Where's Saddam???
 

One would think that the liberals would get the hint sooner
or later.

All it takes is a little time to invalidate EVERY single one
of their lame arguments/points/conjectures/whines. For
example up until today they used to complain, "Bush is
a failure, Saddam has not been found!". Now, they
have been proven wrong and impotent. They are still
whining, "Why hasn't Bush gotten bin Laden?" Soon,
they will be proven wrong and impotent on that one
as well. Then there's still the omnipresent, "Where
are the WMDs?" Are they really so stupid that they
don't realize that even if it takes years to find
WMDs that even their heart throb United Nations
acknowledged existed that sooner or later they
will be proven incorrect and impotent on this
whine as well?

Everything they believe in, everything they think
they can use to discredit President Bush is coming
back to haunt them. They are losing every point.
They have placed themselves on the wrong side
of every issue. They have allowed their hatred
for a fine President to cloud their judgment.
They cannot even enjoy the victory over Saddam
with his capture yesterday. They are already
conjuring up new ways they think they can use
to make the capture of Saddam seem like a
negative thing. (You can hear the whisperings
already which surely will become shouts with
the campaigns of the nine joke Democrat Presidential
candidates, whisperings like,"Saddam's capture
and trial will serve only to motivate the resistance
into more bombing and acts of terror!" Mark my
words, a week won't pass until you hear this
on the mainstream media.)

But, never fear all you loyal Americans. These
seditious statements are recognized for what they
really are - the last gasps of a dying Democrat Party
that has allied itself with Saddam and against the
people of Iraq. Now that any hope of Saddam ever
returning to power is gone so is the hope of Democrats
ever returning to power. The Democrat Party is a dead
party. Rest in Peace.

S.Simon

Where's Saddam???
 

Simple Simon wrote:


But, never fear all you loyal Americans. These
seditious statements are recognized for what they
really are - the last gasps of a dying Democrat Party
that has allied itself with Saddam and against the
people of Iraq. Now that any hope of Saddam ever
returning to power is gone so is the hope of Democrats
ever returning to power. The Democrat Party is a dead
party. Rest in Peace.


Good lord. Proof simple that fascism in the US is alive and well.

Cheers MC

Where's Saddam???
 

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
One would think that the liberals would get the hint sooner
or later.

All it takes is a little time to invalidate EVERY single one
of their lame arguments/points/conjectures/whines. For
example up until today they used to complain, "Bush is
a failure, Saddam has not been found!".

Did they?

I thought that most of the people that you so loosly describe as "liberal"
were complaining that the war in Iraq was unjustified.

Bush is a failure because he has increased terrorism.

Regards


Donal
--

Where's Saddam???
 

Everything they believe in, everything they think
they can use to discredit President Bush is coming
back to haunt them. They are losing every point.


You mean all of the people killed on 9/11 while Bush vacationed aren't dead?
You mean we didn't lose all of those American lives in Iraq? You mean Bush
isn't killing the forests and oceans?

Oh...okay!

RB

Where's Saddam???
 

I thought that most of the people that you so loosly describe as "liberal"
were complaining that the war in Iraq was unjustified.

Saddam being free was bad. Bin Laden is worse. Eventually they'll catch him.
But there will be another Bin Laden. Bush does not understand the nature of the
beast and enemy.

RB

Where's Saddam???
 

You are very correct.

It is also true that the only valid criticism of George W. Bush comes from
true Conservatives such as myself.

He spends like a drunken sailor and is growing the nanny state. He's a left
of center Republican. Clinton was a centrist Democrat. There's not much
difference except Bush has grown government more than Clinton.

Milos

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
One would think that the liberals would get the hint sooner
or later.

All it takes is a little time to invalidate EVERY single one
of their lame arguments/points/conjectures/whines. For
example up until today they used to complain, "Bush is
a failure, Saddam has not been found!". Now, they
have been proven wrong and impotent. They are still
whining, "Why hasn't Bush gotten bin Laden?" Soon,
they will be proven wrong and impotent on that one
as well. Then there's still the omnipresent, "Where
are the WMDs?" Are they really so stupid that they
don't realize that even if it takes years to find
WMDs that even their heart throb United Nations
acknowledged existed that sooner or later they
will be proven incorrect and impotent on this
whine as well?

Everything they believe in, everything they think
they can use to discredit President Bush is coming
back to haunt them. They are losing every point.
They have placed themselves on the wrong side
of every issue. They have allowed their hatred
for a fine President to cloud their judgment.
They cannot even enjoy the victory over Saddam
with his capture yesterday. They are already
conjuring up new ways they think they can use
to make the capture of Saddam seem like a
negative thing. (You can hear the whisperings
already which surely will become shouts with
the campaigns of the nine joke Democrat Presidential
candidates, whisperings like,"Saddam's capture
and trial will serve only to motivate the resistance
into more bombing and acts of terror!" Mark my
words, a week won't pass until you hear this
on the mainstream media.)

But, never fear all you loyal Americans. These
seditious statements are recognized for what they
really are - the last gasps of a dying Democrat Party
that has allied itself with Saddam and against the
people of Iraq. Now that any hope of Saddam ever
returning to power is gone so is the hope of Democrats
ever returning to power. The Democrat Party is a dead
party. Rest in Peace.

S.Simon

Where's Saddam???
 

If he weren't so pathetic, he would be scary.

"The_navigator©" wrote in message
...


Simple Simon wrote:


But, never fear all you loyal Americans. These
seditious statements are recognized for what they
really are - the last gasps of a dying Democrat Party
that has allied itself with Saddam and against the
people of Iraq. Now that any hope of Saddam ever
returning to power is gone so is the hope of Democrats
ever returning to power. The Democrat Party is a dead
party. Rest in Peace.


Good lord. Proof simple that fascism in the US is alive and well.

Cheers MC

Where's Saddam???
 

"Simple Simon" wrote in message ...

Well said Capt. Neal.

The nay sayers wrote it here and we all can see what true losers they
all are turning out to be. Point after Point, issue after issue. Thank
god they are such a small minority. I love it! Perhaps some undecided
person will turn to ASA for answers, when they do they will run as
fast as they can to get away from the liberal democrats . And fine
British citizens will finally see what a brave just and good person
Tony Blair is.

Joe




One would think that the liberals would get the hint sooner
or later.

All it takes is a little time to invalidate EVERY single one
of their lame arguments/points/conjectures/whines. For
example up until today they used to complain, "Bush is
a failure, Saddam has not been found!". Now, they
have been proven wrong and impotent. They are still
whining, "Why hasn't Bush gotten bin Laden?" Soon,
they will be proven wrong and impotent on that one
as well. Then there's still the omnipresent, "Where
are the WMDs?" Are they really so stupid that they
don't realize that even if it takes years to find
WMDs that even their heart throb United Nations
acknowledged existed that sooner or later they
will be proven incorrect and impotent on this
whine as well?

Everything they believe in, everything they think
they can use to discredit President Bush is coming
back to haunt them. They are losing every point.
They have placed themselves on the wrong side
of every issue. They have allowed their hatred
for a fine President to cloud their judgment.
They cannot even enjoy the victory over Saddam
with his capture yesterday. They are already
conjuring up new ways they think they can use
to make the capture of Saddam seem like a
negative thing. (You can hear the whisperings
already which surely will become shouts with
the campaigns of the nine joke Democrat Presidential
candidates, whisperings like,"Saddam's capture
and trial will serve only to motivate the resistance
into more bombing and acts of terror!" Mark my
words, a week won't pass until you hear this
on the mainstream media.)

But, never fear all you loyal Americans. These
seditious statements are recognized for what they
really are - the last gasps of a dying Democrat Party
that has allied itself with Saddam and against the
people of Iraq. Now that any hope of Saddam ever
returning to power is gone so is the hope of Democrats
ever returning to power. The Democrat Party is a dead
party. Rest in Peace.

S.Simon

Where's Saddam???
 

Your computer working OK this last few days?

S.Simon


"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message ...

Where's Saddam???
 

"Joe" wrote in message
om...
"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...

Well said Capt. Neal.

The nay sayers wrote it here and we all can see what true losers they
all are turning out to be. Point after Point, issue after issue. Thank
god they are such a small minority. I love it! Perhaps some undecided
person will turn to ASA for answers, when they do they will run as
fast as they can to get away from the liberal democrats . And fine
British citizens will finally see what a brave just and good person
Tony Blair is.

Joe, I was wondering if you were aware that Tony Blair is leader of the
Labour Party.

The Labour Party is a Socialist party. Their anthem is "Keep the red flag
flying".



Regards


Donal
--

Where's Saddam???
 

Ummm... sure thing why?

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
Your computer working OK this last few days?

S.Simon


"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...

Where's Saddam???
 

Actually, I'm in the process of building a raid system... 4 - 200 gig ata
serial drives,
P4, 3.06 processor, XP Pro, Abit IC7-Max3 mb., 2 gigs ram. I'm doing raid
0+1
and having a bit of trouble with part of the configuration.

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...
Your computer working OK this last few days?

S.Simon


"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message
...

Where's Saddam???
 

What's the problem? You are using NTFS?

Cheers MC

Jonathan Ganz wrote:

Actually, I'm in the process of building a raid system... 4 - 200 gig ata
serial drives,
P4, 3.06 processor, XP Pro, Abit IC7-Max3 mb., 2 gigs ram. I'm doing raid
0+1
and having a bit of trouble with part of the configuration.

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...

Your computer working OK this last few days?

S.Simon


"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message

...

Where's Saddam???
 

I've been using NTFS exclusively for many years.

The problem is that I've successfully mirrored the first two HDs,
but I can't seem to get the second two to be recognized by the
bios. They're on the same SATA controller. If I put them on the
other SATA controller, then no problem, but if I do that, then
I can't stripe across controllers, which is the whole point. There
must be something in the bios that's screwy. I just updated to
the lastest version of the bios, so it can't be that (didn't work
with the older version either).

"The_navigator©" wrote in message
...
What's the problem? You are using NTFS?

Cheers MC

Jonathan Ganz wrote:

Actually, I'm in the process of building a raid system... 4 - 200 gig
ata
serial drives,
P4, 3.06 processor, XP Pro, Abit IC7-Max3 mb., 2 gigs ram. I'm doing
raid
0+1
and having a bit of trouble with part of the configuration.

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...

Your computer working OK this last few days?

S.Simon


"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message

...

Where's Saddam???
 

If you've four drives on one controller you can go raid 3... The trouble
with going raid across two controllers is that the likelihood of system
failure is increased... -at least that's how I understand it. (We are
running a raid 3 single controller linux box). Are you running hardware
raid, if so then are you sure the decoding can be shared across
controllers?

Cheers MC


Jonathan Ganz wrote:

I've been using NTFS exclusively for many years.

The problem is that I've successfully mirrored the first two HDs,
but I can't seem to get the second two to be recognized by the
bios. They're on the same SATA controller. If I put them on the
other SATA controller, then no problem, but if I do that, then
I can't stripe across controllers, which is the whole point. There
must be something in the bios that's screwy. I just updated to
the lastest version of the bios, so it can't be that (didn't work
with the older version either).

"The_navigator©" wrote in message
...

What's the problem? You are using NTFS?

Cheers MC

Jonathan Ganz wrote:


Actually, I'm in the process of building a raid system... 4 - 200 gig

ata

serial drives,
P4, 3.06 processor, XP Pro, Abit IC7-Max3 mb., 2 gigs ram. I'm doing

raid

0+1
and having a bit of trouble with part of the configuration.

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...


Your computer working OK this last few days?

S.Simon


"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message

...

Where's Saddam???
 

Well, for one thing the MB doesn't support R3. I don't want to run across
controllers, that's why I'm trying to get everything on the Silicon Image...
yes hardware...damn thing. I know it's possible... it says it in the manual.

"The_navigator©" wrote in message
...
If you've four drives on one controller you can go raid 3... The trouble
with going raid across two controllers is that the likelihood of system
failure is increased... -at least that's how I understand it. (We are
running a raid 3 single controller linux box). Are you running hardware
raid, if so then are you sure the decoding can be shared across
controllers?

Cheers MC


Jonathan Ganz wrote:

I've been using NTFS exclusively for many years.

The problem is that I've successfully mirrored the first two HDs,
but I can't seem to get the second two to be recognized by the
bios. They're on the same SATA controller. If I put them on the
other SATA controller, then no problem, but if I do that, then
I can't stripe across controllers, which is the whole point. There
must be something in the bios that's screwy. I just updated to
the lastest version of the bios, so it can't be that (didn't work
with the older version either).

"The_navigator©" wrote in message
...

What's the problem? You are using NTFS?

Cheers MC

Jonathan Ganz wrote:


Actually, I'm in the process of building a raid system... 4 - 200 gig

ata

serial drives,
P4, 3.06 processor, XP Pro, Abit IC7-Max3 mb., 2 gigs ram. I'm doing

raid

0+1
and having a bit of trouble with part of the configuration.

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...


Your computer working OK this last few days?

S.Simon


"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message

...

Where's Saddam???
 

Had a quick look at the MB. It looks to me like the extra 2 ATA's are
reached via a ICH5R bridge. You'll need XP to load the dll etc into the
HAL to make that work... ??? If you look at the devices manager is the
bridge there and alive?

Cheers MC

Jonathan Ganz wrote:

Well, for one thing the MB doesn't support R3. I don't want to run across
controllers, that's why I'm trying to get everything on the Silicon Image...
yes hardware...damn thing. I know it's possible... it says it in the manual.

"The_navigator©" wrote in message
...

If you've four drives on one controller you can go raid 3... The trouble
with going raid across two controllers is that the likelihood of system
failure is increased... -at least that's how I understand it. (We are
running a raid 3 single controller linux box). Are you running hardware
raid, if so then are you sure the decoding can be shared across
controllers?

Cheers MC


Jonathan Ganz wrote:


I've been using NTFS exclusively for many years.

The problem is that I've successfully mirrored the first two HDs,
but I can't seem to get the second two to be recognized by the
bios. They're on the same SATA controller. If I put them on the
other SATA controller, then no problem, but if I do that, then
I can't stripe across controllers, which is the whole point. There
must be something in the bios that's screwy. I just updated to
the lastest version of the bios, so it can't be that (didn't work
with the older version either).

"The_navigator©" wrote in message
...


What's the problem? You are using NTFS?

Cheers MC

Jonathan Ganz wrote:



Actually, I'm in the process of building a raid system... 4 - 200 gig

ata


serial drives,
P4, 3.06 processor, XP Pro, Abit IC7-Max3 mb., 2 gigs ram. I'm doing

raid


0+1
and having a bit of trouble with part of the configuration.

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...



Your computer working OK this last few days?

S.Simon


"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message

...

Where's Saddam???
 

Interesting suggestion. I'm not really using the ICH5R bridge at the moment,
and the Application Accelerator doesn't function, but it is running. I think
the
MB is using a proprietary version of the driver. As I mentioned, I can get
the hds to be seen on the ICH5R, but that's not going to let me raid them
with the SATA drives on the SI controller.... sigh... I think it's time to
try
tech support. It's 10:30 pm and I've had it for the evening.

"The_navigator©" wrote in message
...
Had a quick look at the MB. It looks to me like the extra 2 ATA's are
reached via a ICH5R bridge. You'll need XP to load the dll etc into the
HAL to make that work... ??? If you look at the devices manager is the
bridge there and alive?

Cheers MC

Jonathan Ganz wrote:

Well, for one thing the MB doesn't support R3. I don't want to run
across
controllers, that's why I'm trying to get everything on the Silicon
Image...
yes hardware...damn thing. I know it's possible... it says it in the
manual.

"The_navigator©" wrote in message
...

If you've four drives on one controller you can go raid 3... The trouble
with going raid across two controllers is that the likelihood of system
failure is increased... -at least that's how I understand it. (We are
running a raid 3 single controller linux box). Are you running hardware
raid, if so then are you sure the decoding can be shared across
controllers?

Cheers MC


Jonathan Ganz wrote:


I've been using NTFS exclusively for many years.

The problem is that I've successfully mirrored the first two HDs,
but I can't seem to get the second two to be recognized by the
bios. They're on the same SATA controller. If I put them on the
other SATA controller, then no problem, but if I do that, then
I can't stripe across controllers, which is the whole point. There
must be something in the bios that's screwy. I just updated to
the lastest version of the bios, so it can't be that (didn't work
with the older version either).

"The_navigator©" wrote in message
...


What's the problem? You are using NTFS?

Cheers MC

Jonathan Ganz wrote:



Actually, I'm in the process of building a raid system... 4 - 200 gig

ata


serial drives,
P4, 3.06 processor, XP Pro, Abit IC7-Max3 mb., 2 gigs ram. I'm doing

raid


0+1
and having a bit of trouble with part of the configuration.

"Simple Simon" wrote in message
...



Your computer working OK this last few days?

S.Simon


"Jonathan Ganz" wrote in message

...

Where's Saddam???
 

"Milos Forman" wrote in
ink.net:

It is also true that the only valid criticism of George W. Bush comes
from true Conservatives such as myself.

He spends like a drunken sailor and is growing the nanny state. He's
a left of center Republican. Clinton was a centrist Democrat. There's
not much difference except Bush has grown government more than
Clinton.

True enough -- at least for domestic policy -- although if Clinton's party
had controlled Congress like Bush's party does, I think he would have out-
drunk and out-nannied Bush.

Here's to gridlock... Salud!