Flawed analysis, I'm afraid. That's like the guy who continues to hold a
stock because he thinks he hasn't lost money until he sells, rather than
cutting his losses and putting the money into something that will
appreciate.

Wrong, the revenue that NY apartments generated was a certainty. Pulling out
was a mistake for those who did. Those apartments paid HUGELY, yet you suggest
that gambling elsewhere was viable. How so? The property went up. It's history
now.

RB