On Mar 13, 1:29*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 10:12:48 -0700 (PDT),





wrote:
On Mar 13, 1:09*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 09:53:50 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Mar 13, 12:44*pm, wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 12:14:10 -0400, BAR wrote:
wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 06:09:43 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Mar 13, 8:53 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" wrote:
"BAR" wrote in message

news:ZM6dnQQBGJp4v0TanZ2dnUVZ_j6dnZ2d@comcast. com...

JoeSpareBedroom wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Mar 13, 8:31 am, HK wrote:
wrote:
On Mar 13, 8:17 am, wrote:
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 05:05:37 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:
Our local paper which basically trumpets the New York Lies, did not
make one mention of Spitzers party, not only that, the article left
out all the possible felonies and only noted the prostitution in one
paragraph. Completely ignoring the
Wire fraud
Mail fraud
Money structuring
Mann act
and all of the other felonies included in the possible charges..
Here we go again, "it's all about the sex". Here come the excuses.
Americans deserve better than that kind of double standard.
I still say he will be back, stronger than ever.. you watch.
Just keeping count, you have the Chicago paper, ABC news, Journal
Inquirer (our local DNC ragsheet).
Anyone else have any expamples of local news outlest protecting the
DNC on this one to add to this list? Check your papers folks, bet
they
are doing the same. Some are even worse, trying in a clever way to
associate the GOP with Spitzer for those around the country that do
not know what party Spitzer was, it is quite a scam...
The idea that there is any collusion among newspapers is just plain
laughable. Not much different than suggesting that all the drivers in
the Indy 500 get together ahead of time and decide who is going to
win.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
You don't think the DNC has enough folks to make the phone calls.. Did
your local paper mention he was a dem? If so, please link me. Bet you
cant
Here's a bit from *my* local paper:
Spitzer to Step Down as N.Y. Governor
Embattled *Democrat* Apologizes for His 'Private Failings'
By Keith B. Richburg and Carrie Johnson
Washington Post Staff Writers
Thursday, March 13, 2008; A01
NEW YORK, March 12 -- New York Gov. Eliot L. Spitzer, a rising
*Democratic* Party star who won election 16 months ago as a crusading
reformer against corruption, announced his resignation Wednesday after
being ensnared in a federal investigation that exposed his double life
as a longtime regular client of high-priced prostitutes.
With his wife, Silda Wall Spitzer, at his side, Spitzer apologized for
what he said were "my private failings" and said he is stepping down so
as not to "disrupt the people's work." He said the resignation will take
effect Monday, to give his successor, Lt. Gov. David A. Paterson, time
to make a smooth transition.
- - -
Time for you to check Rush for your next idiotic accusation.- Hide
quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Good, I will add it to the list, so far we are 3-1... Thanks, and BTW,
like I said before, Rush bores me, I don't listen to talk radio..
=================
But....doesn't the mother ship claim that the Washington Post is not fair
and balanced? Are you allowed to read it? You might want to pull down the
shades while doing so.
The Washington Post is not fair and balanced by anyone's standards except
Harry's.
It's fair when the person reading it sees what he wants to see. In this
case, it made JWFM happy because it associated Spitzer with the word
"Democratic". Tomorrow, it may not please him as much.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -
My paper is the Journal Inquirer... Hartford CT area.. And you are
lieing again, I never said I was happy, I just noted it.. period...
stop putting words in my mouth. You and Harrry seem to be pretty good
at that.

If you live in New England, you would have to be pretty ignorant of
your surroundings not to know who Elliot Spitzer is. Add to that the
fact that the stories you are looking at are filed from NEW YORK,
where it would be pretty silly to mention that Spitzer is a democrat
every time his name is printed. How often do they put the word
Republican after the name of Jodie Rell, Governor of Connecticut? I
think you'll find that they occasionally mention it when it is
actually pertinent to the story, and pretty much never as part of a
headline or lead paragraph unless it's a story about the republican
party position on something.

Isn't the standard style that the identification goes with the first use
and there after it is not needed? The problem with "journalism" today is
that the political agenda of the journalist determines which style is used?

Nope. You've got it about as wrong as possible. The first use of a
name in an article should be first and last name, and after that, the
last name only is used unless it would cause confusion.

AP publishes a style book that most newspapers follow at least
loosely. Some follow it more closely than others. Political
afilliation is not used unless it impacts the story in some meaningful
way. Spitzer didn't do any of the things he allegedly did because he
is a member of any particular political party, organization, race, or
religion. All are incidental to the story, so none are prominent in
the stories. They mention that he is married, and has children because
that DOES help tell the story.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Then why did the Chicago paper and ABC news only mention "GOP" and
"Republican" in their stories.. Was that in line with your "rules" or
was it to confuse the readers who are not as informed as to what party
Spitzer belongs to?

I have no idea hat you are jabbering about. If someone identified
Spitzer as a Republican, then they simply screwed up. At one of the
newspapers I used to run, we frequently got letters from a very
elderly former school teacher who would send us corrections of all the
typos she found in our classifieds. I've also seen editing notes end
up running in the paper.

Lets not overlook the famous "Dewey Wins" and "Perot Wins" headlines!

One of my favorite bloopers of all time was at one of my papers. It
was a Headline that said: "POPULAR LOCAL COUPLE ASSUMES MISSIONARY
POSITION"

Yeah, we got a few letters on that one!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No, links were posted yesterday. The only mention of party in the
Chicago paper was the headline which read "GOP demands Spitzer resign"
and the ABC news identified a "Republican" legislator who commented on
the issue..

Well, GOP D-I-D call for Spitzer's ouster. That was what THAT story
was about.

No it was not about that, that is just untrue.

I really can't continue with you with your deflections and
name calling, I don't really expect a coherant answer here either.. I
am going outside to play with the gardens..

What name calling? What deflections?

Saying I was ignorant or whatever cause I am from CT and did not know
his partys affiliation.

I have given reasoned responses
to those who asked reasonable questions.

Another slight, I guess my questions are not clear enough for you,
that is just another deflection.. You just can't do this..

You just fly off the handle
and start throwing things. I can't be responsible for your personal
shortcomings

Hummmm...........


when it comes to discussing something where you already
have your mind made up and securely locked.

Nope, I have an opinion, and no one here has the integerity to
honestly oppose it,

Can you say, elitist Later salty