LIST OF THREADS ON:LIST: NAUTICAL THREADS - OCT 26, 03 TO NOV 02, 03 -
 

Two Wheel is such a loser.

Seriously.

I'm going sailing now. Maybe he can write a book with Binary Jane!

Bwahahahahahaha!

RB

LIST OF THREADS ON:LIST: NAUTICAL THREADS - OCT 26, 03 TO NOV 02, 03 -
 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02 Nov 2003 16:49:57 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote:



Two Wheel is such a loser.

Seriously.

I'm going sailing now. Maybe he can write a book with Binary Jane!

Bwahahahahahaha!

RB


Suzzane's pregnant! Baby due August 12!

Captain and soon to be proud father,

At least I don't brag about imaginary 11 month pregnancies (allowing
for the discovery of,) or imaginary billionaire daughter passengers.

two wheels


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2

iQA/AwUBP6U6GtCBA23eyf45EQJ1mQCg+aEm2U2DVPl9b2p41mpUlX 1FEJsAnioP
YN6sd57dUUV+gTnslM0Wgf1+
=GTK0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

LIST OF THREADS ON:LIST: NAUTICAL THREADS - OCT 26, 03 TO NOV 02, 03 -
 

I'd have to agree with RB - what's the value of your list?

And RB's "pregnancy" was not his post - it was a forgery; a good hoax, since it was consistent with
much of his nonsense. I assumed he forget his meds that day.

And what's with the PGP silliness? It doesn't prevent any forgeries - it just makes your posts look
stupid.

--
-jeff


"two wheels" wrote in message
...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02 Nov 2003 16:49:57 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote:



Two Wheel is such a loser.

Seriously.

I'm going sailing now. Maybe he can write a book with Binary Jane!

Bwahahahahahaha!

RB


Suzzane's pregnant! Baby due August 12!

Captain and soon to be proud father,

At least I don't brag about imaginary 11 month pregnancies (allowing
for the discovery of,) or imaginary billionaire daughter passengers.

two wheels


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2

iQA/AwUBP6U6GtCBA23eyf45EQJ1mQCg+aEm2U2DVPl9b2p41mpUlX 1FEJsAnioP
YN6sd57dUUV+gTnslM0Wgf1+
=GTK0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

LIST OF THREADS ON:LIST: NAUTICAL THREADS - OCT 26, 03 TO NOV 02, 03 -
 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 2 Nov 2003 12:16:33 -0500, "Jeff Morris"
wrote:

I'd have to agree with RB - what's the value of your list?

And RB's "pregnancy" was not his post - it was a forgery; a good hoax,
since it was consistent with much of his nonsense. I assumed he
forget his meds that day.

And what's with the PGP silliness? It doesn't prevent any forgeries -
it just makes your posts look stupid.

If the "SHA1 hash" doesn't "verify" for one of these two "PGP
fingerprints":

Before 9/4/2003:
C7B4 9CA6 9698 01D2 2823 DF72 F151 AD95 DA1D AF09

After 9/4/2003:
4753 0A55 AB76 FFE8 BF6A 95C1 D081 036D DEC9 FE39

Then assume I didn't write it.

On the otherhand, if the PGP message signature does "verify" for one of
the above "fingerprints," then I can't really disavow it.

two wheels


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2

iQA/AwUBP6VNJNCBA23eyf45EQK2EgCfSL63Uwmga7eK924eyh3tY5 c3xUMAn1HC
l5uRrwReNBFHdk7QiUiLYJjY
=D2rn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

LIST OF THREADS ON:LIST: NAUTICAL THREADS - OCT 26, 03 TO NOV 02, 03 -
 

No, Jeff is correct on both counts.. sorry. The value of the list
is minimal if anything. No offense intended. I think it had some
merit, if for nothing else as a good idea.

The PGP stuff doesn't add any value to your posts. They're
just clutter. You claim that SHS1 hash may not verify, but
for ng posting, who really cares? It's not like you're posting
to a secure site with classified data. It's just an annoyance
for everyone else. I could see it in an email, I suppose, as
a valid security measure, but even then, same question...
most people, 99.99999% don't have anything that's worth
stealing from an email.

"two wheels" wrote in message
...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 2 Nov 2003 12:16:33 -0500, "Jeff Morris"
wrote:

I'd have to agree with RB - what's the value of your list?

And RB's "pregnancy" was not his post - it was a forgery; a good hoax,
since it was consistent with much of his nonsense. I assumed he
forget his meds that day.

And what's with the PGP silliness? It doesn't prevent any forgeries -
it just makes your posts look stupid.

If the "SHA1 hash" doesn't "verify" for one of these two "PGP
fingerprints":

Before 9/4/2003:
C7B4 9CA6 9698 01D2 2823 DF72 F151 AD95 DA1D AF09

After 9/4/2003:
4753 0A55 AB76 FFE8 BF6A 95C1 D081 036D DEC9 FE39

Then assume I didn't write it.

On the otherhand, if the PGP message signature does "verify" for one of
the above "fingerprints," then I can't really disavow it.

two wheels


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2

iQA/AwUBP6VNJNCBA23eyf45EQK2EgCfSL63Uwmga7eK924eyh3tY5 c3xUMAn1HC
l5uRrwReNBFHdk7QiUiLYJjY
=D2rn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

LIST OF THREADS ON:LIST: NAUTICAL THREADS - OCT 26, 03 TO NOV 02, 03 -
 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Like I said, mostly worthless stuff added to a post....

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2

iQA/AwUBP6VNJNCBA23eyf45EQK2EgCfSL63Uwmga7eK924eyh3tY5 c3xUMAn1HC
l5uRrwReNBFHdk7QiUiLYJjY
=D2rn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

LIST OF THREADS ON:LIST: NAUTICAL THREADS - OCT 26, 03 TO NOV 02, 03 -
 

Perhaps we should turn the criticism around and try and think
of a useful list....

"Jeff Morris" wrote in message
...
I'd have to agree with RB - what's the value of your list?

And RB's "pregnancy" was not his post - it was a forgery; a good hoax,
since it was consistent with
much of his nonsense. I assumed he forget his meds that day.

And what's with the PGP silliness? It doesn't prevent any forgeries - it
just makes your posts look
stupid.

--
-jeff


"two wheels" wrote in message
...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02 Nov 2003 16:49:57 GMT, (Bobsprit) wrote:



Two Wheel is such a loser.

Seriously.

I'm going sailing now. Maybe he can write a book with Binary Jane!

Bwahahahahahaha!

RB


Suzzane's pregnant! Baby due August 12!

Captain and soon to be proud father,

At least I don't brag about imaginary 11 month pregnancies (allowing
for the discovery of,) or imaginary billionaire daughter passengers.

two wheels


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2

iQA/AwUBP6U6GtCBA23eyf45EQJ1mQCg+aEm2U2DVPl9b2p41mpUlX 1FEJsAnioP
YN6sd57dUUV+gTnslM0Wgf1+
=GTK0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

LIST OF THREADS ON:LIST: NAUTICAL THREADS - OCT 26, 03 TO NOV 02, 03 -
 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 2 Nov 2003 11:06:33 -0800, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Like I said, mostly worthless stuff added to a post....

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2

iQA/AwUBP6VNJNCBA23eyf45EQK2EgCfSL63Uwmga7eK924eyh3tY5 c3xUMAn1HC
l5uRrwReNBFHdk7QiUiLYJjY
=D2rn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


*** PGP SIGNATURE VERIFICATION ***
*** Status: Bad Signature
*** Alert: Signature did not verify. Message has been altered.
*** Signer: two wheels
(0xDEC9FE39)
*** Signed: 11/2/2003 12:29:56 PM
*** Verified: 11/2/2003 3:58:49 PM
*** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***

Like I said, mostly worthless stuff added to a post....


*** END PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2

iQA/AwUBP6V+ZdCBA23eyf45EQLF5gCgg2zVDaQeQm/uQAlbQEkCNbnHybQAnjMq
ZmhBlLA9o4TAwPys37YXjD/g
=Hyal
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

LIST OF THREADS ON:LIST: NAUTICAL THREADS - OCT 26, 03 TO NOV 02, 03 -
 

Like I said, this may have meaning for you, but for the rest
of humanity (not counting Horass), it's a meanless jumble
that does nothing for the flow of communication.

"two wheels" wrote in message
...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 2 Nov 2003 11:06:33 -0800, "Jonathan Ganz"
wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Like I said, mostly worthless stuff added to a post....

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2

iQA/AwUBP6VNJNCBA23eyf45EQK2EgCfSL63Uwmga7eK924eyh3tY5 c3xUMAn1HC
l5uRrwReNBFHdk7QiUiLYJjY
=D2rn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


*** PGP SIGNATURE VERIFICATION ***
*** Status: Bad Signature
*** Alert: Signature did not verify. Message has been altered.
*** Signer: two wheels
(0xDEC9FE39)
*** Signed: 11/2/2003 12:29:56 PM
*** Verified: 11/2/2003 3:58:49 PM
*** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***

Like I said, mostly worthless stuff added to a post....


*** END PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.2

iQA/AwUBP6V+ZdCBA23eyf45EQLF5gCgg2zVDaQeQm/uQAlbQEkCNbnHybQAnjMq
ZmhBlLA9o4TAwPys37YXjD/g
=Hyal
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

LIST OF THREADS ON:LIST: NAUTICAL THREADS - OCT 26, 03 TO NOV 02, 03 -
 

"two wheels" wrote in message
If the "SHA1 hash" doesn't "verify" for one of these two "PGP
fingerprints":

Who gives a s*it?


Can'y you get it into your thick skull that PGP signatures are out of place
here?

Only interesting people (weirdos) get forged. You are absolutely safe.
There is no chance that anybody is going to pretend that they are you.


Regards



two wheels
--