|
Bush IQ!!!!
President Bush Ranks Lowest IQ in 50 Years of US Presidents. In a report
published Monday, the Lovenstein Institute of Scranton, Pennsylvania, detailed its findings of a four-month study of the intelligence quotient of President George W. Bush. Since 1973, the Lovenstein Institute has published its research to the educational community on each new president, which includes the famous "IQ" report among others. There have been twelve presidents over the past 50 years, from F.D. Roosevelt to G.W. Bush, who were rated based on scholarly achievements, writings that they produced without aid of staff, their ability to speak with clarity, and several other psychological factors, which were then scored using the Swanson/Crain system of intelligence ranking. The study determined the following IQs of each president as accurate to within five percentage points: In order by presidential term: 147 .. Franklin D. Roosevelt (D) 132 .. Harry Truman (D) 122 .. Dwight D. Eisenhower (R) 174 .. John F. Kennedy (D) 126 .. Lyndon B. Johnson (D) 155.. Richard M. Nixon (R) 121 .. Gerald Ford (R) 175 .. James E. Carter (D) 105 .. Ronald Reagan (R) 098 .. George Bush (R) 182 .. William J. Clinton (D) 091 .. George W. Bush (R) In IQ order: 182 .. William J. Clinton (D) 175 .. James E. Carter (D) 174 .. John F. Kennedy (D) 155 .. Richard M. Nixon (R) 147 .. Franklin D. Roosevelt (D) 132 .. Harry Truman (D) 126 .. Lyndon B. Johnson (D) 122 .. Dwight D. Eisenhower (R) 121 .. Gerald Ford (R) 105 .. Ronald Reagan (R) 098 ..George Bush (R) 091 .. George W. Bush (R) The six Republican presidents of the past 50 years had an average IQ of 115.5, with President Nixon having the highest at 155. President G.W. Bush rated the lowest of all the Republicans with an IQ of 91. The six Democrat presidents had IQs with an average of 156, with President Clinton having the highest IQ, at 182. President Lyndon B. Johnson was rated the lowest of all the Democrats with an IQ of 126. No president other than Carter (D) has released his actual IQ, 176.Among comments made concerning the specific testing of President GW Bush, his low ratings are due to his apparently difficult command of the English language in public statements, his limited use of vocabulary (6,500 words for Bush versus an average of 11,000 words for other presidents), his lack of scholarly achievements other than a basic MBA, and an absence of any body of work which could be studied on an intellectual basis. The complete report documents the methods and procedures used to arrive at these ratings, including depth of sentence structure and voice stress confidence analysis. "All the Presidents prior to George W. Bush had a least one book under their belt, and most had written several white papers during their education or early careers. Not so with President Bush," Dr. Lovenstein said. "He has no published works or writings, which made it more difficult to arrive at an assessment. We relied more heavily on transcripts of his unscripted public speaking." The Lovenstein Institute of Scranton Pennsylvania think tank includes high caliber historians, psychiatrists, sociologists, scientists in human behavior, and psychologists. Among their ranks are Dr. Werner R. Lovenstein, world-renowned sociologist, and Professor Patricia F. Dilliams, a world-respected psychiatrist. |
Bush IQ!!!!
"john" wrote in message om... http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/lovenstein.html Claim: According to a study by the Lovenstein Institute, President Bush has the lowest IQ of all presidents of past 50 years. Status: False. Origins: No, this isn't a real news report, nor does it describe a real study. There isn't a "Lovenstein Institute" in Scranton, Pennsylvania (or anywhere else in the USA), nor do any of the people quoted in the story exist, because this is just another spoof that was taken too seriously. Good research, John! I cannot believe that anybody with an IQ of 91 would insult a foreign leader, and 6 months later ask for military assistance from that same leader!! Bush's IQ cannot be any higher than 60. Recently, people like Bush were classified as having "learning difficulties". A few years ago, they were called "mentally disabled". Before that, they were called lunatics. Now, they are called "Mr. President.". Regards Donal -- |
Bush IQ!!!!
"Donal" wrote in message ...
"john" wrote in message om... http://www.museumofhoaxes.com/lovenstein.html Claim: According to a study by the Lovenstein Institute, President Bush has the lowest IQ of all presidents of past 50 years. Status: False. Origins: No, this isn't a real news report, nor does it describe a real study. There isn't a "Lovenstein Institute" in Scranton, Pennsylvania (or anywhere else in the USA), nor do any of the people quoted in the story exist, because this is just another spoof that was taken too seriously. Good research, John! I cannot believe that anybody with an IQ of 91 would insult a foreign leader, and 6 months later ask for military assistance from that same leader!! Bush's IQ cannot be any higher than 60. Recently, people like Bush were classified as having "learning difficulties". A few years ago, they were called "mentally disabled". Before that, they were called lunatics. Now, they are called "Mr. President.". Regards Donal -- If you think you are being clever, you're not. You haven't said one word about his intelligence, or supposed lack of it, but you have just spoken volumes about your own ignorance and bigotry. |
Bush IQ!!!!
"john" wrote in message om... "Donal" wrote in message ... snipped donal's crap Donal -- If you think you are being clever, you're not. You haven't said one word about his intelligence, or supposed lack of it, but you have just spoken volumes about your own ignorance and bigotry. Donal has become just another anti-American, liberal fool foreigner who hates President George W. Bush so much that he's allowed his meager reasoning powers to morph into complete mush and consequently has reduced himself to repeating lies and rumors because he can can do little else. Pacifists like Donal need to be tossed into a gulag and made to live on bread and water and break rocks 18 hours a day for about a year so they get it through their thick heads that they'd be doing this permanently if enough people were as stupid and cowardly as they are. S.Simon - lives in the real world - a world kept free by brave and patriotic men like George W. Bush and Tony Blair. |
Bush IQ!!!!
"john" wrote in message om... If you think you are being clever, you're not. You haven't said one word about his intelligence, or supposed lack of it, but you have just spoken volumes about your own ignorance and bigotry. Brilliant, John. You are obviously a man who understands what is going on in the world. Perhaps you can explain why no WMD have been found in Iraq.? Regards Donal -- |
Bush IQ!!!!
"Donal" wrote in message ... | | "john" wrote in message | om... | If you think you are being clever, you're not. You haven't said one | word about his intelligence, or supposed lack of it, but you have just | spoken volumes about your own ignorance and bigotry. | | Brilliant, John. You are obviously a man who understands what is going on | in the world. | | Perhaps you can explain why no WMD have been found in Iraq.? Better yet Donal.... maybe he can explain why the USA is begging for help from the same people it insulted and dismissed for not joining in this idiotic fiasco. Seems like failing to achieve objectives is the hallmark of this presidency. Didn't all this start off to stop terrorism? Osama Bin Missin'?? CM |
Bush IQ!!!!
Now I understand why you post from Canada. You're
undoubtedly one of those long-haired, maggot-infested, low-life, scum-sucking, commie pinko war protesters who tucked tail and crawled on your belly up to Canada to avoid the draft back in the sixties. It's much easier to punch out teenagers at the local mall than fight real enemies who actually shoot at you and toss grenades. S.Simon - a real Viet Nam era vet who's proud of his country and was happy to fight to keep her free "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message ... Didn't all this start off to stop terrorism? Osama Bin Missin'?? CM |
Bush IQ!!!!
"Simple Simon" wrote in message ... | Now I understand why you post from Canada. You're | undoubtedly one of those long-haired, maggot-infested, | low-life, scum-sucking, commie pinko war protesters | who tucked tail and crawled on your belly up to Canada | to avoid the draft back in the sixties. Nope.... immigrated from the Congo. I was 5 at the time. Seems to me it's Canadian Troops relieving your boys in Afghanistan. Another friggin screw up... with the USA managing to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory once more. | It's much easier to punch out teenagers at the local mall | than fight real enemies who actually shoot at you and toss | grenades. I've shot people who shot at me. I haven't killed anyone yet though. I've no doubt after seeing your boys in action that if you provided me with the same equipment... I fair much better with fewer friendly fire incidences. I'm surprisingly fast in the bush and exceptionally cool under fire. CM |
Bush IQ!!!!
"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message ... I've shot people who shot at me. I haven't killed anyone yet though. I've no doubt after seeing your boys in action that if you provided me with the same equipment... I fair much better with fewer friendly fire incidences. I'm surprisingly fast in the bush and exceptionally cool under fire. I like to take my time in the bush. I don't get there often enough as it is. S.Simon |
Bush IQ!!!!
"john" wrote in message om... If you think you are being clever, you're not. You haven't said one word about his intelligence, or supposed lack of it, but you have just spoken volumes about your own ignorance and bigotry. OK! Let me put it simply. A few months ago, the French and German governments were given all sorts of abuse by various members of the Bush administration for their refusal to support war in Iraq. The French and Germans felt that the War against Terror would not be helped by invading Iraq. They warned that the situation would be made worse. They claimed that there was no proof that Iraq posed an imminent threat. They claimed that there was no evidence to link Al Q'aeda with Saddam, and they said that there was no proof of the existence of WMD. The situation in Iraq has now gone "tits up", just as the French and Germans predicted. Now, the Bush administration is seeking assistance from the French and Germans because the US is finding it difficult to deal with the daily terrorist attacks. It is very stupid to ask the French and Germans to help to pay for the mess that they tried to prevent in the first place. Only an idiot would expect help in this situation. I don't think that I am being very clever. I do think that anyone who still thinks that Bush is intelligent must be very stupid. Regards Donal -- |
Bush IQ!!!!
"The Captains Nemesis" wrote in message ... Doinal me lad, that will be construed as anti American by the patriots. [sigh] I know! Only an American patriot could believe that Bush is intelligent. Surely, a real patriot would try to put the truth before politics. In the long term, the Bush administration will be seen to have caused huge damage to US interests. Regards Donal -- |
Bush IQ!!!!
"Donal" wrote in message ...
"john" wrote in message om... If you think you are being clever, you're not. You haven't said one word about his intelligence, or supposed lack of it, but you have just spoken volumes about your own ignorance and bigotry. Brilliant, John. You are obviously a man who understands what is going on in the world. Perhaps you can explain why no WMD have been found in Iraq.? Trying to change the subject to deflect attention away from your own ignorance? Perhaps you can explain your stunning ignorance, and the fact that ample evidence has been found that shows saddam was actively engaged in WMD programs? Regards Donal -- |
Bush IQ!!!!
"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message ...
"Donal" wrote in message ... | | "john" wrote in message | om... | If you think you are being clever, you're not. You haven't said one | word about his intelligence, or supposed lack of it, but you have just | spoken volumes about your own ignorance and bigotry. | | Brilliant, John. You are obviously a man who understands what is going on | in the world. | | Perhaps you can explain why no WMD have been found in Iraq.? Better yet Donal.... maybe he can explain why the USA is begging for help from the same people it insulted and dismissed for not joining in this idiotic fiasco. Seems like failing to achieve objectives is the hallmark of this presidency. Pure spin. He didnt insult them but he did dismiss them (If they didnt want to join, they didnt want to join). There is no "begging for help" going on. While it may make you feel good to say that, it is far from the case. Bush is simply going to the UN to satisfy the non-stop criticism from the left...knowing that they will not agree on anything. This is exactly what he's done before. It's amazing how short people's memories are. Last September, Bush used the threat of the UN being irrelevent as a means to get 1441 passed. It worked. While the threat of irrelevancy is still there, the rhetoric is now being moved to "Who is part of the civilized world? France, Germany and the UN are you going to side with the barbarians?" To call these people uncivilized is the ultimate insult to their way overblown egos. Thus, the reason for going to the UN is to either expose France and Germany for who they really are -- allies of the barbarians -- or force them to comply with the "civilized world". Anyone who thinks we are going to the UN because we are "failing miserably" in Iraq is sadly mistaken. Instead, we are forcing France, Germany and the UN in general to play their hand. Bush is either going to get his resolution or the UN's inability to be part of the civilized world will render it irrelevant. My bet is that Bush will get his resolution just like last fall and then some -- perhaps some much needed institutional reform at the UN. This is strategy of the highest order folks. Sun Tzu couldn't have done it better himself. Didn't all this start off to stop terrorism? Osama Bin Missin'?? Global Terrorist Attacks Rose 8 Percent in 2000 http://usinfo.state.gov/topical/pol/terror/01050102.htm International Terrorist Attacks Fell 44 Percent in 2002 http://usembassy.state.gov/islamabad/wwwh03050103.html CM |
Bush IQ!!!!
John,
Very good to excellent reply. You definitely put Donal and his misguided and pathetic ideology to rest with it. It is really sad that, due to the efforts of brave men who are willing to fight and die for freedom against terrorists who would usurp everyone's freedom, cowards like Donal and his ilk are able to hop on the bus for a free ride yet they complain loudly and long about these benefits. They would rather continue to be giant hypocrites and continue to spout their ignorant lies. Like terrorists homicide bombers they spend their time trying to destroy the bus. They are scum! S.Simon "john" wrote in message om... "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message ... "Donal" wrote in message ... | | "john" wrote in message | om... | If you think you are being clever, you're not. You haven't said one | word about his intelligence, or supposed lack of it, but you have just | spoken volumes about your own ignorance and bigotry. | | Brilliant, John. You are obviously a man who understands what is going on | in the world. | | Perhaps you can explain why no WMD have been found in Iraq.? Better yet Donal.... maybe he can explain why the USA is begging for help from the same people it insulted and dismissed for not joining in this idiotic fiasco. Seems like failing to achieve objectives is the hallmark of this presidency. Pure spin. He didnt insult them but he did dismiss them (If they didnt want to join, they didnt want to join). There is no "begging for help" going on. While it may make you feel good to say that, it is far from the case. Bush is simply going to the UN to satisfy the non-stop criticism from the left...knowing that they will not agree on anything. This is exactly what he's done before. It's amazing how short people's memories are. Last September, Bush used the threat of the UN being irrelevent as a means to get 1441 passed. It worked. While the threat of irrelevancy is still there, the rhetoric is now being moved to "Who is part of the civilized world? France, Germany and the UN are you going to side with the barbarians?" To call these people uncivilized is the ultimate insult to their way overblown egos. Thus, the reason for going to the UN is to either expose France and Germany for who they really are -- allies of the barbarians -- or force them to comply with the "civilized world". Anyone who thinks we are going to the UN because we are "failing miserably" in Iraq is sadly mistaken. Instead, we are forcing France, Germany and the UN in general to play their hand. Bush is either going to get his resolution or the UN's inability to be part of the civilized world will render it irrelevant. My bet is that Bush will get his resolution just like last fall and then some -- perhaps some much needed institutional reform at the UN. This is strategy of the highest order folks. Sun Tzu couldn't have done it better himself. Didn't all this start off to stop terrorism? Osama Bin Missin'?? Global Terrorist Attacks Rose 8 Percent in 2000 http://usinfo.state.gov/topical/pol/terror/01050102.htm International Terrorist Attacks Fell 44 Percent in 2002 http://usembassy.state.gov/islamabad/wwwh03050103.html CM |
Bush IQ!!!!
"Simple Simon" wrote in message ... Donal Besides being a complete asshole, you've got to be one of the most ignorant people in the world. What has this to do with the topic? Everything you say is either an outright lie or an ignorant assumption. Comments interspersed. "Donal" wrote in message ... A few months ago, the French and German governments were given all sorts of abuse by various members of the Bush administration for their refusal to support war in Iraq. Wrong! The French and German government leaders were given WHAT THEY DESERVED for playing politics and putting their own economic interests ahead of the war against terrorism. What a strange answer. You started out by saying that I was wrong, and then you proceeded to say the same thing!!! Typical short-sighted and cowardly liberals that they are they actually think a stick-your-head-in-the-sand-and-show-your-ass posture will impart safety. They thought that attacking Iraq will cause an increase in global terrorism. They could care less about their stated reasons against invading Iraq. The bottom line is they stood to lose billions with illegal contracts for weapons and favorable oil prices in exchange being nixed as soon as Saddam's govt. was thrown out. Good point! Foreign policy is always influenced by economic considerations. Some US companies are doing very well out of the recent war. Oddly, they are not only American companies, but they all seem to have very close ties to the Bush administration. Now, that it has happened they are even more bitter because they no longer receive special prices on oil for their illegal weapons contracts. France and Germany should be next on the list of countries to have their governments overthrown Uh oh!!!! I think that you have just revealed that you are a liberal at heart. That's a pity. It's more fun argueing with a redneck. right after Iran, N. Korea, Syria, Saudi Arabia, etc. and any other country that supports terrorists groups and activities. As for their claims of no WMDs how come they were signatories to so many resolutions against Iraqi WMDs. They are either very stupid or very duplicitous or both at the same time. Nobody is claiming that Iraq never possessed WMD. The only issue was the threat posed by those WMD. If there was no threat, then there was no real excuse for the war. The big question is "Was Bush so stupid that he really believed that Iraqi WMD posed a threat?" 80% of the world's population did not think so. The situation in Iraq has now gone "tits up", just as the French and Germans predicted. The situation in Iraq is under control. So why is Bush asking for international help?? Maybe you should stop watching Fox! Only the incidents that result in US deaths are being reported. These are only a small proportion of the total. The French and Germans are wrong, were wrong and will continue to be wrong unless they change their "Me First" attitudes. Nope! So far they have been proved to be absolutely correct. There were no WMD, and there was no link between Al Q'aeda and Saddam. ****Bush went after the wrong target.**** Unless and until they decide to pony up an ante they will continue to be dealt out of any future economic benefits. This is what gauls them. They lost their arguments and are too proud to swallow their pride. I think this is also what gauls you. I'm not galled by the situation. I am surprised that the Bush spin machine has managed to turn this into a left vs right issue, and that they have also managed to make it a test of "patriotism". Do Republicans really believe that democrats are not patriotic? If so, then you have some really tough times ahead. The Iraqis appear to be becoming more hostile to the occupying forces. There is also evidence that Al Q'aeda are gaining a foothold in parts of Iraq. I assume that you can see the irony - Bush says that Iraq needs to be invaded because Saddam is providing training camps for Al Q'aeda, and the invasion creates the environment that allows AL Q'aeda to set up shop. This alone proves that Bush is an idiot. Now, the Bush administration is seeking assistance from the French and Germans because the US is finding it difficult to deal with the daily terrorist attacks. The US is NOT finding it difficult to deal with terrorist attacks in Iraq. So you must think that the US approves of the terrorist attacks??? Get real! Like President George W. Bush stated, "Bring 'em on!" Unlike idiots like you, Donal, the President realized it's far better to fight terrorists in Iraq with soldiers than allowing them free access to our citizens and trying to fight them with police and firefighters here in our streets. Many of the terrorists in Iraq were *not* terrorists before the war. There has been a nett increase in terrorism. Bush will not be able to confine it to Iraq. This is a fact that simpering cowards like yourself can't seem to get through your simian skulls. I don't think that I am being very clever. Right you are! You are incapable of an original thought. Like all other liberals you get your list of lies and talking points right off a liberal website or publication. You and your rhetoric and what you call arguments are pathetic. Begone coward! S.Simon - will not abide continued liberal lies and ignorance BTW, you do yourself a great disservice by your overuse of personal insults. It weakens your arguement, and it only tends to obscure any valid points that you have. Regards Donal - who knows a Simple idiot when he sees one. -- |
Bush IQ!!!!
"john" wrote in message m... Perhaps you can explain why no WMD have been found in Iraq.? Trying to change the subject to deflect attention away from your own ignorance? Wow! Your answer is truly breathtaking. Perhaps you can explain your stunning ignorance, and the fact that ample evidence has been found that shows saddam was actively engaged in WMD programs? Of course I can explain my stunning ignorance. It is the result of *your* interpretation of my words. It is how you see people who disagree with you - especially if they have a valid point. You are so certain that you are right that any evidence to the contrary must be the result of ignorance. Easy, huh? What have WMD *programmes* to do with the discussion? We were told that Saddam *possessed* WMD. I find it interesting that the Bu****es need to resort to insults. Regards Donal -- Regards Donal -- |
Bush IQ!!!!
I use personal insults because liberal assholes like
you deserve no better. If and when you decide to take terrorism seriously and do something to fight it instead of supporting it you should be damned glad that personal insults are the ONLY thing you are subject to. More comments below. "Donal" wrote in message ... What has this to do with the topic? It has everything to do with the topic because ignorance can easily be recognized. You might not like it but if the shoe fits, wear it! What a strange answer. You started out by saying that I was wrong, and then you proceeded to say the same thing!!! Only to an ignorant fool like yourself are the facts strange! They thought that attacking Iraq will cause an increase in global terrorism. They thought wrong! Are you and they so stupid that you think fighting terrorism will make it increase? Only an idiot would think doing NOTHING but giving aid and comfort to terrorists like you do will lessen the chances of a terrorist attack right where you live. Ignoring it won't make it go away. Only liberals are so stupid to think that way. Some US companies are doing very well out of the recent war. Oddly, they are not only American companies, but they all seem to have very close ties to the Bush administration. Show me the books and prove your statements before you expect anyone to believe you. You continue to repeat liberal lies and propaganda. Uh oh!!!! I think that you have just revealed that you are a liberal at heart. That's a pity. It's more fun argueing with a redneck. Among all your other ignorance's you now demonstrate you don't even know the definition of a liberal. Nobody is claiming that Iraq never possessed WMD. The only issue was the threat posed by those WMD. If there was no threat, then there was no real excuse for the war. Bull****! That's exactly what you sniveling liberals are claiming. You demand proof of the existence of actual WMD's and when you don't get proof you say "Bush lied - there are no WMDs". You admit WMDs existed yet you somehow claim they represent no threat. Even if Saddam destroyed every WMD the fact the he knows how to built more is enough of a threat for civilized men in view of the fact that he has already demonstrated a willingness to use them against his own people. You are just so stupid and illogical it is beyond belief. The big question is "Was Bush so stupid that he really believed that Iraqi WMD posed a threat?" 80% of the world's population did not think so. And, where do you come up with that figure? It's just more liberal pie-in-the-sky. It would more logical to claim 80% of the world's population could care less about what's going on in Iraq. It certainly would be easier to prove. The situation in Iraq is under control. So why is Bush asking for international help?? He's hoping countries lead by sane men will feel at least a little inclined to do what is RIGHT! What's wrong with helping an oppressed Iraqi populace to establish a productive and free country? Why are you and your liberal ilk so against it? Maybe you should stop watching Fox! Only the incidents that result in US deaths are being reported. These are only a small proportion of the total. I don't watch television. I see what your problem is now if that's where you get your information. Nope! So far they have been proved to be absolutely correct. There were no WMD, and there was no link between Al Q'aeda and Saddam. Illogical - above you said you never claimed there were no WMDs. As a matter of fact you said the exact opposite - you can't have it both ways you hypocrite. I'm not galled by the situation. I am surprised that the Bush spin machine has managed to turn this into a left vs right issue, and that they have also managed to make it a test of "patriotism". Do Republicans really believe that democrats are not patriotic? If so, then you have some really tough times ahead. There are many sensible and patriotic Democrats - not all Democrats are liberal. It's only the liberal Democrats who are doing the 'spinning". Liberals are anti-American and that's a proven fact. Try reading Ann Coulter's new book, "Treason" and you'll understand why I say this. The Iraqis appear to be becoming more hostile to the occupying forces. There is also evidence that Al Q'aeda are gaining a foothold in parts of Iraq. I assume that you can see the irony - Bush says that Iraq needs to be invaded because Saddam is providing training camps for Al Q'aeda, and the invasion creates the environment that allows AL Q'aeda to set up shop. This alone proves that Bush is an idiot. Negative! It proves President George W. Bush is very savvy and knows it's much much much better to fight and destroy any and all terrorists over in Iraq with soldiers than it is to have them doing their dirty work in our cities. Like the President said, "Bring 'em on!" Let's see how successful Al Queerda is against people who can and do fight back. So you must think that the US approves of the terrorist attacks??? Get real! As long as the terrorists engage our military in Iraq - BRING THEM ON! What don't you understand about this. Would you rather be fighting the same terrorists with your unarmed Bobbies in the streets of London! Gawd what an ASS! Many of the terrorists in Iraq were *not* terrorists before the war. There has been a nett increase in terrorism. Bush will not be able to confine it to Iraq. Says who? More liberal lies and wishful thinking. You are actually admitting you support terrorists with this statement. You are claiming that terrorism cannot be defeated. You are a cowardly waste of space. S.Simon - knows Donal is a terrorist sympathizer and proves it. |
Bush IQ!!!!
"Simple Simon" wrote in message ... I use personal insults because liberal assholes like you deserve no better. Nonsense, you use personal insults because your intellect has been stretched beyond its limits. If and when you decide to take terrorism seriously and do something to fight it instead of supporting it you should be damned glad that personal insults are the ONLY thing you are subject to. Do you really think that I support terrorism? I think not! Once again, you reveal that your real mission is to subvert the "Bush position". I'm happy to debate the issue, but if you want to debunk Bush, then you should do it in your own words. If you want to do it with my words, then you will have to be a little less obvious. More comments below. "Donal" wrote in message ... What has this to do with the topic? It has everything to do with the topic because ignorance can easily be recognized. You might not like it but if the shoe fits, wear it! What a strange answer. You started out by saying that I was wrong, and then you proceeded to say the same thing!!! Only to an ignorant fool like yourself are the facts strange! Nonsense! Read it again. We said the same thing. They thought that attacking Iraq will cause an increase in global terrorism. They thought wrong! Are you and they so stupid that you think fighting terrorism will make it increase? Wake up! You were fighting Saddam, and not terrorism! Your president's powers of perception are under scrutiny here. Saddam was no saint, but he was not an international terrorist! Please feel free to rebut this assertion with personal abuse, but you really haven't produced any evidence that Saddam was a threat. Only an idiot would think doing NOTHING but giving aid and comfort to terrorists like you do will lessen the chances of a terrorist attack right where you live. Ignoring it won't make it go away. Only liberals are so stupid to think that way. Good trolling technique! You have accused me of saying something that I did not say. Lesser mortals than myself might try to argue this point with you. Some US companies are doing very well out of the recent war. Oddly, they are not only American companies, but they all seem to have very close ties to the Bush administration. Show me the books and prove your statements before you expect anyone to believe you. You continue to repeat liberal lies and propaganda. Huh? The facts speak for themselves. Once again, your question sounds like you are a liberal! Do your own dirty work. I don't have a political agenda here. Uh oh!!!! I think that you have just revealed that you are a liberal at heart. That's a pity. It's more fun argueing with a redneck. Among all your other ignorance's you now demonstrate you don't even know the definition of a liberal. The American definition is different to our definition of the term. Bull****! That's exactly what you sniveling liberals are claiming. You demand proof of the existence of actual WMD's and when you don't get proof you say "Bush lied - there are no WMDs". Sorry, but I tried to warn you in an earlier post that I could see that you were really a Democrat. I am happy to be provoked into making the points that you would like me to make. However, I am not willing to be such an obvious stooge. If you want me to make your points for you, then you will have to get a little better at playing the Republican. Regards Donal -- |
Bush IQ!!!!
Fact... the USA's reaction to Canada not joining... 3 trips by Celucci the
faggot to tells us we would be punished. [Hah!] Fact.... imposed trade restrictions against Canada for not joining... fact ... cancelled all meetings by the Whitehouse with Canada... fact... boycott Canadian products suggested by your government. Kiss my ass you Dork! You friggin' whiners are worse than cry babies. Fact.. since the USA invasion.. crime has sky rocketed by 500 % in Iraq. CM "john" wrote in message om... | "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message ... | "Donal" wrote in message | ... | | | | "john" wrote in message | | om... | | If you think you are being clever, you're not. You haven't said one | | word about his intelligence, or supposed lack of it, but you have just | | spoken volumes about your own ignorance and bigotry. | | | | Brilliant, John. You are obviously a man who understands what is going on | | in the world. | | | | Perhaps you can explain why no WMD have been found in Iraq.? | | Better yet Donal.... maybe he can explain why the USA is begging for help | from the same people it insulted and dismissed for not joining in this | idiotic fiasco. Seems like failing to achieve objectives is the hallmark of | this presidency. | | Pure spin. He didnt insult them but he did dismiss them (If they didnt | want to join, they didnt want to join). There is no "begging for help" | going on. While it may make you feel good to say that, it is far from | the case. Bush is simply going to the UN to satisfy the non-stop | criticism from the left...knowing that they will not agree on | anything. This is exactly what he's done before. It's amazing how | short people's memories are. | | Last September, Bush used the threat of the UN being irrelevent as a | means to get 1441 passed. It worked. While the threat of irrelevancy | is still there, the rhetoric is now being moved to "Who is part of the | civilized world? France, Germany and the UN are you going to side with | the barbarians?" To call these people uncivilized is the ultimate | insult to their way overblown egos. | | Thus, the reason for going to the UN is to either expose France and | Germany for who they really are -- allies of the barbarians -- or | force them to comply with the "civilized world". Anyone who thinks we | are going to the UN because we are "failing miserably" in Iraq is | sadly mistaken. Instead, we are forcing France, Germany and the UN in | general to play their hand. Bush is either going to get his resolution | or the UN's inability to be part of the civilized world will render it | irrelevant. My bet is that Bush will get his resolution just like last | fall and then some -- perhaps some much needed institutional reform at | the UN. | | This is strategy of the highest order folks. Sun Tzu couldn't have | done it better himself. | | | | | | Didn't all this start off to stop terrorism? Osama Bin Missin'?? | | Global Terrorist Attacks Rose 8 Percent in 2000 | http://usinfo.state.gov/topical/pol/terror/01050102.htm | | International Terrorist Attacks Fell 44 Percent in 2002 | http://usembassy.state.gov/islamabad/wwwh03050103.html | | | | CM |
Bush IQ!!!!
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 20:20:27 -0300, "Capt. Mooron"
wrote this crap: Fact.. since the USA invasion.. crime has sky rocketed by 500 % in Iraq. What fact is that, dumbass? Since the government is gone, there are no laws, so how could there be crime, dumbass? Ave Imperator Bush! Bush Was Right! Four More Years! |
Bush IQ!!!!
This is too stupid for words.
"Horvath" wrote in message ... On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 20:20:27 -0300, "Capt. Mooron" wrote this crap: Fact.. since the USA invasion.. crime has sky rocketed by 500 % in Iraq. What fact is that, dumbass? Since the government is gone, there are no laws, so how could there be crime, dumbass? Ave Imperator Bush! Bush Was Right! Four More Years! |
Bush IQ!!!!
"Horvath" wrote in message ... On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 20:20:27 -0300, "Capt. Mooron" wrote this crap: Fact.. since the USA invasion.. crime has sky rocketed by 500 % in Iraq. What fact is that, dumbass? Since the government is gone, there are no laws, so how could there be crime, dumbass? If there are no laws, then why are the US military trying to train a local police force? Oooops! I've just figured it out! They trained a police force - then they realised that there were no laws for the police to enforce. So, now they are going to kill them all. If you didn't understand that nasty jibe, then complain to Fox for not telling you that US soldiers recently killed 8 Iraqi policemen in a 3 hour battle. Regards Donal -- |
Bush IQ!!!!
"Capt. Mooron" wrote in message ...
Fact... the USA's reaction to Canada not joining... 3 trips by Celucci the faggot to tells us we would be punished. [Hah!] Fact.... imposed trade restrictions against Canada for not joining... fact .. cancelled all meetings by the Whitehouse with Canada... fact... boycott Canadian products suggested by your government. Yeah? So? I didnt say they didnt dismiss those fellas. Canadian products are not the concern on the US Government. That's the concern of the Canadian government. They were duly warned, Join us, or face the consequences. It would be completely insulting to the United States to turn around and act as if nothing had happened when our so called friends turn their backs on us. We look out for our interests. Canada looks out for theirs. Nothing wrong with that. But just dont expect us to turn the other cheek anymore everytime we're slighted. Kiss my ass you Dork! For free? You friggin' whiners are worse than cry babies. Projection. Call a waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhmbulance. Fact.. since the USA invasion.. crime has sky rocketed by 500 % in Iraq. You base this "fact" on...what? Where did you get that percentage figure, and how does it compare to WHAT crime rate percentage before the invasion? CM "john" wrote in message om... | "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message ... | "Donal" wrote in message | ... | | | | "john" wrote in message | | om... | | If you think you are being clever, you're not. You haven't said one | | word about his intelligence, or supposed lack of it, but you have just | | spoken volumes about your own ignorance and bigotry. | | | | Brilliant, John. You are obviously a man who understands what is going on | | in the world. | | | | Perhaps you can explain why no WMD have been found in Iraq.? | | Better yet Donal.... maybe he can explain why the USA is begging for help | from the same people it insulted and dismissed for not joining in this | idiotic fiasco. Seems like failing to achieve objectives is the hallmark of | this presidency. | | Pure spin. He didnt insult them but he did dismiss them (If they didnt | want to join, they didnt want to join). There is no "begging for help" | going on. While it may make you feel good to say that, it is far from | the case. Bush is simply going to the UN to satisfy the non-stop | criticism from the left...knowing that they will not agree on | anything. This is exactly what he's done before. It's amazing how | short people's memories are. | | Last September, Bush used the threat of the UN being irrelevent as a | means to get 1441 passed. It worked. While the threat of irrelevancy | is still there, the rhetoric is now being moved to "Who is part of the | civilized world? France, Germany and the UN are you going to side with | the barbarians?" To call these people uncivilized is the ultimate | insult to their way overblown egos. | | Thus, the reason for going to the UN is to either expose France and | Germany for who they really are -- allies of the barbarians -- or | force them to comply with the "civilized world". Anyone who thinks we | are going to the UN because we are "failing miserably" in Iraq is | sadly mistaken. Instead, we are forcing France, Germany and the UN in | general to play their hand. Bush is either going to get his resolution | or the UN's inability to be part of the civilized world will render it | irrelevant. My bet is that Bush will get his resolution just like last | fall and then some -- perhaps some much needed institutional reform at | the UN. | | This is strategy of the highest order folks. Sun Tzu couldn't have | done it better himself. | | | | | | Didn't all this start off to stop terrorism? Osama Bin Missin'?? | | Global Terrorist Attacks Rose 8 Percent in 2000 | http://usinfo.state.gov/topical/pol/terror/01050102.htm | | International Terrorist Attacks Fell 44 Percent in 2002 | http://usembassy.state.gov/islamabad/wwwh03050103.html | | | | CM |
Bush IQ!!!!
We know.
Cheers MC Simple Simon wrote: "Capt. Mooron" wrote in message ... I've shot people who shot at me. I haven't killed anyone yet though. I've no doubt after seeing your boys in action that if you provided me with the same equipment... I fair much better with fewer friendly fire incidences. I'm surprisingly fast in the bush and exceptionally cool under fire. I like to take my time in the bush. I don't get there often enough as it is. S.Simon |
Bush IQ!!!!
Great typo!
Cheers MC Simple Simon wrote: The situation in Iraq is under control. The French and Germans are wrong, were wrong and will continue to be wrong unless they change their "Me First" attitudes. Unless and until they decide to pony up an ante they will continue to be dealt out of any future economic benefits. This is what gauls them. They lost their arguments and are too proud to swallow their pride. I think this is also what gauls you. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com