderful girl who also likes to sail... http://hometown.aol.com/bobsprit/images/freedom.jpg RB |
What world do they live in
At least your memory is not faulty!
Cheers MC Donal wrote: "Joe" wrote in message om... That is truly oneof the sad situations of war donel. If Saddam had allowed the inspectors to inspect, and followed the UN res those people would not have died. If you must blame someone blame Saddam for it, it's his fault. That's like blaming the burglary victim because he didn't lock his house up. Look how Bush and Blair have changed their positions. A year ago, Saddam had long range WMD that posed an international threat. Now we are being told that he had short range battlefield WMD. Soon, we will be told that he had no illegal weapons at all. A year ago, Saddam was hosting Al Qaeda training camps. Now, we know that Bush has admitted that there is no evidence to back that claim up. A year ago, Saddam had mobile chemical facilities. Now we know that those trucks were built in Britain, and were used to fill artellirey balloons. A year ago, Saddam controlled one of the planet's biggest armies. Now we know that it was an under-equipped rabble, incapable of fighting a real war. So far, all the reasons that were used to justify the war, have been proved to be false. Bush led his country into war under false pretexts. You should be demanding his immediate resignation. Before the war, Bush did not try to convince anybody that war was justified by the fact that Saddan was evil. He sold the war on the basis that Saddam posed a threat. That threat existed because Saddan had WMD, and the intention to use them. Regards Donal -- |
What world do they live in
Scott Vernon wrote: That's a shame. I live where there's no need for alarm clocks. |
What world do they live in
That's a shame. I live where there's no need for alarms and locks.
Scott Vernon Plowville PA __/)__/)__ "Bob****" wrote ... Yup, putting locks on houses has stopped burglury, Right? Yup, especially if you buy really good locks and security. My alarm system cost more than your boat. |
What world do they live in
Captain William Collin, Master of the barque Grimenza wrote in message ... On 16 Dec 2003 18:59:48 GMT, (Bobsprit) scribbled thusly: Suzy is a babe, she run circles around the mermaid. You must be jealous. Thanks, Ozzy...and she's a wonderful girl who also likes to sail... http://hometown.aol.com/bobsprit/images/freedom.jpg RB Actually I didn't write that. I think it was Donal. Oi!! It certainly wasn't me. I think that it was Milos. He needs a new white stick! Regards Donal -- A man of taste! |
What world do they live in
"Simple Simon" wrote in message ...
MsTerryMermaid trumps Suzanne. Terry is hot. Horvath's babe might be as sexy but I don't think he's posted a real picture of her - just some stripper babe he snuck a Polaroid of. Danny Taddae's babe is also hotter than Booby's. S.Simon Captain William Collin, Master of the barque Grimenza wrote in message ... On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 03:52:38 GMT, "Milos Forman" scribbled thusly: Suzy is a babe, she run circles around the mermaid. You must be jealous. And just in case you've forgotten, This is what the dwarf looks like http://hometown.aol.com/tertrnty/myh...e/profile.html Oz1...of the 3 twins. Wow thats kinda scary, stalker like. Do you sleep with her picture under your pillow? Lets see a picture of your wife, girl friend, S.O. anything. Oh forgot you dont have one, and you spent all that money on a hot sport car, reminds me of all the fat gut losers around here that buy cigar boats to try to attract a women, they just hang out together get drunk and end up sucking each other dick. Bet you wear big gold chains to. Bwaahahahah what a loser. Joe I welcome you to crackerbox palace,We've been expecting you. |
What world do they live in
Captain William Collin, Master of the barque Grimenza wrote in message ... On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 12:05:19 -0500, "Simple Simon" scribbled thusly: MsTerryMermaid trumps Suzanne. Terry is hot. You like 5'4" (I think she's exaggerating) chunky little tarty lookin women eh? Women of between five feet and five feet four are sooooooo sexy. I hate big fat women. I hate tall women. I think a woman MsTerry's size is just right. They fit a 27-foot boat just right. Their feet don't get in the way at the pointy end of the v-berth and they don't eat like a horse. They don't swamp a dinghy and they have a low center of gravity which makes it more stable in rough seas. You can see over the top of their heads when rowing. They are a cinch to haul up to the masthead for repairs. They are easy to get back on board when they get drunk and fall over the side. They don't get backaches so easily after a long day in the galley preparing food. The do 'spoons' just perfectly. Women are SUPPOSED to be small. S.Simon |
What world do they live in
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 17:27:25 -0000, "Donal"
wrote this crap: A year ago, Saddam had long range WMD that posed an international threat. Now we are being told that he had short range battlefield WMD. Soon, we will be told that he had no illegal weapons at all. I don't think so. He had them and used them against the Iranians and the Kurds. A year ago, Saddam was hosting Al Qaeda training camps. Now, we know that Bush has admitted that there is no evidence to back that claim up. Lies. You never heard of Salman Pak? [all other lies and crap deleted] This signature is now the ultimate power in the universe |
What world do they live in
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:02:44 -0500, "Scott Vernon"
wrote this crap: That's a shame. I live where there's no need for alarms and locks. That's because nobody has anything worth stealing. Scott Vernon Plowville PA __/)__/)__ "Bob****" wrote ... Yup, putting locks on houses has stopped burglury, Right? Yup, especially if you buy really good locks and security. My alarm system cost more than your boat. This signature is now the ultimate power in the universe |
What world do they live in
Donal's like that bad guy in the 'Dirty Harry' movie
who paid a guy to beat him to a pulp. He actually enjoyed the beating. Donal must get his rocks off on taking a newsgroup beating. Why else would he keep coming back for more? Or should I say 'cumming' back for more? S.Simon "Horvath" wrote in message ... On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 17:27:25 -0000, "Donal" wrote this crap: A year ago, Saddam had long range WMD that posed an international threat. Now we are being told that he had short range battlefield WMD. Soon, we will be told that he had no illegal weapons at all. I don't think so. He had them and used them against the Iranians and the Kurds. A year ago, Saddam was hosting Al Qaeda training camps. Now, we know that Bush has admitted that there is no evidence to back that claim up. Lies. You never heard of Salman Pak? [all other lies and crap deleted] This signature is now the ultimate power in the universe |
What world do they live in
Or it could be those who steal get an ass full of buckshot. S.Simon "Horvath" wrote in message ... On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:02:44 -0500, "Scott Vernon" wrote this crap: That's a shame. I live where there's no need for alarms and locks. That's because nobody has anything worth stealing. Scott Vernon Plowville PA __/)__/)__ |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com